I just implemented a simple WCF server using net.tcp.
First, I use 127.0.0.1 as server address and client able to connect the WCF service.
Everything is Ok. But when I try to use the internal IP 192.x.x.x I get an error:
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it
Any idea what may cause this?
Best Wishes
PS: I disabled auth on WCF. Even turn off firewall all...Not worked...
Well, I got this error message when I forgot to install necessary components. see link Configuring WCF Service with netTcpBinding
(summary of steps)...
Go to "Programs and Features" (usually in control panel)
Go to "Turn Windows features on or off"
(assuming VS2012) Go to ".NET Framework 4.5 Advanced Services"->"WCF Services"
Enable "TCP Activation"
Do you use 192.x.x.x on both client and server? I remember seeing an issue a while back in which for TCP the client and server names needed to match (something related to one of the message properties), so if you define the service with "localhost" and the client with <machine name> there would be a problem.
The physical client and service addresses can differ if the logical address is the same and the server endpoint has been configured with a "listenUri" and the client behaviour is configured to use a <clientVia> address. In our case, this is required in for our proxy/firewall configuration. In effect, the client calls the firewall and the server listens locally for a forwarded request.
For an IIS-hosted service, check the following:
The Application pool is started and looks correct (.NET 4 etc/security)
For NET.TCP, ensure the "Allowed Protocols" in the Web Site/Application (via advanced settings) are configured correctly: e.g. http,net.tcp
For a non-IIS hosted service, you may need to configure a Namespace Reservation (URLACL). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733768.aspx
Also ensure the appropriate Windows Services are running, e.g. Net.Tcp listener.
If you're running from within visual studio in debug mode, ensure your solution port numbers match. I have seen several instances where I had Properties>Web>Auto-Assign Port - selected and the endpoint from, in this case my silverlight app, didn't match the port auto generated. I usually change the port to 1318 in my .web.
Today I found out that this error will also show up if you have a circular reference in your WCF Service Class. I had a method that was calling itself infinitely and causing this error message, which led me here.
So if none of the other suggestions work, check your code to see if you're doing any recursive functionality and make sure you're not caught in an infinite loop.
I resolved this issue by either commenting this setting in the application configuration:
<defaultProxy>
<proxy bypassonlocal="False" usesystemdefault="True" proxyaddress="http://127.0.0.1:8888" />
</defaultProxy>
or, running Fiddler which would take the WCF call at 127.0.0.1 and then forward it.
The complete scenario is, I encountered the same issue with WCF calls made to one of the service. The calls would fail with top level error message "There was no endpoint listening at http://LinuxIP:Port/...", and service trace viewer log showing inner exception to be "No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 127.0.0.1:8888
".
The reason was that I had put this configuration in my application to capture the outgoing traffic in Fiddler. If this configuration is in place then the Fiddler needs to be running for the WCF calls to make it to the intended destination. If Fiddler is not running this error will be there. Comment this setting in such scenarios, and the WCF call will go to the destination.
Related
I am new to wcf programming and I have been working on a small project and am having problems with net.tcp port sharing. I am using .net framework 4 and iis 7.
I have two wcf services (serviceA and serviceB) being hosted on our server in separate websites on IIS. Each website has its own .svc file, web.config and bin. If I have each of these services on different net.tcp ports then there is no problem and I can add the service reference to each of them from visual studio on my pc. The services run fine.
However we will soon be starting a project with many more services and we wish to avoid having to open a tcp port for each one so I have been trying to get serviceA and serviceB to port share. If I set them up on the same port then I can access the first service I add but when when I try to access the second service added to the same port i get the following error:
Metadata contains a reference that cannot be resolved:
'net.tcp://myserver/serviceB.svc'. The socket connection was aborted. This
could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive
timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network
resource issue. Local socket timeout was **. An
existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host If the
service is defined in the current solution, try building the solution
and adding the service reference again.
I can not work out what is going wrong. I have done a lot of searching on the subject and I have made sure that the following services are running:
Windows Process Activation Service
Net.Tcp Port Sharing Service
Net.Tcp Listener Adaptor
In addition net.tcp is an enabled protocol in the website's advanced settings. My current best guess is that it might have something to do with how I have defined the net.tcp bindings in IIS manager. Both of my websites running their independant services have the following: 808:*(net.tcp) is this correct?
