this is the query:
SELECT DISTINCT pprom.pk
FROM
(
SELECT
item_t0.SourcePK as pk
FROM
links item_t0
WHERE (? = item_t0.TargetPK AND item_t0.SourcePK in (?,?))
AND (item_t0.TypePkString=? )
UNION
SELECT
item_t1.TargetPK as pk
FROM
cat2prodrel item_t1
WHERE ( item_t1.SourcePK in (? ) AND item_t1.TargetPK in (?,?))
AND (item_t1.TypePkString=? )
) AS pprom
And this is the error:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Any ideas what could be wrong?
Edit:
The question marks are replaced by PKs of the respective items:
values = [PropertyValue:8802745684882, PropertyValue:8796177006593, PropertyValue:8796201713665, 8796110520402, PropertyValue:8796125954190, PropertyValue:8796177006593, PropertyValue:8796201713665, 8796101705810]
Edit 2:
The query is executed deep inside some proprietary software system so I don't know exactly the code that runs it.
Edit 3:
I found one more query that's a little shorter but results in the same error message:
SELECT DISTINCT pprom.pk
FROM
(
SELECT
item_t0.SourcePK as pk
FROM
links item_t0
WHERE (? = item_t0.TargetPK AND item_t0.SourcePK in (?))
AND (item_t0.TypePkString=? )
) AS pprom
Using the following values:
values = [PropertyValue:8799960601490, PropertyValue:8796177006593, 8796110520402]
Edit 4
I found the SQL code that is sent to the db after replacing the values:
SELECT DISTINCT pprom.pk
FROM
(
SELECT
item_t0.SourcePK as pk
FROM
links item_t0
WHERE (8801631769490 = item_t0.TargetPK AND item_t0.SourcePK in (8796177006593))
AND (item_t0.TypePkString=8796110520402 )
) AS pprom
I also tried executing the inner SELECT statement and that alone runs ok and returns a single PK as a result.
I could not find any obvious syntax error in your query so I'd presume the issue is the client library you are using to convert the ? place holders into actual values. Your question edit displays a sort of dump where there are 8 integers but only 6 PropertyValue items. Make sure that's not the issue: IN (?, ?) requires 2 parameters.
Edit
Try removing the AS keyword when you assign an alias to the subquery:
SELECT DISTINCT pprom.pk
FROM
(
SELECT
item_t0.SourcePK as pk
FROM
links item_t0
WHERE (8801631769490 = item_t0.TargetPK AND item_t0.SourcePK in (8796177006593))
AND (item_t0.TypePkString=8796110520402 )
) AS pprom
^^
Related
I created a many-to-many relationship between the tables PRODUCT_TYPE and LABEL by creating and intermediate table PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS. I wanted to retrieve all the products that have the labels 'Gluten free' and 'Lactose free' and found help on a similar subject (How to filter SQL results in a has-many-through relation) but never got it to work properly.
The tables are as follows:
PRODUCT_TYPE{
PRODUCT_TYPE ->Primary Key
CONTAINER
VOLUME_L
PRICE_EUROS
...
}
LABEL{
LABEL_NAME ->Primary Key
REQUIREMENTS
}
PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS{
PRODUCT_TYPE
LABEL_NAME
}
In fact, even when creating the simplest command
SELECT PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS.PRODUCT_TYPE
FROM PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS
I obtain the following error ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended that I can't solve. I'm working on Apex Oracle (Required for this course).
Thanks !
If your table is really named PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS then you need to enclose it within double quotes. - is not a standard character that is allowed in table names so to use special characters such as that, you need to put quotes around the table. I would recommend AGAINST using a table name such as that and maybe use something like PRODUCT_TYPE_LABEL.
Does the query work from SQL Developer, SQLPlus or any other tool that you can use to run queries?
