File Output using Gforth - file-io

As a first project I have been writing a short program to render the Mandelbrot fractal. I have got to the point of trying to output my results to a file ( e.g. .bmp or .ppm ) and got stuck.
I have not really found any examples of exactly what I am trying to do, but I have found two examples of code to copy from one file to another.
The examples in the Gforth documentation ( Section 3.27 ) did not work for me ( winXP ) in fact they seemed to open and create files but not write to files properly.
This is the Gforth documentation example that copies the contents of one file to another:
0 Value fd-in
0 Value fd-out
: open-input ( addr u -- ) r/o open-file throw to fd-in ;
: open-output ( addr u -- ) w/o create-file throw to fd-out ;
s" foo.in" open-input
s" foo.out" open-output
: copy-file ( -- )
begin
line-buffer max-line fd-in read-line throw
while
line-buffer swap fd-out write-line throw
repeat ;
I found this example ( http://rosettacode.org/wiki/File_IO#Forth ) which does work. The main problem is that I can't isolate the part that writes to a file and have it still work. The main confusion is that >r doesn't seem to consume TOS as I might expect.
: copy-file2 ( a1 n1 a2 n2 -- )
r/o open-file throw >r
w/o create-file throw r>
begin
pad maxstring 2 pick read-file throw
?dup while
pad swap 3 pick write-file throw
repeat
close-file throw
close-file throw ;
\ Invoke it like this:
s" output.txt" s" input.txt" copy-file
I would be very grateful if someone could explain exactly how the open, create read and write -file words actually work, as my investigation keeps resulting in somewhat bizarre stacks.
Any clues as to why the Gforth examples do not work might help too.
In summary, I want to output from Gforth to a file and so far have been thwarted. Can anyone offer any help?
Thank you Vijay, I think that I understand the example that you gave. However when I try to use something like this ( which I think is similar ):
0 value test-file
: write-test
s" testfile.out" w/o create-file throw to test-file
s" test text" test-file write-line ;
I get ok but nothing is put into the file, have I made a mistake?
It seems that the problem was due to not flushing the relevant buffers or explicitly closing the file. Adding something like
test-file flush-file throw
or
test-file close-file throw
between write-line and ; makes it work. Consequently the Gforth documentation example would have worked had I followed the instructions.
Thanks again Vijay for helping.

I will try to explain how write-line works with this simple example. Here we have a buffer that contains the string " hello", and we want to write that to a file opened with open-output.
buffer 5 fd-out write-line
5 is the length of the buffer. fd-out is the open file handle. A call to write-line will leave an integer result on the stack, the value of which is implementation dependent. More information on the file I/O words could be found in File Access words.
Calling the word throw is optional. It will check the integer value on the top of the stack and based on that value either pops the topmost exception frame from the exception stack or call abort or display an implementation-dependent message giving information about the condition associated with the integer. (Exact details on how throw works could be found in THROW).

You program is incomplete, which makes the question hard to answer.
With prepending
1024 CONSTANT max-line
CREATE line-buffer max-line 3 + ALLOT
and postpending
copy-file
fd-in close-file throw
fd-out close-file throw
and after creating a testfile foo.in gforth the first program works flawlessly on Debian.
Probably your problem is caused by not properly closing the file after writing.

Related

What is the perl6 equivalent of #INC, please?

I go
export PERL6LIB="/GitHub/perl6-Units/lib"
and then
echo $PERL6LIB
/GitHub/perl6-Units/lib
But when I run perl6 t/01-basic.t
use v6;
use Test;
plan 3;
lives-ok {
use Units <m>;
ok #Units::UNITS.elems > 0;
ok (0m).defined;
}
done-testing;
I still get an error
===SORRY!===
Could not find Units at line 8 in:
/Users/--me--/.perl6
/usr/local/Cellar/rakudo-star/2018.01/share/perl6/site
/usr/local/Cellar/rakudo-star/2018.01/share/perl6/vendor
/usr/local/Cellar/rakudo-star/2018.01/share/perl6
CompUnit::Repository::AbsolutePath<140707489084448>
CompUnit::Repository::NQP<140707463117264>
CompUnit::Repository::Perl5<140707463117304>
In Perl 5 I would have used print "#INC"; to see what paths are searched for the lib before the error is thrown. Using say flat $*REPO.repo-chain.map(*.loaded); either is before it loads or after it throws the exception.
Any help would be much appreciated - or maybe a hint on what to put in ~/.perl6 as I can't get a symlink to work either.
The error message itself is telling you what the library paths available are. You are failing to print them because you are expecting a run time action ( say ) to take place before a compile time error -- you could print out $*REPO at compile time, but again the exception is already showing you what you wanted.
$ PERL6LIB="/GitHub/perl6-Units/lib" perl6 -e 'BEGIN say $*REPO.repo-chain; use Foo;'
(file#/GitHub/perl6-Units/lib inst#/Users/ugexe/.perl6 inst#/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6/site inst#/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6/vendor inst#/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6 ap# nqp# perl5#)
===SORRY!===
Could not find Foo at line 1 in:
/GitHub/perl6-Units/lib
/Users/ugexe/.perl6
/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6/site
/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6/vendor
/Users/ugexe/.rakudobrew/moar-2018.08/install/share/perl6
CompUnit::Repository::AbsolutePath<140337382425072>
CompUnit::Repository::NQP<140337350057496>
CompUnit::Repository::Perl5<140337350057536>
You can see /GitHub/perl6-Units/lib is showing up in the available paths, which is unlike your example. I'd question if your shell/env is actually setup correctly.

