Many times, I get:
-Frozen, load goes to 5.0. Can't use my box.
-Just doesn't work.
Do following steps:
1.rabbitmq-plugins enable rabbitmq_management
2.service rabbitmq-server restart
3.browse to http://rabbitmq-server-ip:15672
4.login with
username: guest
password: guest
Dont forget to change your password later.
As sheki notes, rabbitmqctl is your first port of call for diagnostics, and for building monitoring on top of, but it's not suitable for actual monitoring directly being a manual command line.
I've found DataDog very good to monitor both the MQ details, plus the host platform in parallel. e.g. you can watch the queue levels and set alerts on queues backing-up, while also watching the CPU/memory/IO inflicted by these queue levels. It really helps to get ratios of resource usage, and the alerts are good. Having a uniform platform for both infrastructure and application level monitoring is surprisingly rare, but speeds up diagnoses of production issues hugely.
NewRelic is similar and also has a RabbitMQ plugin, although I've not used this plugin specifically, I've used NR for years and found it invaluable in diagnosing operational issues.
AppDynamics is another example. Similarly this allows you to drill down into your app from a high-level dashboard, and visually navigate from problems to causes. It's especially good with visualising the network of a distributed application across various services/servers. I've used this, for example, to find complex problems in .NET applications and SQL Server clusters using 3rd party Web Services (e.g. latency and its consequences to your app over chatty protocols). These things are very difficult to diagnose, especially for developers who are limited to checking their code. Diagnosing operational issues requires a much broader picture.
I gave up trying to even install and configure Nagios. I know it's the 'best' but it's the best of an old breed of self-configured beasts which we don't have time to manage. I didn't even get it going... and eventually turned to the more 'modern' cloud approach. Once you get over the trust factor, it's pretty liberating.
I'm using these APM platforms together* to aggregate data from:
Windows O/S level Event Logs/Services
Linux O/S level
AWS console level
RDS, EC2
Apache
MySQL
App integrations / custom NR plugins I've written
Rabbit MQ
*NewRelic can feed into Datadog! So if you are already using NR you don't need to install DD on those hosts as well.
Being able to view all these levels together gives you a view on the publishers, middleware, MQ servers, workers and front-end app - all in one dashboard.
I would highly recommend an approach like this, because just looking at one server alone leads you to a lot of head-scratching. Seeing an entire stack in one customisable dashboard is just so illuminating it takes most of the guesswork out of it.
Worried about installing these things? I found New Relic to be especially light-weight and unobtrusive. AppDynamics seemed to stress the host a bit more, but mostly that's because you had to run the visualisation tools on the host! (this may have changed). DataDog seems performant, but creates a lot of control panels/icons on the target host (perhaps just a visual impression).
To a four year old question - this answer probably wasn't available in 2011, but in 2015 these once 'startup' style APM services are just tens or hundred dollars a month for an unbelievably rich enterprise-level solution.
There are bunch of RabbitMQ monitoring plugins available for different monitoring systems like Nagios, Zabbix etc.
Look at http://www.rabbitmq.com/how.html#management
Using rabbitmqctl is the most straight forward solution to check the status of the node.
$ rabbitmqctl status
This should tell you the status of the RabbitMQ node.
If you have PRTG (or any probe system with a HTTP sensor check), you can check the server status described at the following page:
https://blog.cdemi.io/monitoring-rabbitmq-in-prtg/
In particular you have to
Enable Management Plugin
The rabbitmq-management plugin provides an HTTP-based API for management and monitoring of your RabbitMQ
server, along with a browser-based UI and a command line tool,
rabbitmqadmin. The management plugin is included in the RabbitMQ
distribution. To enable it, we need to run: rabbitmq-plugins enable
rabbitmq_management on the RabbitMQ nodes. For more details on the
Management plugin refer to RabbitMQ Documentation.
The web UI is located at: http://server-name:15672/ The HTTP API and
its documentation are both located at: http://server-name:15672/api/
Once done, you can check the overview of your server with the API:
http://server-name:15672/api/overview
Where you have a JSON with all details about the server, active connections, queues, etc.
This cmd will help you service rabbitmq-server status
OR try theseservice rabbitmq-server stop and service rabbitmq-server start then service rabbitmq-server status.
Related
Advanced Attacks Detection in a Platform-as-a-Service(PaaS) Environment
In the first part of this project, i'm supposed to monitor incoming packets
in a web service, accept only HTTP & HTTPS (TCP)packets for later analysis and, drop the rest.
I was thinking doing this in JAVA, because i think it's a very flexible and
complete language and, it's present in every PaaS Environment! So, my idea is
to build a simple web page in JSP/JSF with a bean to attend this first step
of the project.
This is where i need some guidance! Because i've started considering
libpcap JAVA wrappers like jNetPcap, Jpcap and Pcap4J. But none of them is able to drop packets!
