In my application, I need to talk to multiple databases. I am handling this in NHibernate by creating one SessionFactory per database (I assume this is the correct thing to do). So I have two sets of models (one per database), and two sets of Fluent NHibernate ClassMap<> mappings. Both are in the same project (separated by namespace) and I'd like to keep it that way.
The problem comes when creating the SessionFactory. As far as I can see, Fluent NHibernate has basically two methods for adding mappings:
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<UserClassMap>())
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.Add<UserClassMap>()
If I use the first overload, then my session factories get all the mappings for both databases. If I use the second, I have to specify each individual ClassMap. I'd like something like FluentMappings.AddFromNamespace(). Is there a way to do this?
It's odd that FluentNHibernate supports this type of filtering for automapping, but not for ClassMaps. It shouldn't be too hard to add this feature yourself, though, via the magic of extension methods. Try this:
public static FluentMappingsContainer AddFromAssemblyOf<T>(
this FluentMappingsContainer mappings,
Predicate<Type> where)
{
if (where == null)
return mappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<T>();
var mappingClasses = typeof(T).Assembly.GetExportedTypes()
.Where(x => (typeof(IMappingProvider).IsAssignableFrom(x)
|| typeof(IExternalComponentMappingProvider).IsAssignableFrom(x))
&& where(x));
foreach (var type in mappingClasses)
{
mappings.Add(type);
}
return mappings;
}
... and use it like this:
m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<UserClassMap>(t => t.Namespace.StartsWith("One.Of.The.Two.Namespaces"));
I wound up writing an extension method that does this for me. Basically it uses reflection to iterate over all the types I'm interested in, and add them one-by-one. It is based on the implementation of AddFromAssemblyOf. Usage:
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromNamespaceOf<UserClassMap>())
Implementation:
public static class FluentNHibernateExtensions
{
public static FluentMappingsContainer AddFromNamespaceOf<T>(
this FluentMappingsContainer fmc)
{
string ns = typeof(T).Namespace;
IEnumerable<Type> types = typeof(T).Assembly.GetExportedTypes()
.Where(t => t.Namespace == ns)
.Where(x => IsMappingOf<IMappingProvider>(x) ||
IsMappingOf<IIndeterminateSubclassMappingProvider>(x) ||
IsMappingOf<IExternalComponentMappingProvider>(x) ||
IsMappingOf<IFilterDefinition>(x));
foreach(Type t in types) {
fmc.Add(t);
}
return fmc;
}
/// <summary>
/// Private helper method cribbed from FNH source (PersistenModel.cs:151)
/// </summary>
private static bool IsMappingOf<T>(Type type)
{
return !type.IsGenericType && typeof(T).IsAssignableFrom(type);
}
}
Caveats:
The name is a little misleading, since it only searches one assembly. It should perhaps be called AddFromAssemblyAndNamespaceOf, but that's a little verbose.
It is not entirely future-proof. If future versions of FNH add or remove some of the mappable interfaces, it wouldn't include them.
But it works for my purposes.
... AutoMap.AssemblyOf<Person>().Where(x => x.Namespace.EndsWith("Domain")) ...
There is no way to do this. I recommend separating the namespaces out into separate projects. Remember:
Separate namespaces, same project when logical separation makes sense.
Separate namespaces, separate projects when physical separation makes sense.
In this case, since you can't separate by namespace in nhibernate mappings, physical separation makes sense. You can, however, get around this with with fluent automaps that use a .Where or a ShouldMap configuration. Look up fluent automaps and see if that can get you where you want to be.
Related
I use NHibernate for a dynamic website that its modules can be loaded dynamically, so when I want to build a sessionFactory, I use a way to find all assemblies and sort them with their dependencies
after all, I add them to Configuration instance I created and it works.