Ghostscript for PS integrity test: terminate at EOF, return error unless stack is empty

To test the integrity of PostScript files, I'd like to run Ghostscript in the following way:
Return 1 (or other error code) on error
Return 0 (success) at EOF if stack is empty
Return 1 (or other error code) otherwise
I could run gs in the background, and use a timeout to force termination if gs hangs with items left on the stack. Is there an easier solution?
Ghostscript won't hang if you send files as input (unless you write a program which enters an infinite loop or otherwise fails to reach a halting state). Having items on any of the stacks won't cause it to hang.
On the other hand, it won't give you an error if a PostScript program leaves operands on the operand stack (or dictionaries on the dictionary stack, clips on the clip stack or gstates on the graphics state stack). This is because that's not an error, and since PostScript interpreters normally run in a job server loop its not a problem either. Terminating the job returns control to the job server loop which does a save and restore round the total job, thereby clearing up anything left behind.
I'd suggest that if you really want to do this you need to adopt the same approach, you need to write a PostScript program which executes the PostScript program you want to 'test', then checks the operand stack (and other stacks if required) to see if anything is left. Note that you will want to execute the test program in a stopped context, as an error in the course of the program will clearly potentially leave stuff lying around.
Ghostscript returns 0 on a clean exit and a value less than 0 for errors, if I remember correctly. You would need to use signalerror in your test framework in order to raise an error if items are left at the end of a program.
[EDIT]
Anything supplied to Ghostscript on the command line by either -s or -d is defined in systemdict, so if we do -sInputFileName=/test.pdf then we will find in systemdict a key /InputFileName whose value is a string with the contents (/test.pdf). We can use that to pass the filename to our program.
The stopped operator takes an executable array as an argument, and returns either true or false depending on whether an error occurred while executing the array (3rd Edition PLRM, p 697).
So we need to run the program contained in the filename we've been given, and do it in a 'stopped' context. Something like this:
{InputFileName run} stopped
{
(Error occurred\n) print flush
%% Potentially check $error for more information.
}{
(program terminated normally\n) print flush
%% Here you could check the various stacks
} ifelse
The following, based 90% on KenS's answer, is 99% satisfactory:
Program checkIntegrity.ps:
{Script run} stopped
{
(\n===> Integrity test failed: ) print Script print ( has error\n\n) print
handleerror
(ignore this error which only serves to force a return value of 1) /syntaxerror signalerror
}{
% script passed, now check the stack
count dup 0 eq {
pop (\n===> Integrity test passed: ) print Script print ( terminated normally\n\n) print
} {
(\n===> Integrity test failed: ) print Script print ( left ) print
3 string cvs print ( item(s) on stack\n\n) print
Script /syntaxerror signalerror
} ifelse
} ifelse
quit
Execute with
gs -q -sScript=CodeToBeChecked.ps checkIntegrity.ps ; echo $?
For the last 1% of satisfaction I would need a replacement for
(blabla) /syntaxerror signalerror
It forces exit with return code 1, but is very verbous and distracts from the actual error in the checked script that is reported by handleerror. Therefore a cleaner way to exit(1) would be welcome.

