I'm debating whether or not to try running through a list of tables and truncating them with a stored procedure. Would it be that easy with MySql and how would I do it?
The main piece of info you need is the list of tables. Most platforms support this:
select table_name from information_schema.tables
However, before you code the sproc, do a select * from information_schema.tables and examine the entries, there may be some you do not expect -- system tables and such, so you may need to craft a filter to get the set you want.
Since I don't do mySQL that much, I can't show you the code, but if you can translate this from MS SQL, and fill in some blanks you can make it work:
declare #table_name varchar(200)
while 1=1 begin
select top 1 #table_name = table_name
from information_schema.tables
where ....possible filter...
if #table_name is null break
-- for this line you may need dynamic sql
truncate table #table_name
end
Related
It looks like #temptables created using dynamic SQL via the EXECUTE string method have a different scope and can't be referenced by "fixed" SQLs in the same stored procedure.
However, I can reference a temp table created by a dynamic SQL statement in a subsequence dynamic SQL but it seems that a stored procedure does not return a query result to a calling client unless the SQL is fixed.
A simple 2 table scenario:
I have 2 tables. Let's call them Orders and Items. Order has a Primary key of OrderId and Items has a Primary Key of ItemId. Items.OrderId is the foreign key to identify the parent Order. An Order can have 1 to n Items.
I want to be able to provide a very flexible "query builder" type interface to the user to allow the user to select what Items he want to see. The filter criteria can be based on fields from the Items table and/or from the parent Order table. If an Item meets the filter condition including and condition on the parent Order if one exists, the Item should be return in the query as well as the parent Order.
Usually, I suppose, most people would construct a join between the Item table and the parent Order tables. I would like to perform 2 separate queries instead. One to return all of the qualifying Items and the other to return all of the distinct parent Orders. The reason is two fold and you may or may not agree.
The first reason is that I need to query all of the columns in the parent Order table and if I did a single query to join the Orders table to the Items table, I would be repoeating the Order information multiple times. Since there are typically a large number of items per Order, I'd like to avoid this because it would result in much more data being transfered to a fat client. Instead, as mentioned, I would like to return the two tables individually in a dataset and use the two tables within to populate a custom Order and child Items client objects. (I don't know enough about LINQ or Entity Framework yet. I build my objects by hand). The second reason I would like to return two tables instead of one is because I already have another procedure that returns all of the Items for a given OrderId along with the parent Order and I would like to use the same 2-table approach so that I could reuse the client code to populate my custom Order and Client objects from the 2 datatables returned.
What I was hoping to do was this:
Construct a dynamic SQL string on the Client which joins the orders table to the Items table and filters appropriate on each table as specified by the custom filter created on the Winform fat-client app. The SQL build on the client would have looked something like this:
TempSQL = "
INSERT INTO #ItemsToQuery
OrderId, ItemsId
FROM
Orders, Items
WHERE
Orders.OrderID = Items.OrderId AND
/* Some unpredictable Order filters go here */
AND
/* Some unpredictable Items filters go here */
"
Then, I would call a stored procedure,
CREATE PROCEDURE GetItemsAndOrders(#tempSql as text)
Execute (#tempSQL) --to create the #ItemsToQuery table
SELECT * FROM Items WHERE Items.ItemId IN (SELECT ItemId FROM #ItemsToQuery)
SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE Orders.OrderId IN (SELECT DISTINCT OrderId FROM #ItemsToQuery)
The problem with this approach is that #ItemsToQuery table, since it was created by dynamic SQL, is inaccessible from the following 2 static SQLs and if I change the static SQLs to dynamic, no results are passed back to the fat client.
3 around come to mind but I'm look for a better one:
1) The first SQL could be performed by executing the dynamically constructed SQL from the client. The results could then be passed as a table to a modified version of the above stored procedure. I am familiar with passing table data as XML. If I did this, the stored proc could then insert the data into a temporary table using a static SQL that, because it was created by dynamic SQL, could then be queried without issue. (I could also investigate into passing the new Table type param instead of XML.) However, I would like to avoid passing up potentially large lists to a stored procedure.
2) I could perform all the queries from the client.
