This is a question asked with an ignorance of thew subject matter, but i have searche dlong and hard so i hope this will not be too painful.
I'm using nhibernate for a many to many query.
My objects map (not my design, not getting changed any time soon):
Computer (id, name, etc...) -> (mapping table ) -> Config ( id, key, value )
One computer may have many configs, any config may belong to multiple computers. i can read a computer out fine and the list(bag) member is populated fine.
I then want to find a computer that has numerous configs.
E.g. all computers that have:
OS : Windows
CPU : 2GHz
etc.
Any assistance on how I could put this into a criteria query would be greatly appreciated. I've done some of the basics but wrapping my head around this is proving hard work.
Cheers for any assistance,
Rob.
If the parameters are always the same, use a query like the following:
var computers = session.CreateQuery(
#"select c
from Computer c
inner join c.Configurations as osconfig
inner join c.Configurations as cpuconfig
where
osconfig.Name = 'OS'
and osconfig.Value = :os
and cpuconfig.Name = 'CPU'
and cpuconfig.Value = :cpu")
.SetString("os", "Windows")
.SetString("cpu", "2GHz")
.List<Computer>();
If you mapped it as a map, you can even do something like this:
var computers = session.CreateQuery(
#"select c
from Computer c
where
c.Configurations['OS'] = :os
and c.Configurations['CPU'] = :cpu")
.SetString("os", "Windows")
.SetString("cpu", "2GHz")
.List<Computer>();
If the parameters are always different, use criteria to add them dynamically.
Related
I have this statement that is generated by Geoserver
SELECT
shape AS shape
FROM
(
SELECT
c.chantier_id id,
sdo_geom.sdo_buffer(c.shape, m.diminfo, 1) shape,
c.datedebut datedebut,
c.datefin datefin,
o.nom operation,
c.brouillon brouillon,
e.code etat,
u.utilisateur_id utilisateur,
u.groupe_id groupe
FROM
user_sdo_geom_metadata m, lyv_chantier c
JOIN lyv_utilisateur u ON c.createur_id = u.utilisateur_id
JOIN lyv_etat e ON c.etat_id = e.etat_id
JOIN lyv_operation o ON c.operation = o.id
WHERE
m.table_name = 'LYV_CHANTIER'
AND m.column_name = 'SHAPE'
) vtable
WHERE
( brouillon = 0
AND ( etat != 'archive'
OR etat IS NULL )
AND sdo_filter(shape, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, 4326, NULL, mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1, 1003, 1), mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(
2.23365783691406, 48.665657043457, 2.23365783691406, 48.9341354370117, 2.76649475097656, 48.9341354370117, 2.76649475097656, 48.665657043457, 2.23365783691406, 48.665657043457)), 'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE' );
On my local instance (dockerized if that can explain anything) it works fine, but on another instance I get an error :
ORA-13226: interface not supported without a spatial index
I guess that the SDO_FILTER is applied to the result of SDO_BUFFER which is therefore not indexed.
But why is it working on my local instance ?!
Is there some kind of weird configuration shenanigan that could explain the different behavior maybe ?
EDIT : The idea behind this is to get around a bug in Geoserver with Oracle databases where it renders only the first point of MultiPoint geometries, but works fine with MutltiPolygon.
I am using a SQL view as layer in Geoserver (hence the subselect I guess).
First, you need to do some debugging here.
Connect to each instance, on the same user as your Geoserver's datasource, and run the sql. From the same connections (in each instance) you must also verify that the user's metadata view (user_sdo_geom_metadata) have an entry for the table and the table has a spatial index - whose owner is the same user as the one you connect.
Also, your query ( select ... from 'vtable') has a column 'shape' which is a buffer of the column lyv_chantier.shape. The sdo_filter, in this sql, expects a spatial index on the vtable.shape - which cannot exist. You should try to use a different alias (e.g. buf_shape) and sdo_filter(buf_shape,...) - to see if the sql fails in both instances, as it should.
