I've just started using Cucumber and formatting them as pdf's to show clients.
Is there a way to make sure a whole Scenario stays together on the one page?
Is there some sort of Orphan/Widow control in the Cucumber pdf output which I could use?
Sometimes I find I end up with a page with one line on it from the last Scenario. Not only is this a waste of paper but it can be sometimes an issue when going through Scenarios with the client.
I'm not sure if there are any formatters that do what you are looking for but you can always create your own.
Related
Note: Before asking i searched some on embedding but couldn't get exactly what i wanted.
I have a resume file in the pdf format that i would like to display in my website without storing anywhere like google or other but on my own. I have static website [which i made using Jekyll] lets say https://www.example.com and what i actually need is to display my resume accessible in the following link https://www.example.com/resume
Some of them have long permalinks and i actually hate them. (Just saying)
Upload the PDF into the website's / or assets/ directory.
To make a link for HTML:
CV
To make a link for Markdown:
[CV](<PATH>/cv.pdf)
On Chrome, this has been around for a long time and plagues webdevs to this day. There seem to be no plans to change that anytime soon because that's just the way it was built. Chrome behaves slightly different when not online, so offline/local-testing will not always produce expected result.
My answer to you, for this question, is a suggestion. In order to make it cross-browser compatible, your mode of implementation should be:
Modal or,
Lightbox
Whether or not you are using a SSG should not matter here. Look for a bootstrap or material implementation.
On the client-side, it is possible with extension. I reckon this isn't helpful to you; but I'm including this information for future readers.
I am just thinking about command typeAndWait in Selenium, because I cant figure out any real purpose of it.
In what situation you type in some input and then the page immedeately starts reloading? I can imagine AJAX, but in this case the page doesn't reload - which is the reason, you have to use waitForXY commands instead of xyAndWait when testing AJAX...
But it was a long day today, maybe I am just dull now and the answer is quite obvious...
The google search while you type is the only situation I can think of where that would happen, except your right that the page wouldn't actually load, but there are some weird cases out there that I'm sure I haven't thought of.
I want to evaluate my content blocks before running my test suite but the closures' property names is in bytecode already. I'm ooking for the cleanest solution (compared with parsing source manually).
Already tried solution outlined in this post (and I'd still wind up doing some RegEx/parsing) but could only get it to work via script execution engine. It failed in IDE and GroovyConsole. Rather than embedding a Groovy script in project's code, I thought I'd try using Geb's native classes.
Is building on the suggestion about extending Geb Navigators here viable for Geb's PageContentSupport class whose contentTemplates contain a LinkedHashMap of exactly what I need? If yes, would someone provide guidance? If no, any suggestions?
It is currently not possible to get hold of all content elements for a given page/module. Feel free to create an issue for this in Geb's bug tracker, but remember that all that Geb can provide is either a list of content element names or a map from these names to closures that create these elements.
Having that information isn't a generic solution to your problem because it's possible for content elements to take parameters and there are situations where your content elements will be available on the page only after some other actions are performed (for example you have to click on button to reveal a section of a page that uses ajax to retrieve it's content). So I'm afraid that simply going over all elements and checking if they don't throw any errors will not cut it.
I'm still struggling to see what would "evaluating" all content elements prior to running the suite buy you. Are you after verifying that your content elements still work to get a faster feedback than running the whole suite? I'm pretty sure that you won't be able to fully automate detection of content definitions that don't work anymore. In my view it will be more effort than it's worth.
I am a Ph.D student, and I usually write articles which are later proof-read by my supervisor. I usually do it in LaTeX and reviews are done to the PDF outputs in Adobe Reader itself. There are mostly grammatical ones and mostly I miss prepositions and conjuctions in fast writing. To re-phrase everything I have to manually enter everything in my LaTeX script again.
This seems to be hell lot of work and this goes on multiple times sometimes. Is there any software in current world that makes the task easier? For example, if a text stuck out for grammar errors and suggested alternatives, can I accept the changes to replace old one with new phrase or sentence and also able to blank out the striked text. Please suggest me a tool which really makes my life easier.
You may want to take a look at the following link. It has some good information about version controlling.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Collaborative_Writing_of_LaTeX_Documents
You could attach the LaTeX sources to the PDF (with the attachfile2 package), so reviewers can directly edit the source and send that back. Or you try to accept comments to the PDF, but currently only Adobe Reader and Foxit allow that - and not on Linux.
I'm looking for a way to process a web page and associated Javascript from the command-line, so that the resulting DOM model can be outputted.
The purpose for this is to identify forms within the page without doing any nasty HTML (and Javascript) parsing with regular expressions.
Are there any command-line tools that will do this? So hypothetically speaking, a command-line web browser that downloads the content and outputs the DOM as text rather than producing a pretty page.
I don't know of any, but I wanted to highlight one difficulty with what you've suggested:
process a web page and associated Javascript
When would the output be? Many webpages have time-sensitive javascripts, or onclick/onhover scripts which would affect the DOM. Would you want these to be executed? All of them, or only some? It's not trivial to decide when the page is "finished" and ready for the DOM to be output after javascript manipulation. (Before javascript manipulation, it's an easier problem; just wait till the document.DOMReady event...)
Edit: I'm not saying that you don't need javascript execution at all: you might want to handle any document.write sections during loading, as they might write out a form... I'm saying it's hard to know when you've done "enough" javascript...
For java, I've had fairly good experiences with htmlunit.
I've also used the BeautifulSoup python library to parse forms and formdata. No need to specify regexps, as it'll let you traverse the DOM tree without much effort.