I'm trying to model this inheritance for a simple blog system
Blog has many Entries, but they may be different in their nature. I don't want to model the Blog table, my concern is about the entries:
simplest entry is an Article that has title and text
Quote, however, does not have a title and has short text
Media has a url and a comment...
etc...
What is a proper way to model this with Ruby on Rails? That is
Should I use ActiverRecord for this or switch to DataMapper?
I would like to avoid the "one big table" approach with lots of empty cells
When I split the data into Entry + PostData, QuoteData etc can I have belongs_to :entry in these Datas without having has_one ??? in the Entry class? That would be standard way to do it in sql and entry.post_data may be resolved by the entry_id in the postdata table.
EDIT: I don't want to model the Blog table, I can do that, my concern is about the entries and how would the inheritance be mapped to the table(s).
I've come across this data problem several times and have tried a few different strategies. I think the one I'm a biggest fan of, is the STI approach as mentioned by cicloon. Make sure you have a type column on your entry table.
class Blog < ActiveRecord::Base
# this is your generic association that would return all types of entries
has_many :entries
# you can also add other associations specific to each type.
# through STI, rails is aware that a media_entry is in fact an Entry
# and will do most of the work for you. These will automatically do what cicloon.
# did manually via his methods.
has_many :articles
has_many :quotes
has_many :media
end
class Entry < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Article < Entry
has_one :article_data
end
class Quote < Entry
has_one :quote_data
end
class Media < Entry
has_one :media_data
end
class ArticleData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :article # smart enough to know this is actually an entry
end
class QuoteData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :quote
end
class MediaData < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :media
end
The thing I like about this approach, is you can keep the generic Entry data in the entry model. Abstract out any of the sub-entry type data into their own data tables, and have a has_one association to them, resulting in no extra columns on your entries table. It also works very well for when you're doing your views:
app/views/articles/_article.html.erb
app/views/quotes/_quote.html.erb
app/views/media/_media.html.erb # may be medium here....
and from your views you can do either:
<%= render #blog.entries %> <!-- this will automatically render the appropriate view partial -->
or have more control:
<%= render #blog.quotes %>
<%= render #blog.articles %>
You can find a pretty generic way of generating forms as well, I usually render the generic entry fields in an entries/_form.html.erb partial. Inside that partial, I also have a
<%= form_for #entry do |f| %>
<%= render :partial => "#{f.object.class.name.tableize}/#{f.object.class.name.underscore}_form", :object => f %>
<% end %>
type render for the sub form data. The sub forms in turn can use accepts_nested_attributes_for + fields_for to get the data passed through properly.
The only pain I have with this approach, is how to handle the controllers and route helpers. Since each entry is of its own type, you'll either have to create custom controllers / routes for each type (you may want this...) or make a generic one. If you take the generic approach, two things to remember.
1) You can't set a :type field through update attributes, your controller will have to instantiate the appropriate Article.new to save it (you may use a factory here).
2) You'll have to use the becomes() method (#article.becomes(Entry)) to work with the entry as an Entry and not a subclass.
Hope this helps.
Warning, I've actually used Media as a model name in the past. In my case it resulted in a table called medias in rails 2.3.x however in rails 3, it wanted my model to be named Medium and my table media. You may have to add a custom Inflection on this naming, though I'm not sure.
You can handle this easily using ActiveRecord STI. It requires you to have a type field in your Entries table. This way you can define your models like this:
def Blog > ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :entries
def articles
entries.where('Type =', 'Article')
end
def quotes
entries.where('Type =', 'Quote')
end
def medias
entries.where('Type =', 'Media')
end
end
def Entry > ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :blog
end
def Article > Entry
end
def Quote > Entry
end
def Media > Entry
end
Related
I have a polymorphic association in a Rails 3 app where a User may favorite objects of various classes.
class Favorite < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :favoriteable, :polymorphic => true
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :favorites
end
class Image < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :favorites, :as => :favoriteable
end
class Video < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :favorites, :as => :favoriteable
end
I would like to be able return a list of just a User's favorite_images for example.
user.favorite_images #returns a list of the images associated with the user via :favoritable
I'm guessing there is a straightforward way of doing this but I haven't been able to figure it out. Let me know if you need anymore info.
Thanks!
===edit====
I know that I could retrieve what I am looking for via
favorite_images = user.favorites.collect{|f| if f.favoriteable_type=='Image'; f.favoriteable; end}
I could define an instance method for the User class and put that inside. I was wondering if there is a way to do it as some sort of has_many association. Really just because going forward it would be easier to have all that in one place.
