Call external programs with CMake - cmake

I tried to search the CMake documentation, but I couldn't figure out how to call external programs from CMake.
There are few things I want to do.
Compile other third-party dependencies that uses a makefile
Compile Thrift definition files to C++ / Python stubs.
Compile Cython definition files.
Another question is, what is a good way to handle those cases anyway? It feels like calling a shell script directly from CMake doesn't feel so clean, when "C" in CMake stands for Cross Platform.
EDIT: I have few extra questions. Before, in my build, I prebuilt my dependencies, and the project itself used FIND_PACKAGE(...) to find the header / libraries for the dependencies.
Now, I'm ExternalProject_Add() to compile the dependencies, but the problem is, all my FindXYZ() functions fails when I run cmake ., because the dependencies aren't present when CMake gets executed.
How should I include the third-party libraries in my project in this case?

http://www.kitware.com/media/html/BuildingExternalProjectsWithCMake2.8.html
2+3. can be hacked with CONFIGURE_COMMAND/BUILD_COMMAND/INSTALL_COMMAND

Related

How to use CMake file provided by a Conan package?

Bret Brown in his talk Modern CMake Modules recommends using Conan (or other package manager) to deliver reusable CMake code.
As instructed by Brett I've created a Conan package that delivers a MyHelpersConfig.cmake CMake file.
(The MyHelpersConfig.cmake file is the content of the package; it is not part of the package build system.)
My Conan package delivers only this one file.
Unfortunately I don't know how to make this line in CMake actually work:
find_package(MyHelpers)
Brett mentions, that when using Conan you need to manually override CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, but he doesn't go into more detail (link to the relevant portion of his talk: Delivering CMake modules).
Does anyone know what needs to go into the Conan recipe, and how to use the package from CMake, to make it work?
EDIT:
From what I was able to figure out cmake_multi (generator I use when consuming packages) will update CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, but only if CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is set (which is rarely the case for multi configuration projects):
if(${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} MATCHES "Debug")
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${CONAN_CMAKE_MODULE_PATH_DEBUG} ${CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH})
...
We would need to add something like this to CMake (pseudocode):
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${CONAN_CMAKE_MODULE_PATH_$<CONFIG>} ${CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH})
But that is impossible.
So my conclusion would be that it should work out of the box for non-multi configuration projects, and can not possibly work for multi configuration projects.
The problem I had was that when consuming a package from CMake Conan was not updating CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH, and therefore MyHelpersConfig.cmake was not found.
This happened when using a cmake_multi generator for the consuming project.
Single-configuration generators should not have this problem, or could be solved easily by adding something like:
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${CONAN_CMAKE_MODULE_PATH_<BUILD-MODE-HERE>} ${CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH})
To solve it for multi-config generators you can add the following to CMake in the consuming project:
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${CONAN_<YOUR-PACKAGE-NAME>_ROOT_RELEASE} ${CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH})
This will work only under assumption that CMake files you deliver in your Conan package are the same for all build types (Debug, Release...). So it is a viable solution for general-purpose utility functions.
I don't think it is possible solve this situation when CMake files differ between build modes, simply because in multi-config projects build type is known only after all find_package() calls were already evaluated.

CLion and CMake: only building a library without an executable?

How to only build a static library with clion without having an executable?
How does the CMakeLists.txt look like? (without add_executable)
Update: If I don't add executable to Clion, I have an
error, that an executable is required.
Here my CMakeLists.txt.
This is an old question. But I'll add the answer to your question as a help for other people. You need to replace your add_executable with add_library
add_library(target_name source_files)
Short answer: compile the library target and run any custom command as a placeholder to avoid the warning.
Long answer:
CLion lets you either build the whole project and run executables/configurations.
When running executables, you can choose a target to compile and the executable to run after compiling the target. For executable targets, they are usually the same thing. You compile the executable target and then run it.
It seems like this is not really designed for libraries, but there is a workaround. You usually set the target to be the library and the executable to be any executable that depends on this library. However, this is usually not very useful because if you wanted to run this executable you could just set this executable to be the target and the library would be built anyway.
So people probably want to just build the library (to check if everything is OK, etc) without compiling or running any extra executable targets. In this case, the workaround is to choose a custom executable to run after building the library, and the error message is gone.
You have nothing useful you need to run after building the library, just choose any cheap command as a placeholder. Something like "pwd" or "ls".

