I have some performance test results on the database, and what I want to do is to group every 1000 records (previously sorted in ascending order by date) and then aggregate results with AVG.
I'm actually looking for a standard SQL solution, however any T-SQL specific results are also appreciated.
The query looks like this:
SELECT TestId,Throughput FROM dbo.Results ORDER BY id
WITH T AS (
SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY ID) Rank,
P.Field1, P.Field2, P.Value1, ...
FROM P
)
SELECT (Rank - 1) / 1000 GroupID, AVG(...)
FROM T
GROUP BY ((Rank - 1) / 1000)
;
Something like that should get you started. If you can provide your actual schema I can update as appropriate.
Give the answer to Yuck. I only post as an answer so I could include a code block. I did a count test to see if it was grouping by 1000 and the first set was 999. This produced set sizes of 1,000. Great query Yuck.
WITH T AS (
SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY sID) Rank, sID
FROM docSVsys
)
SELECT (Rank-1) / 1000 GroupID, count(sID)
FROM T
GROUP BY ((Rank-1) / 1000)
order by GroupID
I +1'd #Yuck, because I think that is a good answer. But it's worth mentioning NTILE().
Reason being, if you have 10,010 records (for example), then you'll have 11 groupings -- the first 10 with 1000 in them, and the last with just 10.
If you're comparing averages between each group of 1000, then you should either discard the last group as it's not a representative group, or...you could make all the groups the same size.
NTILE() would make all groups the same size; the only caveat is that you'd need to know how many groups you wanted.
So if your table had 25,250 records, you'd use NTILE(25), and your groupings would be approximately 1000 in size -- they'd actually be 1010 in size; the benefit being, they'd all be the same size, which might make them more relevant to each other in terms of whatever comparison analysis you're doing.
You could get your group-size simply by
DECLARE #ntile int
SET #ntile = (SELECT count(1) from myTable) / 1000
And then modifying #Yuck's approach with the NTILE() substitution:
;WITH myCTE AS (
SELECT NTILE(#ntile) OVER (ORDER BY id) myGroup,
col1, col2, ...
FROM dbo.myTable
)
SELECT myGroup, col1, col2...
FROM myCTE
GROUP BY (myGroup), col1, col2...
;
Answer above does not actually assign a unique group id to each 1000 records. Adding Floor() is needed. The following will return all records from your table, with a unique GroupID for each 1000 rows:
WITH T AS (
SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY your_field) Rank,
your_field
FROM your_table
WHERE your_field = 'your_criteria'
)
SELECT Floor((Rank-1) / 1000) GroupID, your_field
FROM T
And for my needs, I wanted my GroupID to be a random set of characters, so I changed the Floor(...) GroupID to:
TO_HEX(SHA256(CONCAT(CAST(Floor((Rank-1) / 10) AS STRING),'seed1'))) GroupID
without the seed value, you and I would get the exact same output because we're just doing a SHA256 on the number 1, 2, 3 etc. But adding the seed makes the output unique, but still repeatable.
This is BigQuery syntax. T-SQL might be slightly different.
Lastly, if you want to leave off the last chunk that is not a full 1000, you can find it by doing:
WITH T AS (
SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY your_field) Rank,
your_field
FROM your_table
WHERE your_field = 'your_criteria'
)
SELECT Floor((Rank-1) / 1000) GroupID, your_field
, COUNT(*) OVER(PARTITION BY TO_HEX(SHA256(CONCAT(CAST(Floor((Rank-1) / 1000) AS STRING),'seed1')))) AS CountInGroup
FROM T
ORDER BY CountInGroup
You can also use Row_Number() instead of rank. No Floor required.
declare #groupsize int = 50
;with ct1 as ( select YourColumn, RowID = Row_Number() over(order by YourColumn)
from YourTable
)
select YourColumn, RowID, GroupID = (RowID-1)/#GroupSize + 1
from ct1
I read more about NTILE after reading #user15481328 answer
(resource: https://www.sqlservertutorial.net/sql-server-window-functions/sql-server-ntile-function/ )
and this solution allowed me to find the max date within each of the 25 groups of my data set:
with cte as (
select date,
NTILE(25) OVER ( order by date ) bucket_num
from mybigdataset
)
select max(date), bucket_num
from cte
group by bucket_num
order by bucket_num
Related
I want to pull all rows except the last one in Oracle SQL
My database is like this
Prikey - Auto_increment
common - varchar
miles - int
So I want to sum all rows except the last row ordered by primary key grouped by common. That means for each distinct common, the miles will be summed (except for the last one)
Note: the question was changed after this answer was posted. The first two queries work for the original question. The last query (in the addendum) works for the updated question.
