If I have an object Sale that contains another object Item. Let's say my Sale header looks like this:
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import "Item.h"
#interface Sale : NSObject {
Item *item;
}
#property (readonly) Item *item;
-(id) initWithItem:(Item*)i;
#end
And in my function I create a new Item and Sale object like so:
Item *i = [[Item alloc] init];
Sale *s = [[Sale alloc] initWithItem:i];
[i release];
If, when I'm done with the Sale object I simply do:
[s release];
is that enough to make sure that all of that memory allocation is cleaned up effectively?
Furthermore, will releasing *i cause any issues if I later try to access [s item]?
It depends on how you're storing i. If you copy or retain it in initWithItem:, you need to release it in Sale's dealloc method (see below). If you're storing a weak reference, this is fine.
- (id)initWithItem:(Item *)i {
if ((self = [super init])) {
// If you're retaining i here, you need to release it in dealloc.
item = [i retain];
}
return self;
}
- (void)dealloc {
[item release];
[super dealloc];
}
See Apple's Memory Management Programming Guide for more information.
Related
This is one segment of codes used in one of my project for managing one of my class instance:
#interface C: NSObject
{
NSMutableArray *myArr;
}
#property (nonatomic,retain) NSMutableArray *myArr;
//...
#end
#implementation C
#synthesize myArr;
//...
-(id)init
{
//...
myArr = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
//...
}
//version 1 of dealloc method
-(void)dealloc
{
//...
self.myArr = nil;
//...
}
//version 2 of dealloc method
-(void)dealloc
{
//...
[myArr release];
//...
}
here the version 1 dealloc method doesn't work and Xcode says something like "EXC_BAD_ACCESS..." and the app crashed.
if I modified the dealloc method as version 2, it works.
Does anybody have any idea why?
Thx in advance.
As Duncan said, the EXEC_BAD_ACCESS error means that the object doesn't exist anymore.
This is probably due to the fact that myArr is being released before the dealloc gets called.
To facilitate memory management and to keep track of reference counts, I like to make it clearer in the init methods, for example:
-(id)init
{
//...
NSMutableArray *array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:0];
self.myArr = array;
[array release];
//...
}
By using the generated setter self.myArr = array; you are ensuring that the reference count is being delt with correctly, it will release the old value and retain the new one for you.
#MadhavanRP : if the property is a retained property:
#property(nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray *myArr;
calling
self.myArr = nil
is exactely the same as calling
[myArr release];
myArr = nil;
Edit: #Sylvain beat me to it :)
This is OK even if it's bad idea/confusing to have same name for iVar and property. I removed the iVar declaration.
#interface C: NSObject
{}
#property (nonatomic,retain) NSMutableArray *myArr;
//...
#end
Generate your iVar using #synthetize.
#implementation C
#synthesize myArr = _myArr;
//...
Your init is all wrong. You are assigning the iVar without using the setter method.
-(id)init
{
//...
// You were doing
// _myArr = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
// You should do
NSMutableArray array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
self.myArr = array;
[array release];
// You could avoid the temporary variable but this confuse XCode static analyzer
//...
}
This is OK. I guess that #synthetize generated another iVar to back your property.
This other iVar was not properly assign.
You would not notice this if you do not user self.myArr (or the equivalent [self myArr]).
This confusion is main reason why hardcore ObjC programmer do not like the new property thing. :) This confuse new programmers.
//version 1 of dealloc method
-(void)dealloc
{
//...
self.myArr = nil;
//...
}
This is not good as you bypass the setter, as in init method. This was working anyway.
//version 2 of dealloc method
-(void)dealloc
{
//...
[myArr release];
//...
}
It looks like your myArr object is being messaged when it should not be, in the first case you hide the problem by setting it to nil, in the second you don't. Either method should not crash. When do you call [super dealloc]; (you should call it at the end of the dealloc implementation).
Here is my ItemInfo class interface
#interface ItemInfo : NSObject {
NSString *item;
}
#property (nonatomic, copy) NSString *ipaddress;
... and the implementation
#synthesize item;
- (id) initWithItem:(NSString *)someItem {
self = [super init];
if(self) {
item = someItem; // Ideally these things should happen here.
// Since item is a NSString and not NSMutableString,
// it should be sent a retain, thus
// making its refcount = 1
// Is my understanding correct?