Now I want to change configuration type from hbm.xml files to fluent
I added below codes:
sessionFactory =
Fluently
.Configure()
.Database(
FluentNHibernate.Cfg.Db.MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008.ConnectionString(
c => c.FromAppSetting("connectionString")
)
)
.Mappings(
m => m.AutoMappings.Add(
AutoMap.Assemblies(
new FarayanConfig(),
assembliesArray
)
)
).BuildSessionFactory();
FarayanConfig is:
class FarayanConfig : DefaultAutomappingConfiguration
{
public override bool ShouldMap(Type type)
{
return type.Name.EndsWith("Entity");
}
public override bool IsVersion(FluentNHibernate.Member member)
{
return member.Name == "Version";
}
}
also I have a class in an assembly that will be loaded by this code (notice that assembly is not referenced, will be loaded dynamically) with a class named ControlEntity and also another class:
public class ControlEntityMap : ClassMap<ControlEntity>
{
public ControlEntityMap()
{
HasMany(x => x.Properties).Component(c => {
c.Map(v => v.Culture);
c.Map(v => v.Name);
c.Map(v => v.Value);
});
}
}
now the problem is constructor of ControlEntityMap will not execute!
what I must do?
Because of you are trying to use AutoMap.
You can use something like this:
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(Assembly.Load("your assembly name")))
Update:
You are doing right by ovverride DefaultAutomappingConfiguration for this situation but also you are trying to AutoMap all classes which ones end with "Entity" and your class which one you want to ignore it from AutoMap also ends with "Entity". I think you can seperate your classes in different namespaces and declare it in your ShouldMap property.
And there are some information in FluentNhibenate Wiki:
You can ignore base types by simply excluding them from your
ShouldMap(Type) method, that's sometimes the cleanest option; however,
if you want to be a bit more explicit you can use the IgnoreBase
method.
After AutoMap.AssemblyOf() we need to alter the conventions
that the auto mapper is using so it can identify our base-class.
AutoMap.AssemblyOf(cfg) .IgnoreBase();
We've added the IgnoreBase call which simply instructs the
automapper to ignore the Entity class; you can chain this call as many
times as needed.
I am trying to detect HasManyToMany relationships in entities at run-time for testing purposes. I've had many problems with people writing bad mappings so I wrote a test to test every single mapping on our continuous integration server.
Right now I can test every entity, composite and non-composite by detecting the mapped Id property(s) and calling .Get() or a composite getter. Most of which is done using reflection. I am using GetClassMetadata while going over every entity type.
But I missed testing something that was broken, a HasManyToMany.
I am using Fluent NHibernate, and the mapping is:
mapping.HasManyToMany<ServiceType>(x => x.ServiceTypes)
.Schema("Marketplace")
.Table("ListingServiceTypes")
.ParentKeyColumn("PackageID")
.ChildKeyColumn("ServiceTypeID")
.Cascade.SaveUpdate().LazyLoad();
Now since there is no entity to "test" this relationship with, I do not run over it.
What I need to know is how can I find the properties of an object that are mapped with "HasManyToMany". I can invoke them just fine, if I could only detect them.
I do not want to have to force lazy loading of every collection because if the mapping for the individual entities are correct, the mappings will be, because we use conventions for them.
Get the source code of FluentNHibernate, and copy to your project HasManyToManyStep.cs (FluentNHibernate.Automapping.Steps)
Add your logic to ShouldMap() method. This method is called by FNH to detect Many To Many relations. You can alter the way many to many relations are determined (for example by an attribute). In your case you want probably add a an attribute by reflection to tag the properties...
Replace the default step with your new one :
public class MyMappingConfiguration : DefaultAutomappingConfiguration
{
public override IEnumerable<IAutomappingStep> GetMappingSteps(AutoMapper mapper, IConventionFinder conventionFinder)
{
var steps = base.GetMappingSteps(mapper, conventionFinder);
var finalSteps = steps.Where(c => c.GetType() != typeof(FluentNHibernate.Automapping.Steps.HasManyToManyStep)).ToList();
var idx = finalSteps.IndexOf(steps.Where(c => c.GetType() == typeof(PropertyStep)).First());
finalSteps.Insert(idx + 1, new MyCustomHasManyStep(this));
return finalSteps;
}
}
Had to do this today.
var CollectionMetaData = SessionFactory.GetCollectionMetadata(T.FullName + '.' + info.Name);
if (CollectionMetaData is NHibernate.Persister.Collection.BasicCollectionPersister)
{
if (((NHibernate.Persister.Collection.BasicCollectionPersister)CollectionMetaData).IsManyToMany)
{
//Do something.
