I have a model with a searchable block, like so:
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
searchable do
text :contact_name, :company_name, :contact_email
end
end
In the controller's index action, I'm calling Contact.new, which is giving me an error message on the page, which is currently running on our Staging server:
undefined method `searchable' for #<Class:0xce0bf80>
The stack trace is pointing to the searchable block in the Model via the Contact.new line in the controller.
When I run the code locally, either on the webpage or the console, or through the console on the Staging server, this error isn't appearing - only on the Staging webpage.
The Solr service is running fine on the Staging server, and the data has been indexed successfully. Any theories as to why it's not playing ball in Staging will be accepted.
EDIT
In response to Nick's question below, the Gemfile just has this line for Sunspot: gem 'sunspot_rails'
For Gemfile.lock, these are all the lines I could spot containing Sunspot or Solr references:
GEM
rsolr (0.12.1)
builder (>= 2.1.2)
sunspot (1.2.1)
escape (= 0.0.4)
pr_geohash (~> 1.0)
rsolr (= 0.12.1)
sunspot_rails (1.2.1)
nokogiri
sunspot (= 1.2.1)
DEPENDENCIES
sunspot_rails
I had the same problem, and I just had to restart my rails server. Simple solution, but if it wasn't for another post somewhere that suggested I do so, I would probably have tried to debug the error for a much longer time before just trying to restart the server, hehe...
This can also happen if you forget to restart your rails server after installing the new sunspot gem
Sounds to me like the gem isn't being loaded correctly on your staging site. If you can show the relevant sections of your Gemfile and Gemfile.lock, I can update with more of an answer.
EDIT — Gemfile looks fine. Sorry, but I've got nothin' without being able to get my hands on the app. Report a bug to the Sunspot mailing list? http://outoftime.github.com/sunspot
After reading this post
I understood that the problem is because the rake tasks line prevents the loading of Sunspot
I managed to solve it in the following way:
I removed the following line from my Rakefile
require 'sunspot/rails/tasks'
I created a sunspot.rake file and added to it the contents of the following file from the sunspot gem source:
/gems/sunspot_rails-1.2.1/lib/sunspot/rails/tasks.rb
I know that this a hack, but it is working.
I just ran spring stop and it fixed it
Related
I've got a Redmine 3.4.4 installation running, which uses Ruby 2.2.5-p319 and Rails 4.2.8. We want to upgrade this to Redmine latest (currently 4.0.4) which requires Rails 5.
I'm running the new server using 4.0.4 using Ruby 2.6.3-p62 and Rails 5.2.3. Overall it's OK, but we have a number of plugins installed we would like to migrate. Many of these have had problems because of deprecations in Rails 5. I've managed to muddle my way through 8 of 9 plugins, even though I've not written Ruby on Rails before, but I'm stuck on the last one and just can't figure it out.
The plugin is the My Page Customization plugin and when I attempt to migrate the database and plugins I get this error:
[centos#redmine]$ bundle exec rake db:migrate RAILS_ENV=production
rake aborted!
NoMethodError: undefined method `alias_method_chain' for ActivitiesController:Class
Did you mean? alias_method
/usr/local/src/redmine-4.0.4/plugins/redmine_my_page/lib/my_page_patches/activities_controller_patch.rb:11:in `block in included'
/usr/local/src/redmine-4.0.4/plugins/redmine_my_page/lib/my_page_patches/activities_controller_patch.rb:7:in `class_eval'
/usr/local/src/redmine-4.0.4/plugins/redmine_my_page/lib/my_page_patches/activities_controller_patch.rb:7:in `included'
/usr/local/src/redmine-4.0.4/plugins/redmine_my_page/init.rb:30:in `include'
/usr/local/src/redmine-4.0.4/plugins/redmine_my_page/init.rb:30:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
So, it's clear that the deprecated 'alias_method_chain' is the issue here. After some digging I found a lot of references online such as this one which is good and clear, but I just can't get code written that works - I keep getting syntax errors and can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
This is the original snippet from activities_controller_patch.rb:
module ActivitiesControllerPatch
def self.included(base) # :nodoc:
base.send(:include, InstanceMethods)
base.class_eval do
unloadable
helper :issues
helper :queries
alias_method_chain :index, :esi
end
end
We'd like to hang onto this plugin if we can even though it doesn't officially support Redmine 4. I'm hoping someone with better Ruby knowledge will be able to help.
