I made a wrapper for some sdk written in C# using C++/CLI to be used with a c++ program. The managed code project has "Common Language Runtime Support (/clr)" enabled in Visual Studio and .Net Target Framework set to v4.5.2.
My problem is that I receive the below exception:
"System.IO.FileNotFoundException: 'Could not load file or assembly 'Test, Version=1.0.6.52, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified."
I can't reproduce this all the time on the same machine, more of the time is working well.I also checked for test.dll in running directory and it's there.
Thank you.
I have a project in which I have some C# classes which I am building using csc in my ant script. I have also have written some unit tests which I want to test with NUnit2.6, My test class and actual class refer to one DLL which is compiled with String Key Name (.snk), if I install thi DLL in my GAC (gacutil /i myDLL.dll) everything works fine. As soon as I uninstall this DLL from my gac I get following error for all the test during the build when I try to run my test using NUnit;
Test Error : fromJDynTest1
[exec] System.IO.FileNotFoundException : Could not load file or assembly 'myDLL, Version=5.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c0409b584f86b2d6' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
[exec] at fromJDynTest1()
...
...
Does anyone know how to resolve this. Let me know if you need any other information.
Thanks
--
SJunejo
The code you are testing cannot see the assembly in question when you place it in the gac it can see the assembly. You need to ensure that the code you are testing has the assembly in the bin directory when compiled (perhaps copy local is set to false in your project on the assembly reference).
The reason I am sure it is not a dependency (which is mentioned in the message) is because the situation is resolved when the assembly is placed in the gac. This error is not likely caused because the assembly is strongly named.
Failing that the test code refers to the assembly and that test code either doesn't have a reference or has the same problem (not in its compiled directory).
Would help if you posted the actual test or structure of the project.
.net locates assemblies as follows:
Determines the correct assembly version by examining applicable configuration files, including the application configuration file, publisher policy file, and machine configuration file. If the configuration file is located on a remote machine, the runtime must locate and download the application configuration file first.
Checks whether the assembly name has been bound to before and, if so, uses the previously loaded assembly. If it failed before it will fail again now.
Checks the gac. If the assembly is found there, the runtime uses this assembly.
Probes for the assembly (if you open up a .csproj file in a text editor you will see hintpaths, which try and help .net find the assembly).
I've recreated the Northwind Spring/NHibernate example that comes with Spring.NET, but with MySQL rather than SQLServer. I've almost got it working I think, but I'm getting this when I try to use Hibernate to load something from the database
A first chance exception of type 'System.IO.FileNotFoundException'
occurred in mscorlib.dll NHibernate.Util.ReflectHelper:
ERROR lambda_method - Could not load type
MySql.Data.MySqlClient.MySqlCommand, MySql.Data.
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly
'MySql.Data' or one of its dependencies.
The system cannot find the file specified.
File name: 'MySql.Data'
Every project (DAO, Service, Web) has a reference to the MySQL.Data DLL so I'm a bit unsure what's going on.
Can anyone help me please?
Make sure that MySQL.Data.dll actually got copied to the output folder. And that you are using right platform (x32 vs x64 bit) and right version of .NET (2,3,3.5 vs 4). If everyhing seems fine, enable Fusion Logging and take a look at this article:
For FileNotFoundException: At the bottom of the log will be the paths
that Fusion tried probing for this assembly. If this was a load by
path (as in Assembly.LoadFrom()), there will be just one path, and
your assembly will need to be there to be found. Otherwise, your
assembly will need to be on one of the probing paths listed or in the
GAC if it's to be found.
You may also get this exception if an unmanaged dependency or internal
module of the assembly failed to load. Try running depends.exe on the
file to verify that unmanaged dependencies can be loaded. Note that if
you re using ASP.NET, the PATH environment variable it's using may
differ from the one the command line uses. If all of them could be
loaded, try ildasm.exe on the file, double-click on "MANIFEST" and
look for ".file" entries. Each of those files will need to be in the
same directory as the manifest-containing file.
I am using the reportviewer control from VS 2010 to create client side reports (rdlc). Everything is working fine on my development machine, and when I manually compile (via VS2010) and manually deploy to a test machine that doesn't have development tools installed.
In order to get the test machine to work (without installing VS2010 or ReportViewer.exe), I had to add references in my project to Microsoft.ReportViewer.Winforms, Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common and Microsoft.ReportViewer.ProcessingModel and have them all "Copy Local".
I have the rdlc files configured for Build Action => embedded resources. This is the default setting when adding a new rdlc to the project. I am open to configuring this otherwise if this would resolve this problem (no idea if its related).
The problem: since adding the rdlc files, the solution no longer builds on the build server. I have installed ReportViewer.exe on the build server, and have verified that the required assemblies exist in the GAC. The .Net 4 framework is NOT installed on the build server--I don't think this is required because the solution targets the 3.5 runtime.
I believe the root of the problem is the following from the build log:
Target "RunRdlCompiler": Building
target "RunRdlCompiler" completely.
Output file
"obj\Release\RdlCompile.compiled" does
not exist. Using "RdlCompile" task
from assembly
"Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common,
Version=9.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a". Task
"RdlCompile":
Report\RDLC\GreenReport.rdlc (0,0):
error rsInvalidReportDefinition: The
report definition is not valid.
Details: The report definition has an
invalid target namespace
'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2008/01/reportdefinition'
which cannot be upgraded.