}
return self;
}
- (void) dealloc {
[item release]; // I own 'item', so I should release it when done
[super dealloc];
}
I am using this class from elsewhere like thus:
char *str = inet_ntoa(addy->sin_addr);
ItemInfo *h = [[ItemInfo alloc] initWithItem:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%s", str]];
ContentBrowserViewController *d
= [[ContentBrowserViewController alloc] initWithItemInfo:h];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:d animated:YES];
[h release];
[d release];
The crash I am encountering is
*** -[CFString release]: message sent to deallocated instance 0x6225570. 0x6225570 is the address of h.item
Where am I going wrong?
You need to call your setter using self.item = someItem. You currently disregard the setter and therefore do not copy/own the String.
In your initWithItem:, you need to do item = [someItem copy]; You could also do item = [someItem retain];, but that would cause problems if your string was a NSMutableString.
The reason for the crash is that you pass an autoreleased string, and your initWithItem: doesn't say "I need this string to stay around" (retain) or "I need my personal version of this string" (copy). The string thus gets released too often as you do release it in your dealloc.
According to your source, I'm willing to bet that the crash does not happen in the code you've posted but actually when the NSAutoreleasePool is finally releasing the string.
im fairly new to objective-c, most of it is clear however when it comes to memory managment I fall a little short. Currently what my application does is during a NSURLConnection when the method -(void)connectionDidFinishLoading:(NSURLConnection *)connection is called upon I enter a method to parse some data, put it into an array, and return that array. However I'm not sure if this is the best way to do so since I don't release the array from memory within the custom method (method1, see the attached code)
Below is a small script to better show what im doing
.h file
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#interface memoryRetainTestViewController : UIViewController {
NSArray *mainArray;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSArray *mainArray;
#end
.m file
#import "memoryRetainTestViewController.h"
#implementation memoryRetainTestViewController
#synthesize mainArray;
// this would be the parsing method
-(NSArray*)method1
{
// ???: by not release this, is that bad. Or does it get released with mainArray
NSArray *newArray = [[NSArray alloc] init];
newArray = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:#"apple",#"orange", #"grapes", "peach", nil];
return newArray;
}
// this method is actually
// -(void)connectionDidFinishLoading:(NSURLConnection *)connection
-(void)method2
{
mainArray = [self method1];
}
// Implement viewDidLoad to do additional setup after loading the view, typically from a nib.
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
}
- (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning {
// Releases the view if it doesn't have a superview.
[super didReceiveMemoryWarning];
// Release any cached data, images, etc that aren't in use.
}
- (void)viewDidUnload {
mainArray = nil;
// Release any retained subviews of the main view.
// e.g. self.myOutlet = nil;
}
- (void)dealloc {
[mainArray release];
[super dealloc];
}
#end
Your -method1 first creates a new array and then overwrites it with a new one:
NSArray *newArray = [[NSArray alloc] init]; // first array, retained
newArray = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:...]; // second array, auto-released,
// pointer to first one lost
The first array is simply leaked here. You are also leaking the array stored in the ivar, just use the synthesized setter to avoid that - it retains and releases for you.
If you haven't done so yet, read the Memory Management Guide for Cocoa.
A better version:
- (NSArray *)method1 {
NSArray *newArray = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:...];
return newArray;
}
- (void)method2 {
self.mainArray = [self method1];
}
Yes, your newArray is released when mainArray is released. But this just if method2 is called once.
We're talking about references so if you have
newArray = something
mainArray = newArray
[mainArray release]
both variables will be referencing to just a NSArray*. Then in your case newArray is just a local so there's no problem.
The problem occurs if you call method2 twice:
newArray = something
mainArray = newArray
newArray = something2
mainArray = newArray <- old reference is lost
[mainArray release] <- just something2 is released
To avoid this issue you should make sure to release mainArray before overwriting the reference with another object.
EDIT: didn't noticed that you were creating the array twice :) No, that's not good..
I've got this code:
Entry.h
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#interface Entry : NSObject {
id object;
SEL function;
}
#property (retain) id object;
#property (assign) SEL function;
-(Entry*) initWithObject:(id)object selector:(SEL)function;
#end
Entry.m
#import "Entry.h"
#implementation Entry
#synthesize object;
#synthesize function;
-(Entry*) initWithObject:(id)obj selector:(SEL)sel {
self = [super init];
[self setObject:obj];
[self setFunction:sel];
return self;
}
-(void) dealloc {
[super dealloc];
if ([self object] != nil)
[[self object] release];
}
#end
And when I do this:
Entry *hej = [Entry alloc];
[hej release];
I get:
objc[2504]: FREED(id): message object sent to freed object=0xf5ecd0
Program received signal: “EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION”.
What am I doing wrong?