I'm in a bit of a hurry right now, so my instructions are summarized. If you want, do this debugging and post the results. We then can go into details.
EDIT: Judging from your efforts, I'd say that the simplest approach is: 1) add a second geometry column to lyv_chantier (e.g. buf_shp). 2) update lyv_chantier set buf_shp = sdo_geom.sdo_buffer(shape,...). 3) insert into user_sdo_geom_metadata the values (lyv_chantier, buf_shp, ...). 4) create a spatial index on column buf_shp. You may need to consider a trigger to update buf_shp whenever shape changes...
This is a very practical approach but you don't provide any info about your case (what is the oracle version, how many rows does the table have, how is it used, why do you want to use sdo_buffer, etc), so that's my recommendation for now.
Also, since you are, most likely, using an sql view as layer in Geoserver (you don't say anything about that, either), you could also consider using pure GS functionality to achieve your goal.
At the end, without describing your goal, it's difficult to provide anything more tailor-made.
I'm creating an AddOn for a private server of World of Warcraft 1.12.1/Classic/Vanilla and I need to check the user's professions.
The information I got was the APIs GetProfessions() and GetProfessionInfo() but I can't find out how to use them.
I wanna have a variable for each profession.
It's something like this:
prof1, prof2, archaeology, fishing, cooking, firstAid = GetProfessions()
Profession1 = GetProfessionInfo(prof1)
Profession2 = GetProfessionInfo(prof2)
Profession3 = GetProfessionInfo(archaeology)
Profession4 = GetProfessionInfo(fishing)
Profession5 = GetProfessionInfo(cooking)
Profession6 = GetProfessionInfo(firstAid)
Quick glance shows there are no special tradeskill functions in API in 1.12.1. AFAIR professions were just regular entries in the spellbook back then. As such you can iterate over spellbook with GetSpellName and check that either first return matches name of known profession or second return matches name of a known profession rank.
Additional info on each profession can be retrieved with GetTradeSkillLine, but only when this profession is opened in tradeskill window (i.e. window where you see list of items to craft).
If I'm understanding this correctly, GetProfessions() returns a table. You could always try a different way around the problem, like so:
professions = GetProfessions()
Profession1 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[1])
Profession2 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[2])
Profession3 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[3])
Profession4 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[4])
Profession5 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[5])
Profession6 = GetProfessionInfo(professions[6])
I'm not sure if this will solve your problem, but I figured I could weigh in my opinion. I have never done anything with World of Warcraft.
I've got a few tables, Deployment, Deployment_Report and Workflow. In the event that the deployment is being reviewed they join together so you can see all details in the report. If a revision is going out, the new workflow doesn't exist yet new workflow is going into place so I'd like the values to return null as the revision doesn't exist yet.
Complications aside, this is a sample of the SQL that I'd like to have run:
DECLARE #WorkflowID int
SET #WorkflowID = 399 -- Set to -1 if new
SELECT *
FROM Deployment d
LEFT JOIN Deployment_Report r
ON d.FSJ_Deployment_ID = r.FSJ_Deployment_ID
AND r.Workflow_ID = #WorkflowID
WHERE d.FSJ_Deployment_ID = 339
The above in SQL works great and returns the full record if viewing an active workflow, or the left side of the record with empty fields for revision details which haven't been supplied in the event that a new report is being generated.
Using various samples around S.O. I've produced some Entity to SQL based on a few multiple on statements but I feel like I'm missing something fundamental to make this work:
int Workflow_ID = 399 // or -1 if new, just like the above example
from d in context.Deployments
join r in context.Deployment_Reports.DefaultIfEmpty()
on
new { d.Deployment_ID, Workflow_ID }
equals
new { r.Deployment_ID, r.Workflow_ID }
where d.FSJ_Deployment_ID == fsj_deployment_id
select new
{
...
