I am working on a windows forms project that will allow a user to have an interface to the database, and another will be a nightly run process file that will update the database table.
The user will add new records to the table, whereas the nightly process will update the columns with new values (think mortgage interest rates)
Both these projects will be using the same business logic component that has the calculations needed to enter values into the table.
The way I am figuring this out, is that I will have two exe's (one for the interface and one for the nightly process) and have a central object that will host the calculations. What would be the best object for this purpose?
A class file?
A windows service? (I want to stay away from a windows service, because it will have to be running all the time)
Thanks
You're on the right track.
The central object with your business logic components should be a Class Library project (outputting a DLL).
The Winform project that allows users to interface with the database should reference (and use) your Class Library project.
The nightly process should run a Windows Console Application that would also reference and use your Class Library project. Like Davita suggests the nightly process should be called from a Windows Scheduled Task.
if I understand correctly your question, you can consider Windows Task Scheduler. You create a job which will execute your exe at any given time of day.
Related
My application contains lots of forms which use buttons, gridviews etc. I'v made new form (buttons, labels, richtext for api response for testing etc.) which gets data from API, tested it and works. My idea is to make task schedule in Windows and run this sync every day at 8 AM. I'v made a class which got only code for getting data and saving it into database (save new or update). How to make this particular class make run inside project with 100+ forms using Windows scheduler?
Below will be one of the (if not only) way forward :
Make a separate console application with this class.
Generate the exe file
Use Task Scheduler to run it at a specified time
I am wondering about where to start in building a test framework here.
I create a vb.net application to display the list of projects available. Allow user to select the project, time and date when test needs to get executed.
Once the user decides the time and task, I want my system to schedule a task onto a remote machine where the test execution would happen at the specified time.
I am stuck at point two. any pointers or question is much appreciated.
I use testcomplete for automation.
I want my system to schedule a task onto a remote machine where the test execution would happen at the specified time
There's a Windows Task Scheduler and associated API that supports scheduling tasks at specific times. The API is aimed at C++ programmers.
You could use the Task Scheduler Managed Wrapper available on CodePlex for easy interop with VB.Net.
The task to execute could be copied to a network drive so that it is accessible from the remote machine.
For point 2 you'll have to call TestComplete from the command line as per these instructions:
http://support.smartbear.com/viewarticle/55587/
You can also call TestExecute from the command line, it's a cut down version of Test Complete that will run your tests. Your license may or may not include that.
Did you also consider taking a look at Jenkins for scheduling your test runs?
I created a time recording program in vb.net with a sql-server as backend. User can send there time entries into the database (i used typed datasets functionality) and send different queries to get overviews over there working time.
My plan was to put that exe in a folder in our network and let the user make a link on their desktops. Every user writes into the same table but can only see his own entries so there is no possibility that two user manipulate the same dataset.
During my research i found a warning that "write contentions between the different users" can be occur. Is that so in my case?
Has anyone experience with "many user using the same exe" and where that is using datasets and could give me an advice whether it is working or what i should do instead?
SQL Server will handle all of your multi-user DB access concerns.
Multiple users accessing the same exe from a network location can work but it's kind of a hack. Let's say you wanted to update that exe with a few bug fixes. You would have to ensure that all users close the application before you could release the update. To answer you question though, the application will be isolated to each user running it. You won't have any contention issues when it comes to CRUD operations on the database due to the network deployment.
You might consider something other than a copy/paste style publishing of your application. Visual Studio has a few simple tools you can use to publish your application to a central location using ClickOnce deployment.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/31kztyey(v=vs.110).aspx
My solution was to add a simple shutdown-timer in the form, which alerts users to saving their data before the program close att 4 AM.
If i need to upgrade, i just replace the .exe on the network.
Ugly and dirty, yes... but worked like a charm for the past 2 years.
good luck!
It would be useful for many people to know how to completely remove an application from your device when testing.
I have downloaded my app many times now, and likewise have deleted it many times. The problem is when deleting the app, it does not remove things like the persistent object related to my app, or the images downloaded through the app. So, when I download the next build, I have no idea if something broke that is related to building the persistent object or fetching the images since those elements already exist from the last build.
