I wish to implement a load balancing stack on an FPGA.
Apart from this research : link text, I haven't found anything available.
Do you know of any LB stacks out there, proprietary or open source?
Cheers,
Louis
Since that requires hardware around the FPGA with multiple Ethernet links, this is going to be hard to find. However there may be commercial hardware that does this with FPGAs, but that will be fully proprietary.
I would consider doing this in software with DD-WRT or similar.
If you need multiple ethernet links, you might want to check out Terasic's DE4 or DE2-115 at www.Terasic.com. Used their boards in university. I very much recommend.
Related
Is there any open hardware microcontroller?. I can't find something about this.
I mean microcontroller which i can buy from vendors or somewhere and i can download and see full scheme of it. And this information enough to emulate it. something like it.
I think they opened up the code for the propeller yes? and you can get an msp430 clone on opecores or an arm2 on opencores as well as the or1k and 2k, plus a myriad of other open source cores there and elsewhere (just google it). The lm32 is open, and the mico8 is maybe, certainly can be used on a lattice part. But you can certainly find cores like that from each of the fpga/cpld vendors, tuned for and likely free on their platforms. Plus what is it the 68hc11 there are free and or for purchase cores, probably 8051s, etc. And of course there is the cortex-m1, not open but if you wanted a microcontroller in source form to implement on your platform.
The propeller is probably the closest to what you are looking for.
I am not sure what you mean with "open hardware microcontroller". For professionals it's much better to buy a microcontroller or a microcontroller design (ARM for example). Hobbyists usually don't have access to a fab and the required tooling to create their own ASIC.
If you're interested in implementations for FPGAs on the other hand, you should check out the site http://opencores.org/projects where you can find (among other things) different open-source processors.
For what it's worth, SPARC is fully "open", both in it's early conception, and then again later in life by Sun. I think short of some big-iron stuff (that's gradually been taken over by x86), it's basically dead. Maybe you could revive it?
I am building a temporary controller that needs to monitor 20 separate button pushes along with another 15-20 analog and digital signals.
It also needs to output at least 20 different digital signals.
Which Netdurino will let me get all these different ports together on a single device?
It seems like the Netduino Go with multiple shield bases (image) is the way to go.
Can anyone confirm that this is the hardware solution I am looking for with the most analog and digital ports available?
Thank you,
Keith
Seeing as you're settled on the Netduino platform, I'd suggest you ask either on the Netduino forums or in their live chat room http://forums.netduino.com/index.php?/chat/
Alternately, https://electronics.stackexchange.com/ might yield better answers than stackoverflow.
Note that in the forum post you link to for the shield base, they indicate that only one shield base is supported per Netduino (at the time of writing, this may have changed):
Another noob question: How many shield bases can one connect to a NGO? Is more than 1 a viable option?
Currently just one. But with the final release I'm hoping on more :)
I am a ME undergrad and am designing an implant device that requires programming knowledge. I honestly have no idea how to get started and am looking for advice. Basically what I need is a way to control a stepper motor. Stepper motor's use steps (pulses) to rotate the gear head. Now this motor I'm using needs 20 steps to revolve once. I need to be able to control the # of steps I want in a day per say. The motor I'm purchasing comes with an encoder which I'm guessing connects to the circuit board. Now what I want to do is have an external control (like a remote control for a toy)that can set these rates. I don't know anything about radio transmitters, or how to program the circuit board to do this for me. Any help would be appreciated, or books I can look into, websites, or tutorials. Thanks.
There are many ways of solving this problem, but it is more of a systems engineering question than a programming question; until you know what the system looks like, there is no way of determining what parts will be implemented in software. More details would be required to provide a specific answer.
For example what are the security/safety considerations?
What wireless technology do you need to use? e.g. RF or IR, if RF then licensing may be an issue, and that may vary from country to country. You could use BlueTooth, ZigBee, or even WiFi, but these technologies are probably more expensive and complex than necessary for such a simple application. If IR then is immunity from interference from TV remotes or PC IrDA ports or similar required?
If the commands/signals from the remote are complex you will probably need both the remote and the motor driver to incorporate a micro-controller and software. On the other hand if you just need increase/decrease functions then it would be entirely possible to implement the remote functionality you describe without any processing at all (depending on teh communication technology you choose).
What is the motor encoder for? Stepper motors do not normally need an encoder since the controller can simply count steps executed in either direction to determine position. Is the encoder incremental or absolute? If it is incremental, then it is certainly not needed; if it is absolute than it may be useful if you need to know the exact position of the motor on power-up without having to perform an initialisation or requiring end-stop switches.
You mentioned a "circuit board"; what hardware do you already have? What does it do? Do you have documentation for it? If it is commercially available, can you provide a link so we can see the documentation?
As you can see you have more system-level design issues to solve before you even consider software implementation, so the question is not yet ready to be answered here on SO. I suggest you seek out your university's EE department and team-up with someone with electronics expertise do design a complete system, then consider the software aspects.
Well worth taking a look at the Microchip site:
http://www.microchip.com/forums/f170.aspx
They produce microcontrollers that can be programmed to do exactly what you require (and a lot more).
In the last two months I've worked as a simple application using a computer vision library(OpenCV).
I wish to run that application directly from the webcam without the need of an OS. I'm curious to know if that my application can be burned into a chip in order to not have the OS to run it.
Ofcorse the process can be expensive, but I'm just curious. Do you have any links about that?
ps: the application is written in C.
I'd use something bigger than a PIC, for example a small 32 bit ARM processor.