Forgetting JAVA, i also have red about other libraries like: libnet, libdnet and libcrafter.
libnet can not handle the task!
libdnet has network firewall rule manipulation capabilities, but it's a very old library and, i'm not sure it can handle integration with iptables!
libcrafter is the best! Because it's an actual updated project and, it allows the use of iptables rules in the code.
And, of course, working directly with netfilter would be the ideal scenario!
But working with libcrafter or netfilter, to follow my simple idea of a web service with a JAVA bean, i would have to write my own java wrapper by JNI! Which i assume NOT to be a simple task!
Now, what is raising many doubts in my mind, is the fact that this has to be
done in a PaaS environment! None of them (PaaS providers) seem to have the
same restrictions. There are some more flexible like AWS and Microsoft Azure that let you choose and manage a VM with the OS distro you want. Others like OpenShift, BlueMix or Cloud Foundry, in a project, only give you the option of defining the programming language, application server and, that's it! So, one might not have permissions to install libraries and control network & transport layers to manage the packets! Since the hole OS administration is handled by the provider.
Considering only the main purpose of this project, which is managing the packet flow pointed to a domain located in a PaaS environment, without the help of other servers like tcp proxies, i am desperately in need of someone pointing me a direction to start from! Because with that, i can dig as deep as needed to get a solution. Please HELP!
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
I'd like to deploy kubernetes on a large physical server (24 cores) and I'm uncertain as to a number of things.
What are the pros and cons of creating virtual machines for the k8s cluster other than running on bare-metal.
I have the following considerations:
Creating vms will allow for work load isolation. New vms for experiments can be created and assigned to devs.
On the other hand, with k8s running on bare metal a new NAMESPACE can be created for each developer for experimentation and they can run their code in it. After all their code should be running in docker containers.
Security:
Having vms would limit the amount of access given to future maintainers, limiting the amount of damage that could be done. While on the other hand the primary task for any future maintainers would be adding/deleting nodes and they would require bare metal access to do that.
Authentication:
At the moment devs would only touch the server when their code runs through the CI pipeline and their running deployments are deployed. But what about viewing logs? Could we setup tiered kubectl authentication to allow devs to only access whatever namespaces have been assigned to them (I believe this should be possible with the k8s namespace authorization plugin).
A number of vms already exist on the server. Would this be an issue?
128 cores and doubts.... That is a lot of cores for a single server.
For kubernetes however this is not relevant:
Kubernetes can use different sized servers and utilize them to the maximum. However if you combine the master server processes and the node/worker processes on a single server, you might create unwanted resource issues. You can manage those with namespaces, as you already mention.
What we do is use continuous integration with namespaces in a single dev/qa kubernetes environment in which changes have their own namespace (So we run many many namespaces) and run full environment deployments in those namespaces. A bunch of shell scripts are used to manage this. This works both with a large server as what you have, as well as it does with smaller (or virtual) boxes. The benefit of virtualization for you could mainly be in splitting the large box in smaller ones so that you can also use it for other purposes then just kubernetes (yes, kubernetes runs except MS Windows, no desktops, no kernel modules for VPN purposes, etc).
I would separate dev and prod in the form of different vms. I once had a webapp inside docker which used too many threads so the docker daemon on the host crashed. It was limited to one host luckily. You can protect this by setting limits, but it's a risk: one mistake in dev could bring down prod as well.
I think the answer is "it depends!" which is not really an answer. Personally, I would split up the machine using VM's and deploy that way. You've got better flexibility as to how much of the server's resources you carve out and you can easily create new environments, then destroy easily.
Even if these vms are really big, I think it's still easier to manage also given that you have existing vm's on the machine.
That said, there's not a technical reason that you can't run a single node server, but you may run into problems with downtime with upgrades (if that's an issue), as well as if that server needs patched or rebooted, then your entire cluster is down.
I would look at your environment needs for HA and uptime, as well as how you are going to deploy VM's (if you go that route), and decide what works the best for you.
Currently I use jmeter aggregate report or summary report for submitting reports. But they expect something extra.. How can I give. Is there any plugins for getting server resources usage when testing load.
Reporting: since JMeter 3.0 there is a HTML Reporting Dashboard which can be generated during the test run. It contains exhaustive overview information. If you need to find out the reason of the bottleneck or memory leak or whatever you can consider extra Graphs available via JMeter Plugins project.
The same JMeter Plugins project provides PerfMon - client-server application which is able to collect over 70 different metrics and plot them via JMeter Listener. See How to Monitor Your Server Health & Performance During a JMeter Load Test guide for detailed setup and usage instructions.
There are quite a few plug-ins available that can help you analyze the results better. You can refer to https://jmeter-plugins.org/ for the same.
Most popularly used ones are:
Response Times Over Time
Response Times Percentiles
Transactions per Second
Response Latencies Over Time
In case of server usage you can use following that comes with JMeter plug-ins
PerfMon Metrics Collector and Server Agent or
In case of Unix based system use sar command that comes with sysstat package or VMstat. In case of windows based system use Perfmon to capture the system utilization data while the test is running and then use Ksar to plot graphs with the data collected using sar. https://sourceforge.net/projects/ksar/
If you have collected data using Perfmon then plot the graphs using PAL. https://pal.codeplex.com/
In this case, I would suggest using Grafana. It shows realtime results. And the best thing is, it can be configured according to the need.