Instead of
alias_method_chain :index, :esi
you'll just use
alias_method :index_without_esi, :index
alias_method :index, :index_with_esi
It was some kind of syntactic sugar.
I'm trying to set up the sinatra-authentication gem in a simple sinatra app, and running into an issue where sinatra can't find the correct views. I understand that sinatra-authentication uses haml by default, but I'm using erb in this app.
This in mind, I found in the sinatra-authenticaiton docs that there is a setting which allows you to change the template engine, by adding the following to your app file:
configure do
set :template_engine, :erb # for example
end
I've added this to my app.rb file, and sinatra is still looking for the signup.haml when I try to hit the /signup route in my app.
A couple of notes:
I've included the gem in my Gemfile, and successfuly run a bundle install on my app.
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'sinatra'
gem 'data_mapper'
gem 'pg'
gem 'dm-postgres-adapter'
gem 'sinatra-authentication'
I saw something in the documentation that suggested that I may need to specify the location of my view files, so I added the following to my configuration block.
set :sinatra_authentication_view_path, Pathname(__FILE__).dirname.expand_path + "views/"
**I think I've required the gem accurately in my app file by adding
require "sinatra-authentication"
use Rack::Session::Cookie, :secret => 'mys3cr3tk3y'
This gist is a current representation of my app.rb file in the root of my sinatra app. https://gist.github.com/rriggin/5378641#file-gistfile1-txt
Here is a screenshot of the error sinatra throws: http://cl.ly/image/0y041t0K3u3O
When I run the app locally, a 'dm-users' table is created in my local db as expected.
Is there another configuration setting that I'm missing in order to get sinatra-authentication to properly look for the erb templates rather than haml files. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
The specs don't test that the template_engine setting works, and looking at the way the setting is called, I believe it's not correct, i.e.
send settings.template_engine, get_view_as_string("index.#{settings.template_engine}"), :layout => use_layout?
might better work as:
send app.settings.template_engine, get_view_as_string("index.#{app.settings.template_engine}"), :layout => use_layout?
that's what I reckon. If you fork the project, change the line and add it to your Gemfile and it works then consider writing a quick spec for it and you'll have improved the mainline of that project as well as fixed your problem.
I recently have watched railscast 284 about active admin and wanted to implement it into my web app, however I am running into an issue when I add a resource. I get the following message every time I try to navigate to the created tab:
NameError in Admin::LoadsController#index
undefined local variable or method `per' for []:ActiveRecord::Relation
Rails.root: /Users/thomascioppettini/rails_projects/want-freight
Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace
Request
Parameters:
{"order"=>"id_desc"}
Show session dump
Show env dump
Response
Headers:
None
The only thing I can think of that may affect the application is adding a recaptcha to devise, which active admin depends on.
For me, it looks like this is a pagination problem. What gem are you using? You should give as more details about your settup. Can you show us your resource file from admin directory? What version of rails and what ActiveAdmin are you using ?
If you are using the will_paginate gem, set the version to 3.0.pre2. I was using ~>3.0.pre2, which auto-updated to 3.0.2 when I ran a bundle update Reverting fixed the issue. If you're using Bundler, the line is this:
gem "will_paginate", "3.0.pre2"
I agree with Dawaid. It is a pagiantion error. Add "Kaminari" gem to you Gemfile. According to active admin docs, it is using kaminari for pagination.. will_paginate will also work for you as swilliams described...
As I understand active_admin doesn't support will_paginate anymore. But if you don't want to rewrite your pagination to Kaminari you can fix this problem with putting some code to initializers
# config/initializers/will_paginate.rb
if defined?(WillPaginate)
module WillPaginate
module ActiveRecord
module RelationMethods
alias_method :per, :per_page
alias_method :num_pages, :total_pages
end
end
end
end
module ActiveRecord
class Relation
alias_method :total_count, :count
end
end
I'm trying to use both of PaperClip and ActiveScaffold with help of as_paperclip_bridge in a rails3.0.5 project.
