is there anyway to tell CMake to ignore one specific header file when using include_directories ?
Since the directories are not expanded into single files I can't just list(REMOVE_ITEM ..) the file out.
cheers Daniel
An include_directories call in CMakeLists does not result in a list of all available header-files. It simply passes those directories directly to the compiler as a search-dir for your "#include <...>" E.g. look at the documentation for the "-I" option of GCC 4.6.
In addition: I am not sure why you would want to exclude a single file. Very often you can work around a problematic header file, by creating your own header-file in your own project which includes everything except that single-file...
If you really, really want something like this and you insist on solving it with CMake, you will probably end up with file-globing all header-files, copying (without that one file of course) them manually to a new include-dir and then include that new dir.
Related
I have a project under CMake with some files generated with python generator from XML files. I cannot specify all files generated by this generator in CMakeLists.txt so I use file globbing for this.
The problem is that when I update my XML files or generator sources (which are in the same repository) I would like to have my build system reconfigured so changed files are taken into account when rebuilding the code (via make for example).
Is it possible to make CMake treat some files like it treats CMakeLists.txt files and to make it regenerate build system when those file are changed?
It doesn't require any kind of workarounds. The standard way is to use CMAKE_CONFIGURE_DEPENDS property:
set_property(DIRECTORY APPEND PROPERTY CMAKE_CONFIGURE_DEPENDS <filename>)
Yes, you should be able to do that by (ab)using configure_file(). Configuring a file makes the source a dependency of the CMake run, so that any changes in it cause a reconfiguration. Simply like this:
configure_file(MyInputFile.xml DummyOutput.xml)
Since it has been a while I will add to #roolebo's answer.
There's actually a better command to add a dependency on a file:
set_directory_properties(PROPERTIES CMAKE_CONFIGURE_DEPENDS <relative_or_full_path_to_file>)
What might be confusing is that this command adds a property to the current directory. Well, it does not matter since you can set a full path to a file that resides outside of the current directory's scope, for instance: ../../config.json
I might be googling wrongly, but I'm unable to find what's the purpose of .cmake files.
I've just stumbled across the CMake tool for a project I've to work with and I'm having a hard time to understand how it works. I do understand that running the CMake command in a directory containing a CMakeLists.txt executes the commands in that file (along with the commands in the CMakeLists.txt contained in the sub-directories) but the purpose of .cmake files is a lot more fuzzy.
It seems that they are used to define functions/set variables that are thereafter used in the CMakeLists.txt but I'm not sure. How are they used by the CMake tool ?
You can include it with the include command. Similar to how other languages allow you to split source files into modules or header files, they can contain function definitions, macros which can then be reused across multiple CmakeLists.
See https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/include.html
Note that you can actually include any file, but a .cmake extension is commonly used.
Within this file you can define functions of macros which can be used in your CMakeLists.txt file. But there are some more other applications for .cmake files. For example if you want to provide a library or tool they should at least contain a <name>Config.cmake so that your library can be used with the find_package() command. Further information can be found in CMake Wiki
CMake input files are written in the "CMake Language" in source files named CMakeLists.txt or ending in a .cmake file name extension.
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-language.7.html
This means they're one and the same thing. "CMakeLists.txt" is simply the default name. If you decide to split the code (CMake is technically just another interpreted language) into separate files/modules (that you can include into each other), they obviously can't all have the same name, so you would use the ".cmake" extension. Theoretically, you could call "CmakeLists.txt" as "CmakeLists.cmake", but then cmake won't be able to find it by default, so you'd have to pass the filename as a command-line argument. So it is just a difference of naming conventions. Everything you can put in one file, you can put in the other, and vice-versa.
i like to structure my code in multiple subdirs but i dont want to create a new cmakelist.txt in each new subdir.
my folder structure is something like this:
project
>cmakelist.txt
>build
>src
>main.cpp
>multiple_subdirs_or_(c|h)pp_files_with_more_subdirs_or_(c|h)pp_files
my cmakelist.txt looks like this:
...
file(GLOB_RECURSE cpps RELATIVE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR} "src/*.cpp")
file(GLOB_RECURSE hpps RELATIVE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR} "src/*.hpp")
#remove files with main
list(REMOVE_ITEM cpps "src/test.cpp")
#bins
add_executable(test src/test.cpp src/test.cpp ${hpps} ${cpps})
#same problem if this is used instead of the other add_executable
add_library(foo OBJECT ${cpps} ${hpps})
add_executable(test src/test.cpp $<TARGET_OBJECTS:foo>)
the problem with my file:
source files created after the execution of cmake are not compiled and the build fails if they are used.
as predicted by http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/file.html in section GLOB:
We do not recommend using GLOB to collect a list of source files from
your source tree. If no CMakeLists.txt file changes when a source is
added or removed then the generated build system cannot know when to
ask CMake to regenerate.
the question: is it possible to use a single cmakelist.txt for a project with multiple sub directories? (without the problems of file(GLOB ...) )
You have two totally unrelated things here.
First, can you use only a single CMakeLists.txt file for your whole project? Yes, of course you can (although I'd personally not go this way after a project has reached a certain size), and you're already doing this.
