I'm thoroughly intrigued by Scheme, and have started with some toy programming examples, and am reading through Paul Graham's On Lisp.
One thing I haven't been able to find is a book or website intended to teach Scheme to "OO people", i.e. people like myself who've done 99 % of their coding in c++/Java/Python.
I see that closures are sort of object-y, in the sense that they have local state, and offer one or more functions that have access to that state. But I don't want to learn Scheme only to port my existing habits on to it. This is why I'm learning Scheme rather than Common Lisp at the moment; I fear that CLOS might just serve as a crutch to my existing OO habits.
What would be ideal is a book or website that offers case studies of problems solved in both an OO language, and also in Scheme in a Schemey way. I suppose I would most appreciate scientific computing and/or computer graphics problems, but anything would do.
Any pedagogical leads would be much appreciated.
I doubt CLOS would serve as a crutch for old habits, I found it to be pretty different from the OO style in C++/Java/Python, and very interesting. I don't understand all the details, but I would recommend Peter Seibel's Practical Common Lisp. If you are reading On Lisp without much trouble, you should be able to dive into the chapters introducing CLOS in PCL. Also, I'd recommend his Google Tech Talk comparing Java and Common Lisp.
Here's a few more recommendations to make this a more full-fledged answer:
The classic text Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs covers quite a few examples in chapter 3 of building modular systems using closures (and addresses issues with introducing state and mutability). Chapter 2 includes some generic and data/type-directed programming which could be helpful for motivating study of CLOS. This book really needs no introduction though, it's a towering work, and I've only been reading it slowly since the spring. Highly recommended if you are interested in Scheme.
While SICP is a great book, it's not without its flaws: A really interesting look at these is the essay "The Structure and Interpretation of the Computer Science Curriculum" which elaborates on a few criticism of SICP, and is written by the authors of How to Design Programs (I haven't read HTDP but I hear it's very good). While this essay won't teach you specifically what you are looking for - comparing functional and OO programming - it is really interesting anyway. Their freshman undergraduate course starts with a first semester introduction to functional programming using Scheme (I think, PLT/Racket) and is followed by a semester of OO programming with C++ or Java... at least that's the course they describe in the essay.
These slides from Peter Norvig address some of the design patterns common in OO programming and show why they are missing or unnecessary in dynamic, functional languages like Scheme and Lisp: http://norvig.com/design-patterns/
I cautiously recommend the book by the same authors as the Little Schemer books: A Little Java, A Few Patterns. I can't say for sure if this is a really a good book or not, it was incredibly strange and there are some really bad typesetting decisions (italic, serif, variable-width, superscript doesn't belong in a text on programming), but it might be interesting to take a look at. You can probably find it cheap, anyway. Don't take this recommendation that seriously. I think it would be better to stick to the Scheme texts.
p.s. I have to disagree with one comment stating that functional programming is not as complicated at OO programming, I think that's grossly misstating it. Functional programming in all its breadth is truly mind-boggling. When you go beyond map/filter/reduce and first-class functions, and take a look at other things in the functional realm like lazy evaluation, avoiding side effects and mutation, and the strong, static-typed languages, it gets pretty interesting, and is certainly just as complicated as traditional OO programming. I've only just scratched the surface myself but have discovered a great deal of new ideas. Programming is complicated business, whether OO or functional.
Congrat you, my friend ! Love cs, love functional programming.
If you are python developer it takes 3-4 days to think in scheme
Here is the best simple tutorial I have ever met http://www.shido.info/lisp/idx_scm_e.html
I found this course http://cs.gettysburg.edu/~tneller/cs341/scheme-intro/index.html and it may be useful for you
One beginner's resource that is very helpful and geared very much toward the casual reader is "The Adventures of a Pythonista in Schemeland". It's written (obviously) from the point of view of a Python programmer taking first steps with Scheme. One especially nice thing about it is that it includes an overview of the current implementations and compatibility issues between each scheme implementation, which, unfortunately, can cause some headaches when you're just starting out.
With regards to object systems, these two documents (linked from here) give nice examples of very simple toy implementations using closures that I found helpful in understanding their use in capturing state.
If you are starting off with Scheme, have a look at How to Design Programs. This book presents the "Schemey" approach to problem solving. I don't think there is a book that compares OO and functional solutions to the same programming problems. But there is a nice presentation that shows how dynamic languages like Scheme could provide simple solutions to problems that demand complex design patterns in statically typed OOP languages.