Try running the query:
SELECT PRODUCT_TYPE
FROM "PRODUCT_TYPE-LABELS"
select * from (
select rownum rowno, CUST_ID,CUST_NAME,no_of_orders,orders_amount,EMAIL from (
select mst.CUST_ID, mst.CUST_NAME, count(mst.INVONO) no_of_orders, sum(SUB_TOTAL) orders_amount, au.EMAIL
from sales_mst mst,CUSTOMER_INFO cust, APP_USERS au
where cust.USER_NAME = au.USERNAME
and cust.cust_id=mst.cust_id
and (au.gender= :P41_GENDER or :P41_GENDER is null)
and (au.DOB = :P41_DOB or :P41_DOB is null)
group by mst.CUST_ID, mst.CUST_NAME,au.EMAIL
having nvl(sum(SUB_TOTAL),0) > 0
order by 3 desc,4 desc
)) where rowno <=:P41_TO_CUSTOMER
/*select * from (
select rownum rowno, CUST_ID,CUST_NAME,no_of_orders,orders_amount from (
select mst.CUST_ID, mst.CUST_NAME, count(mst.INVONO) no_of_orders, sum(SUB_TOTAL) orders_amount
from sales_mst mst
group by mst.CUST_ID, mst.CUST_NAME
having nvl(sum(SUB_TOTAL),0) > 0
order by 3 desc,4 desc
)) where rowno <=:P41_TO_CUSTOMER
*/
I'm trying to compare two table's values for difference (I suspect for two TankSystemIds containing same data)
My query is
SELECT *
FROM [dbo].[vwRawSaleTransaction]
WHERE hdTankSystemId = 2782
MINUS
SELECT *
FROM [dbo].[vwRawSaleTransaction]
WHERE hdTankSystemId = 2380
But I get an error about syntax issues:
Incorrect syntax near 'minus'
But this is right[1]?
[1] https://www.techonthenet.com/sql/minus.php
Quoted in your link.
For databases such as SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, use the EXCEPT operator to perform this type of query.
For your case, it seems like you are looking for duplicated data, intersect should be used instead.
Also, INTERSECT statement like
SELECT
EXPRESSION_1, EXPRESSION_2, ..., EXPRESSION_N
FROM
TABLE_A
INTERSECT
SELECT
EXPRESSION_1, EXPRESSION_2, ..., EXPRESSION_N
FROM
TABLE_B
can be written as
SELECT
TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_1, TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_2, ..., TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_N
FROM
TABLE_A
INNER JOIN
TABLE_B
ON
TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_1 = TABLE_B.EXPRESSION_1
AND TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_2 = TABLE_B.EXPRESSION_2
.
.
.
AMD TABLE_A.EXPRESSION_N = TABLE_B.EXPRESSION_N
If you use select * from the same table with a different where condition then intersect them, you are not going to get any rows as they have different value on the specific column used in where condition.
I need to update few columns in one table with the very convoluted calculation.
I'm not good enough in SQL so I tried to use "with" clause in combination with update, but It threw error.
Then I found a post online which suggested to use MERGE so I came up with Merge query. But that one was also throwing an error.
So I removed all other column and updating only one column to remove complexity, but no avail still errors
Below is my query, select query inside working perfectly fine.
Please suggest.
MERGE INTO TABLE_1 AS O
USING (
SELECT ((TO_NUMBER(TABLE_3.Total_Whsle_Price)-TO_NUMBER(TABLE_2.OPT_BASE_WHSLE)) - ((TO_NUMBER(TABLE_3.Total_Whsle_Price)-TO_NUMBER(TABLE_2.OPT_BASE_WHSLE))*TO_NUMBER(TABLE_1.AUC_MILEAGE))/100000 ) as CORRECT_FLOOR_PRICE
FROM TABLE_1, TABLE_2,TABLE_3
WHERE TABLE_2.Primary_ID= TABLE_1.Primary_ID
AND TABLE_2.option_code = 'FSDS'
AND TABLE_1.FLOOR_PRICE <> '0.00'
and TABLE_3.Primary_ID=TABLE_1.Primary_ID
and TABLE_3.Primary_ID=TABLE_2.Primary_ID
) AS CORRECT
ON(
O.Primary_ID = CORRECT.Primary_ID
)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
set O.FLOOR_PRICE =CORRECT.CORRECT_FLOOR_PRICE
Error is
An error occurred when executing the SQL command:
MERGE INTO ........
DB2 SQL Error: SQLCODE=-199, SQLSTATE=42601, SQLERRMC=SELECT;VALUES, DRIVER=3.61.75 [SQL State=42601, DB Errorcode=-199]
Try this instead, I think you forgot your identifier in your select statement because after the "ON" statement "CORRECT.Primary_ID" doesn't associate to anything.