As i said earlier the tcp services run fine if set up on two separate ports so the issue must be related to the port sharing. Very grateful for any advice
OK I found the problem I was having. In IIS I had set up each service as its own website and was trying to get those different websites to port share. This would not work.
However I found that if I set up just one website and then added my services as seaprate applications under the website then the port sharing will work. This approach lets me have multiple services as applications under one website.
Check this.
This can be helpful to you.
http://himanshudesai.wordpress.com/2011/06/03/multiple-wcf-services-on-a-single-port/
Hope this helps.
I built a WCF service that exposes itself for a web application, it accepts an object and prints the data on the clients machine. Works fine on my development machine, and the service is up and running on any machine i install it on. I can enter ip address in clients machine web browser and see it is running. Problem is when i send the object to the clients machine it returns an error, that sounds like it could be because of the clients windows firewall. Where would i start at to deal with this problem ?
There was no endpoint listening at http://192.168.1.168:2202/PrintLabel that could accept the message. This is often caused by an incorrect address or SOAP action. See InnerException, if present, for more details.
And the InnerException: Unable to connect to the remote server
With further research and discussion with people in the community i came to understand that as was mentioned at the bottom of this article.
"Self-hosted HTTP addressing for WCF is not integrated into the Windows firewall. An exception must be added to the firewall configuration to allow inbound connections using a particular URL.
But this SO question led me to a page with how to control Windows Firewall through code to enable my WCF self hosted service to accept an object.
This the link below.
http://www.shafqatahmed.com/2008/01/controlling-win.html
That link was towards the direction i needed, but based on user comments it seemed to have some bugs. A colleague found this link and i believe this technique will be the best solution for this scenario.
I am hosting 3 WCF services inside windows services.Each WCF service contains Multiple endpoints. Right now, i am host all my endpoints thru TCP binding on different ports.
Is there any way to host all these end points from different wcf services on same port?
Sure is! You can use the Net.TCP Port Sharing service.
Net.TCP Port Sharing on MSDN
I just looked into that, out of curiosity. The behavior I discovered seems so strange that I almost don't want to put it here. But it worked in my case, so maybe it's doing the same for you:
I am getting the AddressAlreadyInUseException when I'm trying to host 2 services (i.e., 2 separate ServiceHost instances) on the same net.tcp port with portSharingEnabled="True" set on the netTcpBinding for both. That happens with or without the Net.Tcp Port Sharing Service running. The exception is thrown even if I only start one of the services (and I verified via netstat that there was no other listener on that same port on the machine, plus, I ran the app with elevated privileges).
Now, the funny thing is, the AddressAlreadyInUseException is not thrown when I set PortSharingEnabled = False, and yet both services are fully working!! Once again, with or without the Port Sharing Service running. I could even successfully connect to those services from a different machine.
An important note to make, however, is that the above only applies if the services are hosted within the SAME PROCESS! It does blow up if I try to start another instance of the app that's listening on the same port, but a different base address. But I'm assuming you're hosting those 3 WCF services inside the same Windows Service?
So, even though it doesn't seem right, my answer would be to disable PortSharingEnabled and see if it works with different BaseAddresses on the same port (provided they're all inside the same process).
As far as I know you not only have to enable port sharing on the configuration (or via code), you also have to manually start the Windows Port Sharing service.
That's the reason why I (having similar problem) didn't want to use port sharing, to make it easier for deployment rather than having to mess with other things the user may or may not know.
I am consuming a web service in .NET application with WCF client.
The Endpoint's address of the service is over port 4338, and it is over HTTPS, secured with WS-Security standard.
So the address is something like :
https://[servername]:4338/[servicename]/
I was not able to communicate to the service with just running the application.
it gave me the following error :
Could not connect to [servername]:4338
TCP error code 10060: A connection
attempt failed because the connected
party did not properly respond after a
period of time, or established
connection failed because connected
host has failed to respond
[servername]:4338
But when I run Fiddler to investigate the http communication, the application start to work, and I will be able to communicate to the service.
As well, I want to add that I have a different service on the same web server that hosts the first service, and that second service's address is hosted on port 8080, and I am able to communicate with it with WCF client (without running Fiddler).
So, I googled and I found that it might be related to the proxy settings. Do you know what the problem is, and how can I solve it?
Thanks
Fiddler acts as an Internet proxy server. In general, any symptom of the form: "it works when I use Fiddler" means "it works when there's a (different) proxy server".