(And this insert code thing at stack overflow doesnt work, unless I'm doing something wrong and you're not supposed to click "code sample" and then paste.)
+alloc only allocates memory. You need -init to actually create the object in that memory space. Since you are only allocating memory and not creating an object there, calling -release on a chunk of memory is giving you an error. Further, you want your [super dealloc] call to appear at the end of you -dealloc method. Change those two things and the following should work:
Entry *hej = [[Entry alloc] init];
[hej release];
there are two problems here:
1) you need to check that self = [super init] does not return nil. Typical usage would be to follow wrap your initialization code with the conditional:
if ((self = [super init]) != nil) {
// initialize the object...
}
2) but where you are getting stuck is on instantiating your object: you should do it like this:
Entry *hej = [[Entry alloc] initWithObject:myObj selector:mySelector];
(assuming that you want to go through the custom initializer you just defined...
else just use the default init method.) but 'alloc' must be followed by an init.
Entry *hej = [[Entry alloc] init]; // will do the trick...
Firstly, you need an init to go with your alloc. Second, in dealloc, you send a message to self after calling [super dealloc]. You can't do that. The final deallocation should go at the end.
I would also recommend changing:
if ([self object] != nil)
[[self object] release];
to:
[self setObject:nil];
It's less code and functionally equivalent. =)
There are many things wrong with your code. I'll try to go through them.
First, its better to use a different ivar name to your property name so its clear where you are using each. Apple normally uses an underscore prefix, but any prefix will do.
#interface Entry : NSObject {
id _object;
SEL _function;
}
#property (retain) id object;
#property (assign) SEL function;
#synthesize object = _object;
#synthesize function = _function;
Next, you aren't using the standard init template (although this probably wont make any difference normally).
-(Entry*) initWithObject:(id)obj selector:(SEL)sel {
self = [super init];
if (self != nil) {
// initializations
}
return self;
}
Next, Apple (for good reasons) recommends against using getters/setters in your init/dealloc. So your init would be:
-(Entry*) initWithObject:(id)obj selector:(SEL)sel {
self = [super init];
if (self != nil) {
_object = [obj retain];
_object = sel;
}
return self;
}
Next, after [super dealloc] your object is destroyed, so you cannot reference self (and hence your ivars) after that, so your dealloc should look like:
-(void) dealloc {
// your deallocations
[super dealloc];
}
Further, as above, Apple recommends you should not use setters or getters in your dealloc routine, so your deallocation would initially look like:
if (_object != nil)
[_object release];
But further still, Objective C allows (and Cocoa encourages) that sending a method to nil does nothing. This is in stark contast to most other languages where messaging nil would cause a crash, but it is how Objective C/Cocoa work and you need to get used to it. So your deallocation is actually just:
[_object release];
And finally, alloc only allocates the memory for your object, you have to initialize it, so the initialization would be something like:
Entry *hej = [[Entry alloc] initWithObject:myobj selector:#selector(mymethod)];
I am using the iPhone SDK and have an issue doing something simple. I am trying to add an NSNumber object to an NSMutableArray instance variable. I tried adding NSNumber card to NSMutableArray viewedCardsArray, however without breaking, it does not get added to the array. Here is the code.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Inside the header file Class.h
#interface MyViewController : UIViewController {
NSMutableArray *viewedCardsArray;
//snip ...
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray *viewedCardsArray;
#end
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Inside the methods file Class.m
#import "StudyViewController.h"
#implementation StudyViewController
#synthesize viewedCardsArray
//snip ...
- (IBAction)doShowCard {
//snip ...
NSNumber *cardIdObject = [[NSNumber alloc] initWithInt:(int)[self.currentCard cardId]];
[viewedCardsArray addObject: cardIdObject];
[cardIdObject release];
}
So this code executes, and does not seem to leak (according to the Leaks performance tool). However when stepping through the code, at no point does CardIdObject appear in viewedCardsArray.
Looking through SO, I know these basic questions are pretty common to ObjC newbies (like me) so apologies in advance!
Have you initialized your viewedCardsArray? If not you need to somewhere - this is usually done in the init method for your class:
- (id)init
{
self = [super init];
if(self) {
viewedCardsArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
}
return self;
}
Then it is released in the dealloc method:
- (void)dealloc
{
[viewedCardsArray release];
[super dealloc];
}
Perspx has outlined one way of initializing the array. However, you can also use the class methods provided by NSArray:
self. viewedCardsArray = [NSMutableArray array];
This can go in init or elsewhere.
Note: The object will be autoreleased.