Does anybody have any idea if there exists a demo of a Kohana admin system? (i am thinking at one admin system like Django has one). I am building an online store, and i need a quick way to manage the products inside it. Is there any chance for me to be able to use the Kohana admin system in order to perform this task?
thanks!
i don't know any kohana admin.
the kohana auth will help you to create a security log-in but kohana don't have any pre-builded admin or scaffold.
The cause of kohana don't have any scaffold system or admin is because you will spend more time changing or adapting the admin/scaffold to your needs than do it from zero.
Kohana give you very very impressive tools to build and validate the forms.
If you read the docs carefully and you understand the docs you can program your own admin in less than half an our i guarantee you
A few months ago I was looking for something exactly what you are asking about. I was unable to find a finished product but I found many pieces. I have since been glueing them together as I see fit into the night. The project is quite a buggy mess right now but it works for my purposes. Once I get it in better shape I planned on posting it to my website or maybe github if I ever figure it out that is...
Lately however my job has gotten a bit stricter in regards to coming in early... so I can't code away into the night like I used to. Also, the last component: jQuery mobile UI is still in Alpha 3 so I'm in no major rush either...
My main questions are...
The following are the components it utilizes, will those work with your project?
If 1 == true... and this is for a potential project when would you need/like this module by?
Jelly -->
https://github.com/jonathangeiger/kohana-jelly
Formo -->
https://github.com/bmidget/kohana-formo
Formo-Jelly -->
https://github.com/bmidget/kohana-formo-jelly
Jelly-Auth -->
https://github.com/raeldc/jelly-auth
Jelly-Auth-Demo -->
https://github.com/rob/jelly-auth-demo
A neat admin template style -->
http://mathew-davies.co.uk/2010/03/13/free-admin-template.html
A x12 Grid from -->
http://960.gs/
jQuery Mobile UI Elements -->
http://jquerymobile.com/
Posted as answer instead of a message, just in case others are interested... Gauging the amount of interest will likely determine the amount of evening time sacrificed.
Kohana does not have a magical admin system like Django.
Related
I am trying to improve the performance/speed of an ASP.NET MVC 4 website. One area that I discovered as a hot spot and kinda fixed was Newtonsoft.Json.Net's poor performance of de-serialization. I replaced Json.NET with ServiceStack.Text and now I get a much better performance. That said, when I profile the application I see that Newtonsoft.Json.Net is still the slowest component of the application!
One user story/use case that is vital for us is when a user clicks on "Download" button and then the content is provided by the site for the user to download (we do not provide a static link to the content). From when a user clicks on "Download" button to when the content begins downloading it takes something like 1 seconds. As you can see in the below figure, 254 milliseconds, or 25% of total time, is spent by Newtonsoft.Json doing almost nothing! Therefore I am really keen on getting rid of Json.NET to gain 25% improvement in performance.
Is there anyway to either remove Json.NET or disable it?
Based on information supplied in your comments, you have WebApi installed. WebApi has a dependency on JSON.net. You can remove WebApi via the nuget package manager (there are several supporting packages you may have to delete as well).
on my blog I’m using from a long time the IntenseDebate pluging as commenting system in place of the default one.
I would replace it with Google+ comment system but I don’t want to lose all comments already left by the users via IntenseDebate, so I would figure out if there’s any way to load on the old posts the IntenseDebate pluging in place of the default Google+.
As possible solution, I’m thinking something like a tag in the html post code that (if defined) load the IntenseDebate pluging.
What do you think?
its not posible to migrate IntenseDebate comment on google plus. Their is one solution that you can use multiple comment system in your blogger blog. just few month ago i had written trick for the same. I hope that this will be useful to you.
http://www.tipsviablogging.com/multiple-comment-system-blogspot/
I'm having a problem when trying to A/B test certain nodes in my node-tree in Umbraco.
What I want to do is to copy a node in the node-tree to a specific spot and use that B-structure to see which of the structures works best, using Google analytics.
For example we have two node structures, let's call them "Private" and "Sweden".
Their structure with childnodes and properties are exactly the same. The only difference between them is the propertyvalues (content). The "Private"-URL is www.mysite.com/Private and the "Sweden"-URL is www.mysite.com/Sweden.
What I would like to do is to change every link on the B-structure, so that it points to its match at the A-structure. The problem is that since it's two different structures, it will have two different alternative links.
With other words, it should be a coinsidence that it enters the B-structure, then be moved back to the A-structure in the next click.