When you created the table for Favorite you created a couple of columns favoriteable_id and favoriteable_type and you can use this information to restrict your query.
If you do user.favorites you will get all of the favorites and to restrict them to say just the images then you can do user.favorites.where(favoriteable_type: 'image') but that just gives you the favorite records and it sounds like you want the actual images. To get those you can do it by then mapping and pulling the favoriteable out. You'll likely want to include it in the query though so you don't hit the database so much. I would also make this a method on User.
def favorite_images
favorites.includes(:favoriteable).where(favoriteable_type: 'Image').map(&:favoriteable)
end
i've been searching through similar questions but i still don't get how implement this relationship. I have of course three models :
class Recetum < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name, :desc, :duration, :prep, :photo, :topic_id
has_many :manifests
has_many :ingredients, :through => :manifests
end
class Ingredient < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :kcal, :name, :use, :unity
has_many :manifests
has_many :recetum, :through => :manifests
end
class Manifest < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :ingredient_id, :quantity, :receta_id
belongs_to :recetum
accepts_nested_attributes_for :ingredient
belongs_to :ingredient
end
Recetum would be a recipe (typo when scaffolding), this recipe may have one or more ingredients (already on the db). So when i create a new Recetum, i need the new recetum to be created and one record inserted in manifest for each ingredient entered by the user.
I would need some help now with views and controllers, how do i create the form for recetum with fields for the ingredients and more important what do i have to modify recetum controller.
Any suggestions or help would be very much appreciated as this part is crucial for my project, thanks in advance.
You have a couple options, and mainly they depend on what you want to do in your view. Do you want to display a set number of max_ingredients or do you want it to be completely dynamic? The dynamic case looks better for the user for sure, but it does make for some more complicated code.
Here is a good RailsCast which explains how to do it dynamically via JavaScript:
http://railscasts.com/episodes/74-complex-forms-part-2
Unfortunately, not everyone runs with JavaScript enabled so you may want to consider doing it the static way.
Firstly, I don't think you need accepts_nested_attributes_for in your Manifest model. However, I do think you need it in your Recetum model. If you're going the static route, you'll probably want to set a reject_if option too.
accepts_nested_attributes_for :manifests, reject_if: :all_blank
Once you do this, you'll need to add manifests_attributes to your attr_accessible.
With the static route, you'll need to prebuild some of the manifests. In your new controller you'll want something like this:
max_ingredients.times do
#recetum.manifests.build
end
In your edit and the error paths of your create and update, you may want:
(max_ingredients - #recetum.manifests.count).times do
#recetum.manifests.build
end
Finally, your view will need some way to set the ingredient. I'll assume a select box for now.
f.fields_for :manifests do |mf|
mf.label :ingredient_id, "Ingredient"
mf.collection_select :ingredient_id, Ingredient.all, :id, :name
You'll want to add some sort of formatting through a list or table probably.
Hopefully, that's enough to get you started.
I am trying to get the attributes of the objects after calling a .where query. The query is the following:
#matchers = TutoringSession.where(:begin_time_hour => 21).limit(5)
I get an array of tutoring sessions as a result. But I would like to be able to return only specific attributes of each of the matching tutoring sessions. So I have the following code in my view:
#matchers.each do |matcher|
matcher.begin_time_hour
end
Instead of listing each of matcher's begin_time_hour attributes, it all of the attributes for each matcher object. I have experimented with this block trying "puts matchers.begin_time_hour," and have also tried using partials to solve this problem, however I keep running into issues. If I ask #matcher.class, it says, it is ActiveRecord::Relation object. I thought it would be a TutoringSession object.
Here are my models, in case this helps.
require 'date'
class TutoringSession < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :refugee
belongs_to :student
before_save :set_day_and_time_available, :set_time_available_hour_and_day
attr_accessor :begin_time, :book_level, :time_open
attr_accessible :time_open, :day_open, :tutoring_sessions_attributes, :page_begin, :begin_time
end
and my other class is the following
require 'date'
require 'digest'
class Refugee < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :tutoring_sessions
has_many :students, :through => :tutoring_sessions
accepts_nested_attributes_for :tutoring_sessions, :allow_destroy => true
attr_accessible :name, :email, :cell_number, :password, :password_confirmation, :day_open, :time_open, :tutoring_sessions_attributes
end
Please let me know if you need more info. Thanks for the help!
It looks like you're not outputting anything to the view. By calling
#matchers.each do |matcher|
matcher.begin_time_hour
end
you get the result from running the loop, which is the relation, instead of the data. You are accessing begin_time_hour, but you aren't doing anything with it. You'd need something more like this to display the begin_time_hour fields.