This should do the trick, though it will be a bit slow for larger tables:
SELECT prikey, authnum FROM myTable
WHERE prikey <> (SELECT MAX(prikey) FROM myTable)
ORDER BY prikey
This query is longer but for a large table it should faster. I'll leave it to you to decide:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
prikey,
authnum,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY prikey DESC) AS RowRank
FROM myTable)
WHERE RowRank <> 1
ORDER BY prikey
Addendum There was an update to the question; here's the updated answer.
SELECT
common,
SUM(miles)
FROM (
SELECT
common,
miles,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY common ORDER BY prikey DESC) AS RowRank
FROM myTable
)
WHERE RowRank <> 1
GROUP BY common
Looks like I am a little too late but here is my contribution, similar to Ed Gibbs' first solution but instead of calculating the max id for each value in the table and then comparing I get it once using an inline view.
SELECT d1.prikey,
d1.authnum
FROM myTable d1,
(SELECT MAX(prikey) prikey myTable FROM myTable) d2
WHERE d1.prikey != d2.prikey
At least I think this is more efficient if you want to go without the use of Analytics.
query to retrieve all the records in the table except first row and last row
select * from table_name
where primary_id_column not in
(
select top 1 * from table_name order by primary_id_column asc
)
and
primary_id_column not in
(
select top 1 * from table_name order by primary_id_column desc
)
I have the following table:
ItemID Price
1 10
2 20
3 12
4 10
5 11
I need to find the second lowest price. So far, I have a query that works, but i am not sure it is the most efficient query:
select min(price)
from table
where itemid not in
(select itemid
from table
where price=
(select min(price)
from table));
What if I have to find third OR fourth minimum price? I am not even mentioning other attributes and conditions... Is there any more efficient way to do this?
PS: note that minimum is not a unique value. For example, items 1 and 4 are both minimums. Simple ordering won't do.
SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table
WHERE price > ( SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table )
select price from table where price in (
select
distinct price
from
(select t.price,rownumber() over () as rownum from table t) as x
where x.rownum = 2 --or 3, 4, 5, etc
)
Not sure if this would be the fastest, but it would make it easier to select the second, third, etc... Just change the TOP value.
UPDATED
SELECT MIN(price)
FROM table
WHERE price NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT TOP 1 price FROM table ORDER BY price)
To find out second minimum salary of an employee, you can use following:
select min(salary)
from table
where salary > (select min(salary) from table);
This is a good answer:
SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table
WHERE price > ( SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table )
Make sure when you do this that there is only 1 row in the subquery! (the part in brackets at the end).
For example if you want to use GROUP BY you will have to define even further using:
SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table te1
WHERE price > ( SELECT MIN( price )
FROM table te2 WHERE te1.brand = te2.brand)
GROUP BY brand
Because GROUP BY will give you multiple rows, otherwise you will get the error:
SQL Error [21000]: ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression
I guess a simplest way to do is using offset-fetch filter from standard sql, distinct is not necessary if you don't have repeat values in your column.
select distinct(price) from table
order by price
offset 1 row fetch first 1 row only;
no need to write complex subqueries....
In amazon redshift use limit-fetch instead for ex...
Select distinct(price) from table
order by price
limit 1
offset 1;
You can either use one of the following:-
select min(your_field) from your_table where your_field NOT IN (select distinct TOP 1 your_field from your_table ORDER BY your_field DESC)
OR
select top 1 ColumnName from TableName where ColumnName not in (select top 1 ColumnName from TableName order by ColumnName asc)
I think you can find the second minimum using LIMIT and ORDER BY
select max(price) as minimum from (select distinct(price) from tableName order by price asc limit 2 ) --or 3, 4, 5, etc
if you want to find third or fourth minimum and so on... you can find out by changing minimum number in limit. you can find using this statement.
You can use RANK functions,
it may seem complex query but similar results like other answers can be achieved with the same,
WITH Temp_table AS (SELECT ITEM_ID,PRICE,RANK() OVER (ORDER BY PRICE) AS
Rnk
FROM YOUR_TABLE_NAME)
SELECT ITEM_ID FROM Temp_table
WHERE Rnk=2;
Maybe u can check the min value first and then place a not or greater than the operator. This will eliminate the usage of a subquery but will require a two-step process
select min(price)
from table
where min(price) <> -- "the min price you previously got"
I'm looking to some expresion like this (using SQL Server 2008)
SELECT TOP 10 columName FROM tableName
But instead of that I need the values between 10 and 20. And I wonder if there is a way of doing it using only one SELECT statement.
