I have a custom silverlight control, which exposes a property with DataGridLength type. Now I want that property to have the same editor as a common DataGridColumn's Width property, with the combobox and everything, like this:
instead, I only get a simple TextBox, with "Auto" written in, with no way to set to SizeToCells and so on.
I assume I need a DesignTime attribute, but none of the ones I found in ComponentModel namespace even came close...
I guess you just have to create an Enum with the all the values autorized (Pixels, SizeToCells, etc ...), you that Enum as the type of your property DataGridLength and then, in the code of your control, take the corresponding action regarding the value sent.
Related
OK, so here's my situation :
I've got an NSDictionary, let's call it : myItem.
myItem.valueNames contains the values that I want to show up in the popup
myItem.values contains the values the popup must return (e.g. for valueName[0] -> value[0], and so on)
myItem.value contains the current value
How am I suppose to bind that? Even though I've studied the official reference, it still looks a bit obscure...
I'm currently binding :
myItem.valueNames to Content
myItem.values to Content Objects
myItem.value to Selected Value
and... all I've managed is that it shows the valueNames.
Any ideas?
Your model is a little strange to me. I wouldn't use an NSDictionary, I'd use a custom subclass with KVC/KVO compliant properties for each of these. Also, if the name of each value is a property of the value object itself, there's no need for a separate valueNames property. So, with that change, I'd do this:
Bind Content to modelObject with a key path of values
Bind Content Values to modelObject with a key path of values.name
Bind Selected Object to modelObject (or yourControllerObject if that makes more sense) with a key path of value (I'd name it selectedValue)
In the auto-generated resource designer file, there are properties for each resource. The property calls "GetString" which returns the string value. I would like to override this getstring function so I can do logic to see if I need to retrieve this value or a different value. I can't figure out how to do this because the designer file is auto-generated.
Public ReadOnly Property General() As String
Get
Return ResourceManager.GetString("General", resourceCulture)
End Get
End Property
For example, in my version of the GetString function, I would check the key passed in ("General") and see if there is a custom value for this key in a database. If the custom value exists, I would use that value. If the custom value does not exist, I would call the base GetString function to get the Resource value. I'd like to use the built in Resource class for this because then in my code I can just use "#Resources.General" and take advantage of the auto-complete functionality that already exists.
Refer to ASP.NET Resourcemanager to read local .resx. It's in C# but you can just convert it over. It isn't 100% of what you are looking for but shows a way of overriding in which you may be able to adjust to work with your needs.
I have a set of groups of different types of item, all inheriting form a common base type (ItemBase). Each of my groups has an Items collection of type ObservableCollection<ItemBase>.
In my SemanticZoom.ZoomedInView, I can set a DataTemplateSelector, and in SelectTemplateCore() I can cast the item parameter to detrmine which template to apply.
In my zoomed out view, though, the objects are passed around as DependencyObjects, and I can't for the life of me figure out how I can take the data passsed in to determine which template to use.
To set the items source of the GridView in the zoomed out view, I use
(semZm.ZoomedOutView as ListViewBase).ItemsSource = this.groupedItemsViewSource.View.CollectionGroups;
as this appears to be the only way to get the zoomedin and zoomedout views to synchronise (when you click on a group in the zoomed out view it should take me to the appropriate place in the zoomedinview to see that group's detail.
So, am I missing something obvious in terms of getting the actual group in SelectTemplateCore(), or failing that is there a better way of binding my ItemsSource of the ZoomedOutView?
For the appropriate way to handle casting of the DependencyObject to a usable type, see the answer to This question.
Essentially, cast it to ICollectionViewGroup to access the members.
I have a ListView bound to an ObjectDataSource, I'm passing some custom parameters to the Insert and Update methods on my bound class methods by adding them to the event.Values map in the ListView ItemInserting/ItemUpdating events.
However when I try to do the same thing on the ItemDeletingEvent the additional parameters do not seem to be passed to the datasource ( If I register a listener for ObjectDataSource.ItemSourceDeleting I only see one parameter, effectively the 'id' of the row).
Is this an expected behavior? I can't see anything in the documentation that indicates as such.
I found a solution -
I Added a 'DeleteParameter' value with the same name as my desired 'custom' parameter to the ObjectDataSource declaration.
Then in the ItemDeleting Event get the ObjectDataSource.DeleteParameters["myparam"] and set the DefaultValue property. Seems like a hack, but it does work.
Is setX() method name appropriate for only for setting class property X?
For instance, I have a class where the output is a string of an html table. Before you can you can call getTable, you have to call setTable(), which just looks at a other properties and decides how to construct the table. It doesn't actually directly set any class property -- only causes the property to be set. When it's called, the class will construct strHtmlTable, but you can't specify it.
So, calling it setTable breaks the convention of get and set being interfaces for class properties.
Is there another naming convention for this kind of method?
Edit: in this particular class, there are at least two ( and in total 8 optional ) other methods that must be called before the class knows everything it needs to to construct the table. I chose to have the data set as separate methods rather than clutter up the __construct() with 8 optional parameters which I'll never remember the order of.
I would recommend something like generateTable() instead of setTable(). This provides a situation where the name of the method clearly denotes what it does.
I would probably still use a setTable() method to actually set the property, though. Ideally, you could open the possibility of setting a previously defined table for further flexibility.
Yes, setX() is primarily used for setting a field X, though setX() may have some additional code that needs to run in addition to a direct assignment to a field. Using it for something else may be misleading to other developers.
I would definitely recommend against having a public setTable() and would say that setTable() could be omitted or just an unused private method depending upon your requirements.
It sounds like the activity to generate the table is more of a view of other properties on the object, so you might consider moving that to a private method on the object like generateHtmlTable(). This could be done during construction (and upon updates to the object) so that any subsequent calls to getTable() will return the the appropriate HTML.