Related
The team is familiar with ASP.NET and has been working in VB.NET for several years, but they just haven't made the transition in thinking in terms of objects. In fact, they may be a little intimidated by OOP from brief glimpses they've seen of C++ and unmanaged environments. Work has kept them busy enough that they haven't had time to properly absorb the benefits that .NET and OOP provides.
I'm looking for some lightweight resources (i.e.: blog posts, articles) that I can share with both developers and/or managers which would help to introduce the object oriented paradigm in a nicely presented fashon. The language could be in either C# or VB.NET, though VB.NET would be preferred.
Thanks!
Another approach that has worked spectacularly for me is to host an open-ended series of brown bag lunches. This is when you invite your coworkers (not demand) to a conference room where you discuss some aspect of OO.
Everyone brings their own lunch. And you can buy a pizza now and then to incent them to come, but you wouldn't do this every week.
Always have it the same place and the same time every week. You'll always talk briefly, no more than 30 minutes, leaving plenty of time for questions and discussion on how we use this in our company. Start on time and finish religiously on time.
Publish the schedule, emphasizing that they'll get the most out of it if they attend all sessions, but if they miss one, they can still catch on.
Here are some example topics:
OO for beginners.
Abstraction is the main thing; how to
get there.
Encapsulation 101
Why inheritance?
Top 5 things we should use
inheritance for here
Interfaces are way better than
inheritance.
What are Design Patterns?
... then drill down into the patterns
that you'd use in real life.
I'm telling you, if you make these things interesting, you'll be amazed at how quickly your people will come up to speed.
Then, the best followup in the world is to implement Pair Programming and Friendly Code Walkthroughs. If you don't do one or both of these, the lessons will likely not stick.
Head First Object-Oriented Programming from O'Reilly & Associates by McLaughlin, et al.
Here's a link for more: Head First OOAD
Great book. Great series. Easy to read and easy to grasp the concepts of OO, which is what you're after with your team.
(source: coverbrowser.com)
For OOP with VB...
Beginning Object-Oriented Programming with VB.Net
Object-Oriented Programming with Visual Basic .Net
Depending on how experienced one is you may want to also read about Object-Oriented Analysis and Design. These will help you to wrap your head around how to do it.
Head First Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications
MS article on OO in VB.Net:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa289512(VS.71).aspx
A little old but gives the basics....
It has been my experience that depending on how entrenched the team is on the event driven model will greatly influence how effective the team moves/embraces OO. It's easier than I would like to admit to just use objects in .Net and not really understand OO. Coming from VB6 it was too easy to keep on trucking the classic way. The OOA & OOD books may be a great starting point if your team seems to be just "users" of the objects in .Net versus actually creating classes in their own code.
I've worked with VB developers of varying skills before (mostly from a VB6 background). Design Patterns might already require too much abstract thinking on their part.
If they're pretty savvy with business requirements, can I suggest a 'Naked Objects' type approach? This approach let's everyone visualise objects, encapsulation, inheritance, relationships and composition, and can ease the initial pain of OOAD. And you can use concrete examples from your business, instead of contrived examples from a book.
It's a long road - best of luck!
P.S. If you're interested, I provide a tool that supports the Naked Object pattern.
Design Pattens
The book is actually pretty "lightweight" from the perspective of a single pattern.
While reading some programming books, I notice that the authors says that, in OOP, you may have some confusion while understanding the main idea of OOP.
And hell yeah!. I had some confusion. Did you have the same and what makes this confusion to programmers(even experienced programmers)?!
And if you had it, how could you beat this ?!
Thanks
The Animal trope works when explaining it to most people.
(Further useful links here and here)
A lot of the confusion when learning OOP comes from trying to pick the right relationship between objects and classes of objects, particularly whether:
Object contains Some other Object (or Object1 has an Object2)
Object is an instance of Class
If I can think of a good example that shows a case where either might be appropriate, I'll add it...
OOP takes a "problem oriented" approach to programming as opposed to the traditional "machine oriented" approach used in languages like C and Pascal. Learning OOP can be quite tough if you've programmed extensively in procedural/functional languages. It is to these programmers that things tend to be more confusing. If you are new to programming, you'll probably find things a lot less confusing since you're starting off with a fresh mind.