However, following initialization error is occurred when I launch the project.
=> Booting WEBrick
=> Rails 3.0.5 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000
=> Call with -d to detach
=> Ctrl-C to shutdown server
Exiting
C:/Users/ken/Documents/NetBeansProjects/fcheck/vendor/plugins/as_paperclip_bridge/init.rb:10: undefined method bridge' for ActiveScaffold:Module (NoMethodError)
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/plugin.rb:81
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:ininstance_exec'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:in run'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/initializable.rb:50:inrun_initializers'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/initializable.rb:49:in each'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/initializable.rb:49:inrun_initializers'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/application.rb:134:in initialize!'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/application.rb:77:insend'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.5/lib/rails/application.rb:77:in method_missing'
from C:/Users/ken/Documents/NetBeansProjects/fcheck/config/environment.rb:7
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:239:inrequire'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:239:in require'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:inload_dependency'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:596:in new_constants_in'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:inload_dependency'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:239:in require'
from C:/Users/ken/Documents/NetBeansProjects/fcheck/config.ru:3
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.2.3/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:ininstance_eval'
from C:/Ruby187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.2.3/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:in initialize'
from C:/Users/ken/Documents/NetBeansProjects/fcheck/config.ru:1:innew'
from C:/Users/ken/Documents/NetBeansProjects/fcheck/config.ru:1
The code in as_paperclip_bridge\init.rb is attempting to call a module method 'ActiveScaffold.bridge' but it coun't be found.
Even though, same code is working without error in rails2.3.8 project.
We can see a big difference of rails initialization code between version 2 and 3.
On rails 2.3.8, plugins are loaded in 'load_plugins' method which is called after 'load_gems' method in initializer.rb. However, rails3 doesn't have initializer.rb and the loading process seems to be totally different.
I also have tried to remove AS gem and install both of AS plugin with as_paperclip_bridge plugin. But, the error haven't disappeared.
Could someone explain why the error is occurring?!
Anyway, I really hope to get any solution or workaround.
Thanks,
Kenichi
Self reply.
I had realized that as_paperclip_bridge was not required for latest ActiveScaffold implementation. (It's including the bridge)
Please make sure to install ImageMagick and RMagick gem to use PaperClip for image files. Or, you may also think 'as_paperclip_bridge should be there'
Thank you,
Kenichi
I had a working app, added Nokogiri, to parse some xml, runs fine locally.
My Gemfile includes: gem 'nokogiri'
I ran bundle install and verified my Gemfile.lock includes DEPENDENCIES ... nokogiri
In my controller class I added (didnt thinkI had to but got an error locally if I didnt):
class MydealController < ApplicationController
require 'rubygems'
require 'open-uri'
require 'nokogiri'
when I use my browser to get the url in MydealController that uses nokogiri doc = Nokogiri::XML(getresult) Heroku crashes.
heroku logs shows this error No such file to load -- nokogiri (LoadError)
Looking at what happens when I git push heroku I do not see nokogiri on the list of many many gems that get installed. Heroku says the push was fine, but nokogiri is not listed and I get the aforementioned error...
It seems that when using Windows Gemfile.lock will contain version of nokogiri gem specific for windows, solution is to remove Gemfile.lock and push to heroku.
More info on this subject here
Your mission should you choose to accept it.
Ensure:
nokogiri is in Gemfile.lock
Gemfile.lock is committed to git
you push the commit that has nokogiri in Gemfile.lock to Heroku
Good luck! This message will self destruct in 10 seconds...
Just had the same problem -- you have to run bundle install to get it added to the Gemfile.lock which heroku looks at to find uninstalled dependencies.
This might help to understand the reason:
http://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/ps
Indeed removing Gemfile.lock might help. All other compiled gem will cause isseu. Best way is to ask Heroku's support.
Only found this article:
http://ganeshprasadsr.blogspot.com/2010/10/installing-nokogiri-for-rails-3-app-on.html
Try to remove require 'nokogiri' from controller.
It works for me.