}
}
where T is the Type and info is the property info from T.GetProperties()
I'm taking a complicated legacy schema and mapping it with Fluent NHibernate. The schema is wacky enough that I've given up on automapping; the relationships between tables are weird and complicated, and it would involve a ton of exceptions.
The thing is, the simple properties are totally normal; a table's Title column maps to that entity's Title property, and so on. But because I've opted out of global automapping, there doesn't seem to be a way to avoid mapping each of my string and integer properties on every class. I find myself wanting something like
class SomeMapping : ClassMap<SomeEntity>
{
public SomeMapping()
{
MapEverythingSimple();
}
}
Before I build something complicated that reflectively emits lambda expressions (or somesuch), am I just missing an obvious feature?
How about using automapping and then overrides where things don't fit conventions?
I don't think it's too much of a burden. You'll need to specify the complex relationships
that don't fit a convention somewhere anyhow.
Or you can try NHibernate Mapping Generator to generate NHibernate mapping files and corresponding domain classes from existing DB tables:
http://nmg.codeplex.com/
Use the trial version of Visual NHibernate to quickly generate your entity classes and Fluent mappings, then take it from there. Disclaimer: I work for Slyce Software.
This is not what I ended up doing, but for posterity, here's how you can map properties automatically without using an automapper:
public class PropMap<V> : ClassMap<V>
{
public PropMap()
{
foreach (var propInfo in typeof(V).GetProperties()
.Where(p => simpleTypes.Contains(p.PropertyType)))
{
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(V), "x");
Map(Expression.Lambda<Func<V, object>>(
Expression.Convert(Expression.MakeMemberAccess(param, propInfo), typeof(object)), param));
}
}
private static readonly Type[] simpleTypes = new[]
{
typeof (DateTime),
typeof (String),
typeof (int),
typeof (long),
typeof (Enum)
};
}
And then just have the map classes inherit from that. Obviously, it has some serious flaws, and I didn't go with it.
I've configured Fluent NHibernate to map the entities in my project. None of my entities expose public properties (except their Id), all of their data is stored in private fields.
By using:
public override bool ShouldMap(Member member)
{
return member.Name == "Id" || (member.IsPrivate && member.IsField);
}
it successfully finds my fields, but then expects my database columns to be called things like _emailAddress.
How can I make it map _emailAddress to a column called EmailAddress? My SessionFactory initialisation looks like:
Fluently.Configure()
.Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008.ConnectionString(c => c.FromConnectionStringWithKey("AppConnection")))
.Mappings(m => m.AutoMappings.Add(AutoMap.AssemblyOf<User>(new NHibMappingConfiguration())
.Conventions.Add(DefaultAccess.CamelCaseField(CamelCasePrefix.Underscore))))
.CurrentSessionContext("web")
.ExposeConfiguration(BuildSchema)
.BuildSessionFactory();
using obviously a default access convention.
Thanks,
Matt
i think you have a couple of options here.
1. you could create your own Convention for naming columns (use the INamingConvention interface. see here).
2. you could create a MappingOverride class for individual classes and define the column name for each one:
mapping.Map(x => x.Name).Column("MyColumnName");
When using fluent configuration to specify fluent mappings like this:
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(typeof(UserMapping).Assembly))
At the moment I am getting a "NHibernate.MappingException : No persister for" error.
Is it a problem that my Entities and my ClassMaps are in different assemblies? Presumably AddFromAssembly is interested in the assembly that holds the class maps, not the entities? (that is what I have assumed)
Thanks!
UPDATE:
Sorry for not responding to answers very quickly - I had to travel unexpectedly after setting the bounty.
