I am having some trouble understanding CSqlDataProvider and how it works.
When I am using CActiveDataProvider, the results can be accessed as follows:
$data->userProfile['first_name'];
However, when I use CSqlDataProvider, I understand that the results are returned as an array not an object. However, the structure of the array is flat. In other words, I am seeing the following array:
$data['first_name']
instead of
$data['userProfile']['first_name']
But the problem here is what if I have another joined table (let's call it 'author') in my sql code that also contains a first_name field? With CActiveDataProvider, the two fields are disambiguated, so I can do the following to access the two fields:
$data->userProfile['first_name'];
$data->author['first_name'];
But with CSqlDataProvider, there doesn't seem to be anyway I can access the data as follows:
$data['userProfile']['first_name'];
$data['author']['first_name'];
So, outside of assigning a unique name to those fields directly inside my SQL, by doing something like this:
select author.first_name as author_first_name, userProfile.first_name as user_first_name
And then referring to them like this:
$data['author_first_name'];
$data['user_first_name']
is there anyway to get CSqlDataProvider to automatically structure the arrays so they are nested in the same way that CActiveDataProvider objects are? So that I can call them by using $data['userProfile']['first_name']
Or is there another class I should be using to obtain these kinds of nested arrays?
Many thanks!
As far as I can tell, no Yii DB methods break out JOIN query results in to 2D arrays like you are looking for. I think you will need to - as you suggest - alias the column names in your select statement.
MySql returns a single row of data when you JOIN tables in a query, and CSqlDataProvider returns exactly what MySql does: single tabular array representation indexed/keyed by the column names, just like your query returns.
If you want to break apart your results into a multi-dimensional array I would either alias the columns, or use a regular CActiveDataProvider (which you can still pass complex queries and joins in via CDbCritiera).
Related
similar to this question how to pass variables to Azure Data Factory REST url's query stirng
However, I have a pipeline to query against graphapi, where I need to pass in a userid as part of the Url to get their manager to build an ActiveDirectory staff hierarchy, this is fine on an individual basis, or even as a predefined array variable where I insert["xx","xxx"] into the pipeline variable etc. My challenge is that I need to pass the results of a SQL query to be the array variable. So, instead of defining the list of users, I need to pass into the foreach loop the results from a SQL query.
I can use a lookup to a set variable, but the url seems to be misconstructed and has extra characters added in for some reason.
returning graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/%7B%7B%22id%22:%22xx9e7878-bwbbb-bwbwbwr-7897-414a8e60c78c%22%7D%7D/?$expand=xxxxxx where the "%7B%7B%22id%22:%" and "%22%7D%7D/" is all unnecessary and appears to come from the json rather than just utilising the value.
The lookup runs the query from SQL
The Set variable uses the lookup value's (below) to assign to a pipeline variable as an array.
then the foreachloop uses the variable value in the source
#concat('users/{',item(),'}/?$expand=manager($levels=max;$select=id,displayName,userPrincipalName,createdDate)')
If anyone can suggest how to construct the array value dynamically that would be great.
I have used
SELECT '["'+STRING_AGG(CONVERT(NVARCHAR(MAX),t.[id]),'","')+'"]' AS id FROM
stage.extract_msgraphapi_users t LEFT JOIN stage.extract_msgraphapi_users s ON s.id = t.id
and this returns something that looks like an array ["xx","xxx"] but data factory still interpreted this as a string and not an array. Any help would be appreciated.
10 minutes later:
#concat('users/{',item().id,'}/?$expand=manager($levels=max;$select=id,displayName,userPrincipalName,createdDate)')
note the reference to item().id to use the id level of the array. Works like a dream for anyone else facing the same issue
I have two related tables. 1 table contains books and the other table contains the libraries that own the books. Now I only want to see 1 library with the books. There is a variable called IDGemeente. It is defined as integer. Now I want to fill the Tableadapter with the data using a FillBy query
The query is defined like this:
SELECT BoekGemeenteID, GemeenteID, BoekID, IsUitgeleend, KerenUitgeleend, LaatstUitgeleend, Aanschafdatum, KastPlank, Kenmerk
FROM BoekenGemeenten
WHERE ('GemeenteID' = '%IDGemeente%')
But the result is nothing. How can I use a variable in the query?
