I'm having trouble referencing one view controller from another. The code works but I get warnings which makes me think I'm going about it wrong. I'm trying to reload the data in a tableView whose controller is in a NavigationController.
What's wrong with a message like this:
From the AppDelegate:
[self.tabBarController.selectedViewController.topViewController.tableView reloadData];
Although this works, I get the warning request for member 'topViewController' in something not a structure or union because Xcode doesn't know that the selectedViewController will return a navigationController. So I could do the following:
UINavigationController *myNavigationController = self.tabBarController.selectedViewController;
[myNavigationController.topViewController.tableView reloadData];
But then I get this warning: incompatible Objective-C types initializing 'struct UIViewController *', expected 'struct UINavigationController *'
How far do I have to go with this? The first line works. To get to the "right way" is it gonna take 8 lines of code?
A major code smell here, IMO. You're trying to do action at a (great) distance. It's not exactly clear what you're trying to accomplish, nor why you need to do this action from the app delegate. I have seen some developers treat the app delegate like a giant catch-all global lump of mud, and I think this is an anti-pattern that should be eliminated from iOS development.
Back to your question: you're trying to force a table view controller, inside a tab view controller, to reload its data. I'm assuming this is in response to something happening. Why not have the view controller in charge of that table watching for that event instead of the app delegate? That way, the thing that owns the table view is directly controlling it -- which is the entire point of the MVC pattern. This is a much better approach than having the app delegate drill down through a hierarchy to find a table view... in terms of complexity, readability, and brittleness.
If, for some reason, you can't or won't have that view controller observing for the event directly (hard to fathom why offhand), you could always have the app delegate post an NSNotification and let the view controller in charge of the table register as an observer for it. Not as good as direct observation, but definitely better than your current approach.
You can't use dot-notation unless the compiler knows what type of object you are using it on, and that that object type can receive a message with that name.
You can use dot-notation with a bunch of type-casts (which in this case, is hideously ugly):
[((UITableViewController *) ((UINavigationController *) self.tabBarController.selectedViewController).topViewController).tableView reloadData];
Or you can break it up into discrete steps:
UINavigationController *navController = (UINavigationController *) self.tabBarController.selectedViewController;
UITableViewController *tableViewController = (UITableViewController *) navController.topViewController;
[tableViewController.tableView reloadData];
Note that I'm assuming that your top VC is a sub-class of UITableViewController.
You really shouldn't be accessing the .tableView property externally - you should encapsulate that behaviour with a reloadData method on the View Controller itself. Even if all it does is call reloadData on its .tableView, you should encapsulate it. This will make your code more modular (which makes it easier to understand for you and others), and make it easier to expand on and add complexity to your View Controller down the track.
Without knowing exactly how this app is structured, I would guess that you're probably better off using notifications or observers to get your VC to reload its data. If you have some global event that requires a UI refresh, an NSNotification is a good way to make the UI layer get the message while keeping your code nice and modular.
Related
I am using Xcode 4.3 and need to know the parent view controller of the current view.
I am also using storyboard.
self.parentViewController always returns nil.
I saw different answers to save the parent view controller in AppDelegate class as a property. E.g., To create a variable: UIViewController parentViewController in AppDelegate and in the code write:
appDelegate.parentViewController = self;
I am afraid that it will consume memory - as this is a heavy object.
What is the best approach to know aretnViewController when using story board?
Whether or not an object is "heavy" does not matter as long as you store only a reference to it (in your case in the application delegate). Creating a second object would make a difference, but the line
appDelegate.parentViewController = self;
does not do that, it merely stores a reference to the object.
I know that this does not answer your direct question, but I think you should go ahead with the "store a reference in the app delegate" approach.
It is possible, to create an exact object copy of a UINavigationController? I have seen examples of copying objects using copyWithZone:, but I am confused as to how I would use this to copy my UINavigationController.
Any help?
UINavigationController doesn't conform to the NSCopying protocol, so you can't use copyWithZone: or copy on it.
If you are looking to have a customised UINavigationController that you can use throughout the app then you should subclass it and then create a new instance of that subclass every time you need a new one, such as when you create a new modal view controller.
EDIT: If you want to keep the view controllers from a previous navigation controller then you can do something like this (use subclassed navigation controller if needed):
UINavigationController *newNavigationController = [[UINavigationController alloc] init];
[newNavigationController setViewControllers:oldNavigationController.viewControllers animated:NO];
This will do a shallow copy of the viewControllers, i.e. you will have references to the original navigation controller's view controllers, not copies. If you want to do a deep copy on the view controllers then that will be far more complicated and will require specific copying code for each view controller. (See here for more info).
You can do this by creating a category (or a subclass), make the category NSCoding compliant, and add the necessary encoding and decoding functions. You then need to determine what properties you want to encode - the types of view controllers it currently has in its array, and perhaps you'll need to make those objects be NSCoding compliant. You can see that this is not going to be a trivial thing to do, but its not impossible. You may find the solution to your problem is best done using some other techniques.
EDIT: If you want to "duplicate" it, what you really need to know is what viewControllers are in the array. So suppose you want to replicate "state", which in some sense is the same as the original answer but less rigorous. Add a category or method to each object and ask to to give you current state as a dictionary. For the navigationController, that might be just the classes of the objects currently on the stack.
For each of these objects on the stack, you get them to give you a dictionary of their state. By state, its means what text is in UITextFields, views etc, anything that that object would need to go from a startup condition and get back to where it is now.
You package this all up - the nav dictionary and array of the state ones. You can save this as a plist. When you want to construct where you were later, the nav controller can tell what objects to create by knowing their class, then as each one is created it can be sent its dictionary and told "get back to where you were". Once done, then push another controller on the stack.