Having said that, I've seen many programmers who've worked extensively with languages like Java and claim to be good OOP programmers when they were actually far from it. Sure they use Java language features like interfaces, inheritance etc, and create objects "which are instances of classes", and "send a message to an object". Most people use a lot of OOP jargon because they are exposed to it. But when it comes down to writing a simple application their resulting code exposes their poor understanding.
My advise to you is don't get caught in using jargon alone. Question and learn the underlying concepts diligently. You might have your first semi-nirvana (like I did) when you learn polymorphism and the benefits it brings to code re-usability. Another semi-nirvana when you understand the trade-offs between reuse via inheritance and reuse via composition. In the end, you will know that you've understood OOP well if you able to design well, or rather, a good OO design is easily a good measure of how well you understand OOP.
If you are serious about OOP, you should read the first two chapters of the GOF book on Design Patterns. It might be a little tough on new programmers, but it lays the crux of the thinking behind OOP. This book is an important reference which any serious OOP programmer should have. If you understand the concepts in this book well, consider yourself to be a good OO programmer.
Yes, I experienced a bit of confusion initially. This was back in the day when OO was just starting to become mainstream, so there were a lot of books out there which covered it, but didn't explain it well for people who didn't already know what it was. As a result, I started out thinking that an object and a class were largely interchangeable and defining a new class for each object I wanted to create.
I finally "got it" by playing around on LambdaMOO, a MUD (think World of Warcraft, but with no graphics) with an object-oriented in-game programming language. Ironically, MOOCode makes no distinction between classes and objects - objects inherit directly from other objects. (It did have a convention of objects intended for use as "base classes" to be named "Generic Foo" as a way to distinguish them from specific ("instance") Foos, but that's as close to a class/object distinction as it had.)
Indeed, I think way too much emphasis is put on the 'class' concept.
The biggest leap forward in my understanding was when reading about the "Tell, don't Ask" principle.
I only started 'feeling' Object Orientation when playing around with (and reading about) duck-typed environments like Ruby, JavaScript, Python etc... after like 8 years happily creating truckloads of classes in C++.
Statically typed languages are great for production code, but you pay a lot of overhead when trying to get a feeling for Object Orientation.
Also, next to the commonly used term OOP, often one forgets that first comes OOA and OOD.
I think that especially programmers, that were experienced in the development with function-oriented languages, had trouble understanding the concepts of OOP. At least, it was really confusing to me and i did a whole bunch of things to program functional while using an OOP language(Java).
But i also think that the OOP approach is a great thing to beginners because this approach ist very "natural".
I never really had any confusion but I learned programming along the time-axis it evolved. so I had assembly, c, c++, java, c# and loads of other which is not relevant here. What you have to embrace is that everything shall be expressed by an object and an object contains information describing itself (properties) and that they can perform tasks related to them (methods i.E.: Car.GetAllCars();).
For inheritance and polymorphism and all the rest I recommend practice. practice everything - since practice makes perfect. Try to develop the examples given in all the books.
Once you understand the oo basics take a look at design patterns and design principles (e.g. by reading Head First Design Patterns). It will teach you how you should actually use the tools that oo gives you. While this is no substitute for practical experience it can certainly speed up the learning process.
Thank you for your answers.
I think giving examples works best but not every time, right ?!
I heared the creator of C++ when he said, it takes time and patience and you will understand it better by trying.
I'm looking for some good courses on object oriented programming. I've been programming for about 4 years so far, but I don't feel like I have a SOLID grasp on OO.
How did you learn?
Its all learning by doing. Courses and books are good, but the bottom line: Coding is all about writing programs; start from there. Another thing I personally think is very important: read other peoples code!
Try these: http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_details_new.php?seriesid=2008-D-26263&semesterid=2008-D
Maybe you'll like the "Head First" approach.
The mechanics of OO (i.e. the syntax and semantics, terminology, what it is, what it does) are very easy. They "why" and "where" of it is the hard part. I'd suggest you just learn the mechanics quick and dirty on Wikipedia if you haven't already, and then pick up a book on design patterns. Head First is a good choice here. I don't believe that you can truly understand OOP (or really anything for that matter) unless you know where it's useful and what problems it's meant to solve.
After this, the next step would be to look at APIs you use every day in your favorite language from your new perspective. You should start seeing why using OO techniques in certain situations makes the API much more usable than if everything were just free/static functions and plain old data objects. You might also see areas where OOP is awkward and overused and free/static functions and plain old data objects might be better solutions.
