Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know of a newer standard for software interface specifications than IEEE J-STD 16 1995? I have been searching the web and the IEEE site and have not found anything, but may not be using the right combination of words in my searches.
I believe the standard that replaced J-STD-016-1995 was IEEE 12207.
The standards that defined the Software Life Cycle Process evolved in the following order:
MIL-STD-2167 (1988) & MIL-STD-7935A (1988)
MIL-STD-498 (1994)
J-STD-016-1995 (1995)
IEEE/EIA 12207 (1998)
Source
From all of the information that I have been able to gather, this is the best standard. There are others out there or I could create my own format, but this one seems to be the most accepted....for anyone who wishes to know an answer to this question.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I wanted to know the spell correct api's available for commercial/non commercial usage other than google/bing.
First of all you can write your own spell corrector with this tutorial. In addition there are some Python packages that may help you with that, such as TextBlob (which I highly recommend). Another option is Gingerit which Iv'e never tried but looks promising. Another DIY spell correct tutorial might interest you as well.
https://www.gigablast.com/spellcheckapi.html
I just launched this, so it's still beta, but it's not bad. It has a dictionary of over 600,000,000 entries covering most non-Asian languages.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a service/library (free or paid) that takes a piece of text and return the language of it?
I need to go over a million blog posts and determine their languages.
I think this is the best out there!
https://code.google.com/p/language-detection/
I've heard good things about langid.py.
Features from the README:
Fast
Pre-trained over a large number of languages (currently 97)
Not sensitive to domain-specific features (e.g. HTML/XML markup)
Single .py file with minimal dependencies
Deployable as a web service
https://github.com/saffsd/langid.py
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a language translator API for my project. I don't want to use the Google Translate API.
Can anyone suggest another? An open source translator would be better.
you can use Bing (Microsoft) machine translation engine.But it is almost the same as translate.google.com Or, you can make your own english-nepali machine tanslation system (engines), e.g.use this:
http://www.statmt.org/moses/
But, it will costs yo a lot of effort and time (question is whether it is worth of it).
Here is some discussion what options do you have if looking for some language translator for not-so-common language:
http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=4370115&type=member&item=201871372&qid=3588ce96-f0c1-4789-a72d-b00a124127ee&trk=group_most_popular-0-b-ttl&goback=.gmp_4370115
(hopefully you will be able to display it)
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I often hack out some Thor, Rake, Bash or even PHP commandline tools. And I want to document the command-line-arguments and variations in a consistent way.
Is there an official, or recommended standard on this documentation?
Like when an option is optional[--foo=bar], or when an option can be one n-values ("yes|no"), etceteras.
I'd rather not come up with my own standard, when there is an official (POSIX?) standard or guide that already lists the do's and don't for documenting tools and applications on CLI's.
I'm not sure what output format you have in mind, but why not use the man-page style? It seems a nice fit for commandline tools.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there an open source alternative to Mosek?
Basically, I'm looking for large scale convex optimization solver packages.
Thanks!
EDIT:
Forgot to mention earlier, problem is non-linear; mostly quadratic, but occasionally may need non-quadratic constraints + non-quadratic objective
There are many packages, mostly with Matlab interfaces, like SDPT3, SeDuMi, and CVX. I believe the first two have their backends in C. The websites of these projects link to other packages. What language did you have in mind?
Does GLPK suit you?