I'm currently generating two msis using Wix let's call them A and B. I install A to a directory C:\test and then I install B to the same directory. Some of the files will be overwritten when the second installation happens.
So, how would I go about restoring A to its original installed state while removing every trace of B? I know msis can do rollbacks if for example, the installation of msi B fails, but I read that if the installation is successful, the rollback script etc is deleted.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
I don't think that your approach is correct. Why are your packages installing files in the same location? Are they shared files? If they are, you can use the Windows Installer component sharing mechanism:
make sure that these files use the same components in both installers
these components should have the same names and GUIDs in both installers
when package B installs over package A, Windows Installer will use a reference count for the shared components
the original files are not overwritten
the shared components are removed only when both products are uninstalled
If they are not shared files, why are you using the same location for different file versions?
Related
I have a couple of MSI files installing different applications. All these packages share the same underlying runtime which basically is a set of DLLs. This runtime is pulled in each of the installers as a merge module. Installing a couple of these packages works just fine, always the latest version of the runtime stays on the system and when the last package is removed everything is removed from the system.
Now I had to split one of the DLLs into 2 and added a new component to the runtime installing the new DLL. This new DLL is linked with other libs of the runtime. Now assume the following scenario:
install an old package with the merge module for the runtime without the new DLL
install a new different package with a newer version of the merge module for the runtime. Now there are 2 packages on the system
remove the new package again
Now the old package is broken because:
the new component for the new DLL had a reference count of one as the old package didn't have it and therefore gets removed
the other runtime DLLs stay on the system because they are still referenced by the older package. However as they are new they are already linked with the new DLL that is now no longer present
So my question is:
Is there either a way to explicitly state in the WiX code that file A depends on file B so that it stays on the system until all references have been uninstalled?
or is there a way to explicitly downgrade the dependees in a way the dependency does not longer exists?
Am I doing something fundamentally wrong?
What I did try on a clean machine was to follow Stein Åsmul suggestion like this:
<Component Id='OldLibsNowDependingOnNewLib' Guid='C8DCD2AB-CBE5-4853-9B25-9D6FE1F678DD'>
<File Id='LibOne' Name='LibOne.dll' Source='$(var.SourceDir)/LibOne.dll' />
<File Id='LibTwo' Name='LibTwo.dll' Source='$(var.SourceDir)/LibTwo.dll' />
</Component>
<Component Id='NewLibComponent' Guid='CD2DB93D-1952-4788-A537-CE5FFDE5F0C8' Shared='yes'>
<File Id='LibNew' Name='LibNew.dll' Source='$(var.SourceDir)/LibNew.dll' />
</Component>
However unfortunately this doesn't change the behaviour.
UPDATE: Looking in the SDK again, I see the flag msidbComponentAttributesShared for components. This
looks promising for the problem you describe. Please try to enable
this flag and recompile the version 2 of your setup (unless it is
live).
Enable the Shared flag for the component in question (last part):
<Component Feature="Product" Shared="yes">
This seems to be for patch support, but maybe it will work for your case too. From the MSI SDK:
"If a component is marked with this attribute value in at least one package installed on the system, the installer treats the component as marked in all packages. If a package that shares the marked component is uninstalled, Windows Installer 4.5 can continue to share the highest version of the component on the system, even if that highest version was installed by the package that is being uninstalled."
I think the above should work, but don't have time to test right now. Leaving the below for review.
Short Answer: Use WiX's Burn (setup chainer) to install in sequence the application setup and a new, separate runtime setup that can be handled
independently of your application setup versions.
Prerequisite Setup: Interesting case. This is why I like to split prerequisites into its own MSI package and deploy it via a Burn Bundle Bootstrapper. Burn is WiX's bootstrapper / downloader / chainer - essentially a way to run several setups in sequence - in a few different formats such as MSI, EXE, MSU, MSP. When doing this - putting the runtime in its own MSI - there are no entanglements and you get good decoupling of your runtime and application-specific files. In other words: you can update the runtime files on its own - with their own MSI. The files will even have a reference count of 1 meaning you can easily uninstall them all (not if you install via a merge module that also can be included in other packages - more below).
