I am testing a web site which uses both http and https protocols depending on its configuration file.
I am writing my test cases in java.
My test cases are working fine for http but in https it generates a untrusted connection error.
I know i can avoid this using firefoxprofile manager but problem is that my test cases will be used on many machines to test this website and creating a profile on every machine is not possible
Is there any way to avoid getting this error so that my test cases works perfectly for both http and https.
You could try invoking the browser with -trustAllSSLCertificates clause.
Here's a code snippet:
BrowserConfigurationOptions bco = new BrowserConfigurationOptions();
bco.setCommandLineFlags("-trustAllSSLCertificates");
bco.setCommandLineFlags("-disable-web-security");
bco.setCommandLineFlags("-avoidProxy");
settings.setReuseBrowserSessions(true);
settings.setSingleWindow(true);
SeleniumServer seleniumserver=new SeleniumServer(settings);
seleniumserver.boot();
seleniumserver.start();
rs79's answer is a good start, but depending on your browser there are more steps you need to take. I wrote up a pretty comprehensive article on testing SSL in Selenium that you may want to check out:
http://mogotest.com/blog/2010/04/13/how-to-accept-self-signed-ssl-certificates-in-selenium
Related
Using Selenium's WebDriver, with PhantomJSDriver, I am trying to do headless browser testing. It works fine when connected to internet WITHOUT a proxy. But when the connection to internet is via an authenticated proxy, it fails. I want to deploy this program to multiple user sites, which might be connected to internet with or without proxy, and in case of proxy, it might be authenticated or unauthenticated.
Is there a way to tell Selenium Webdriver to use the "current" browser's internet connection settings? Please note I am using phantomjs.
Thanks,
abbas
There is some more simple but very effective solution, that I've used when battling with similar issues an year ago.
Do you have these issues when using other *Drivers? If not - my proposal is to use your implementation of any other *Driver that works fine and after it passes authentication just cast it to PhantomJSDriver. Please note that is just possible workaround if your TestFramework hierarchy is built to support such an action.
In addition you can consider the following - when I used such Polymorphism the difference is speed. For FirefoxDriver and PhantomJSDriver it wasn't such a pain and if you can use it only for authentication it will not slow you down noticeable.
I'm not sure that I can help you with my solution, but it will not hurt to try it.
I am using htmlunit for web scraping - logging to a website on behalf of the users, settings something in their profile and then come back.
Just using pure Htmlunit and no selenium framework.
Now my question:
WebClient webClient = new WebClient(BrowserVersion.INTERNET_EXPLORER_11);
Does this statement - creates a browser instance on the machine where i am executing the code or what it does?
I am using BrowserVersion.INTERNET_EXPLORER_11 as this is an accepted browser at that website.
How Selenium is different than htmlunit - i know we can use htmlunit as a webdriver in Selenium. Does Selenium needs a native browser instance on the machine where the code is getting executed? Does Selenium creates browser instances?
My use case is - I will be having multiple users accessing this application. I know WebClient in htmlunit is not thread safe(so have to code it as Spring proto type bean).
Is there any suggestions regarding this?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
HTMLUnit is a headless browser. So no window will be created if used with Selenium either. Setting the BrowserVersion will just tell HTMLUnit to present itself to the server as if it were a given browser (AFAIK, it will just change the User-Agent but might perform additional internal processing depending on the version). I guess this answers most of the questions but the last one.
Regarding asking for suggestions on how to implement this I would try to avoid logging in to a website that way. If the website does not provide an API for this then it is likely that it is agains the Terms Of Service. Assuming it is not, you will have to create new WebClient instances for each user each time the data needs to be extracted from the other site.
I want to capture all the network calls from Web Driver in Java. I am not doing any UI testing, just testing JS execution and, requests and responses of some network calls.
I tried using Browser Mob as is suggested in most forums, but I need it to work across all browsers. It worked flawlessly with Firefox, but I was facing some issues with the others. Safari driver doesn't event support a Proxy capability.
