I'm trying to horizontally align two absolute positioned elements inside a flex item.
This is my current CodePen
HTML :
<div class="stepper-wrapper">
<ul class="step-wrapper" >
<li class="step__bubble"></li>
<li class="step__circle"></li>
</ul>
<ul class="step-wrapper" >
<li class="step__bubble"></li>
<li class="step__circle"></li>
</ul>
</div>
CSS :
.stepper-wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
ul {
border: 1px solid grey;
height: 0px;
position: relative;
top: 40%;
min-width: 100px;
flex: 1;
li.step__bubble {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
li.step__bubble::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: -9px;
left: calc(50%);
display: block;
width: 16px;
height: 16px;
border: 2px solid grey;
border-radius: 50%;
background: white;
}
li.step__circle {
width: 8px;
height: 8px;
border: 1px solid red;
border-radius: 50%;
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: -4px;
left: calc(50% + 1px);
}
}
What I want to do is :
Having the grey circle vertically and horizontally aligned over the
line. Vertically is not really a pb, I'm able to set a fixed value as the height of the .stepper-wrapper will be fixed. Horizontally needs to be adaptative and it's where I'm stuck.
Having the red circle right inside the grey circle
I tried to use the calc() function and set it to (50% - width_of_element_in_px/2) for both circles, but I don't know why, each px seems to be ~10px.
Thx for your help
Welcome to the club of the LESS users pwned by calc() and string interpolation
I've been using LESS since 5 years and it still happens from time to time :(
Sooo tl;dr calc() was and is a LESS function that its compiler will happily output as some result (probably 50% + 10(stripped) => 60%).
If you want LESS compiler to output calc() the CSS Level 3 function, you need to escape it, that is wrap it in ~"calc(50% + 5px)"!
Codepen
EDIT: also see https://stackoverflow.com/a/17904128/137626
EDIT2: couldn't find an entry about calc in LESS documentation oO but the problem is explained in http://lesscss.org/usage/#command-line-usage-options (search "calc" in text). strict-math is a cool option but you'll have to make sure everybody else has it activated (won't be the case by default)
Typically, to insert a Glyphicon inside a Bootstrap 3 app, it's as simple as:
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-envelope"></span>
etc. In many apps, however, it is typical for Glyphicons to be "customized" so that they appear with numeric superscripts like so:
Above, this red/white "5" bubble might indicate that the user has 5 notifications. I'm wondering how this "numeric superscript" effect can be achieved in Bootstrap 3.
You mean something like this?
This is just some CSS basic styling, there is afaik no "standard" and certainly no special HTML tags nor "secret" bootstrap features that supports it. Below my suggestion - modify so it fit your expectations :
.rw-number-notification {
position: absolute;
top: -7px;
right: -6px;
padding: 3px 3px 2px 3px;
background-color: red;
color: white;
font-family: arial;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 10px;
border-radius: 4px;
box-shadow: 1px 1px 1px silver;
}
markup :
<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-envelope">
<span class="rw-number-notification">7</span>
</span>
demo with some examples -> http://jsfiddle.net/rqfthhkx/
NB: Not completely related, but I do believe, though, that it is common practice to use the <i> tag when you are using glyphicons, fontawesome etc
<i class="glyphicon glyphicon-envelope"></i>
at least it renders as exactly the same -> http://jsfiddle.net/rqfthhkx/1/
Font Awesome
Example:
<i class="fa fa-envelope text-primary">
<span class="number-notification">7</span>
</i>
The .number-notification CSS is the same, except it seems impossible to adjust the position of the number container to fa-xx sizes and different font-sizes. The solution is to wrap the <i> element into <h> elements and specify the relative position in rem units :
.number-notification {
position: relative;
padding: 3px 3px 2px 3px;
background-color:red;
color:white;
font-family: arial;
font-weight:bold;
font-size: 10px;
border-radius: 4px;
box-shadow:1px 1px 1px silver;
}
.fa .number-notification {
top: -1rem;
right: 1rem;
}
h3 .fa .number-notification {
top: -1.2rem;
right: 1.2rem;
}
h2 .fa .number-notification {
top: -1.5rem;
right: 1.5rem;
}
h1 .fa .number-notification {
top: -2.2rem;
right: 1.8rem;
}
This should look more or less the same with different font sizes.