The first would be something like this:
SELECT Items.* FROM Orders, Items WHERE Order.OrderId = Items.OrderId AND (dynamic filter)
SELECT Orders.* FROM Orders, Items WHERE Order.OrderId = Items.OrderId AND (dynamic filter)
This still provides me with the ability to reuse my client sided object-population code because the Orders and Items continue to be returned in two different tables.
I have a feeling to, that I might have some options using a Table data type within my stored proc, but that is also new to me and I would appreciate a little bit of spoon feeding on that one.
If you even scanned this far in what I wrote, I am surprised, but if so, I woul dappreciate any of your thoughts on how to accomplish this best.
You first need to create your table first then it will be available in the dynamic SQL.
This works:
CREATE TABLE #temp3 (id INT)
EXEC ('insert #temp3 values(1)')
SELECT *
FROM #temp3
This will not work:
EXEC (
'create table #temp2 (id int)
insert #temp2 values(1)'
)
SELECT *
FROM #temp2
In other words:
Create temp table
Execute proc
Select from temp table
Here is complete example:
CREATE PROC prTest2 #var VARCHAR(100)
AS
EXEC (#var)
GO
CREATE TABLE #temp (id INT)
EXEC prTest2 'insert #temp values(1)'
SELECT *
FROM #temp
1st Method - Enclose multiple statements in the same Dynamic SQL Call:
DECLARE #DynamicQuery NVARCHAR(MAX)
SET #DynamicQuery = 'Select * into #temp from (select * from tablename) alias
select * from #temp
drop table #temp'
EXEC sp_executesql #DynamicQuery
2nd Method - Use Global Temp Table:
(Careful, you need to take extra care of global variable.)
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..##temp2') IS NULL
BEGIN
EXEC (
'create table ##temp2 (id int)
insert ##temp2 values(1)'
)
SELECT *
FROM ##temp2
END
Don't forget to delete ##temp2 object manually once your done with it:
IF (OBJECT_ID('tempdb..##temp2') IS NOT NULL)
BEGIN
DROP Table ##temp2
END
Note: Don't use this method 2 if you don't know the full structure on database.
I had the same issue that #Muflix mentioned. When you don't know the columns being returned, or they are being generated dynamically, what I've done is create a global table with a unique id, then delete it when I'm done with it, this looks something like what's shown below:
DECLARE #DynamicSQL NVARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE #DynamicTable VARCHAR(255) = 'DynamicTempTable_' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(36), NEWID())
DECLARE #DynamicColumns NVARCHAR(MAX)
--Get "#DynamicColumns", example: SET #DynamicColumns = '[Column1], [Column2]'
SET #DynamicSQL = 'SELECT ' + #DynamicColumns + ' INTO [##' + #DynamicTable + ']' +
' FROM [dbo].[TableXYZ]'
EXEC sp_executesql #DynamicSQL
SET #DynamicSQL = 'IF OBJECT_ID(''tempdb..##' + #DynamicTable + ''' , ''U'') IS NOT NULL ' +
' BEGIN DROP TABLE [##' + #DynamicTable + '] END'
EXEC sp_executesql #DynamicSQL
Certainly not the best solution, but this seems to work for me.
I would strongly suggest you have a read through http://www.sommarskog.se/arrays-in-sql-2005.html
Personally I like the approach of passing a comma delimited text list, then parsing it with text to table function and joining to it. The temp table approach can work if you create it first in the connection. But it feel a bit messier.
Result sets from dynamic SQL are returned to the client. I have done this quite a lot.
You're right about issues with sharing data through temp tables and variables and things like that between the SQL and the dynamic SQL it generates.
I think in trying to get your temp table working, you have probably got some things confused, because you can definitely get data from a SP which executes dynamic SQL:
USE SandBox
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE usp_DynTest(#table_type AS VARCHAR(255))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #sql AS VARCHAR(MAX) = 'SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_TYPE = ''' + #table_type + ''''
EXEC (#sql)
END
GO
EXEC usp_DynTest 'BASE TABLE'
GO
EXEC usp_DynTest 'VIEW'
GO
DROP PROCEDURE usp_DynTest
GO
Also:
USE SandBox
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE usp_DynTest(#table_type AS VARCHAR(255))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #sql AS VARCHAR(MAX) = 'SELECT * INTO #temp FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_TYPE = ''' + #table_type + '''; SELECT * FROM #temp;'
EXEC (#sql)
END
GO
EXEC usp_DynTest 'BASE TABLE'
GO
EXEC usp_DynTest 'VIEW'
GO
DROP PROCEDURE usp_DynTest
GO
Say, I have 100 columns in a table. I do not know in which columns a particular value could exist. So, I would like to check across all columns, if it exists in any of the 100 columns, I would like to select it.
