Dynamic grid using FlashDevelop & Actionscript 2.0 - actionscript-2

I'm new to actionscript. What I'm tryin to do is simulate traffic flow near a 2 lane intersection, following Wolfram's rule 184. To begin with, I'm trying to create a grid (8x8 of which the intersection is between the middle two rows and the middle two columns, like a plus sign) whose cells have the following attributes:
color = white;
car = false;
when clicked:
color = red;
car = true (a car is present);
So, after the user clicks cells to position the cars initially and presses the start button, the simulation will begin.
Here's my code so far (apologies for incorrect formatting):
class Main
{
private var parent:MovieClip;
public static function main(mc:MovieClip)
{
var app = new Main(mc);
}
public function Main(mc:MovieClip)
{
this.parent = mc;
//grid settings
var Cell:MovieClip = mc.createEmptyMovieClip("cell", mc.getNextHighestDepth());
var x:Number = 0;
var y:Number = 0;
var color:Number = 0xffffff;
var car:Boolean = false;
for (y = 0; y < 3 * Stage.height / 8; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 3*Stage.width/8; x < 5*Stage.width/8; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8) - 5, (Stage.height / 8) - 5, color, 100);
}
}
for (y = 3*Stage.height/8; y < 5 * Stage.height / 8; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 0; x < Stage.width; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8)-5, (Stage.height / 8)-5, color, 100);
}
}
for (y = 5*Stage.height/8; y < Stage.height; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 3*Stage.width/8; x < 5*Stage.width/8; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8)-5, (Stage.height / 8)-5, color, 100);
}
}
Cell.onMouseDown()
{
Cell.color = UI.RED;
Cell.car = true;
}
}
}
I know there's quite a few things gone wrong here. First of all, the cell color doesn't change on mouse down. Do i need to make movie clip for each cell in the for loops? I think it would be easier to make a grid of objects with given attributes, but i don't know how to do that. Would really appreciate if someone helps me out.

From what I can tell, issue with your current approach is that using drawRect() literally draws pixels on to the stage, which means you'll have no reference to those shapes in future frames. right now, you've got one MovieClip that has been drawn many times. What you need is a lot of MovieClips so you have a reference to each cell that you can update/edit every frame.
Your best bet is to do the following (I'll just provide pseudo because I'm a bit shaky on AS2 syntax):
A) Create an array to hold all of the Cells. Call it:
var Cells:Array = new Array();
B) During each step of the loops in your constructor, do 4 things.
1) Create a new MovieClip `var tempCell:MovieClip = new MovieClip();
2) Draw a rectangle on to each MovieClip: A tutorial for the graphics API in AS2 http://www.actionscript.org/resources/articles/727/1/Drawing-shapes-with-AS2/Page1.html
3) Add an event listenerto each MovieClip that points to a common event handler. This listener listens for mouse clicks on that MovieClip (or MOUSE_DOWN)
4) and use Cells.push(tempClip) to add that new MovieClip to your array so you now have one object that contains a reference to all of your cells.
C) Create an click event handler that redraws the cell that has been clicked. Try MouseEvent.target
You have another option to using the graphics API to draw rectangles, and that is to simply add and remove stock graphics from your Flash library. You'll have to draw these graphics in Flash and then 'Export for Actionscript' to call them up.
Hope this points you in the right direction!
J