For example this is useless:
SELECT columName FROM
(SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY someId) AS RowNum, * FROM tableName) AS alias
WHERE RowNum BETWEEN 10 AND 20
Because the select inside brackets is already returning all the results, and I'm looking to avoid that, due to performance.
Use SQL Server 2012 to fetch/skip!
SELECT SalesOrderID, SalesOrderDetailID, ProductID, OrderQty, UnitPrice, LineTotal
FROM AdventureWorks2012.Sales.SalesOrderDetail
OFFSET 10 ROWS FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY;
There's nothing better than you're describing for older versions of sql server. Maybe use CTE, but unlikely to make a difference.
WITH NumberedMyTable AS
(
SELECT
Id,
Value,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id) AS RowNumber
FROM
MyTable
)
SELECT
Id,
Value
FROM
NumberedMyTable
WHERE
RowNumber BETWEEN #From AND #To
or, you can remove top 10 rows and then get next 10 rows, but I double anyone would want to do that.
There is a trick with row_number that does not involve sorting all the rows.
Try this:
SELECT columName
FROM (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (select NULL as noorder)) AS RowNum, *
FROM tableName
) as alias
WHERE RowNum BETWEEN 10 AND 20
You cannot use a constant in the order by. However, you can use an expression that evaluates to a constant. SQL Server recognizes this and just returns the rows as encountered, properly enumerated.
Why do you think SQL Server would evaluate the entire inner query? Assuming your sort column is indexed, it'll just read the first 20 values. If you're really nervous you could do this:
Select
Id
From (
Select Top 20 -- note top 20
Row_Number() Over(Order By Id) As RowNum,
Id
From
dbo.Test
Order By
Id
) As alias
Where
RowNum Between 10 And 20
Order By
Id
but I'm pretty sure the query plan is the same either way.
(Really) Fixed as per Aaron's comment.
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/db162/6
One more option
SELECT TOP(11) columName
FROM dbo.tableName
ORDER BY
CASE WHEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY someId) BETWEEN 10 AND 20
THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY someId) ELSE NULL END DESC
You could create a temp table that is ordered the way you want like:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY someId) AS RowNum, * FROM tableName
into ##tempTable
...
That way you have an ordered list of rows.
and can just query by row number the subsequent times instead of doing the inner query multiple times.
I was wondering if it would be possible to enumerate returned rows. Not according to any column content but just yielding a sequential integer index. E.g.
select ?, count(*) as usercount from users group by age
would return something along the lines:
1 12
2 78
3 4
4 42
it is for https://data.stackexchange.com/
try:
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY age) AS RowNumber
,count(*) as usercount
from users
group by age
If it's Oracle, use rownum.
SELECT SOMETABLE.*, ROWNUM RN
FROM SOMETABLE
WHERE SOMETABLE.SOMECOLUMN = :SOMEVALUE
ORDER BY SOMETABLE.SOMEOTHERCOLUMN;
The final answer will entirely depend on what database you're using.
For MySql:
SELECT #row := #row + 1 as row FROM anytable a, (SELECT #row := 0) r
use rownumber function available in sql server
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY columnNAME) AS 'RowNumber',count(*) as usercount
FROM users
How you'd do that depends on your database server. In SQL Server, you could use row_number():
select row_number() over (order by age)
, age
, count(*) as usercount
from users
group by
age
order by
age
But it's often easier and faster to use client side row numbers.
for Mysql
set #row:=0;
select #row:=#row+1 as row, a.* from table_name as a;
In contrast to majority of other answers, and in accordance of the actual OP question, to
enumerate returned rows (...) NOT according to any column content
but rather in the order of returned query, one could use a dummy ordinal variable to ORDER BY in an ROW_NUMBER function, e.g.
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (SELECT 0)) AS row_num
where one could actually use anything as an argument to the SELECT-statement, like SELECT 100, SELECT ‘A’, SELECT NULL, etc..
This way, the row numbers will be enumerated in the same order the data was added to the table.
I want to use the ROW_NUMBER() to get...
To get the max(ROW_NUMBER()) --> Or i guess this would also be the count of all rows
I tried doing:
SELECT max(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId)) FROM Users
but it didn't seem to work...
To get ROW_NUMBER() using a given piece of information, ie. if I have a name and I want to know what row the name came from.