I searched around a bit, and in most places the solution seems to be something like the following
select *
from tablename
where col1='myval'
or col2='myval'
or col3='myval'
or .. or col100='myval'
I also read a few forums where having to do this is said to be a bad case of database design, I agree, but I'm working on an already existing table in a database.
Is there a more intelligent way to do this?
One way is by reversing the In operator
select *
from yourtable
where 'Myval' in (col1,col2,col3,...)
If you don't want to manually type the columns use dynamic sql to generate the query
declare #sql varchar(max)='select *
from yourtable
where ''Myval'' in ('
select #sql+=quotename(column_name)+',' from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
where TABLE_NAME='yourtable'
select #sql =left(#sql,len(#sql)-1)+')'
--print #sql
exec sp_executesql #sql
(1) Is there a good/reliable way to query the system catalogue in order
to find all stored procedures which create some temporary tables in their
source code bodies but which don't drop them at the end of their bodies?
(2) In general, can creating temp tables in a SP and not dropping
them in the same SP cause some problems and if so, what problems?
I am asking this question in the contexts of
SQL Server 2008 R2 and SQL Server 2012 mostly.
Many thanks in advance.
Not 100% sure if this is accurate as I don't have a good set of test data to work with. First you need a function to count occurrences of a string (shamelessly stolen from here):
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.CountOccurancesOfString
(
#searchString nvarchar(max),
#searchTerm nvarchar(max)
)
RETURNS INT
AS
BEGIN
return (LEN(#searchString)-LEN(REPLACE(#searchString,#searchTerm,'')))/LEN(#searchTerm)
END
Next make use of the function like this. It searches the procedure text for the strings and reports when the number of creates doesn't match the number of drops:
WITH CreatesAndDrops AS (
SELECT procedures.name,
dbo.CountOccurancesOfString(UPPER(syscomments.text), 'CREATE TABLE #') AS Creates,
dbo.CountOccurancesOfString(UPPER(syscomments.text), 'DROP TABLE #') AS Drops
FROM sys.procedures
JOIN sys.syscomments
ON procedures.object_id = syscomments.id
)
SELECT * FROM CreatesAndDrops
WHERE Creates <> Drops
1) probably no good / reliable way -- though you can extract the text of sp's using some arcane ways that you can find in other places.
2) In general - no this causes no problems -- temp tables (#tables) are scope limited and will be flagged for removal when their scope disappears.
and table variables likewise
an exception is for global temp tables (##tables) which are cleaned up when no scope holds a reference to them. Avoid those guys -- there are usually (read almost always) better ways to do something than with a global temp table.
Sigh -- if you want to go down the (1) path then be aware that there are lots of pitfalls in looking at code inside sql server -- many of the helper functions and information tables will truncate the actual code down to a NVARCHAR(4000)
If you look at the code of sp_helptext you'll see a really horrible cursor that pulls the actual text..
I wrote this a long time ago to look for strings in code - you could run it on your database -- look for 'CREATE TABLE #' and 'DROP TABLE #' and compare the outputs....
DECLARE #SearchString VARCHAR(255) = 'DELETE FROM'
SELECT
[ObjectName]
, [ObjectText]
FROM
(
SELECT
so.[name] AS [ObjectName]
, REPLACE(comments.[c], '#x0D;', '') AS [ObjectText]
FROM
sys.objects AS so
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT CAST([text] AS NVARCHAR(MAX))
FROM syscomments AS sc
WHERE sc.[id] = so.[object_id]
FOR XML PATH('')
)
AS comments ([c])
WHERE
so.[is_ms_shipped] = 0
AND so.[type] = 'P'
)
AS spText
WHERE
spText.[ObjectText] LIKE '%' + #SearchString + '%'
Or much better - use whatever tool of choice you like on your codebase - you've got all your sp's etc scripted out into source control somewhere, right.....?
I think SQL Search tool from red-gate would come handy in this case. You can download from here. This tool will find the sql text within stored procedures, functions, views etc...