Related

Godot Inversing selected rectangle area made up of two Vector2 objects

This seems like a really simple question but I've been at this for a couple of hours and need an outsiders perspective.
I'm migrating a start of a game to Godot from Unity.
I'm selecting an area of tiles (startDragPosition, endDragPosition, both Vector2 objects) from a TileMap and setting them to a certain tile. Currently the dragging only works if the direction is top->bottom and left->right, so if the ending x and y are larger than the starting x and y
In Unity(C#) I had a few simple lines to flip the rectangle values if it was dragged in reverse.
if (end_x < start_x) {
int tmp = end_x;
end_x = start_x;
start_x = tmp;
}
if (end_y < start_y) {
int tmp = end_y;
end_y = start_y;
start_y = tmp;
}
However in when I try a similar approach in Godot it is not working for some reason. I'm thinking that I'm messing up somewhere earlier and any help would be appreciated. If there is an easier way of doing this please tell me I'm fairly new to Godot itself.
Here is the function responsible for dragging in my Godot script(GD)
func Drag():
if(Input.is_action_just_pressed("click")):
startDragPosition=get_global_mouse_position()
if(Input.is_action_pressed("click")):
endDragPosition=get_global_mouse_position()
print("01 START: "+String(stepify(startDragPosition.x-8,16)/16)+"_"+String(stepify(startDragPosition.y-8,16)/16))
print("01 END: "+String(stepify(endDragPosition.x-8,16)/16)+"_"+String(stepify(endDragPosition.y-8,16)/16))
if(endDragPosition.x<startDragPosition.x):
var temp = endDragPosition.x
endDragPosition.x=startDragPosition.x
startDragPosition.x=temp
if(endDragPosition.y<startDragPosition.y):
var temp = endDragPosition.y
endDragPosition.y=startDragPosition.y
startDragPosition.y=temp
for x in range(startDragPosition.x,endDragPosition.x):
for y in range(startDragPosition.y,endDragPosition.y):
get_node("../DragPreview").set_cell((stepify(x-8,16))/16,(stepify(y-8,16))/16,0)
#get_node("../DragPreview").update_bitmask_area(Vector2((stepify(x-8,16))/16,(stepify(y-8,16))/16))
if(Input.is_action_just_released("click")):
print("START: "+String(stepify(startDragPosition.x-8,16)/16)+"_"+String(stepify(startDragPosition.y-8,16)/16))
print("END: "+String(stepify(endDragPosition.x-8,16)/16)+"_"+String(stepify(endDragPosition.y-8,16)/16))
startDragPosition=null
endDragPosition=null
When you drag, you always write to endDragPosition.
When you drag to the left or drag up, and you update endDragPosition, it will have smaller coordinates than it had before. Because of that you swap the coordinates with startDragPosition… And then you keep dragging left or up, and that updates endDragPosition again. The original startDragPosition is lost.
Either you work with a copy when you are deciding the start and end:
var start = startDragPosition
var end = endDragPosition
if(end.x<start.x):
var temp = end.x
end.x=start.x
start.x=temp
if(end.y<start.y):
var temp = end.y
end.y=start.y
start.y=temp
for x in range(start.x,end.x):
for y in range(start.y,end.y):
# whatever
pass
Or you forget this swapping shenanigans, and give the loops a step:
var start = startDragPosition
var end = endDragPosition
for x in range(start.x,end.x,sign(end.x-start.x)):
for y in range(start.y,end.y,sign(end.y-start.y)):
# whatever
pass

Best way to do object collision?

I'm trying to do wall collision for objects and I've followed a tutorial that offers one method of doing collision.
This is the tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZU1QJJdxgs
Currently, if the object detects a wall, instead of moving it's full distance, it moves pixel by pixel until it's against the wall. This worked well until I started trying to rotate the object with image_rotate, because it caused objects to get stuck in walls by either sliding against them or if they rotated into them.
I fixed this by using draw_sprite_ext instead and changing the rotation of the sprite itself and not the mask, which worked for about 20 minutes until it started causing more problems.
///obj_player Step
//Initialise Variables
hor_speed = 0;
ver_speed = 0;
accelerationspeed = 0.2;
decelerationspeed = 0.2;
maxspeed = 3;
pointdirection = 0;
//Get player's input
key_right = keyboard_check(ord("D"))
key_left = -keyboard_check(ord("A"))
key_up = -keyboard_check(ord("W"))
key_down = keyboard_check(ord("S"))
pointdirection = point_direction(x,y,mouse_x,mouse_y) + 270
hor_movement = key_left + key_right;
ver_movement = key_up + key_down;
//horizontal acceleration
if !(abs(hor_speed) >= maxspeed) {
hor_speed += hor_movement * accelerationspeed;
}
//horizontal deceleration
if (hor_movement = 0) {
if !(hor_speed = 0) {
hor_speed -= (sign(hor_speed) * decelerationspeed)
}
}
//vertical acceleration
if !(abs(ver_speed) >= maxspeed) {
ver_speed += ver_movement * accelerationspeed;
}
//vertical deceleration
if (ver_movement = 0) {
if !(ver_speed = 0) {
ver_speed -= (sign(ver_speed) * decelerationspeed)
}
}
//horizontal collision
if (place_meeting(x+hor_speed,y,obj_wall)) {
while(!place_meeting(x+sign(hor_speed),y,obj_wall)) {
x += sign(hor_speed);
}
hor_speed = 0;
}
//vertical collision
if (place_meeting(x,y+ver_speed,obj_wall)) {
while(!place_meeting(x,y+sign(ver_speed),obj_wall)) {
y += sign(ver_speed);
}
ver_speed = 0;
}
//move the player
x += hor_speed;
y += ver_speed;
///obj_player Draw
//rotate to look at cursor
draw_sprite_ext(spr_player, 0, x,y,image_xscale,image_yscale, pointdirection, image_blend, image_alpha);
I think the best way to rotate objects is through image_rotate, and I'd like to do it without getting stuff stuck in walls. Can my current method of collision be adapted to do this, or should I attempt to do it in a different way?
Your code looks fine, but if you're going to be rotating objects then you would also need to consider having a "knock back mechanic." Reason being is the player could be sitting next to this wall and if you rotate the object over them so they cant move, its not a fun time being stuck.
So you 'could' have the object that's rotating do a check before rotating and if objects are in the way then either stop it or push them back so they cant be within range.