We manage what page it should load (either the A-node or the B-node) with scripts, so that it has a 50% chance for each node, and if it lands on the B-node, Google analytics will save data. What we can't manage is that every link on that page will be to the A-node.
I'd appreciate any help I can get.
Regards,
David
There's a couple of ways that seem likely to give you a start at least.
The /config/urlrewriting.config file allows you to set up multiple redirect rules within umbraco so a section like the following might work in sending all requests (whether (/sweden/pagename/ or /private/pagename/) back to the private structure. Not sure how GA will handle it:
rewriteUrlParameter="ExcludeFromClientQueryString" destinationUrl="http://www.mysite.com/private/$1" redirect="Domain" redirectMode="Permanent" ignoreCase="true" />
Secondly a simple httpmodule (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/307996) can process all page requests and redirect as required - you could do a gaq_push here directly or indirectly.
I'd be interested to know how you get on - it seems a good area for extension to Umbraco.
I'm not sure I have understood perfectly what you need to do, so please excuse any assumptions that may prove mistaken. Here's what I think:
Since A & B nodes should share the same html content (besides the links of course), why don't you make the link href attribute dynamic by using a bit of razor in the template or macro:
#{var isANode = CurrentPage.Parent.Name == "Sweden"; }
A similar approach would work if you are using web forms.
We finally came to the final decision to use the alternative template-solution. Since there seem to be no generic solution for my case of this problem we had to create an alternative template with specific macros to render the different information for every documenttype we're using.
Creating dynamic links for every page is a hell of a job in this stage in the project, since there are so many pages and links. Also some links are made in javascript, so there's another problem.
I copied the a-structure to another node, only for the reason to be able to change propertyvalues. There might be a problem logging and track the information with Google Analytics though, so that's the next step for us in this project. In our alternative templates we're getting the propertyvalues from the b-structure.
Still, if anyone have some better solution I'd highly appreciate it!
Regards,
David
I'd like to add a CMS and blog to a web app. One that won't get in the way. There's not a lot of content, but enough that we want non-devs to be able to revise pages and probably add and remove them too.
We have a substantial app that can't be touched by the CMS, not a site that we're migrating.
How have you dealt with this situation?
Would you advise:
Running two apps (a content app and the 'app' app)
Plugging in a light weight CMS
Rolling our own using gems/plugins for WYSIWYG
Details
We'll be adding a bug ticketing and support system later too. Probably built into the app.
We'd like the users of the app to be able to comment on pages and blog posts, file tickets, etc. all from their main account, so it seems to make sense to build it into our app, rather than as an extra app. Love to hear war stories on this.
Should be:
Unobtrusive (Shouldn't interfere with the existing app)
Must not mess with Devise, DeclarativeAuthorization, or Omniauth. We've got extensive user accounts, permissions, authentication mechanisms and groups setup. These must stay.
Lightweight (prefer something dev friendly than feature loaded)
Desired Features:
Basic WYSIWYG for content editors
Lets us handle accounts (with Devise)
and maybe even permissions (with DeclarativeAuthorization)
I've read this similar question, but the author seems willing to have something a bit more intrusive.
Simple Rails 3 CMS Gem/Plugin?
Options Found
Refinery seems to have a lot of features, but at a cursory look it needs a lot of control over what's going on: http://refinerycms.com/guides/attaching-refinery-cms-to-an-existing-rails-application It says it's modular, but it seems like there's a big chunk of non optional stuff in there.
Radiant seems a bit monolithic as well
http://groups.google.com/group/radiantcms/browse_thread/thread/b691cf9ab644a8b2
ComfortableMexicanSofa seems a bit closer to what I want: https://github.com/twg/comfortable-mexican-sofa
Adva-Cms has the right philosophy but appears to be dead. Adva-Cms2 isn't ready
http://adva-cms.org/
Governor seems good, but maybe a bit too young and lean
https://github.com/carpeliam/governor
Conclusion
So far rolling our own, or using ComfortableMexicanSofa seems like the bet, but I'd like your thoughts before I spend a few days messing around with it.
I am now rolling my own blog app and I am kind of newbie to Rails 3. Even like that, in 1 week i have a blog with tags, comments, authentication with omniauth, etc.. my advise is: roll your own. I was having the same doubt and looking for pre-made solutions and I decided to start it from zero and just look for plugins for anything i need.