Lastly, it's useful to know how some aspects of OO are implemented at a lower level. Understanding things like virtual function tables and how to do OOP in pure C really adds a level of depth to your understanding of what can and cannot be accomplished with it, and what the tradeoffs are inherent in it.
And obviously, try to integrate what you learn into the code you write.
Since you ask :) I learned with Object Oriented Software Construction, 2nd Edition by Bertrand Meyer, Prentice Hall, 1997.
Meyer is due to publish in a very short while a book which is focused on learning to program from the start: Touch of Class. This should be a good option for students.
I notice that people's tastes about learning materials vary quite a lot. Some like summaries, tutorials, how-to's... I learn complex subjects by taking my time to follow the complete dissertations.
A pure-object language is the best course in OO.
I can suggest Java, Ruby, or Smalltalk
Learn any of those (from scratch, not just as rewriting C or Perl) and you know OO.
I would go with ruby, it's more mainstream than smalltalk, and has a richer syntax than java. Perfect for the beginner
It is REALLY difficult to learn this by yourself. The best chance is to learn it alongside someone else at your workspace, who's going to get you through tasks and shows you things on the way.
I can recommend this book. http://squeakbyexample.org/ it's far from perfect, but it's free and comes with a special squeak version that is optimized so you find the code fast. The examples are kind of nice for starters, I think. At least I enjoyed reading it.
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
I'm a confused newbie and hobbyist programmer trying to get a grip on this, so forgive me if my question is a little off or doesn't make much sense.
I see a lot of questions on SO revolving around the use of design patterns, and I'm wondering if anyone has a good resources for learning about, and implementing design patterns? I understand the general idea, and know how/when to use a couple of them(Singletons, Factory methods) but I know I'm missing out.
(Just in case it matters, my language of preference is C# but I could learn from examples in other languages)
Head First Design Patterns
and the Design Pattern Wikipedia page are the best resources for beginners. FluffyCat is another good, free online resource for design patterns in both Java and PHP.
The Gang of Four book is where to go afterward, but it's fairly advanced, so I'd wait until you have a pretty firm grasp from the other resources.
Design patterns are great for various reasons:
gives you a starting for solving common problems.
gives developers a vocabulary to talk about certain ways of solving problems in a very compact manner.
when working with developers who know design patterns and you use design patterns in your solutions they will understand the solutions a lot faster.
But when your goal is just to learn design patterns I think you are missing the fundamentals. All design patterns are based on more common principles. High Cohesion, Low Coupling Open Closed Principle, DRY, Liskov Substitution Principle etc. For these fundamentals I would read the following books in this order:
Head First Object-Oriented Analysis and Design (Head First) [ILLUSTRATED] (Paperback)
Applying UML and Patterns (Hardcover)
Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C# (Robert C. Martin Series) (Hardcover)
After that you are ready for the basic gang of four design patterns
Head First Design Patterns (Head First) [ILLUSTRATED] (Paperback)
The BIBLE
A nice website (don't buy anything, it is not worth it) http://dofactory.com/Patterns/Patterns.aspx (some implementations of this site are worth a discussion
The next step:
Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture (Addison-Wesley Signature Series) (Hardcover)
The POSA books
And always remember : the pattern is not the goal !
I'd add that Design Patterns book from the "Gang of four" is a bible for anyone who is seriously interested in design patterns.
My tip:
Read a lot about the patterns from different sources.
Trying to force as many patterns as possible into all the code you're writing as this point is not going to give good results. Instead, let the information rest inside your brain for a while (read: months).
Suddenly you'll find yourself stumbling upon a problem or piece of code and you'll vaguely remember that you've seen something that might work as a solution to this particular problem. Now is the time to look up the details on the pattern you are thinking of and try to apply it.
That's what has worked for me, anyway.
Design Patterns
This tutorial site contains following sub-sections
Intent of each design pattern
Real World Structure for the design pattern
A Problem statement
Detailed discussion on the problem
Checklist on how to arrive at a pattern
Rules of thumb while arriving at pattern.
Code snippets for the design pattern which includes C#, C++, Delphi, Java and PHP
This site also contains guide on Anti Patterns, UML and Refactoring.
Bruce Eckel has a book on design patterns, although it's Java, it's like all of his books amazing. And the best thing is, they are free!
C# 3.0 Design Patterns for a C# perspective on design patterns.
(source: oreilly.com)
An introductory book that I found useful and well written is
Design Patterns Explained by Alan Shalloway and James Trott (Addison Wesley).
Do not start from the Gang of Four book, for it is not an introductory book by any means.