Unable to detect if a rectangle is touched in libgdx

I have a rectangle with a sprite on it and I have to detect if the touch position lies within the rectangle.
This is my code,
if (Gdx.input.isTouched())
{
int x1 = Gdx.input.getX();
int y1 = Gdx.input.getY();
Vector3 inputs = new Vector3(x1, y1, 0);
gamecam.unproject(inputs);
Gdx.app.log("x" + inputs.x, "y" + inputs.y);
Gdx.app.log("rect" + rectangle.x, "rect" + rectangle.y);
if(rectangle.contains(inputs.x,inputs.y))
{
Gdx.app.log("x" + inputs.x, "y" + inputs.y);
Gdx.app.log("rect" + rectangle, "rect" + rectangle.y);
}
}
Rectangle definition,
BodyDef bdef = new BodyDef();
bdef.type = BodyDef.BodyType.StaticBody;
b2body = screen.getWorld().createBody(bdef);
rectangle = new Rectangle();
rectangle.setHeight(55);
rectangle.setWidth(55);
PolygonShape head = new PolygonShape();
rectangle.setX(300);
rectangle.setY(10);
bdef.position.set((rectangle.getX() - rectangle.getWidth() / 2) / MyJungleGame.PPM, (rectangle.getY() - rectangle.getHeight() / 2) / MyJungleGame.PPM);
head.setAsBox(rectangle.getWidth() / 2 / MyJungleGame.PPM, rectangle.getHeight() / 2 / MyJungleGame.PPM);
FixtureDef fdef = new FixtureDef();
fdef.shape = head;
setPosition(b2body.getPosition().x - getWidth() / 2, b2body.getPosition().y - getHeight() / 2);
This is my output,
The small rectangle at the bottom of the screen is the rectangle I created. But, nothing happens when I click it. I checked the coordinates and here is the log,
x-0.925: y-0.5625
rect300.0: rect10.0
x-0.925: y-0.5625
rect300.0: rect10.0
x-0.925: y-0.5625
I tried checking the touch using the below method,
if (inputs.x > sprite.getX() && inputs.x < sprite.getX() + sprite.getWidth())
{
if (inputs.y > sprite.getY() && inputs.y < sprite.getY() + sprite.getHeight())
{
Gdx.app.log("sprite touched", "");
}
}
This too doesn't work. Any idea where I made the mistake ? Please help . Thanks in advance
Since you are using Box2D, to detect collisions via the common way is more complicated to new users.
However, looking on your code...
I would advice taking this coordinates in consideration with PPM of your world :
int x1 = Gdx.input.getX();
int y1 = Gdx.input.getY();
Vector3 inputs = new Vector3(x1, y1, 0);
Also, If you are going to build a collision system with box2d, you should use this : http://www.aurelienribon.com/blog/2011/07/box2d-tutorial-collision-filtering/