while [[ condition ]] stalls on loop exit

I have a problem with ksh in that a while loop is failing to obey the "while" condition. I should add now that this is ksh88 on my client's Solaris box. (That's a separate problem that can't be addressed in this forum. ;) I have seen Lance's question and some similar but none that I have found seem to address this. (Disclaimer: NO I haven't looked at every ksh question in this forum)
Here's a very cut down piece of code that replicates the problem:
1 #!/usr/bin/ksh
2 #
3 go=1
4 set -x
5 tail -0f loop-test.txt | while [[ $go -eq 1 ]]
6 do
7 read lbuff
8 set $lbuff
9 nwords=$#
10 printf "Line has %d words <%s>\n" $nwords "${lbuff}"
11 if [[ "${lbuff}" = "0" ]]
12 then
13 printf "Line consists of %s; time to absquatulate\n" $lbuff
14 go=0 # Violate the WHILE condition to get out of loop
15 fi
16 done
17 printf "\nLooks like I've fallen out of the loop\n"
18 exit 0
The way I test this is:
Run loop-test.sh in background mode
In a different window I run commands like "echo some nonsense >>loop_test.txt" (w/o the quotes, of course)
When I wish to exit, I type "echo 0 >>loop-test.txt"
What happens? It indeed sets go=0 and displays the line:
Line consists of 0; time to absquatulate
but does not exit the loop. To break out I append one more line to the txt file. The loop does NOT process that line and just falls out of the loop, issuing that "fallen out" message before exiting.
What's going on with this? I don't want to use "break" because in the actual script, the loop is monitoring the log of a database engine and the flag is set when it sees messages that the engine is shutting down. The actual script must still process those final lines before exiting.
Open to ideas, anyone?
Thanks much!
-- J.
OK, that flopped pretty quick. After reading a few other posts, I found an answer given by dogbane that sidesteps my entire pipe-to-while scheme. His is the second answer to a question (from 2013) where I see neeraj is using the same scheme I'm using.
What was wrong? The pipe-to-while has always worked for input that will end, like a file or a command with a distinct end to its output. However, from a tail command, there is no distinct EOF. Hence, the while-in-a-subshell doesn't know when to terminate.
Dogbane's solution: Don't use a pipe. Applying his logic to my situation, the basic loop is:
while read line
do
# put loop body here
done < <(tail -0f ${logfile})
No subshell, no problem.
Caveat about that syntax: There must be a space between the two < operators; otherwise it looks like a HEREIS document with bad syntax.
Er, one more catch: The syntax did not work in ksh, not even in the mksh (under cygwin) which emulates ksh93. But it did work in bash. So my boss is gonna have a good laugh at me, 'cause he knows I dislike bash.
So thanks MUCH, dogbane.
-- J
After articulating the problem and sleeping on it, the reason for the described behavior came to me: After setting go=0, the control flow of the loop still depends on another line of data coming in from STDIN via that pipe.
And now that I have realized the cause of the weirdness, I can speculate on an alternative way of reading from the stream. For the moment I am thinking of the following solution:
Open the input file as STDIN (Need to research the exec syntax for that)
When the condition occurs, close STDIN (Again, need to research the syntax for that)
It should then be safe to use the more intuitive:while read lbuffat the top of the loop.
I'll test this out today and post the result. I'd hope someone else benefit from the method (if it works).

dcl assignment from a command

I am new to DCL.
I want to get the out put of a command in a variable and iterate result one by one.
filePath=dir /since="time_now" [.SUBDIR]*.PNG/noheader/notrail
That's just not how we roll with DCL.
We don't do pipes, we do, but not really.
DIR/SINCE=NOW ... will not give anything by definition, since nothing exists since now.
Use /OUT to stick the directory output into a file, and then read ans parse (F$PARSE and/or F$ELEMENT and/or F$LOC)
Check out HELP OPEN; HELP READ [/END]; HELP LEXICAL
Google for examples.
More advanced DCL scripts use F$PARSE, F$SEARCH and F$FILE(file,CDT) to avoid activating images and creating temp files: $ HELP LEXICAL
Google for examples.
Check out yesterday stack-exhange entry ?! : OpenVMS - DELETE Line if TEXT like x
But if you are just starting... IMHO just skip DCL and stick to PERL
$ perl -e "for (<[.SUBDIR]*.PNG>) { next unless -M > 0.123; print; ... }"
Good luck!
Hein
top:
file = f$search("[.subdir]*.PNG")
if (file .eqs. "")then goto cont
mtime=f$file_attribute(file,"RDT")
if mtime.ges.build_start_time then -
name=f>parse(file,,,"NAME")
call CHECK "''name'"
goto top
cont:
#Hein please review this code and suggest changes

strcpy causing EXC_BAD_ACCESS?

I am making a command-line tool using Xcode 4.
I get the EXC_BAD_ACCESS error on the line with strcpy:
char *invalidOption = NULL;
strcpy(invalidOption, argv[2]);
argv[1] is -v (a "valid" option) and argv[2] is -z (an "invalid" option).
I then need to change "invalidOption" for display reasons (printing the "error" message).
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
Please let me know if you need any more details.
strcpy doesn't allocate any memory for you. You're trying to copy your string to NULL, which causes undefined behaviour. You need something like:
char invalidOption[10];
strcpy(invalidOption, argv[2]);
Just make sure that invalidOption is big enough to hold the whole string (including null terminator) or you'll end up with the same problem. You can use dynamic allocation if necessary.