Check your proxy server settings. In particular, as empi suggested, try it in a browser. If it works there, it could be due to the fact that the browser has the proxy settings configured, and that you do not have them configured for WCF.
If you have proxy set in Internet Explorer, it may cause the problem. What happens when you open https://[servername]:4338/[servicename]/ in Internet Explorer?
Thanks empi for the reply.
I found the answer.
Actually in our company we have a proxy settings through "Automatic configuration script"
and depends on the web sites we are targeting internally, the script will point us to the proper proxy.
So, from the script I got the proper proxy address.
and in my .NET application I added this code
WebRequest.DefaultWebProxy = new WebProxy("http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080");
and that fixed the problem
So WCF client was not detecting the setting of the automatic script.
and this is the reason it worked when I run Fiddler, because Fiddler listen to the http communication, and send it again through the settings.
I'm trying to run a WCF ServiceHost as an NT Service on a Windows 2007 SP1 Server. The ServiceHost is reponsible for hosting a single service endpoint: a basicHttpBinding with the following address:
http://localhost:5555/ToBlah
When I run this ServiceHost on my local machine (Windows XP), it works fine - when I POST a SOAP message to it, I get back an HTTP 202 code ("Accepted"), which is the correct response for my service because the contract has IsOneWay=true. However, when I run this on my 2007 server, I get 503 errors when I try to call the service. I have the WCF message logging turned "all the way up," but I'm not seeing any logging whatsoever, which leads me to believe that this is happening at a lower level than WCF (the call never gets to the WCF "layer").
The sys-admins and I have tried various forms of httpcfg commands, but no luck so far.
I know trying to host this in IIS might be a possible solution, but our production app server does not have IIS installed, so I would like to just run the service as a ServiceHost.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!
Well, I still can't get it to work on the Vista servers - it's still giving 503 errors, but I ended up getting it setup on a Windows 2003 server, and it seems to be working now.
One thing I did learn in this process was the use of HttpCfg.exe to allow a user to open a non-standard HTTP port.
Basically I had to run something like the following command:
httpcfg.exe set urlacl /u http://+:5555/ /a "O:AOG:DAD:(A;;RPWPCCDCLCSWRCWDWOGA;;;S-1-0-0)"
You can then view the URL ACL settings with this command:
httpcfg.exe query urlacl
On Vista, you can run the same types of commands using netsh (see link below).
Sadly, this took awhile to figure out, but it was a good learning experience.
Here are some links that I thought were useful in figuring this out:
http://www.leastprivilege.com/HttpCfgACLHelper.aspx
This explians how to get the SID for your user account (for the /a part of the command. Coincidentally, this is easier on Vista - you can just specify the domain\user in the netsh http set urlacl command
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781601.aspx
This explains the syntax/options of the HttpCfg.exe command
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms733768.aspx
This really explains everything you need to know for HttpCfg/netsh http
http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/04/14/configuring-http.aspx
Similar info to the msdn link above, but provides more explanation, and more relation to WCF
http://dotnet.dzone.com/news/msmq-wcf-and-iis-getting-them-
Another description of WCF and HTTP (and MSMQ), with a focus on IIS
It seems to me that either a firewall on the server or another configuration setting is blocking the port.
If not, then your service may be experiencing an error during the creation of the ServiceHost object instance or during the creation of the service endpoint, and the error is for some reason not trapped(?). You could write some simple internal test loop within the service code to verify that the service endpoint was created correctly. That might reveal something interesting.
Additionally, running a client from that server and connecting to your service that is running on the development machine might tell you something more? You could use WCFTestClient.exe, as referenced here: Is it possible to make the WcfTestClient work for custom transport channels?. That might give you additional information. However, you will need to support MetadataExchange (Mex) in your service in order to use that test client.
Alternatively, you could use the WCF samples from the Visual Studio 2008 Samples folder, combined with WCFTestClient.exe to test some services that are self-hosted and are expected to work correctly, first within the server and then from outside of the server.
What identity is configured for the NT service? To isolate the problem, try using a local-admin account to see if this problem is permission related.
If you are using Windows Vista or Windows 7 you have to use "netsh", which is easier to use as well.
Local user account:
netsh http add urlacl url=http://+:8001/ user=ComputerName\Username
Domain user account:
netsh http add urlacl url=http://+:8001/ user=DomainName\Username
Built-in NetworkService account:
netsh http add urlacl url=http://+:8001/ user="NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE"