I have an application which use CUDA. I am using runtime API and CUDA toolkit 3.2. Application has a dependency on cudart32_32_7.dll. However, there is also cudart32_32_12.dll. The issue is, I do not know how to determine which dll is linked from cudart.lib during the application build. I need to identify dependency dynamically somehow, because I need to include all dependencies into the deployment package. I would like to avoid hard coding dependency path ...
Just put the .dll or .exe of your project into this software: Dependency walker. It will show on what other .dlls yours project depends on. There you'll find either cudart32_32_7.dll or cudart32_32_12.dll.
Alternatively, if you're making a binary project. Just compile it and run the binary (.exe) on a different machine that doesn't have CUDA installed. An error message will come asking for either cudart32_32_7.dll or cudart32_32_12.dll.
Related
I have the same problem as described here:
https://github.com/NLua/NLua/issues/33
Though I have followed the instructions to create a console application...
http://www.screencast.com/t/M12TqePQxW
...which works just fine, when I create a library project and reference it from another project (in this case, a Web API project) the following error occurs:
Unable to load DLL 'lua52': The specified module could not be found.
At this line:
using (var lua = new Lua())
How can a library project be made with the NLua nuget package without failing?
It is the exact same issue as described in the GitHub issue, the Nuget package is missing two DLLs that you need to use lua52.dll. One small difference, the current package (version 1.3.2.1) includes a newer version of lua52.dll that was built with VS2013. And therefore has a dependency on msvcr120.dll and msvp120.dll.
Beware that this may change in the future when Nuget updates your project.
As-is, you need to download and install the Visual C++ redistributable package for VS2013. Run both vcredist_x64.exe and vcredist_x86.exe so your project can run either in 32-bit or 64-bit mode.
To avoid having to do this on the machine on which you want to deploy your program, I recommend you copy the two DLLs from the c:\windows\system32 (64-bit) or c:\windows\syswow64 (32-bit) directories into the same directory as your EXE.
The package author could have done a better job putting this package together. Short from including the DLLs in the package, the better solution would be for him to rebuild lua52.dll with the /MT option so these dependencies are linked in. Consider clicking the New Issue button to let him know.
I have Visual Studio 2010 installed and have a project I got from someone else which I can build successfully without any errors. I get a Wrapper.dll,
which I would like to access using JNA.
I am using Win7 64-bit.
But I get the error: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Unable to load library 'Wrapper': The specified module could not be found.
Wrapper.dll of course is in the correct folder and it is a 32-bit dll and my Java program also uses a JRE with 32-bit, so this is not the cause of the error.
I used DependencyWalker to check whether *.dlls are missing:
MSVCP80.DLL
MSVCR80.DLL
GPSVC.DLL
IESHIMS.DLL
And yes there are some missing.
Can I conclude that the error is related with that these DLLs are missing?
But why does Visual Studio compile correctly then and does not throw an error?
How to solve this in order to access these functions in Wrapper.dll?
I also read that downloading dll's might not be the right thing to do!
(I know that Wrapper.dll relies on another dll or sourcecode which was built in Visual Studio 2005, if that is of interest.)
EDIT:
I found out, that Wrapper.dll relies on three other dlls which probably were built on MSVS2005. These require the above mentioned DLL's (checked with dependencywalker) and I guess therefore Wrapper.dll also links them.
So what do I actually do to get rid of these old dll's?
Would I need to build the other three DLLs with VS2010 or
is this a problem which always will appear, meaning, that you need to copy paste old DLLs in order to use the precompiled Libraries which are dependent on those.
Is there a way, that the program would run on any other system as well without copy pasting these DLL's?
All required DLLs must be available to the system for loading. If you define jna.library.path, that is where JNA will look for the initially loaded DLL, as well as any dependent DLLs. In addition, java.library.path (which is essentially PATH) will be searched for dependent DLLs.
MSVS often uses paths in addition to PATH when building, debugging, and running code within that environment.
Solutions:
a) remove dependencies you don't really need; this may include telling MSVS to build your DLL differently
b) include non-system DLLs next to your custom DLL (or include their location in PATH/java.library.path)
EDIT
a) you can include the offending DLLs in the same directory as yours. this is fairly low impact on the target system, but if they are DLLs that are expected to be on any system, you shouldn't have to do so. It's preferable to adjust java.library.path so that all system DLLs are accessible.
b) you can recompile your dependent DLLs and be more careful about backward compatibility and explicit linkage. Depending on features used by the DLLs, though, you may not be able to remove the dependencies.
MSVC[RP]80.DLL are C and C++ runtimes, respectively; you may or may not be able to link against a previous version.
IESHIMS.DLL is part of IE and should be on the system, but likely in a path inaccessible to your program.
GPSVC.DLL has to do with group security policy, so it should be available on the system (modulo whenever the DLL was introduced).
I wrote a program in C++ using Visual Studio 2010
But when I run it on some computers with WinXP it says
"Cannot start because MSVCP100.dll wasn't found"
How do I prevent such dependencies on dlls that do not come with windows?
Thank you.
you cannot prevent this dependency, as it's the core runtime library of Visual C++. Instead, include the Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable package with your application (usually a separate link is enough since most people have it installed already)
However, if in fact your program cannot start because a dll with D at the end such as MSVCP100D.dll then you need to build your program in release mode, which by default switches the run time to a non-debug version. You need to be careful to nut out any other included static and dynamic libraries you're including in your project to make sure all debug or all release versions match for your builds.
If you are having trouble finding which sub-projects are referencing the debug versions, you can download and run depends.exe and browse through the exe file to see.
Sorry for the late respones, but yes you can prevent this dependency, just go to solution property of yopur project, go to C/C++ > Code Generator and in Runtime Library change it from MDd to MTd, will include statically the dependent libraries, and not in run time, like this avoid Run time errors while try to run the Dll.
I have a set of utility LabVIEW VIs that make calls to a custom DLL written in C++. I'd like to package the VIs into a LabVIEW toolkit and deploy it via an installer, but am unsure about the standard practices involved in doing this where a custom DLL is involved. I've looked at VIPM for packaging the VIs, but so far I haven't found a way to generate a package and include the appropriate DLL dependencies. What is the correct way to go about generating an installer for a LabVIEW Toolkit and installing the DLL dependency for said toolkit in the correct location (where ever that may be)?
The DLLs immediately known to the system - i.e., the ones entered in the CLFN node - are added automatically.
DLLs which are used indirectly and DLLs which are determined programmatically cannot be auto-included and must be added manually to the Source files section of the respective Build rule.
I have a mex64 dll compiled on my machine. I used Matlab 2009b with VS2008 Pro to compile the dll. The dll works fine on my Matlab installation.
I want a colleague to use the dll so I sent it to him and he gets the following error message when trying to use the dll:
??? Invalid MEX-file 'filename.mexw64': The specified module could not be found.
My current assumption is that this is caused because he uses an older Matlab version or missing a dll that I have. I ran dependency checker and asked him to check that he has all the listed dlls.
I am still waiting for him to confirm his Matlab version.
What other reasons can cause this and can the Matlab version make a difference? (I mean R2009a when I have R2009B and not a huge version diff)
The other person has Matlab R2009a. Shouldn't the mex just work if I compile it on my computer and deliver it to him?
Does this only leave a missing dependent dll?
The issue is strange, but I can confirm it exists.
Using pre-built libraries for matlab that are correctly installed and in the path, I sometimes get the same error. If I type in the function name at the command-line, the function is visible and will auto-complete. However, the function will not initialize until I 'cd' into the directory with the .mexw64 library file.
>> AndorInitialize('')
Invalid MEX-file 'C:\Program
Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\AndorInitialize.mexw64': The
specified module could not be found.
>> path
MATLABPATH
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\camera files
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\m files
... etc
It turns out this is due to missing dependencies, which shouldn't be missing. To resolve the issue, use dependency walker (free, lightweight) to identify what's missing. The mathworks explains this.
http://www.mathworks.com/support/solutions/en/data/1-2RQL4L/
In my case, two DLL's weren't showing up properly, even though they were on my system and in the path. I copied the DLL's into the windows/system32 folder and the library functions now work correctly. What's particularly strange is that the same library worked on my computer a few days ago (prior to the moving the DLL's).
In general, MEX files should work across different versions of Matlab; in particular, they should be forward-compatible. You're right; sounds like a dll problem.
If you built it with Visual Studio, it may be linked to the Visual C++ Runtime. This is a set of libraries that is not installed on Windows by default. The "redistributable" for it can be downloaded here; having your coworker install that could resolve the problem. If that doesn't work, you can use Dependency Walker to check for other unsatisfied DLL dependencies.
Normally, configuring Matlab's "mex -setup" to use the Lcc compiler that's distributed with Matlab could be a way around this, but it's not supported for 64-bit Windows AFAIK.
Also, are you sure he has the 64-bit version of Windows?
Another possible source of the problem could be that you compiled in debug mode. The Visual C++ redistributables only support release mode.
The Dll was a wrapper for MySql access. We ended up using Matlab's ODBC and the MySql Connector.