Input Excel/CSV:
SQL Query: -
select 'WWW' as COLUMN_NAME,
(case when to_char (max(WWW)) = to_char(min(WWW)) and to_char(count(WWW)) = count(*) or to_char(max(WWW)) is null then 'same' else 'diff'end)as COMPARISION_VALUE, to_char(max(WWW))as TRANSACTION1, to_char(min(WWW))as TRANSACTION2
from ABC
where Book ='123' and UPDATE_DATE='01-JUN-18';
Note: - I am looking to put this SQL query in loop where first row will pass into the SQL query, then it will check the 2nd row, if the cell is blank it will consider the top most value and COLUMN_NAME will iterate as much we have specified. All the above 4 columns should be parameter.
***Output Console: -***
COLUMN_NAME COMPARISION_VALUE TRANSACTION1 TRANSACTION2
WWW same test test
Expected Output: - I want to save all the transaction in excel/CSV one by one
Please find the attached doc for complete Details
Your question concatenates Excel/CSV as through they're the same thing. They are not. Excel is a very different thing from CSV. Consequently they are two different requirements.
Excel is a binary format which makes it hard to integrate with SQL (although there are third party libraries which can help). CSV is open and text-based, so it's a lot simpler. With an external table you can query a CSV using SQL. Find out more.
As for output, you've tagged your question [plsqldeveloper]. That is the tag for the Allround Automations IDE, which already has excellent capabilities for exporting to Excel or CSV. If you are using that tool you should not reinvent its features. Oracle SQL Developer also already does this (and I suspect TOAD and most of the other IDEs out there do too).
I've discovered the SQL VIEW in Ms Access to execute some queries, but I need to execute about 20.000 UPDATE queries I have in a .sql file.
When I paste in the SQL VIEW it says the "Text is too long to modify".
How can I run those UPDATE's ?
The limit to the number of characters in an Access SQL query is "about 64000" - see here https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Access-2010-specifications-HA010341462.aspx. And unfortunately you cannot execute multiple statements in a query. I think this will mean quite a bit of work for you in VBA. Here is an example approach (pseudocode):-
open file
read line into variable
while not EOF
currentdb.execute variable, dbfailonerror
read next line
wend
close file
Probably a nasty surprise for you if you are used to executing huge batches of statements using other RDBMS!
An alternative suggestion: we don't know exactly what your file looks like or where it comes from, but if it is generated from another RDBMS which you have access to, then I would very strongly recommend that you set up an ODBC connection to it, and query out the data you need (either by linking the tables or writing a pass through query), then inserting into your local Access tables. This will be many orders of magnitude faster than executing thousands of individual statements.
If your only source of the data is the SQL statements then you may still be better of if you can parse the SQL text into relevant columns (for example PK, and value to be updated, or if inserting, then all column values), then save as a csv file, import into Access, add keys as necessary, and then run a single update statement as an updateable query against the imported data and the existing tables. Dumping the file into Excel and using the various string functions may enable you to parse the data quite quickly.
There may be an easier way but you could write VBA code that reads the text file line by line and then uses DoCmd.RunSQL to run each query.
I have a table with a 'query' field containing a select sql and another 'parameters' field containing the sql parameters. I have merged these two fields into a new field containing a correct select sql statement. Now I need to execute this new field containing select sql, get the return from select (the output fields) and generate an excel file.
Use Table-Input if you are interested in a query result set. Table-Input supports SQL parameters, so no need to build the statement yourself using e.g. Replace-In-String, and tripping over escapes on your way. Also, there's variable substitution, just in case you can't live with a single template.
Update 21:14 GMT
I'm not very fond of the way you try to prepare the SELECT statement, but here we go, assuming it's a single statement we have:
Create a job with a Start entry and 2 Transformation entries (T1, T2). Let T1 produce the field containing your SELECT statement and use a Set-Variables step to make the statement available to T2 as variable SELECT. In T2 use a Table-Input step referencing ${SELECT} in the SQL statement text area. Don't forget to enable option "Replace variables in script".
From now on it's a matter of taste. I would prefer to create a CSV file using Text-File-Output. Using the right field separator Excel will open the file after double-clicking it. The advantage of Text-File-Output is that you don't have to specify the fields you don't know at design-time anyway. An empty field list will just handle all fields coming in. Comparable to the total projection in a Table-Input which will create the necessary fields from the retrieved columns downstream.
If you must produce an Excel workbook, you'll have to learn about metadata injection. That would be a separate project for a beginner, though. There are samples in your Kettle installation folder. And there is a very active community if you find yourself in trouble.
I have the following problem, i have a SQL file to execute with DBI CPAN module Perl
I saw two solution on this website to solve my problem.
Read SQL file line by line
Read SQL file in one instruction
So, which one is better, and what the real difference between each solution ?
EDIT
It's for a library. I need to retrieve output and the return code.
Kind of files passed might be as following:
set serveroutput on;
set pagesize 20000;
spool "&1."