I don't know if this is a cache thing. I don't know if this is expected and I have to use some utility to wipe this data after deleting the app. I can't really find much info through basic web searches.
Any information would be appreciated.
Blackberry Bold 9000. 4.6 OS. tested with both SD card and no SD card.
Objects stored in the PersistentStore are automatically deleted on uninstall if their interfaces were defined in your project. If they are from the standard BlackBerry API then they will stick around until they're deleted. E.G if you save a String in the PersistentStore it will stay in the PersistentStore but if you save a class you created it will be deleted on an uninstall. So if you want to have those objects be deleted automatically just create a wrapper class and save that.
Images stored on the filesystem will not be deleted until you or some application deletes them. However, it should be easy for you to write an app that clears everything out.
Another solution you could implement is making your app somewhat self-aware of its data.
Create a simple String value that you persist (or optionally, persist it in a Hashtable so you can store many properties this way) that includes "Version".
At startup of the GUI app, compare the stored "Version" against the application's current version. If the stored version doesn't exist, or if it exists and matches, take no action.
If it exists and does not match, automatically clean up old persisted data; or alternatively prompt the user to see if they want that data to be deleted (which one is better will depend on your implementation)
You can also use CodeModuleListener to listen for an uninstall event -- when that happens, you can clean up at that time as well or instead.
(As an aside and a bit of shameless self promotion, I am actually currently working on a shareable library for Blackberry that makes managing persistence much easier, as well as desktop data backup/restore. I'm doing this as part of the BBSSH project, but I'll be splitting it off into a separate library of core components and publishing it under a dual GPL/optional commercial license. It will contain hooks for data cleanup and data versioning. )
I'm writing managed code that has to interact with a vendor's COM automation server that runs out of process. I have found that this server becomes unstable if more than one client connects to it. For example, if I have managed code in process A and managed code in process B both connecting to this COM server, a single process will be spun up for the COM server and it's behavior is less than reliable. I'm hoping there's a way to force a separate process for each client - server connection. Ideally, I'd like to end up with:
Managed Process A talking to COM Server in process C1
Managed Process B talking to COM Server in process C2
One thought that came to mind was that if I ran process A and process B with different security identities, that that might cause the COM infrastructure to create separate server processes. I'd rather not go down that road, however. Managed Process A and Managed Process B are actually Windows Services. And I'm running them with identity Local System (because I need them to be able to interact with the desktop, and you can't check the "Interact with Desktop" box on the services applet for services that don't run as Local System). And the reason I need to interact with desktop is that this COM server occasionally throws up a dialog box on the screen and if the service itself cannot interact with the desktop then the COM server is spawns can't display the dialog (I believe it is displayed on a hidden WinStation).
Place the component registered at COM+, this put an isolation layer at your.
Use : Control Panel->Administrative Tools
or cmd/execute DCOMCNFG
Component Services->Computers->My Computer->COM+ Application, right click, new application, next, Create an empty application, enter app name “COM+ your.dll”, next, select Local Service, next, next, next, finish.
In new item made, expand, at Components, right click, new component, next, select Install new component, select your component.
Click Component properties, tab Identity, select System Account.
For errors in calls see Event after.
It's been a while since I've done this, so my memory is hazy.
If you configure the OOP COM server as a DCOM server using the DCOM config tool, I believe you can specify the isolation level. I did this years ago with a non-threadsafe in-process DLL that needed to be accessed in a threadsafe fashion from IIS and it worked a charm.
Let me know if it works for you :)
Your best bet would be to get the vendor to fix the component. After all, if it won't handle multiple clients, there could be other bugs lurking. If you can't do this, there are some other things to try.
With in-process COM objects I've had occassion to manually load the dll and access the interfaces directly without going through COM.
I haven't done this myself with out-of-process COM, but there are some things you could try. Ultimately the library is just a process sitting there receiving messages which invoke functions.
You might be able to manually start the a new copy of the process for each client and then send it messages. You may run into some hiccups with this. For example, the process may check to see if it's already running and refuse to start or otherwise be unhappy.
If you have a known upper limit on the number of clients, another approach you could consider would be to make multiple copies of the original .exe file and then use binary patching (something similar to the detours library from Microsoft Research) to override the COM registration functions and register each copy as a separate COM object.