Yes. It is theoretically possible to port your app to PIC chips.
But...
There are C compilers for the PIC chip, however, due to the limitations of a microcontroller, you might find that the compiler, and the microcontroller itself is far too limited for computer vision work, especially if your initial implementation of the app was done on a full-blown PC:
You'll only have integer math available to you, in most cases, if not all (can't quote me on that, but our devs at work don't have floating point math for their PIC apps and it causes many foul words to emanate from their cubes). Either that, or you'll need to hook to an external math coprocessor.
You'll have to figure out how to get the PIC chip to talk USB to the camera. I know this is possible, but it will require additional hardware, and R&D time.
If you need strict timing control,
you might even have to program the
app in assembler.
You'd have to port portions of OpenCV to the PIC chip, if it hasn't been already. My guess is not.
If your'e not already familiar with microcontroller programming, you'll need some time to get up to speed on the differences between desktop PC programming and microcontroller programming, and you'll have to gain some experience in that. This may not be an issue for you.
Basically, it would probably be best to re-write the whole program from scratch given a PIC chip constraint. Good thing is though, you've done a lot of design work already. It would mainly be hardware/porting work.
OR...
You could try using a small embedded x86 single-board PC, perhaps in the PC/104 form factor, with your OS/app on a CF card. It's a real bone fide PC, you just add your software. Good thing is, you probably wouldn't have to re-write your app, unless it had ridiculous memory footprint. Embedded PC vendors are starting to ship boards based on 1 GHz Intel Atoms, and if you needed more help you could perhaps hook a daughterboard onto the PC-104 bus. You'll work around all of the limitations listed above, as your using an equivalent platform to the PC you developed your app on. And it has USB ports! If you do a thorough cost analysis and if your'e cool with a larger form factor, you might find it to be cheaper/quicker to use a system based on a SBC than rolling a solution using PIC chips/microcontrollers.
A quick search of PC-104 on Google would reveal many vendors of SBCs.
OR...
And this would be really cheap - just get a off-the-shelf cheap Netbook, overwrite the OEM OS, and run the code on there. Hackish, but cheap, and really easy - your hardware issues would be resolved within a week.
Just some ideas.
I think you'll find this might grow into pretty large project.
It's obviously possible to implement a stand-alone hardware solution to do something like this. Off the top of my head, Rabbit's solutions might get you to the finish-line faster. But you might be able to find some home-grown Beagle Board or Gumstix projects as well.
Two Google links I wanted to emphasize:
Rabbit: "Camera Interface Application Kit"
Gumstix: "Connecting a CMOS camera to a Gumstix Connex motherboard"
I would second Nate's recommendation to take a look at Rabbit's core modules.
Also, GHIElectronics has a product called the Embedded Master that runs .Net MicroFramework and has USB host/device capabilities built-in as well as a rich library that is a subset of the .Net framework. It runs on an Arm processor and is fairly inexpensive (> $85). Though not nearly as cheap as a single PIC chip it does come with a lot of glue logic pre-built onto the module.
CMUCam
I think you should have a look at the CMUcam project, which offers affordable hardware and an image processing library which runs on their hardware.
I'd like to have an application monitor written in C# monitoring a set of Forex trading positions. It would be connected via USB to a real set of "traffic lights" sat on a desk which it would use to indicate system status. Can anybody suggest a good solution?
Normally I'd say parallel port or some other such thing, but if you've got your hopes up for USB, then definitely have a look at the Arduino. It's a very low cost microcontroller that can run standalone, or can talk to a PC through a number of flexible interfaces (including USB).
It is extremely popular with the hobbyist community, and as such, there are a number of entry-level projects to get one started with the device. Price on Sparkfun is $35 USD for a fully assembled USB-enabled version.
I have used the concepts in this CodeProject article to successfully light up LEDs.
It might meet your requirements if:
You can use parallel port instead of usb (or maybe usb to parallal cable/dongle)
You are ready to tackle some soldering and simple electronic tinkering
You can modify the vb code to monitor your status
As the author mentions in the article, you can destroy your computer's parallel port (and worse!) if you are not very careful.
In addition, a good engineer would insist that you isolate the lights from the port to further protect the computer. (relays, triacs, opto isolators, etc.)
That being said, it does work!
The easiest solution is to buy a USB traffic light, rather than building one yourself. E.g. USB Ampel. With a simple API included, it would probably be much easier.
Traditionally people have used the X10 automation framework for this kind of thing. People at my company use it to control lava lamps to indicate the status of our continuous integration build.
There's a pointer over at How does one get started writing applications that interact with x10 protocol?
One step further is to build something yourself using a microcontroller platform like the Arduino. Some examples of what is possible with the Arduino platform are available on the Arduino Playground page.
An article on how to make traffic lights using an Arduino is available at Instructables.
Channel9 has a video from the Microsoft PDC showing how some developers use a "Build Bunny" for something similar: PDC2008 ShowOff Entry: Brian the Build Bunny
There's also more information and source code here.
Try using simple usb experimentation interfaces such as Phidgets (Www.phidgets.com) or the Velleman k8055 USB experimentation board (http://www.velleman.be/ot/en/product/view/?id=351346).
We used this product at my last job to control a set of revolving traffic lights when a build would break on our CI server. The Ethernet is nice so that you are not limited to the 3M range of USB and it is as easy as opening a TCPClient to port 10000 and sending a "1R1\r".
http://www.6bit.com/products/smartrelayE.php?products_id=33