BabylonJS - Remove smooth animation on the camera

I'm using BabylonJS to make a little game.
I'm using this code to build a camera :
this.cam = new BABYLON.FreeCamera("playerCamera", new BABYLON.Vector3(x, y, z), s);
this.cam.checkCollisions = true;
this.cam.applyGravity = false;
this.cam.keysUp = [90]; // Z
this.cam.keysDown = [83]; // S
this.cam.keysLeft = [81]; // Q
this.cam.keysRight = [68]; // D
this.cam.speed = v;
this.cam.ellipsoid = new BABYLON.Vector3(1, h, 1);
this.cam.angularSensibility = a;
And it works, i have a camera, i can move around ect ...
But my problem is here : by default they are a smooth animation when a move and when i change the orientation of the camera.
Let me explain : When i move with my arrow keys (aproximately 20 pixels to the left) it will go to 25 pixels (20 pixels + 5 smooths pixels).
I don't want it :/ Do you know how o disable it ? (To move and change orientation of the camera).
This is due to the inertia defined in the free camera.
To remove this "smooth" movements, simply disable inertia:
this.cam.inertia = 0;

Count colors in image: `NSCountedSet` and `colorAtX` are very slow

I'm making an OS X app which creates a color scheme from the main colors of an image.
As a first step, I'm using NSCountedSet and colorAtX to get all the colors from an image and count their occurrences:
func sampleImage(#width: Int, height: Int, imageRep: NSBitmapImageRep) -> (NSCountedSet, NSCountedSet) {
// Store all colors from image
var colors = NSCountedSet(capacity: width * height)
// Store the colors from left edge of the image
var leftEdgeColors = NSCountedSet(capacity: height)
// Loop over the image pixels
var x = 0
var y = 0
while x < width {
while y < height {
// Instruments shows that `colorAtX` is very slow
// and using `NSCountedSet` is also very slow
if let color = imageRep.colorAtX(x, y: y) {
if x == 0 {
leftEdgeColors.addObject(color)
}
colors.addObject(color)
}
y++
}
// Reset y every x loop
y = 0
// We sample a vertical line every x pixels
x += 1
}
return (colors, leftEdgeColors)
}
My problem is that this is very slow. In Instruments, I see there's two big bottlenecks: with NSCountedSet and with colorAtX.
So first I thought maybe replace NSCountedSet by a pure Swift equivalent, but the new implementation was unsurprisingly much slower than NSCountedSet.
For colorAtX, there's this interesting SO answer but I haven't been able to translate it to Swift (and I can't use a bridging header to Objective-C for this project).
My problem when trying to translate this is I don't understand the unsigned char and char parts in the answer.
What should I try to scan the colors faster than with colorAtX?
Continue working on adapting the Objective-C answer because it's a good answer? Despite being stuck for now, maybe I can achieve this later.
Use another Foundation/Cocoa method that I don't know of?
Anything else that I could try to improve my code?
TL;DR
colorAtX is slow, and I don't understand how to adapt this Objective-C answer to Swift because of unsigned char.
The fastest alternative to colorAtX() would be iterating over the raw bytes of the image using let bitmapBytes = imageRep.bitmapData and composing the colour yourself from that information, which should be really simple if it's just RGBA data. Instead of your for x/y loop, do something like this...
let bitmapBytes = imageRep.bitmapData
var colors = Dictionary<UInt32, Int>()
var index = 0
for _ in 0..<(width * height) {
let r = UInt32(bitmapBytes[index++])
let g = UInt32(bitmapBytes[index++])
let b = UInt32(bitmapBytes[index++])
let a = UInt32(bitmapBytes[index++])
let finalColor = (r << 24) + (g << 16) + (b << 8) + a
if colors[finalColor] == nil {
colors[finalColor] = 1
} else {
colors[finalColor]!++
}
}
You will have to check the order of the RGBA values though, I just guessed!
The quickest way to maintain a count might just be a [Int, Int] dictionary of pixel values to counts, doing something like colors[color]++. Later on if you need to you can convert that to a NSColor using NSColor(calibratedRed red: CGFloat, green green: CGFloat, blue blue: CGFloat, alpha alpha: CGFloat)