Anyway, thanks for the responses. I've taken a look through them and have updated my code to use AddFromAssemblyOf rather than AddFromAssembly, but still am getting the same error. Possibly I am doing something stupid. Here is the full code for the session factory code I am using:
public class NHibernateHelper
{
private static ISessionFactory _sessionFactory;
private static ISessionFactory SessionFactory
{
get
{
if (_sessionFactory == null)
{
var mysqlConfig = FluentNHibernate.Cfg.Db.MySQLConfiguration
.Standard
.ConnectionString("CONNECTION STRING OMITTED")
.UseOuterJoin()
.ProxyFactoryFactory("NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle");
_sessionFactory = FluentNHibernate.Cfg.Fluently.Configure()
.Database(mysqlConfig)
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<User>())
.BuildSessionFactory();
}
return _sessionFactory;
}
}
public static ISession OpenSession()
{
return SessionFactory.OpenSession();
}
}
I receive this exception when trying to run a test in nunit that makes use of a repository using this session mechanism:
NHibernate.MappingException : No persister for: xxxx.Model.Entities.User
Thanks
P.S.:
I've tried using both and in AddFromAssemblyOf();
Project with mapping definitions (DataAccess) has reference to project with entities (Model).
What version of Fluent NHibernate are you using? There have been problems with the release candidate and the 1.0 release versions. You may want to consider downloading the latest version from the SVN repository.
http://fluent-nhibernate.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Additionally, you may want to check the connection string to make sure that it is completely correct, and you want to make sure that "User" below points to a class.
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<User>())
Also, I should mention that when you use AddFromAssemblyOf, fluent will try to map EVERY class in that assembly. If you have any other classes in that namespace you will want to filter them. There are several different ways to accomplish this. The simplest way is to just place all of the POCOs you want to map in their own namespace and then do something like the following.
.Mappings(m => m.AutoMappings
.Add(AutoMap.AssemblyOf<MyNamespace.Entities.MyClass>()
.Where(type => type.Namespace == "MyNamespace.Entities")
The Where clause will filter items you don't want mapped.
Is it a problem that my Entities and my ClassMaps are in different assemblies?
No there is nothing wrong with that as long as you ClassMap project have refrerence to your Entities project
anyway try this :
m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<UserMapping>()
if this doesn't work post the entire error
Certainly having your entities in a different assembly should not cause a problem as Yassir alludes to above.
According to the Fluent NHibernate Wiki the AddFromAssemblyOf method infers or reflects on the Assembly that contains all of your entities and will map to them when you supply any entity name to it. From the documentation on the FNH wiki you would construct the method as follows:
m.FluentMappings
.AddFromAssemblyOf<YourEntity>();
Therefore in your example, if the entity you are mapping is named User then your code should be constructed as follows:
m.FluentMappings
.AddFromAssemblyOf<User>();
Hope this is of help.
has this been solved? if not could you inlcude your setup?
for example here is my example one
public static ISessionFactory GetSessionFactory()
{
//Old way, uses HBM files only
//return (new Configuration()).Configure().BuildSessionFactory(); //requies the XMl file.
//get database settings.
Configuration cfg = new Configuration();//.Configure();
ft = Fluently.Configure(cfg);
//DbConnection by fluent
ft.Database
(
MsSqlConfiguration
.MsSql2005
.ConnectionString(c => c
.Server(".\\SqlExpress")
.Database("NhibTest")
.TrustedConnection()
)
.ShowSql()
.UseReflectionOptimizer()
);
//set up the proxy engine
//cfg.Properties.Add("proxyfactory.factory_class", "NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle");
//get mapping files.
ft.Mappings(m =>
{
//set up the mapping locations
m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<PersonMap>();//.ExportTo("C:\\mappingfiles");
//m.Apply(cfg);
});
//return the SessionFactory
return ft.BuildSessionFactory();
}
the project structure is as follows
project.Data <- mapping files, and Dao's (also hibernate session manager, containing the above code)
project.Core <- POCO's
project.UI
also have look here incase you have a mixture of Fluent NHibernate and NHibernate configuration
Finally have a look at S#arp Architectures way, as i think it includes this mixture
NhibernateSession <- function : private static ISessionFactory CreateSessionFactoryFor
Hope this helps