<% #matcher.each do |matcher| %>
<%= matcher.begin_time_hour %>
<% end %>
By the way, #matchers should be an ActiveRecord::Relation object, a representation of the sql query that will be generated from the where and limit clauses. Calling all on the relation with make it an array of TutoringSession objects
#matchers = TutoringSession.where(:begin_time_hour => 21).limit(5).all
Calling each implicitly runs the query and iterates over the TutoringSession objects, so you shouldn't need to worry about that though.
I want to create an activity feed from recent article and comments in my rails app. They are two different types of activerecord (their table structures are different).
Ideally I would be able to create a mixed array of articles and comments and then show them in reverse chronological order.
So, I can figure out how to get an array of both articles and comments and then merge them together and sort by created_at, but I'm pretty sure that won't work as soon as I start using pagination as well.
Is there any way to create a scope like thing that will create a mixed array?
One of the other problems for me, is that it could be all articles and it could be all comments or some combination in between. So I can't just say I'll take the 15 last articles and the 15 last comments.
Any ideas on how to solve this?
When I've done this before I've managed it by having a denormalised UserActivity model or similar with a belongs_to polymorphic association to an ActivitySource - which can be any of the types of content that you want to display (posts, comments, up votes, likes, whatever...).
Then when any of the entities to be displayed are created, you have an Observer that fires and creates a row in the UserActivity table with a link to the record.
Then to display the list, you just query on UserActivity ordering by created_at descending, and then navigate through the polymorphic activity_source association to get the content data. You'll then need some smarts in your view templates to render comments and posts and whatever else differently though.
E.g. something like...
user_activity.rb:
class UserActivity < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :activity_source, :polymorphic => true
# awesomeness continues here...
end
comment.rb (post/whatever)
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
# comment awesomeness here...
end
activity_source_observer.rb
class ActivitySourceObserver < ActiveRecord::Observer
observe :comment, :post
def after_create(activity_source)
UserActivity.create!(
:user => activity_source.user,
:activity_source_id => activity_source.id,
:activity_source_type => activity_source.class.to_s,
:created_at => activity_source.created_at,
:updated_at => activity_source.updated_at)
end
def before_destroy(activity_source)
UserActivity.destroy_all(:activity_source_id => activity_source.id)
end
end
Take a look at this railscast.
Then you can paginate 15 articles and in app/views/articles/index you can do something like this:
- #articles.each do |article|
%tr
%td= article.body
%tr
%td= nested_comments article.comment.descendants.arrange(:order => :created_at, :limit => 15)
This assumes the following relations:
#app/models/article.rb
has_one :comment # dummy root comment
#app/models/comment.rb
belongs_to :article
has_ancestry
And you add comments to an article as follows:
root_comment = #article.build_comment
root_comment.save
new_comment = root_comment.children.new
# add reply to new_comment
new_reply = new_comment.children.new
And so forth.
Using rails 3/3.1 I want to store invoices with their items (and later more associations like payments, etc…).
So in a first approach I set up the models like this:
class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :invoice_items
end
class InvoiceItem < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :invoice
end
And the routes likes this:
resources :invoices do
resources :invoice_items
end
I chose InvoiceItem instead of Item because I already have a model named Item and I somehow want to namespace the model to invoices. But this name has the huge disadvantage that one has to use invoice.invoice_items instead of a intuitive invoice.items. Also the generated url helpers look real ugly, for example "new_invoice_invoice_item_path(invoice)" (notice the double invoice_invoice).
So I changed to namespaced models like this:
class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :items, :class_name => "Invoice::Item"
end
class Invoice::Item < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :invoice
end
And the routes likes this:
resources :invoices do
resources :items, :module => "invoice"
end
Now the assocation is named nicely and also the url helpers look pretty. But I can't use dynamic urls (ex. [:new, invoice, :item]) anymore, because the controller is set to "invoice_item" instead of "invoice/item".
I wonder how other people solve this problem and what I'm doing wrong. Or is this simply a bug in rails 3.0.7/ 3.1.rc?
EDIT:
Sorry, I seems I didn't correctly express my concern. My model Item is not related to Invoice::Item. Order::Item is also not related to Item nor Invoice::Item. An Invoice::Item can only belong to one invoice. An Order::Item can only belong to an Order. I need to namespace - but why doesn't rails properly support namespacing out of the box? Or what am I doing wrong with namespacing?
Corin
If an order item and an invoice item are not the same object in the real world then I would name them differently rather than trying to namespace, for example OrderItem and InvoiceItem - this will keep things clearer as your codebase grows and avoid the need to make sure you use the right namespace everywhere you reference an Item.