Tables
Your WHERE clause doesn't make any sense. It is comparing two different strings for equality so of course no records could possibly match it. Depending on your database, your WHERE clause should probably look like this:
WHERE (GemeenteID = #GemeenteID)
or maybe this:
WHERE (GemeenteID = ?)
You should then name your method FillByGemeenteID and, when you call it, pass your IDGemeente variable as an argument.
When you read in a result set in Groovy it comes in a collection of maps.
Seems like you should be able to update values inside those maps and write them back out, but I can't find anything built into groovy to allow me to do so.
I'm considering writing a routine that allows me to write a modified map by iterating over the fields of one of the result objects, taking each key/value pair and using them to create the appropriate update statement, but it could be annoying so I was wondering if anyone else had done this or if it'sa vailable already in groovy.
It seems like just a few lines of code so I'd rather not bring in hibernate for this. I'm just thinking a little "update" method that would allow:
def rows=sql.rows(query)
rows[0].name="newName"
update(sql, rows[0])
to update the first guy's name in the database. Anyone seen/created such a monster, or is something like this already built into Groovy Sql and I'm just missing it?
(I suppose you may have to point out to the update method which field is the key field, but that's doable...)
Using the rows method will actually read out all of the values into a List of GroovyRowResult so it's not really possible to update the data without creating an update method like the one you mention.
It's not really possible to do that in the generic case because your query can contain joins or a column reference that is an aggregate, etc.
If you're selecting from a single table use the Sql.eachRow method however and set the ResultSet to be an updatable one, you can use the underlying ResultSet interface to update as you iterate through:
sql.resultSetConcurrency = ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE
sql.resultSetType = ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY
sql.eachRow(query) { row ->
row.updateString('name', 'newName')
row.updateRow()
}
Depending on the database/driver you use, you may not be able to create an updatable ResultSet.
I don't quite understand how the TABLES statement works in ABAP. From a few example codes I've seen that the tablename afther the statement is an already existing dictionary structure. Is this the only way it can be used? Because I'm never sure which structure it is that I need.
And once it is declared how do I pass this to the actual screen? I wish it were as straight forward as the HIDE method, I can't get my head around this.
The tables statement just provides you with a single-line work area of the dictionary structure that you specify. It allows you to use fields of the structure as select-options and make the structure of the table available as a variable in your program.
If you are trying to write the structure to an abap list you could use it as follows:
tables: aufk.
select single * from aufk into aufk
where aufnr = some_order_number.
"I'm pretty sure the into clause is optional
"because of the tables statement, but including it to be explicit.
write / aufk.
If you are trying to display the field using ABAP dynpro, you should make sure that you read the field in the PBO and add the field(s) to the screen from the dictionary.
MyModel.objects.filter(field__icontains=value) returns all the rows whose field contains value. How to do the opposite? Namely, construct a queryset that returns all the rows whose field is contained in value?
Preferably without using custom SQL (ie only using the ORM) or without using backend-dependent SQL.
field__icontains and similar are coded right into the ORM. The other version simple doesn't exist.
You could use the where param described under the reference for QuerySet.
In this case, you would use something like:
MyModel.objects.extra(where=["%s LIKE CONCAT('%%',field,'%%')"], params=[value])
Of course, do keep in mind that there is no standard method of concatenation across DMBS. So as far as I know, there is no way to satisfy your requirement of avoiding backend-dependent SQL.
If you're okay with working with a list of dictionaries rather than a queryset, you could always do this instead:
qs = MyModel.objects.all().values()
matches = [r for r in qs if value in r[field]]
although this is of course not ideal for huge data sets.