It goes pretty fast if you know already some rails programming and you use the right plugins. This is what i used:
Omniauth to let users be able to autenticate with facebook, twitter etc.. and leave you comments.
rails_admin: it allows you to manage your blog by going to yourapp.com/admin. It uses devise to create an Admin user (you can specify a diferent model name than user to not to mix it with the users from omniauth or from your other app) and if you have the right models and associations between them you can from there create your posts, assign them tags or categories and also delete comments etc.. its all done in an easy way. For the Text Area that you use to introduce the content of your posts you can associate it with the ckeditor just by adding to the rails_admin initializer something like:
config.model Post do
edit do
field :body, :text do
ckeditor true
end
end
end
And with the ckeditor you can introduce pictures, attach videos, format text, and so on.
Use kaminari for pagination, or you can use will_paginate if you are more used to that.
Using the blueprint framework for styling with css you will save time and have a more standar styling.
Use few jquery lines to insert/delete comments graciously.
And that's all I can remember now. And if it shouldn't interfere with the main app, i would just assign a subdomain for it. So if you go to blog.myapp.com you access to the blog and if you go to myapp.com you access to the app. And you want users from the app to interact with the blog so you should use just one app and have this 2 subdomains pointing at differents parts of the same a app.. take a look at: rails 3 - one app, multiple domains, how implement a different 'root' route for one of the domains?
That's all i can think now! let me know if i can help you in anything else.
rails_admin: it allows you to manage your blog by going to yourapp.com/admin. It uses devise to create an Admin user (you can specify a diferent model name than user to not to mix it with the users from omniauth or from your other app) and if you have the right models and associations between them you can from there create your posts, assign them tags or categories and also delete comments etc.. its all done in an easy way. For the Text Area that you use to introduce the content of your posts you can associate it with the ckeditor just by adding to the rails_admin initializer something like:
config.model Post do
edit do
field :body, :text do
ckeditor true
end
end
end
I need some help with what is probably a newbie question in terms of modifying phpBB.
I have a whole system developed in PHP, and I would like to integrate phpBB so that people can navigate into the forums and post seamlessly, without logging in again.
Now, using the phpBB users table as the users table for my system (and having people register in phpBB instead of in my website) is not possible unfortunately (it'd take more work to redo our system than to build our own basic forum).
I'm assuming I can hack my way into making phpBB believe that a certain user ID has logged in, however, that user won't exist in phpBB's users table (which I'm assuming will cause it to error out pretty much everywhere).
All the tutorials and forum posts I could find implied having phpBB as the primary. I couldn't find anything to do it the other way around.
I'm guessing the only possible way to solve this is by having both tables relatively synchronized.
Now, provided that I can have both users table synchronized, what is the best way to integrate both sites, keeping my site's login and users table as the "primary" ones?
Also, is there anything in particular I should keep in mind when creating records in phpBB's users table? Or is it relatively straightforward to figure out? What tables should I be writing to, if there is more than one?
This is an old question so I'm sure you've worked something out by now, but if you need to refactor things in the future, this is entirely possible with authentication plugins in phpBB3:
http://wiki.phpbb.com/Authentication_plugins
I'm working on one now where phpBB is the "secondary" system, and it's going pretty well.
I just worked on this task today, after some investigation implemented an Authentication plugin Here is a good example Getting phpBB to accept Django sessions
I have integrated phpBB with a site before, however I used phpBB's login system/users table as the primary one as you said. Since phpBB is a pretty advanced forum software, it would be a pretty time consuming project to change its user and login system completely.
When I had to use the site's login as the primary one, I used PunBB. It was way simpler to modify PunBB.
If you absolutely have to use your own login as primary, and phpBB, then I agree with you in that the easiest way would be to keep the tables synchronized, and call both the login scripts when somebody logs in.
When you're inserting data into phpBB, the users table is pretty straightforward. Each entry has the basic info for a user, and if you have custom fields for the user profiles, they go into the profile_fields and profile_fields_data tables.
One tricky thing is how phpBB encrypts user passwords. I think you have to use phpBB's function called phpbb_hash($password) to do that. It's declared in the file
phpbb/includes/functions.php
For the phpBB login code, see funciton login_box in file phpbb/includes/functions.php
You can use the below to login into phpBB:
$result=$auth->login($username, $password);
if ($result['status'] == LOGIN_SUCCESS) {
echo "You're logged in";
} else {
echo $user->lang[$result['error_msg']];
}