New fiddle -> http://jsfiddle.net/b86oj9gd/
I'm using IE10 to design something at the moment [Because it needs to be completely compatible with it], and I'm having trouble.
I have two boxes on either side of the page, with an image at the top. The inner top corner is curved using border-top-*-radius, and this is also implemented on the image inside.
CSS:
#rightsidebar {
position:fixed;
width: 300px;
height: 400px;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0px 0 0 500px;
border-top-left-radius: 110px;
-webkit-border-top-left-radius: 110px;
background-color: #ffffff;
border: 2px dashed #000000;
}
#leftsidebar {
position:fixed;
width: 300px;
height: 400px;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0px 0 0 0px;
border-top-right-radius: 110px;
-webkit-border-top-right-radius: 110px;
background-color: #ffffff;
border: 2px dashed #000000;
}
HTML:
<div id="rightsidebar">
<img style="background-color: #000000; width:300px; height:196px; border-top-left-radius:105px; -webkit-border-top-left-radius:110px;" src="{image:right image}">
</div>
<div id="leftsidebar">
<img style="background-color: #000000; width: 300px; height: 196px; border-top-right-radius: 105px; -webkit-border-top-right-radius: 105px;"src="{image:left image}">
</div>
My JSFiddle is here: http://jsfiddle.net/V73G5/
Using IE, you can see that the right container's image isn't doing the same as the left's, even though I just copy and pasted the code and edited it slightly. It does however work on Chrome, which makes me think this may be a bug. Any insight or suggestions on how to resolve this?
EDIT: I've found a way to work around it using:
border-radius: 105px 1px 0 0;
It's not a proper solution, and I've still no clue as to why this happened in the first place, but the 1px is barely noticeable and seems to make it work.
The behaviour of border radius is affected by compatibility mode in IE10.
If you press F12 you can view the developer console and change the compatability settings.
If the Document mode is set to IE7 or IE8 Standards then the border-radius-left: 10px; doesn't work, however if the standards mode is set to IE9 Standards or Standards then it behaves as expected.
download PIE.htc file and attached your css
#rightsidebar {
border-radius: 8px;
behavior: url(/pie/PIE.htc);
}
for more details check below image one.
may it will help you.
When using a rounded border on an image, webkit browsers hide the border behind the image
CSS
img {
border: 10px solid #000;
border-radius: 100%;
}
HTML
<img src="http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbjei3b3re1r30y2do1_500.jpg" />
Bug reproduced # http://jsfiddle.net/zPpVm/
This is probably related to this Webkit bug, but I cannot find a suitable work around.
A possible workaround is to use a box-shadow:
box-shadow: 0 0 0 10px black;
Live Example
The main problem: It won't be calculated in the box-model
As another workaround, you can wrap your image like this:
<span class="img_container" >
<img src="http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbjei3b3re1r30y2do1_500.jpg" />
</span>
Than style elements:
.img_container {
border: 10px solid #000;
border-radius: 100%;
display: inline-block;
overflow: hidden;
}
.img_container img {
display: block;
}
All modern browsers except Opera will render it correctly.
Im trying to achieve an inner-shadow effect on a simple box, something like:
alt text http://gotinsane.com/test.jpg
where the green box is the content inside another box.
My problem is that if i give the content box any kind of background, the outer box box-shadow effect vanish!
Here an example of my problem (with markup and css), i've set the content height smaller to evidence the problem - atm i really dont care about IE*, this is just a test.
Any idea?
UPDATE
The content inside the box is a somewhat kind of slide, here an example (original problem).
thirtydot's answer does the trick, but it forces me to make a little hack, changing the wrapper background in function of the content: example here (thirtydot trick).