I would recommend taking a look at Jean Paul Boodhoo's quintology (?) on Demystifying Design Patterns on DNRtv, urls supplied below. The videocasts touches on Singleton, Abstract Factory among others- the difference being that you can watch him code as he discusses the theory. Good to watch over lunch on a rainy weekday.
http://www.dnrtv.com/default.aspx?showNum=63
http://www.dnrtv.com/default.aspx?showNum=65
http://www.dnrtv.com/default.aspx?showNum=68
http://www.dnrtv.com/default.aspx?showNum=71
http://www.dnrtv.com/default.aspx?showNum=92
An annotation to the above comments.
A Quick Reference For GOF Patterns
Here is a good place you can start dofactory.com/patterns/patterns.aspx - You can find link to each pattern, along with corresponding implementations.
How ever, remember that these are GOF patterns. You might need to read and understand advanced patterns as well, once you gain enough expertise in OOAD. Head First Design Patterns is a good start, and after making some progress, go with Martin Fowler's Enterprise Application Architecture Patterns.
Applying Design Patterns - The Thought Process
Another main aspect - Applying Design patterns is as important as just knowing them. Reading these articles might help you as well.
Applying Design Patterns Part I
Applying Design Patterns Part II
Hope this helps
Head First Design Patterns is a good one like others already noted. Besides this, of course the original book and C# Design Patterns. Also there are good websites already mentioned.
Besides self-learning, I seriously recommend starting or attending a pattern study group in your area. See A Learning Guide To Design Patterns for explanation and great order to study the patterns in. We did this and I can honestly say that I would not understand as much as I do now. A weekly meeting with other interested people keeps you surprisingly disciplined when learning something abstract like design patterns.
Happy studies!
Before spending money on books I would recommend Wikipedia's excellent design patterns page. Also for something different Google for "design pattern screencasts" or search for "design patterns" on YouTube. Getting the same information presented differently often helps the penny drop.
The Gang of Four book is the definitive text on the most well known patterns but is not that easy to read and with C++ examples not everyone's favourite.
The Head First Design Patterns text is far more accessible but only contains a subset of the Gang of Four patterns.
The most important thing is to understand where and why a particular pattern is useful. Afterwards search the web for implementation examples in the language of your choice and experiment until you "get it". Understand one pattern before moving on to the next. Everyone understands some patterns better than others (and there are hundreds of lesser known ones).
Just keep plugging away.
(source: Amazon)
Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture (Hardcover) by Martin Fowler
Refactoring to Patterns (Hardcover) by Joshua Kerievsky
Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk (Paperback) by Paul Duval et.al.
Beyond Software Architecture: Creating and Sustaining Winning Solutions (Paperback) by Luke Hohmann
Design patterns are like any library function, read about them, then when a problem comes up, the design pattern will be in your "Toolchest". There are many design patterns books all patterned after the original "Gang of four" design patters.
For any programmers, I think that and the Refactoring book by Fowler are the absolute minimal requirements.
For websites, a very good site is http://ajaxpatterns.org, from one of the developers of the ajaxian website
The original Design Patterns book is a must-read for all programmers.
It is an excellent book on every level: layout, clarity, insight, depth. It's one of those great books that you first read cover-to-cover, and then use as a reference until you literally know it inside out.
You could start by the Wikipedia page, but treat yourself with the great book too.
Applying UML and Patterns by Craig Larman. Start from the basic of analysis, design and uses a simple Case scenario. Introduces most of the basic patterns in a simple way.
If you read about design patterns you'll notice that Java seems to have a few of them implemented.
Look at the source for any framework and you can glean info about design patterns. Personally I don't see them fitting in perfectly to any of my code, sometimes the examples in books and tutorials seem a little idealized, especially for the lone coder.
Design patterns aren't for lazy coders.
For me and my colleagues study Design Pattern that following on Pattern Study Group. They prepare a list of each pattern that we should learn in order and also have the opening questions that make more discussion in group.
I also suggest having a shufty at Refactoring to Patterns once you've read Head First Design Patterns.
Note: The code examples are in Java, but should be very similar to C# examples...
It does not make too much sense to me for someone with very little experience to delve too far deeply into design patterns. It is great to know they exist, but at this point you should focus more on other things rather than just learning about design patterns.
They are useful in context of a problem - as a concept for a new/beginner developer they are really not too much practical value aside form knowing that you should make use of them when and where you can.