}
Is the SQL query above possible to create using LINQ to Entities without employing Entity SQL? This is the first time I've needed to create such a join since it's very confusing to look at but in the report it's the only way to do it right since it should only return one record at all times.
The workflow ID is a value passed in to the call to retrieve the data source so in the outgoing query it would be considered a static value (for lack of better terminology on my part)
First of all don't kill yourself on learning the intricacies of EF as there are a LOT of things to learn about it. Unfortunately our deadlines don't like the learning curve!
Here's examples to learn over time:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397895.aspx
In the mean time I've found this very nice workaround using EF for this kind of thing:
var query = "SELECT * Deployment d JOIN Deployment_Report r d.FSJ_Deployment_ID = r.Workflow_ID = #WorkflowID d.FSJ_Deployment_ID = 339"
var parm = new SqlParameter(parameterName="WorkFlowID" value = myvalue);
using (var db = new MyEntities()){
db.Database.SqlQuery<MyReturnType>(query, parm.ToArray());
}
All you have to do is create a model for what you want SQL to return and it will fill in all the values you want. The values you are after are all the fields that are returned by the "Select *"...
There's even a really cool way to get EF to help you. First find the table with the most fields, and get EF to generated the model for you. Then you can write another class that inherits from that class adding in the other fields you want. SQL is able to find all fields added regardless of class hierarchy. It makes your job simple.
Warning, make sure your filed names in the class are exactly the same (case sensitive) as those in the database. The goal is to make a super class model that contains all the fields of all the join activity. SQL just knows how to put them into that resultant class giving you strong typing ability and even more important use-ability with LINQ
You can even use dataannotations in the Super Class Model for displaying other names you prefer to the User, this is a super nice way to keep the table field names but show the user something more user friendly.
I have something like this in RavenDb:
Path [hasMany] Goals [hasMany] Achievements
So I have one document that contains goals and achievements.
If it where a traditional database, I could make this query
select g.id, count(a.id)
from path p
join goals g on p.id = g.pathId
join achievement a on a.id = g.id
group by goal.id
How do I do this query in ravendb?
Right now I'm doing it like this:
Path path = RavenSession.Load<Path>(pathId);
path.Goals.Select(x => new
{
Id = x.Id,
Name = x.Name,
TOnCourse = x.Achievements.Where(y => y.Resolution == Resolution.OnCourse).Count(),
TAstray = x.Achievements.Where(y => y.Resolution == Resolution.Astray).Count()
});
I don't want to do it this way, because I think that I'm loading all the "Goals" and "Achievements" and what I only want is to make the aggregation in the DB (ravendb)
If you want to know what Path, Goals and Achievements really are in my model here is my "pet" project http://dpath.apphb.com/
EDIT
I think I will get those "calculated" values and put them in Goal as properties, because I think the calculation is going to be very common, so keeping it simple since an achievement cannot be deleted, and the user will have a "relation" with goal and the quantity of achievements in order to get "My Stats"
Nevertheless, I would like to know how would you accomplish that query in RavenDb
Thanks!
You are loading just a single document for this, so that is likely to not be an issue.
You aren't loading anything else.
You can do this in an index, and then load the stored fields from there, but I don't think you need this unless your document is very large.