I don't want to use Fiddler as it involves some manual steps around invoking and storing the calls. Whereas, Browser Mob being an in-code proxy can be integrated in a more smoother fashion.
I also tried using the RC-like package included in Selenium standalone server package. But, I have some HTTPS calls and some nested iframes in cross domains. I am particularly interested in some cross domain POST call and it doesn't work out that well. Also, people keep saying it's not recommended to use that package.
So, I had a solution where we can use a standalone proxy server running on a machine. Using host entries, we'll point Web Driver to hit the proxy instead of the actual server. The proxy will record all the incoming calls and route them to the actual server host. Later, I can make a request to the proxy which will return me all the calls it intercepted. I am not sure whether it's still called a proxy or a router.
I came across TCPmon, but it's no longer being supported. Does anyone know some similar tools that could run on Unix systems or any alternate solutions?
We modified the Fiddler rules script to include a new exec action. If you use their native script editor, it also provide auto complete features and we were comfortably able to get around it. The syntax is similar to that of JavaScript.
The Fiddler package comes with a ExecActions.exe which can be used to pass console arguments to a running Fiddler instance using the command prompt.
The code we wrote processed all the sessions captured by Fiddler and wrote it to a file in a custom JSON format and later used GSON to deserialize it.
Please let me know, if you want further details.
I'm practicing Selenium, I got a strange issue and couldn't find the reason for a while.
In my Mac, I started a Selenium standalone server and a selenium web driver.
In Elciplse, I coded my Selenium scripts, created a Selenium instance as told like this:
selenium = new DefaultSelenium("localhost", 4444,
"*chrome", "http://sydney.mycompany.net.au/GBT");
http://sydney.mycompany.net.au/" is an internal web of our company.
When I started JUnit, it looks my selenium server didn't sent GET /GBT to our web server (I checked the wireshark trace), only the first part (http://sysney.mycompany.net.au) was counted, but /GBT was cut off.
If I changed the url to www.google.com.au, everything is fine.
I tried some public web page such as www.dailytelegraph.com.au/lifestyle, I got the same problem: the lifestyle was cut off too.
Is there any settings I need to do on seleniume server or driver side? Very thanks.
When you initialize selenium, base url is specified (i.e. domain name). After your base url was specified, you can navigate to internal web pages via selenium.open("/GBT")
I am presently working on a project for which selenium scripts are prepared and i want my jmeter proxy should record the steps executed by selenium browser. I tried running selenium and jmeter proxy server on same port but while doing that proxy server of jmeter refuse to start on same port. I read somewhere that this is possible but i am not getting the steps needs to follow.
You should do the same what you will do for simple test recording through Jmeter proxy:
setup Jmeter HTTP Proxy Server;
start configured Jmeter Proxy;
configure and enable proxy settings in your test browser (used by selenium) to use Jmeter Proxy.
Then run your selenium tests as usual, via configured test browser - HTTP Proxy Server will record execution.
To exclude all the steps performed in the "selenium-server" window try to add the following to 'URL Patterns to Exclude' in HTTP Proxy Server settings:
^/selenium-server/.*
Useful point here is to separate recorded execution into different Thread Groups - e.g. separate Thread Group in Jmeter for each recorded selenium testcase.
Step-by-step guideline you may found here.
To tell the truth such the "re-recording" may appear not very useful and effective: JMeter is not a browser, and does not interpret the JavaScript in downloaded pages.
As per Jmeter wiki:
JMeter does not process Javascript or applets embedded in HTML pages.
JMeter can download the relevant resources (some embedded resources
are downloaded automatically if the correct options are set), but it
does not process the HTML and execute any Javascript functions.
If the page uses Javascript to build up a URL or submit a form, you
can use the Proxy Recording facility to create the necessary sampler.
If this is not possible, then manual inspection of the code may be
needed to determine what the Javascript is doing.
So if you need Jmeter possibilities to implement load/performance-testing based on existent Selenium functional scripts better for you then use run Selenium scripts from Jmeter.