EDIT
To clarify - many design patterns are a result of problems found in some domains. A new programmer can hardly be expected (IMO) to know the design pattern(s) to use for some set of problems. Just as we get a smattering of algorithms in CS studies, we need an understanding of the things we can do with patterns and their benefits, but when a person is still building hello world or discovering stl there is not much practical need for design patterns. Patterns are great. But they are not the silver bullet.
(Neither was CASE (tools), neither is/was UML, neither is SCRUM, neither is TDD, nor STL, nor Java, nor XML, etc. ) These are all just aspects of our profession and to treat these topics as the second coming is naive.
Patterns comprise the high level vocabulary programmers use to talk about abstract design. If you are reusing an abstract solution, it is helpful to refer to it by name. If you invent a pattern, it is professional to do a little checking to make sure it hasn't already been given a name. If it has been named, then the description may be useful.
After you code even a tiny bit, you will notice yourself writing something similar to what you coded before. This is a pattern. Even if it is a tiny pattern, it is worth noticing. Is there a better pattern? Do you see certain tiny patterns cooperating together to solve a larger problem? Well next time, when you want to solve larger problem, the entire pattern comes into your mind as a single chunk. Fleshing out the detailed lines of code becomes mechanical.
The more you notice patterns, the easier programming becomes, and the more you will appreciate some of the biggest and best patterns worked out by other programmers.
Try mastering the MVC pattern. One way or another, variations show up all over the place, even in tiny design decisions.
Once you understand the concept, go through the Eclipse source code or design, lots of really good examples of these patterns (no surprise, Gamma was one of the designers).
I have found Design Pattern articles on this website really easy to understand
Design Patterns in C#
I've been studying OOP for quite a while now and I have a good grasp of the theory. I read the Head First book on OOP and, while it reinforced a lot of the theory, I found the case studies to be somewhat trivial.
I find that I'm applying OOP principles to my code each day, but I'm not sure if I'm applying them correctly. I need to get to the point where I am able to look at my code and know whether I'm using inheritance appropriately, whether my object is cohesive enough, etc.
Does anyone have any good recommendations (books, online guides, blogs, walk-throughs, etc.) for taking the next step in developing solid OOP skills?
I am working primarily in .NET (visual basic), but I welcome suggestions that incorporate various platforms.
Read Refactoring by Martin Fowler, and apply it to your own work.
It will take you through a litany of malodorous characteristics of software code that describe how to detect improperly constructed classes, and even more importantly, how to fix them.
Consider looking into Design Patterns. Although it seems like they aren't commonly used in enterprise applications (I've seen them more commonly used in API's and Frameworks than embedded into enterprise code), they could be applied to make software simpler or more robust in a lot of situations if only developers knew how to apply them.
The key is to understand the design patterns first, then with experience you'll learn how to apply them.
There is a Head First book on design patterns that teaches the concept pretty simply, although if you want a book that really covers design patterns in detail, check out the Gang of Four design patterns book, which is basically what made design patterns mainstream and is referred to almost every time the topic is brought up.
Design patterns can be applied in pretty much any object-oriented language to some degree or another, although some patterns can be overkill or over engineering in some cases.
EDIT:
I also want to add, you should check out the book Code Complete 2. It's a very influential book in the world of software development. It covers a lot of different concepts and theories. I learn something new every time I read it. It's such a good book that if I read it every 6 months to a year, I look at it from a different perspective that makes me a better programmer just by re-reading it. No matter how much you might think you know, this book will make you realize just how little you really know. It's really a great book. I can't stress how much you should own this book.
If you already have the basics, I believe only experience will get you further. You say you are not sure if you are applying the principles correctly, but there is no one correct way. Code you write today, you'll look at in 6 months time, and wonder why you wrote it that way, and probably know of a better, cleaner way of doing it. I also guarantee that after 10 years, you'll still be learning new techniques and tricks. Don't worry too much about it, it will come, just read as much as you can, and try and apply what you read in small chunks.
I am currently half-way through the following book:
http://www.amazon.com/Applying-UML-Patterns-Introduction-Object-Oriented/dp/0131489062
I cannot recommend this book strongly enough in terms of learning a real-life, professional-grade, practical approach to drafting and applying a well-formed and iterative design strategy before diving into code.
I, too, read the "Head First" book and felt that I was much better off for having read it.
After having a few years of working-world experience, I now view the Craig Larman book that I am recommending to be a perfect "next step" for me.