MERGE INTO TABLE_1 as O
USING (
SELECT ((TO_NUMBER(TABLE_3.Total_Whsle_Price)-TO_NUMBER
(TABLE_2.OPT_BASE_WHSLE)) - ((TO_NUMBER(TABLE_3.Total_Whsle_Price)
-TO_NUMBER(TABLE_2.OPT_BASE_WHSLE))*TO_NUMBER
(TABLE_1.AUC_MILEAGE))/100000 ) as CORRECT_FLOOR_PRICE,
TABLE_1.Primary_ID AS Primary_ID
FROM
TABLE_1, TABLE_2,TABLE_3
WHERE TABLE_2.Primary_ID = TABLE_1.Primary_ID
AND TABLE_2.option_code = 'FSDS'
AND TABLE_1.FLOOR_PRICE <> '0.00'
AND TABLE_3.Primary_ID=TABLE_1.Primary_ID
AND TABLE_3.Primary_ID=TABLE_2.Primary_ID
) AS CORRECT
ON(
O.Primary_ID = CORRECT.Primary_ID
)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
set O.FLOOR_PRICE = CORRECT.CORRECT_FLOOR_PRICE
I need to make a query but get the value in every field empty. Gordon Linoff give me the clue to this need here:
SQL Empty query results
which is:
select t.*
from (select 1 as val
) v left outer join
table t
on 1 = 0;
This query wors perfectly on PostgreSQL but gets an error when trying to execute it in Microsoft Access, it says that 1 = 0 expression is not admitted. How could it be fixed to work on microsoft access?
Regards,
If the table has a numeric primary key column whose values are non-negative then the following query will work in Access. The primary key field is [ID].
SELECT t2.*
FROM
myTable AS t2
RIGHT JOIN
(
SELECT TOP 1 (ID * -1) AS badID
FROM myTable AS t1
) AS rowStubs
ON t2.ID = rowStubs.badID
This was tested with Access 2010.
I am offering this answer here, even though you didn't think it worked in my edit to your original question. What is the problem?
select t.*
from (select max(col) as maxval from table as t
) as v left join
table as t
on v.val < t.col;
You can use the following query, but it would still need a little "manual coding".
EDITS:
Actually, you do not need the SWITCH function. Modified query below.
Removed the reference to Description column from one line. Still, you would need to use a Text column name (such as Description) in the last line of the query.
For example, the following query would work for the Months table:
select Months.*
from Months
RIGHT OUTER JOIN
(select "" as DummyColumn from Months) Blank_Data
ON Months.Description = Blank_Data.DummyColumn; --hardcoded Description column
Does this make sense? I otherwise don't see the error.
Using RODBC, R returns a 'Could not SQLExecDirect' error for a sqlQuery statement issued to a table containing a field ID = Order. The SQL otherwise works. I can however read the entire table to a df using sqlFetch (see below).
The target db is on SQL Server.
Example of table structure:
Taxon_Id = c(3000,3001,3002)
Group_Id = c(6,5,5)
Type = c('Fish','Fish','Fish')
Order = c('Petromyzontidae','Acipenseridae','Clupeidae')
Family = c('Petromyzontidae','Acipenseridae','Clupeidae')
txn = data.frame(Taxon_Id,Group_Id,Type,Order,Family)
Example of SQL issued to table:
txn2<-as.data.frame(sqlQuery(channel, paste('SELECT T.Taxon_Id,
T.GroupId,
T.Type,
T.Order,
T.Family
FROM Taxon T
ORDER BY 1
')) )
sqlFetch reads all table fields without error.
txn<-as.data.frame(sqlFetch(channel,"Taxon"))
Thanks for your comments.
This is your query:
SELECT T.Taxon_Id, T.GroupId, T.Type, T.Order, T.Family
FROM Taxon T
ORDER BY 1
In SQL (in general) and SQL Server (in particular), the word Order is a reserved word. You need to escape it with either double quotes or square braces:
SELECT T.Taxon_Id, T.GroupId, T.Type, T.[Order], T.Family
FROM Taxon T
ORDER BY 1