DECLARE
-- Récupération des arguments
-- &2: FLX_REF, &3: SVR_ID, &4: ACQ_STT, &5: ACQ_LOG, &6: FLX_COD_DOC, &7: ACQ_NEL, &8: ACQ_TYP
VAR_FLX_REF VARCHAR2(100):=&2;
VAR_SVR_ID NUMBER(10):=&3;
VAR_ACQ_STT NUMBER(4):=&4;
VAR_ACQ_LOG VARCHAR2(255):=&5;
VAR_FLX_COD_DOC VARCHAR2(30):=&6;
VAR_ACQ_NEL NUMBER(10):=&7;
VAR_ACQ_TYP NUMBER:=&8;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO ACQUISITION_CFT
(ACQ_ID, FLX_REF, SVR_ID, ACQ_DATE, ACQ_STT, ACQ_LOG, FLX_COD_DOC, ACQ_NEL, ACQ_TYP)
VALUES
(TRACKING.SEQ_ACQUISITION_CFT.NEXTVAL, ''VAR_FLX_REF'',
''VAR_SVR_ID'', sysdate, VAR_ACQ_STT, ''VAR_ACQ_LOG'',
''VAR_FLX_COD_DOC'', VAR_ACQ_NEL, VAR_ACQ_TYP);
END;
/
exit;
I have another question to ask, again with DBI Oracle module.
May i use the same code for SQL file and for Control file ?
(Example of SQL Control file)
LOAD DATA
APPEND INTO TABLE DOSSIER
FIELDS TERMINATED BY ';'
(
DSR_IDT,
DSR_CNL,
DSR_PRQ,
DSR_CEN,
DSR_FEN,
DSR_AN1,
DSR_AN2,
DSR_AN3,
DSR_AN4,
DSR_AN5,
DSR_AN6,
DSR_PI1,
DSR_PI2,
DSR_PI3,
DSR_PI4,
DSR_NP1,
DSR_NP2,
DSR_NP3,
DSR_NP4,
DSR_NFL,
DSR_NPG,
DSR_LTP,
DSR_FLF,
DSR_CLR,
DSR_MIM,
DSR_TIM,
DSR_NDC,
DSR_EMS NULLIF DSR_EMS=BLANKS "sysdate",
JOB_IDT,
DSR_STT,
DSR_DAQ "CASE WHEN :DSR_DAQ IS NOT NULL THEN SYSDATE ELSE NULL END"
)
Reading a table one row at a time is more complex, but it can use less memory - provided you structure your code to make use of the data per item and not need it all later.
Often you want to process each item separately (e.g. to do work on the data), in which case you might as well use the read line-by-line approach to define your loop.
I tend to use single-instruction approach by default, but as soon as I am concerned about number of records (especially in long-running batch processes), or need to loop through the data as the first task, then I read records one-by-one.
In fact, the two answers you reference propose the same solution, to read and execute line-by-line (but the first is clearer on the point). The second question has an optional answer, where the file contains a single statement.
If you don't execute the SQL line-by-line, it's very difficult to trap any errors.
"Line by line" only makes sense if each SQL statement is on a single line. You probably mean statement by statement.
Beyond that, it depends on what your SQL file looks like and what you want to do.
How complex is your SQL file? Could it contain things like this?
select foo from table where column1 = 'bar;'; --Get foo; it will be used later.
The simple way to read an SQL file statement by statement is to split by semicolons (or whatever the statement delimiter is). But this method will fail if you might have semicolons in other places, like comments or strings. If you split this statement by semicolons, you would try to execute the following four "commands":
select foo from table where column1 = 'bar;
';
--Get foo;
it will be used later.
Obviously, none of these are valid. Handling statements like this correctly is no simple matter. You have to completely parse SQL to figure out what the statements are. Unfortunately, there is no ready-made module that can do this for you (SQL::Script is a good start on an SQL file processing module, but according to the documentation it just splits on semicolons at this point).
If your SQL file is simple, not containing any statement delimiters within statements or comments; or if it is predictable in some other way (such as having one statement per line), then it is easy to split the file into statements and execute them one by one. But if you have to handle arbitrary SQL syntax, including cases such as above, this will be a complex task.
What kind of task?
Do you need to retrieve the output?
Is it important to detect errors in any individual statement, or is it just a batch job that you can run and not worry about it?
If this is something that you can just run and forget about, you could just have Perl execute a system command, telling Oracle to process the file. This will be simpler than handling all of the statements yourself. But if you need to process the results or handle errors within Perl, doing it yourself statement by statement will be a necessity.
Update: based on your response, you want to write a library that can handle arbitrary SQL statements. In that case, you definitely need to parse the SQL and execute the statements one at a time. This is do-able, but not simple. The possibility of BEGIN...END blocks means that you have to be able to correctly handle semicolons within a statement.
The SQL::Statement class of modules may be helpful.
is there a simple way to just output each record in a select statement to write to its own file?
for example, if you have the tsql query in sql server 2005,
select top 10 items, names + ':' + address from book
and you ended up with 10 text files with the individual name and addresses in each file.
is there a way to do this without writing an extensive spWriteStringToFile procedure? I'm hoping there is some kind of output setting or something in the select statement.
thanks in advance
SQL returns the result set first, there's no opportunity in there for writing records to specific files until afterwards.
Being SQL Server 2005, it's possible you could use a SQLCLR (.NET 2.0 code) function in a SQL statement without having to make a separate application.
In SSMS, you can do a results to file, but that wouldnt split each record out into its own file. I pretty sure you cannot do this out of the box, so it sounds like you will be rolling your own solution.
You'd do this in some client, be it Java, VBA or SSIS typically.