About the Presence of "UML" in this Book Title:
Whether you have positive feelings or negative feelings about UML notation, please do not let that influence your decision to buy the book (ISBN 0131489062) in either direction.
The prominence of "UML" in the title is misleading. While the author does use and explain UML notation, these explanations are extremely well-woven into relevant design discussions, and at no time does this book read like a boring UML spec.
In fact, here is a quote taken directly from the book:
What's important is knowing how to think and design in objects, which is a very different and much more valuable skill than knowing UML notation. While drawing a diagram, we need to answer key questions: What are the responsibilities of the object? Who does it collaborate with? What design patterns should be applied? Far more important than knowing the difference between UML 1.4 and 2.0 !
This book at times seems like it is "speaking to" a lead architect or a project manager. What I mean to say by that is that it assumes that the reader has significant control over the planning and direction of a software project.
Nonetheless, even if you are only responsible for some very small piece of your company's projects and products, I would still recommend this book and encourage you to apply some "scaled down" modifications of the book's advice to your piece of the project.
My OOP epiphany came from Grady Booch's book, way long time ago. Suddenly I realized why objects were good.
While polymorphism is cool, encapsulation is 75% of why objects are cool. It is sort of like an interface: you see the buttons but not the wiring. Before objects, only the most disciplined coders kept their grubby fingers off the internal bits of other people's procedures (it was called "structured programming").
Object make it easy to Do the Right Thing. Inheritance and polymorphism are little bonuses.
One way to learn about objects is to read other peoples' code. I learned a lot by reading the source code for the Delphi VCL framework. Even just looking at the documentation for Java will help you see what a single object class should do and how it is designed to be used by other objects.
Start a project of your own and pay attention when you want to sub-class your own classes and find that you have to go back and break up some protected methods so you can override just one piece of a process instead of replacing all of it. See how ancestors talk to descendants by calling abstract functions. In other words, go make a lot of mistakes and learn from them.
Enjoy!
Frankly, re-reading old David Parnas papers on information hiding helps me get in the right state of mind. The case studies may not be directly applicable but you should be able to get some useful generalizations out of them.
My epiphany happened when I tried to implement a very OO problem (dynamically and recursively building SQL statements) in VB6. The best way to understand polymorphism or inheritance is to need it and not be able to use it.
One thing that will definitely help you is working on a well-known, respected open source project. Either dig through the source code and see how things are done or try to make some additions / modifications. You'll find that there isn't one style or one right answer for most problems, but by looking at several projects, you'll be able to get a wide view of how things can be done. From there, you'll begin to develop your own style and will hopefully make some contributions to open source in the process.
I think you have to attempt and fail at implementing OO solutions. That's how I did it anyway. What I mean by fail is that you end up writing smelly code while successfully delivering a working solution. After it's written you'll get a feel for where things didn't quite feel right. You may have some epiphanies, and/or you may go and hunt for a slicker solution from other programmers. Undoubtedly you'll implement some variation of standard design patterns by accident. In hindsight, a light will click on (oh! so that's what a visitor is for), and then understanding will accelerate.
As others have said, I think tooling through some good OO open source code is a good idea. So is working with more experienced programmers who would be willing to critique your work. However understanding comes through doing.
You might want to try to read (and write) some Smalltalk for a while. Squeak is a free implementation that can show you the power of a fully object-oriented environment (unlike java or .net). All library code source is included. The language itself is incredibly simple. You'll find that java and c# are slowly adding the features well-known to Smalltalk since 1980.
Tortoise HG is extrodanarily well designed piece of OO open source software (written in Python).
If you already understand the basics, building something from scratch in a fully object oriented language will be a good step in fully understanding OOP software architecture. If you don't know Python, Python Essential Reference will take you through the language in full in a few days to a week.
After you understand the language take a look through the software above and you'll have all sorts of epiphanies.
To understand basically anything thoroughly, you need to have a decent knowledge of at least one abstraction level above and one level below it. In the case of OO, others have mentioned design patterns as the layer above OO. This helps a lot to illustrate why OO is useful.
As far as the layer below OO, try to play around with higher-order functions/late binding for a while and get a feel for how these relatively simple constructs are used. Also, try to understand how OO is implemented under the hood (vtables, etc.) and how it can be done in pure C. Once you grok the value of using higher order functions and late binding, you'll quickly realize that OO is just a convenient syntax for passing around a set of related functions and the data they operate on.