I have a piece of SQL that I want to translate to OCL. I'm not good at SQL so I want to increase maintainability by this. We are using Interbase 2009, Delphi 2007 with Bold and modeldriven development. Now my hope is that someone here both speaks good SQL and OCL :-)
The original SQL:
Select Bold_Id, MessageId, ScaniaId, MessageType, MessageTime, Cancellation, ChassieNumber, UserFriendlyFormat, ReceivingOwner, Invalidated, InvalidationReason,
(Select Parcel.MCurrentStates From Parcel
Where ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ReceivingOwner = Parcel.Bold_Id) as ParcelState From ScaniaEdiSolMessage
Where MessageType = 'IFTMBP' and
not Exists (Select * From ScaniaEdiSolMessage EdiSolMsg
Where EdiSolMsg.ChassieNumber = ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ChassieNumber and EdiSolMsg.ShipFromFinland = ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ShipFromFinland and EdiSolMsg.MessageType = 'IFTMBF') and
invalidated = 0 Order By MessageTime desc
After a small simplification:
Select Bold_Id, (Select Parcel.MCurrentStates From Parcel
where ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ReceivingOwner = Parcel.Bold_Id) From ScaniaEdiSolMessage
Where MessageType = 'IFTMBP' and not Exists (Select * From ScaniaEdiSolMessage
EdiSolMsg Where EdiSolMsg.ChassieNumber = ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ChassieNumber and
EdiSolMsg.ShipFromFinland = ScaniaEdiSolMessage.ShipFromFinland and
EdiSolMsg.MessageType = 'IFTMBF') and invalidated = 0
NOTE: There are 2 cases for MessageType, 'IFTMBP' and 'IFTMBF'.
So the table to be listed is ScaniaEdiSolMessage.
It has attributes like:
MessageType: String
ChassiNumber: String
ShipFromFinland: Boolean
Invalidated: Boolean
It has also a link to table Parcel named ReceivingOwner with BoldId as key.
So it seems like it list all rows of ScaniaEdiSolMessage and then have a subquery that also list all rows of ScaniaEdiSolMessage and name it EdiSolMsg. Then it exclude almost all rows. In fact the query above give one hit from 28000 records.
In OCL it is easy to list all instances:
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances
Also easy to filter rows by select for example:
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances->select(shipFromFinland and not invalidated)
But I do not understand how I should make a OCL to match the SQL above.
Listen to Gabriel and Stephanie, learn more SQL.
You state that you want to make the code more maintainable, yet the number of developers who understand SQL is greater by far than the number of developers who understand OCL.
If you leave the project tomorrow after converting this to OCL, the chances that you'd be able to find someone who could maintain the OCL are very slim. However, the chances that you could find someone to maintain the SQL are very high.
Don't try to fit a square peg in a round hole just because you're good with round hammers :)
There is a project, Dresden OCL, that might help you.
Dresden OCL provides a set of tools to parse and evaluate OCL constraints on various models like UML, EMF and Java. Furthermore Dresden OCL provides tools for Java/AspectJ and SQL code generation. The tools of Dresden OCL can be either used as a library for other project or as a plug-in project that extends Eclipse with OCL support.
I haven't used it, but there is a demo showing how the tool generates SQL from a model and OCL constraints. I realize you're asking for the opposite, but maybe using this you can figure it out. There is also a paper that describes OCL->SQL transformations by the same people.
With MDriven (successor of Bold for Delphi) I would do it like this:
When working with OCL to SQL everything becomes easier if you think about the different set's of information you need to check - and then use ocl operators as ->intersection to find the set you are after.
So in your case you might have a set like this:
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances->select(shipFromFinland and not invalidated)
but you also have a set like this:
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances->select(m|m.ReceivingOwner.MessageType = 'IFTMBP')
And you further more have this criteria:
Parcel.allinstances->select(p|p.Messages->exists(m|m.MessageType = 'IFTMBF')).Messages
If all these Sets have the same result type (collection of ScaniaEdiSolMessage) you can simply intersect them to get your desired result
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances->select(shipFromFinland and not invalidated)
->intersection(ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances->select(m|m.ReceivingOwner.MessageType = 'IFTMBP'))
->intersection(Parcel.allinstances->select(p|p.Messages->exists(m|m.MessageType = 'IFTMBF')).Messages
)
And looking at that we can reduce it a bit to:
ScaniaEdiSolMessage.allinstances
->select(m|m.shipFromFinland and (not m.invalidated) and
(m.ReceivingOwner.MessageType = 'IFTMBP'))
->intersection(Parcel.allinstances->select(p|
p.Messages->exists(m|m.MessageType = 'IFTMBF')).Messages
)