Second, the problem with GLOB. You already quoted the part of the documentation where it states what problems the use of GLOB has. This cannot really be avoided at the moment if you want to continue using GLOB, as this is part of the cmake design where they distinguish between what is done during configure and build time. The alternative is to list all files manually. Whether you do this in a single CMakeLists.txt file in your projects main directory, or in multiple files across your subdirectories does not matter.
To answer your question: yes, it is possible to handle a project with multiple sub-directories and one CMakeLists.txt. I have two considerations for you to take into account:
I strongly recommend you not using file(GLOB ...) for sources.
You have to list the files manually. For example (src/ is the source-subdirectory):
set(cpps src/file1.cpp src/file2.cpp src/file3.cpp)
I have a CMakeLists.txt file for a library. It's pretty basic:
set(LIB_FILES source/first.cpp)
add_library(first ${LIB_FILES})
I put the files in a list because I will eventually be adding more source files to the library. The problem is that all of the files will be in the source directory. And I don't want to constantly have to repeat that.
I also don't want to use the GLOB pattern matching solution, because I want to have to edit the CMakeLists.txt file when I add a new file. That way, my build will re-build the build solution, and new files will correctly appear (as I understand it. I'm still new with CMake).
I tried adding a CMakeLists.txt file into the source directory itself, just to build the LIB_FILES list. That didn't work out very well. Variables in CMake are file scoped. And even when I broke scoping (with PARENT_SCOPE), I still had to prefix each file with the directory. So that gained nothing.
I don't want to put the actual library definition in the source directory, as that will generate all the build files in the source directory. And I don't want that. Also, I will need to include headers that aren't in or under the source directory.
My directory structure looks like this:
libroot (where the project build files should go)
\-source (where the source code is)
\-include (where the headers that the user of the library includes go)
So how do I tell CMake that all of the source files come from the source directory, so that I don't have to constantly spell it out?
You could move the add_library call to your source/CMakeLists.txt also:
set(LIB_FILES first.cpp)
add_library(first ${LIB_FILES})
Then just use add_subdirectory in your top-level CMakeLists.txt:
add_subdirectory(source)
you could use a simple macro for that
macro(AddSrc dst_var basepath_var)
foreach(file ${ARGN})
list(APPEND ${dst_var} ${basepath_var}/${file})
endforeach()
endmacro()
set(MY_SRCFILES "")
AddSrc(MY_SRCFILES path/to/source
foo.cpp
bar.cpp
whatever.cpp
)
I have a specific question which serves as context for a more general question.
There is a scientific package called LAMMPS, and it is usually used as an executable. However, it supports use as a "library". To try to do things right, I put it in /usr/local/lib/lammps. It contains a lammps/src/ directory, which has around 40 source files. Using the instructions provided, I compiled lammps as a .so file in lammps/src/liblammps_serial.so.
I also have separate code in "~/code/ljtube/". This uses cmake to try to find the library. Thus, I wrote a FindLAMMPS.txt so that I could use
FIND_PACKAGE (lammps)
in my CMakeLists. I modified the libtool config file to search in /usr/local/ successfully. I found that it searches in /usr/local/lib/ for a .so file and in /usr/local/include/ for a .h file. So I made a dynamic link to the .so file in /usr/local/lib/, and I copied the .h file from the lammps/src/ to /usr/local/include/.
CMake can now find those two files, but it cannot link to anything else in lammps/src/. It seems absurd to need to make a separate FIND_PACKAGE for each of the .h's I want to include (group.h, fix.h, force.h, pair.h, etc.). It also seems ridiculous to dump the whole package of .h files into the /usr/local/include/ directory. I will be using this code both locally and on a cluster, and possibly distributing it to other group members.
How can I make CMake find what I want to find without hard coding in the location of /usr/local/lib/lammps/src/? Phrased more generically, how should I manage large packages like these to make them easy to link to in the code I write, even if the original developer did not use the best conventions?
(As a side note, I am using a shared library because it seems like the right choice, but I'm not especially married to it. Should I be using a static library? Is there a way for CMake to find an already-compiled library relative to the current source directory, and might that be a better way to implement this? I know that I will be using LAMMPS in multiple projects, so having a local shared copy superficially seems to make the most sense.)
Normally a find_package call yields a variable specifying the path to the "includes" folder of the package. This would then be added in the caller's CMakeLists.txt via include_directories.
For example, to use find_package for boost, you could do:
find_package(Boost) # sets ${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS} and ${Boost_LIBRARIES}
if(Boost_FOUND)
include_directories(${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS})
add_executable(foo foo.cc)
target_link_libraries(foo ${Boost_LIBRARIES})
endif()
Regarding your side note, you could use find_library and/or find_path to find the library and its headers given a known location.
Both these commands can be invoked in such a way as to avoid searching in common locations, e.g. by setting PATHS to the known location and using NO_DEFAULT_PATH in the find commands.
Another alternative is for your projects to make use of the ExternalProject_Add function which is described in more detail in this article. From this article:
The ExternalProject_Add function makes it possible to say “download this project from the internet, run its configure step, build it and install it”
A downside to this approach is that each of your projects would end up with its own copy of the third party sources and lib.