Just install this plugin and you can find sql text easily from SSMS.
I'm wondering if copying an existing Table into a Temporary Table results in a worse performance compared to Dynamic SQL.
To be concrete i wonder if i should expect a different performance between the following two SQL Server stored procedures:
CREATE PROCEDURE UsingDynamicSQL
(
#ID INT ,
#Tablename VARCHAR(100)
)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #SQL VARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT #SQL = 'Insert into Table2 Select Sum(ValColumn) From '
+ #Tablename + ' Where ID=' + #ID
EXEC(#SQL)
END
CREATE PROCEDURE UsingTempTable
(
#ID INT ,
#Tablename Varachar(100)
)
AS
BEGIN
Create Table #TempTable (ValColumn float, ID int)
DECLARE #SQL VARCHAR(MAX)
SELECT #SQL = 'Select ValColumn, ID From ' + #Tablename
+ ' Where ID=' + #ID
INSERT INTO #TempTable
EXEC ( #SQL );
INSERT INTO Table2
SELECT SUM(ValColumn)
FROM #TempTable;
DROP TABLE #TempTable;
END
I'm asking this since I'm currently using a Procedure build in the latter style where i create many Temporary Tables in the beginning as simple extracts of existing Tables and am afterwards working with these Temporary Tables.
Could I improve the performance of the stored procedure by getting rid of the Temporary Tables and using Dynamic SQL instead? In my opinion the Dynamic SQL Version is a lot uglier to programm - therefore i used Temporary Tables in the first place.
Table variables suffer performance problems because the query optimizer always assumes there will be exactly one row in them. If you have table variables holding > 100 rows, I'd switch them to temp tables.
Using dynamic sql with EXEC(#sql) instead of exec sp_executesql #sql will prevent the query plan from being cached, which will probably hurt performance.
However, you are using dynamic sql on both queries. The only difference is that the second query has the unnecessary step of loading to a table variable first, then loading into the final table. Go with the first stored procedure you have, but switch to sp_executesql.
In the posted query the temporary table is an extra write.
It is not going to help.
Don't just time a query look at the query plan.
If you have two queries the query plan will tell you the split.
And there is a difference between a table variable and temp table
The temp table is faster - the query optimizer does more with a temp table
A temporary table can help in a few situations
The output from a select is going to be used more than once
You materialize the output so it is only executed once
Where you see this is with a an expensive CTE that is evaluated many times
People of falsely think a CTE is just executed once - no it is just syntax
The query optimizer need help
An example
You are doing a self join on a large table with multiple conditions and some of conditions eliminate most of the rows
A query to a #temp can filter the rows and also reduce the number of join conditions
I agree with everyone else that you always need to test both... I'm putting it in an answer here so it's more clear.
If you have an index setup that is perfect for the final query, going to temp tables could be nothing but extra work.
If that's not the case, pre-filtering to a temp table may or may not be faster.
You can predict it at the extremes - if you're filtering down from a million to a dozen rows, I would bet it helps.
But otherwise it can be genuinely difficult to know without trying.
I agree with you that maintenance is also an issue and lots of dynamic sql is a maintenance cost to consider.
This is my first time posting on SO, so please go easy!
I'm attempting to write a SQL script that queries the same table for a list of databases in a single SQL Server instance.
I have successfully queried the list of databases that I required using the following, and inserting this data into a temp table.
Select name Into #Versions
From sys.databases
Where name Like 'Master%'
Master is suffixed with numerical values to identify different environments.
Select * From #Versions
Drop Table #Versions
The table name I am trying to query, is the same in each of the databases, and I want to extract the newest value from this table and insert it into the temp table for each of the database names returned.
I have tried researching this but to no avail. I am fairly comfy with SQL but I fear I could be out of my depth here.
You can do the following. Once you have the list of your databases, you can build up the query (you need to edit it for your purpose).
Select name Into #Versions
From sys.databases
Where name Like 'test%'
declare #sql as varchar(max) = ''
select #sql = #sql + 'INSERT INTO sometable SELECT TOP 1 * FROM ' + name + '..sourcetable ORDER BY somedate DESC; '
FROM #Versions
exec (#sql)
Drop Table #Versions
Look at The undocumented sp_MSforeachdb procedure and here