From what I can tell, Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common version 10.0.0.0 is what should be used to "compile" the rdlc, but MSBuild appears to be using 9.0.0.0. I believe if I could force it to use the right version (which IS installed in the GAC), the solution would compile.
This is because your Microsoft.Common.Targets file is pointing to the 9.0 version of the assembly.
If you look in [sysdir]\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5 you will find Microsoft.Common.targets, which is driving a lot of what MSBuild does. This verion of the common targets file points to [Program Files]\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v9.0\ReportingServices\Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets forcing MSBuild to run with the 9.0 version.
When you installed .NET 4.0, you got a new common targets file in the v4.0.x directory, this new one now points to [Program Files]\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v10.0\ReportingServices\Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets which points to the 10.0 version of the ReportViewer assemblies.
The 10.0 ReportViewer is compiled against .NET 3.5 and intended to work in both 3.5 and 4.0. You could very likely get rid of the .NET 4.0 framework, and alter your 3.5 common targets file to point to the new ReportingServices target file, and it should work. In theory anyway, I've never actually tried it. You may be best off just sticking with 4.0, as that's what we intended when we designed the MSBuild support for the new viewer.
Just install Microsoft Report Viewer 2010 SP1.
I had a very similar issue. Just all of a sudden I could no longer build a VS2010 project that contained an .rdlc file. I wasn't converting any reports or using a report server, everything was local. I tried creating a brand new project and adding an empty new rdlc report and hit build and it wouldn't work. Just one day it stopped compiling and gave me the following error:
The report definition is not valid. Details: The report definition has an invalid target namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2008/01/reportdefinition' which cannot be upgraded.
Turns out the issue was my "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v10.0\ReportingServices\Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets" file had somehow changed. The top of my file was:
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<UsingTask TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common, Version=9.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
And it should have been:
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<UsingTask TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
I changed that one "Using Task" line in the file and everything builds again. REALLY frustrating and it ate up two days of my life. Hoping posting this comment may help someone else in a similar situation.
Jim Lafler
I have tried re-installing all and it didnt work. Then, I tried updating Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets as per Jim's post but even didnt work for me.
At the end, I just copied Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets from other machine (where it was running without error). And surprisingly, it is working.
The additional difference I noticed while comparing, to change PublicKeyToken along with Version.
This may be the case for me only but Jim's post was much useful.
SFUH
Turns out I did need the .Net 4.0 Framework, and more specifically the 4.x version of MSBuild, which uses the newer version of the Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common library.
So even if you are targeting the 3.5 framework, if you create the rdlc with VS2010 it will expect to be "compiled" using 4.0 tools.
I have the same problem: we using ReportViewer 2012 (version of assemblies starts with 11). Both on local machines and on build machine are installed ReportViewer 2012 package and VisualStudio 2013. On local machines compilation in VS succeeds, but on build machine during queued build MSBuild throws such error:
The report definition is not valid. Details: The report definition has an invalid target
namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2010/01/reportdefinition'
which cannot be upgraded.
I tried to modify Microsoft.Common.targets from .NET 3.5 folder in way, that is described in this post, but no effect. Then I opened Microsoft.Common.targets from .NET 4.0 folder, and found there such strings:
<!-- VS10 without SP1 and without VS11 will not have VisualStudioVersion set, so do
that here -->
<PropertyGroup>
<VisualStudioVersion Condition="'$(VisualStudioVersion)'
==''">10.0</VisualStudioVersion>
</PropertyGroup>
Then I realized that problem may be in incorrect value of variable $(VisualStudioVersion), so I added to build definition in section "Process" this MSBuild parameter:
/p:VisualStudioVersion=12.0
And it worked! Build completed successfully.
Hope this will help someone.
Pasting file paths doesn't seem to be going through... how about this:
Was:
TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common, Version=8.0.0.0...
And is now:
TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0...
James
The NetFx40_LegacySecurityPolicy was enabled in my devenv.exe.config, and when I commented this line out, the project built successfully.
We had enabled the legacy security policy on our team to enable our team to work with DevExpress 7.2 controls from within Visual Studio 2010, but in this case, it shows that the approach we took is not always the best.
I lost 2 full days of development due to a similar issue. On building my project it would succeed, but on rebuild it failed with no errors. On investigating the verbose build log in the Output window it directed me towards a problem with the rdlcompile function (so reporting services local report embedding issue). After trying every thing I finally manage to resolve the issue, but disabling my virus scanner. The Antivirus was somehow interfering with my rebuild and caused the rebuild to fail.
After disabling virus scan, rebuild works 100%
I have same problem on my Visual Studio 2013.
The dll version of reporting service on my project is Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a
When i checked my ReportingServices targets
C:\Program Files\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v12.0\ReportingServices\Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets
I found the task version is 11.0.0.0
<UsingTask TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=11.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91"/>
When i changed the task version to 10.0.0.0 corresponding to dll version on my proejct.
<UsingTask TaskName="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlCompile" AssemblyName="Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
It' worked.
I just removed this file from my file system. The reports are simply ambedded no need to be compiled.
c:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\V11.0\ReportingServices\Microsoft.ReportingServices.targets
this worked fine for me and for my build server.
I am getting an exception when I try to use the FxCop introspection engine:
Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Cci, Version=9.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies.
An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format.
What does this exception mean and how can I fix it?
Ok, fixed it. FxCop assemblies are 32bit, my project was 64bit. Changed the build to x86 and the problem is fixed.