Merge Modules - Semi-Static Linking?: In a weird way merge modules are sort of semi-static linking. The whole merge module is a version - a binary bundle (think COM) - but its installation behavior is one of "higher version wins" only. Hence a single newer MSI with the newest merge module in it will update the shared files for all applications that use them. Uninstalling will then do what you see: preserve the files that were originally installed by older setups.
Options: One "solution" in your case could be to re-compile the older setup with the newer merge module and then reistall, which I understand you don't like. I don't like it either. I guess it is no solution at all. Some other suggestions:
Permanent component: You can set the hosting component for the new file to be permanent on the system. This is very easy, but also quite silly and not always very desirable. Uninstall will then not remove the file at all.
Prerequisite: This is my favorite option mentioned above. You compile a prerequisite MSI setup that installs the runtime components. This MSI can deliver updates to itself without affecting the main application. This is the primary benefit I am after: Cohesion & Coupling benefits.
Merge Modules: I would avoid merge modules altogether, but it is common to merge the same merge module into the prerequisite setup - if you have a merge module already.
In most cases merging a merge module is fine since you then install the prerequisite and then you can install and uninstall application versions at will without affecting the runtime since a different product (prerequisite MSI) installed the runtime - and that setup should stay behind and not be uninstalled.
If the merge module does not work and brings along the conflict that you already had, maybe try to combine with the msidbComponentAttributesShared "solution" mentioned above. Not tested by me so far. Always risky to suggest things like this, but it is "best effort".
WiX Include Files: I prefer to use WiX include files which allows me to pull in new files without re-authoring a whole merge module in binary format (think C++ include files as opposed to a merge module's COM-style binary reuse).
Side-By-Side: Many people prefer to install prerequisites side-by-side so that several versions of the runtime can co-exist. This may or may not involve the GAC. Switching runtime versions would then be a manifest-manipulation task. Generally somewhat confusing, but doable. You can use both merge modules and separate MSI files to deploy such runtimes - as described above. I would definitely use a prerequisite MSI.
I can't think of more right now, but I know I have forgotten something important this time. Let me persist what I have for now in case it sparks ideas for you.
Cumbersome Prerequisite Setups: Note that prerequisite MSI files are not so bad for corporate deployment since deployment systems will allow one to define relationships between MSI files and to set up deployment chains. For home users you can easily wrap everything in a large setup.exe.
Nonsense Options: Options that don't make sense would be to roll the new file into both setup versions. No gain, lots of overhead. Some people like to copy new files locally to the main installation folder. Does not work since the files it is linked to are likely elsewhere (runtime location). Static linking wouldn't be relevant in this case I think. Only as a last resort to solve a live problem I guess. Setting the SharedDllRefCounter flag will not affect MSI reference counting, it is for legacy reference counting (non-MSI setups), though tweaking this manually is an emergency "solution". The last resort people end up with is typically to abandon the runtime installation and install everything to the same installation folder. Then you have to always recompile everything for every release - which is what you want to avoid?
Some Links:
WiX (Windows Installer Xml), Create universal variables
Pre-Processor constructs, features, Burn Bundles and beyond
Copying of license files using Wix 3.10.2? We have a requirement where we need copy some license files after the installation of the webapplication to IIS. Copying of license files will be the last in the sequence. The license files will reside next to the burn (bootstrapper) setup.exe. This way we can control what license file need to be installed based on the user. I am trying to understand if there will be an issue with number of license files reside along with .exe? Is there a custom action to pick files that are not part of the msi or exe?
1) There will not be an issue with number of license files residing along with exe
2) Using the Media element without a Cabinet name you can specify that certain files will neither be inside a cab or embedded into the msi, no custom action needed. See http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/xsd/wix/media.html
You may need to be more precise about exactly when you want the copy to occur. Your original question says "after the installation" which implies that the install has finished and that your generated MSI is no longer running. but in a later comment you say "during the install".
If after the install is what you want, then you could add a custom executable to your Burn bundle that will do whatever you want. In many of these kinds of situations the application that needs the file just goes and gets it with help from the MSI saying where it was installed from, or by using the SourceList capabilities of Windows Installer to get the location.