CMake for Code::Blocks -- how to NOT get a Makefile

Here is my setup:
Windows 7 x64, MingW, Msys, CMake, Freescale Kinetis SDK, Code::Blocks
I'm trying to get the project settings established by CMake into a proper Code::Blocks project. When I modify the provided build_debug.bat file with -G "CodeBlocks - Unix Makefiles", it indeed produces a .cbp file, as well as the normal Makefile (and it builds the project). However when I open this .cbp file in Code::Blocks, it basically just points to the Makefile, and building the project just runs make on the Makefile.
If I deselect "This is a custom Makefile" from Project Options, and add a source file to the project tree like a normal IDE, it doesn't get built correctly, ie the include files, libraries, linker stuff, compile options, etc., are not imported into the project itself. It seems the project is basically just a holder for the Makefile, so there is not much benefit to this as an IDE.
Of course if I add the source file to the original CMakeLists.txt which is part of the distribution, and rerun cmake (via the build_debug.bat file), then it works fine.
So is there any way to get a "real" IDE configuration out of CMake? I'm guessing the answer is No, since a "real" IDE configuration is a static thing, and a Makefile is a general (Turing complete) program, so there is no way in general to create this automatically, although I suspect for 99% of cases you're just specifying include directories, lib files, and compiler options, so no general programmability is truly needed.
I can probably try to figure out where the deeply obscured gcc calls are getting their include files from, what libs are being linked in, and what compile options are being used, and add all that stuff manually into a native Code::Blocks project, but this seems to defeat the purpose of having this already done for me by the package providers, and gets very tedious when building for a different CPU or development board.
Thanks
"Real configuration" is a CMakeLists.txt, and you need to modify CMakeLists when you editing project configuration. Both makefiles and IDE settings generated by CMake are temporary and you should not edit them.
Some IDEs are able to manage project configuration directly in the CMakeLists.txt

Using cmake to compile a non-cmake project

I have a project that uses cmake to be configured and compiled, but this project depends on an external source tree that uses the traditional configure / make / make install procedure. Is it possible to tell cmake that, before compiling the main project, configure (with some specific parameters), make and make install on the external source tree should be called first?
Thanks
I had the exact same question when coming across this one.
(In my case, wanting to properly add libncurses and libcaca, which are both Autoconf based, as dependecies (and git submodules), to my CMake based project.)
So just to have an answer set to the question, based off of mike.did's comment ;
CMake's ExternalProject module definitely seems to be the proper solution.
(also see:)
Compile other external libraries (without CMakeLists.txt) with CMake
Cleanest way to depend on a make-based C library in my CMake C++ project

Is there any interactive shell for module development in cmake?

CMake is awesome, especially with lots of modules (FindOOXX). However, when it comes to write a FindXXX module, a library XXX which your project depends, it's not that easy to handle for non-cmake-expert. I sometimes encounter a library without support to CMake, and I like to make one for it. I'm wondering if there is any interactive shell while writing/testing cmake modules?
Are you writing FindXXX for project "XXX" or is "XXX" a dependency of your project that you're trying to find? If the former, you should instead write a file called XXX-config.cmake (or XXXConfig.cmake) and install it into one of the directories mentioned in the docs for find_package. In general, XXX-config.cmake files are for projects which are expected to be found by CMake (and installed by the project itself) and FindXXX.cmake files are for projects which don't support CMake (and usually have to support finding any version of XXX).
That said, for FindXXX.cmake, usually you just need a few find_file (e.g., for headers), some find_library calls, or even just a single pkg_check_module from FindPkgConfig.cmake followed by a find_package_handle_standard_args call (use include(FindPackageHandleStandardArgs) to get it). FPHSA makes writing proper Find modules a breeze.
For XXX-config.cmake files, I have typically used configure_file to generate two versions: one for the install (which includes your install(EXPORT) file) and one for the build tree (generated by export() calls). Using this, other useful variables can be accurately set such as things like "which exact version of Boost was used" or "was Python support compiled in" so that dependent projects can get a better picture of what the dependency looks like.
I have also recently discovered that CMake ships with the CMakePackageConfigHelpers module which is supposed to help with making these files. There looks to be quite a bit of documentation for it.