Now, the thing is how to use it? Using it is not that tough.
If you're using a Mac or Linux (Any Flavour) things become easy. If you're using Windows, I would suggest using a virtual machine. The reason behind that is windows block traffic after some requests. And that causes a lot of pain in the head.
In my case, I used a virtual machine to setup ubuntu inside it and then configured Grafana.
For working with Grafana, you need to have these two things installed.
Grafana Itself
Influx Db for the backend
Links for both here below:
https://grafana.com/grafana/download?platform=linux
https://portal.influxdata.com/downloads/
Once installed and setup,
You need to use Backen Listener to push results o Graphite Client (Installed along with Influx DB Automatically).
I know it is a bit confusing but once you understand the thing, you and your client will love the detailed reports.
Remeber, Grafana is all about configuration.
Let me know if you have any confusion regarf=ding this.
Happy to help. :)
I would like to attach to a WebSphere JVM and obtain useful data like garbage collectors' names and their collection counts, thread counts, heap/non-heap memory usage, JVM uptime etc. However, this link gives the list of MBeans available with the WebSphere JVM -
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v6r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.javadoc.wsfep.doc%2Fweb%2FmbeanDocs%2Findex.html
These MBeans don't seem to offer any data that I require. Is there any other way to obtain the data? I shall be using JMX to gather it.
If you're a corporate with bucks to spend I would suggest a product like Wily Introscope which runs an agent along with your JVM to collect all the metrics that you are after. I have used it with Websphere servers. Searching for an Open Source alternative I came across GlassBox which may provide a low cost alternative for you.
I'm not aware of any default MBeans that will provide the coverage you're after. It's typically the big Java vendors that provide this type of functionality.
[Update]
Having done something recently using VisualVM with Websphere 7, for the purposes of real-time monitoring/troubleshooting, I thought I would share my knowledge. VisualVM comes with the standard Sun JDK and you will find it installed here: JAVA_HOME\bin\jvisualvm.exe
To enable the JRE in Websphere to allow VisualVM to connect you must add the following JVM parameters using the Websphere Admin Console
Go To: Application Servers > [server_name] > Java and Process Management > Process definition > Java Virtual Machine > Generic JVM arguments
-Djavax.management.builder.initial=
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=1099
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=false
Make sure that the port number you have chosen above is not already in use
netstat -ap | grep 1099
Restart the server and you will be able to connect using VisualVM to see Uptime, Threads, Heap and GC profiles.
I see that Sun have also documented how you can write your own Java JMX client to read these values.
You could go with the suggestions provided by Brad and Andreas.
I would like to give you some insights into some of the tools that should be explored
(1) Tivoli Performance Viewer. This should provide some information about the JVM.
(2) IBM Health Center -> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/tools/healthcenter/
Both of these should provide you a lot of info that you require.
Try them out
The JVM statistics are provided by the platform MXBeans. If you need to collect this data over a short period of time, then you could use a tool such as VisualVM. It's a bit tricky to configure this to connect to a WebSphere instance, but it is possible. One way to do that (there are other options) is described here:
http://code.google.com/p/xm4was/wiki/VisualVMHowTo
If you want to collect the data over a longer period of time, then you need a monitoring system. At work, I wrote a plugin for the Open Source RHQ enterprise management system that adds support for WebSphere. I'm in the process of releasing this plugin as an Open Source project, but at the time of writing, I have not yet published the documentation and there is also no downloadable release yet. Only the source code is available right now. I will try to complete that in the next weeks. If you are interested in this project, please let me know.
Our scenario: dozens of Windows laptops which are occasionally connected to the network. Need to store simple data records on each laptop, then have these reliably transferred to a service running on the network once connection is available. Considering RabbitMQ on each laptop, feeding data to a "main" RabbitMQ on the network. This is a Fortune 100, and packaging etc is a concern.
Question 1: In general, does Rabbit make sense here? If not, any suggestions for an approach?
Question 2: When I installed on Win I had to manually install Erlang first. Are there packaging/deployment options which are simpler/more friendly? (Their IT people can do all the normal deployment stuff including create win service, but installing Erlang on user machines might raise eyebrows...)
Thanks for any help from those of you who've been there, done that with Rabbit.
Question 1: What you need is a store and forward mechanism. RabbitMQ can be used for that, actually by using the Shovel plug-in to take care of moving messages from the local Rabbit to the remote one (handling reconnection, retries, etc... for you).
Question 2: The answer is related to question 1. RabbitMQ+Shovel is conceptually suitable for your store and forward needs but if, alas, not technologically acceptable, you may want to consider simpler/cruder approaches like... SMTP!
If the Windows laptops are backed by a windows infrastructure, the most logical choice is MSMQ, which offers this "Out-of-the-box"; e.g. store and forward from clients to server(s). Easy to install by policy and administrate.