I assume it would be something similar to what I tried for #1
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) From Users WHERE UserName='Joe'
but this didn't work either...
Any Ideas?
For the first question, why not just use?
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM myTable
to get the count.
And for the second question, the primary key of the row is what should be used to identify a particular row. Don't try and use the row number for that.
If you returned Row_Number() in your main query,
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order by Id) AS RowNumber, Field1, Field2, Field3
FROM User
Then when you want to go 5 rows back then you can take the current row number and use the following query to determine the row with currentrow -5
SELECT us.Id
FROM (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id) AS Row, Id
FROM User ) us
WHERE Row = CurrentRow - 5
Though I agree with others that you could use count() to get the total number of rows, here is how you can use the row_count():
To get the total no of rows:
with temp as (
select row_number() over (order by id) as rownum
from table_name
)
select max(rownum) from temp
To get the row numbers where name is Matt:
with temp as (
select name, row_number() over (order by id) as rownum
from table_name
)
select rownum from temp where name like 'Matt'
You can further use min(rownum) or max(rownum) to get the first or last row for Matt respectively.
These were very simple implementations of row_number(). You can use it for more complex grouping. Check out my response on Advanced grouping without using a sub query
If you need to return the table's total row count, you can use an alternative way to the SELECT COUNT(*) statement.
Because SELECT COUNT(*) makes a full table scan to return the row count, it can take very long time for a large table. You can use the sysindexes system table instead in this case. There is a ROWS column that contains the total row count for each table in your database. You can use the following select statement:
SELECT rows FROM sysindexes WHERE id = OBJECT_ID('table_name') AND indid < 2
This will drastically reduce the time your query takes.
You can use this for get first record where has clause
SELECT TOP(1) * , ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) AS rownum
FROM Users
WHERE UserName = 'Joe'
ORDER BY rownum ASC
ROW_NUMBER() returns a unique number for each row starting with 1. You can easily use this by simply writing:
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 'Column_Name' DESC) as ROW_NUMBER
May not be related to the question here. But I found it could be useful when using ROW_NUMBER -
SELECT *,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 100)) AS Any_ID
FROM #Any_Table
select
Ml.Hid,
ml.blockid,
row_number() over (partition by ml.blockid order by Ml.Hid desc) as rownumber,
H.HNAME
from MIT_LeadBechmarkHamletwise ML
join [MT.HAMLE] h on ML.Hid=h.HID
SELECT num, UserName FROM
(SELECT UserName, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) AS num
From Users) AS numbered
WHERE UserName='Joe'
You can use Row_Number for limit query result.
Example:
SELECT * FROM (
select row_number() OVER (order by createtime desc) AS ROWINDEX,*
from TABLENAME ) TB
WHERE TB.ROWINDEX between 0 and 10
--
With above query, I will get PAGE 1 of results from TABLENAME.
If you absolutely want to use ROW_NUMBER for this (instead of count(*)) you can always use:
SELECT TOP 1 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM USERS
ORDER BY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id) DESC
Need to create virtual table by using WITH table AS, which is mention in given Query.
By using this virtual table, you can perform CRUD operation w.r.t row_number.
QUERY:
WITH table AS
-
(SELECT row_number() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) rn, * FROM Users)
-
SELECT * FROM table WHERE UserName='Joe'
-
You can use INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE in last sentence by in spite of SELECT.
SQL Row_Number() function is to sort and assign an order number to data rows in related record set. So it is used to number rows, for example to identify the top 10 rows which have the highest order amount or identify the order of each customer which is the highest amount, etc.
If you want to sort the dataset and number each row by seperating them into categories we use Row_Number() with Partition By clause. For example, sorting orders of each customer within itself where the dataset contains all orders, etc.
SELECT
SalesOrderNumber,
CustomerId,
SubTotal,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY CustomerId ORDER BY SubTotal DESC) rn
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
But as I understand you want to calculate the number of rows of grouped by a column. To visualize the requirement, if you want to see the count of all orders of the related customer as a seperate column besides order info, you can use COUNT() aggregation function with Partition By clause
For example,
SELECT
SalesOrderNumber,
CustomerId,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY CustomerId) CustomerOrderCount
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
This query:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) From Users WHERE UserName='Joe'
will return all rows where the UserName is 'Joe' UNLESS you have no UserName='Joe'
They will be listed in order of UserID and the row_number field will start with 1 and increment however many rows contain UserName='Joe'
If it does not work for you then your WHERE command has an issue OR there is no UserID in the table. Check spelling for both fields UserID and UserName.