This can be a solution, but i dont like it too much and still dont understand why the outer box shadow get behind the inner box background (color, image)
UPDATE 2
Talking about this problem on another forum, i found another way: basically, instead of use box-shadow on the wrapper, that will act as a mask, I use box-shadow and border-radius directly on the content (.step elements)
However, the 'mask' effect is exactly what i was trying to accomplish, so this isnt the solution neither.
I still don't understand how and why an inner element background interfere with an outer element design, or why the shadow dropped from the outer element get behind the inner one. Could this be a css bug?
UPDATE3
Someone opened a bug on mozilla, and got this answer that clearify the 'problem':
From http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-box-shadow :
In terms of stacking contexts and the painting order, the outer shadows of an
element are drawn immediately below the background of that element, and the
inner shadows of an element are drawn immediately above the background of
that element (below the borders and border image, if any).
In particular, the backgrounds of children of the element would paint above
the inset shadow (and in fact they paint above the borders and background of
the element itself).
So the rendering is exactly what the spec calls for.
UPDATE4
Fabio A. pointed out another solution, with css3 pointer-events.
Looks good and works on IE8 too ;)
Since I am having this problem too and I too don't see this behaviour being normal, I filed a bug report over at mozilla
I can reproduce the problem in Google Chrome too, though, so I wonder whether this is really a bug. But it could be.
edit:
Indeed it's not a bug, but just the way it's meant to work. So, on the basis of this information, I forked your jfiddle example and came up with this solution:
The markup now looks like this:
<div id="box">
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="box_content">
Content here
</div>
<div id="mask"></div>
</div>
</div>
The mask becomes another div, which is layered on top of the #box_content one by means of being absolutely positioned. This is the CSS:
#wrapper{
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 280px;
height: 280px;
border-radius: 5px;
margin: 10px;
}
#mask {
position: absolute;
top: 0px; left: 0px;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
pointer-events: none; /* to make clicks pass through */
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000000 inset;
}
#box_content{
background-color: #0ef83f;
height: 100%;
}
I'm a little confused what you're actually after. If it's not quite right, let me know :)
This is my best guess.
Live Demo
CSS:
(I added in the vendor prefix rules.)
#box {
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000;
width: 280px;
height: 280px;
padding: 10px
}
#wrapper {
background-color: #0ef83f;
-moz-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 18px #000;
-moz-box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 18px #000;
box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 18px #000;
width: 240px;
height: 240px;
padding: 20px
}
HTML:
<div id="box">
<div id="wrapper">
Content here
</div>
</div>
the problem is layered is overlapped, you can avoid it using margin or padding.
Try
http://jsfiddle.net/pramendra/FEk3c/5/
#box{
background-color: #FFFFFF;
border-radius: 10px 10px 10px 10px;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000000;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
}
#body{
margin: 0px;
}
#wrapper{
display:inline-block;
width: 280px;
height: 280px;
border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000000 inset;
box-shadow:inset 0 0 10px 0 #000000;
margin: 10px;
}
#box_content{
background-color: #f00;
margin:5px;
}
Check this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/FEk3c/6/
#box{
background-color: #FFFFFF;
border-radius: 10px 10px 10px 10px;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000000;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
}
#body{
margin: 0;
}
#wrapper{
display: inline-block;
width: 280px;
height: 280px;
border-radius: 5px;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000000 inset;
margin: 10px;
}
#box_content{
background-color: #0ef83f;
height: 100px;
}
Just make sure the child background property is specified with rgba, like in this fiddle.
Give the parent a background-color to prevent whatever's underneath showing through.
ul {
box-shadow : inset 0 0 10px 10px gray;
background-color: white;
}
li:nth-child(even) {
background : rgba(255,0,0,0.2);
}
This works great for me without any additional DOM elements (like 'wrapper' etc.):
div.img {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 280px;
background-image: url(/images/anyimage.png);
}
div.img:after {
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 300px; //parent height +20px
position: absolute;
top: -10px;
left: 0;
box-shadow(inset -25px 0 25px -25px rgba(0,0,0,.2), inset 25px 0 25px -25px rgba(0,0,0,.2));
content: ' ';
pointer-events: none;
}