If you want to copy files during the install then the CopyFile element is probably what you need. It has wildcard capability to define the files you want to copy. Your source location will be the SourceDir property and the destination will be one of your defined directories. Note that the files will not be uninstalled when the product is uninstalled.
WiX Copyfile:
http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/xsd/wix/copyfile.html
I had to use native bootstrap that comes with Visual Studio SDK. With the bootstrap you can also create pre-requisite like installing .net. This worked for my requirement. Also there is a msbuild task so that you can automate it. Used setup project to create msi and VS bootstrap to create setup.exe
I'd like to create an installer package to install registration-free COM components (with manifest files included). This would be more or less a self-extracting archive to place some files in a target directory given as commandline argument, but it would also need to check or install some other redistributables like VC++ or DirectX.
The package is supposed to be used in another applications's installer as some kind of redistributable package itself. It should not be registered in the "Program and Features" dialog of Windows but has to be removed with the application. Ideally there should be no changes to the Windows registry.
So far I haven't been very successful. Can anyone please provide me with some hints regarding this use case?
You've got about a dozen different questions in that one question. Start with just creating a simple MSI that successfully installs your files and your manifest. Create a COM client to test it. You can also put AppSearch and LaunchConditions in your MSI to detect your dependencies and not allow installation if they are missing.
That's about all you should have to do for this simple question. As for the other questions.... if you are a redistributable and someone else is silently installing you then it's their job to handle the installation of the other redistributables. Also if they don't want you listed in Programs and Features they can pass the ARPSYSTEMCOMPONENT=1 to your installer and you won't be listed. If they want to uninstall you when they uninstall themselves, that's their problem not yours.
If you are really creating a redistributable to be used by other products, sometimes a merge module is the appropriate solution. They build their MSI files and include your merge module.
Otherwise, reg-free COM is in theory an easy install because you're just installing manifest files and Dlls etc. However I don't understand how that could be used by other apps because (IIRC) a client app exe needs your manifest and Dll in their install folder, so how can they do that when they are not installed yet? Or even if they are installed how can you find them? So that goes back to the merge module idea so they include your merge module and install an exe, your manifest and your Dll in the same location. When they uninstall so do your files.
I'm interested in knowing how WiX is bundling the EXE files created with Burn. I know that creating a self-extracting EXE file is pretty straightforward, having done it a million times in WinRAR. What directory is the EXE file being unpacked to, and how is the installation writing that location into Add/Remove Programs?
Also, how is the UX file being kept around for the uninstall? And even more interesting, what goes on during an upgrade?
Burn doesn't create a typical "self-extracting .exe" that unpacks the contents then launches. Instead, it extracts the bits it needs (the UX or bootstrapper application) to a temporary directory and then caches the packages that are needed when they're needed. That way, no time is wasted extracting packages that aren't used.
The cache directory is named "Package Cache" and stored in an appdata folder, which one depending on whether it's a per-user or per-machine package.
There's nothing special about upgrades, except that when one bundle upgrades another, the previous bundle's cache is removed.
i have already an installer for our application. but it is exe-file. it was created many years ago.. application of course was updated. we used a bat-file to register new dll-files and to install our service(windows). but we want to do all this by installer not a bat-file. we chosen a wix techology. i read about <Patch> node, but to use it i need an msi from previous version.. i think to do a simple installer, that will stop service,copy and register dll in the installed application's directory, install service. but i don't know will it overwrite the files without any problems?
You can only create an MSP (Patch) for an MSI (Installer). Also, you're going to run into component ref counting problems if you install your components into the same directory as the original install. The problem is MSI will go to see a file is already there, make it as a shared resource and increment the usage counters. Then on uninstall it will decrement, see that it's not 0 and remove to uninstall the files.
I'd suggest installing to a new directory and then using the RemoveFile table to get rid of the old files. Also I'd suggest following good CM / Versioning practices so that you don't have to worry about hacks such as Version Lying.
If all your application just needs to xcopy files, setup a directory and maybe even a ShortCut, it should be a piece of cake.
Versioned files like executables will automatically be overwritten if the version of the file number is lower.
See also Copy if not exist in WiX.