Let's say I have a two subclasses of UIViewController called MasterViewController and DetailViewController.
DetailViewController has a property of type NSNumber called level and a UILabel called levelLabel.
MasterViewController has a segue to DetailViewController called ToDetail. MasterViewController's prepareForSegue is like so
- (void)prepareForSegue:(UIStoryboardSegue)segue sender:(id)sender
{
if ([segue.identifier isEqualToString:#"ToDetail"]) {
DetailViewController *detailVC = (DetailViewController *)segue.destinationViewController;
detailVC.level = [NSNumber numberWithInt:10]; // never mind the literal...pretend there was some algorithm for it
}
}
So then, in DetailViewController we implement the setter for levelLabel like so:
- (void)setLevelLabel:(UILabel *)levelLabel
{
if (levelLabel) {
_levelLabel = levelLabel;
_levelLabel.text = level.stringValue;
}
}
Is this good code design? Also, could you critique my code writing style? I pretty much wrote all this code on the fly so this is pretty much how I write code for the most part.
I thought of this question while showering because this is how I implement the setting of almost all the label texts that depend on a segue.
What follows is my own way of thinking about such relationships. Italics applies to your question.
You have the thing being controlled (the label) the controller (destination view controller) and the context it is being controlled within (the source view controller). This can also be expressed as model-view-controller, but I think thinking about a context can apply to much more specific and localised situations.
You should generally try to keep information flow going in one direction, from the context downwards. Objects should not have to be aware of the context in which they exist, ie they shouldn't have to ask for any information, they should be told everything they need to operate. So the source view controller should push the level to the destination view controller, the destination view controller should push this information to the label. This is what you already have, sort-of.
To build upon the above, not only should information flow in one direction, but I also try to ensure the relationships are causal, ie pushing information from one object to another should cause it to subsequently be pushed to the next object. Your code is not doing this which is probably why you have a bad feeling about it.
A more appropriate thing to do is set the text property of the label within the level setter, so that when you set or change the level, the label will update subsequently. The label may or may not be loaded so you will have to check whether it is using -isViewLoaded; -viewDidLoad is the appropriate place to set the text property upon first load.
(When I say 'push' that's just my way of thinking about setting properties or passing arguments because it implies directionality. It is really dependency injection. An example of pulling information would be delegates and data sources. But note here still the object isn't aware of any context, delegates and data sources are clearly defined as protocols, not classes, and usually within the same header file, and are themselves pushed onto the object from a surrounding context. So yes the object is asking for information, but on its own terms and from a system it has no knowledge of.)
Re coding style:
That's exactly how I write code but note Apple reserves the use of underscore prefixes
I have a custom ViewController that is meant to be reusable, and an arbitrary number of instances will be chained together in a NavigationController in Storyboard, all sharing the same model as a delegate.
The ViewControllers need to tell the model which instance they are. Currently, they have an int property that they get from the segue, but it doesn't seem very idiomatic and doesn't lend itself to having multiple instances onscreen (for iPad). I figure there's got to be a cleaner way to do this, so does anyone know what it is? Thanks.
RESULT: self.view.tag
A UIViewController's UIView has a tag property which you can set from anywhere you want. You could also simply identify the type of the controller by using [self class]. Or simply use the memory location by referencing the controller directly.
Update You could simply implement a unique identifier for a UIViewController using a category.
I guess the "cleanest" way in terms of design architecture would perhaps be an array of ViewControllers. (It could be managed in the app delegate.) However, there are memory considerations - on the iPhone you would likely want to create and the destroy the view controllers as needed. The array could contain the identifier and perhaps some other model-related information in order to recreated the controllers as needed.
Too bad there is no property storyboardIdentifier of UIViewController. They can be instantiated with this id but it would be helpful if the viewcontroller can query its id.
I recently ran into this. I figured out you can add a "Restoration ID" in the storyboard. Then you can access it perhaps like this (depending on your use case)
navigationController?.viewControllers.first?.restorationIdentifier
I'm creating a custom ViewController. This VC needs to load some data that is known in the event that creates it and pushes it to the top of the NavigationController that it is going to be part of.
My question is, how should I pass data from the view that handles the custom ViewController's creation into that custom ViewController.
I've thought of four possible options, and I was hoping to get feedback on why each one is good or not for this functionality.
1) Expose public properties in the custom ViewController and set the UI elements in the view based on those properties in - (void) ViewDidLoad.
2) Expose the actual UI elements themselves and set their .text/.image/.whatever attributes as the ViewController is being created.
3) Create a custom constructor for the custom view and pass in the values I need to set up the UI elements
4) Create a custom model that both views have access to, set the data before the CustomView is created/pushed, and access that data in the ViewDidLoad event.
I'm still new to all of this, and I want to make sure that I understand the proper handling of these handoffs of data. It seems like something like this is probably a simple answer, but I'm still a little confused and its probably really important to do this right to avoid memory loss/leaks.
Also, in case anyone cares, I'm using Stanford's CS193p class on iTunes U and Mark/Lamarche's "Beginning iPhone Development" to teach myself cocoa for the iPhone. I'm working on an application with a NavigationController and a couple ViewControllers (Presence 1 if you're familiar with 193p).
Well, I believe there are advantages & disadvantages to each of those methods depending on your requirements...often it will require some combination of approaches. I believe the most common, for me anyway, is to do something like this where you give it enough to get started.
MyViewController *vc = [[MyViewController alloc] init]; // (or initWithNibName:bundle:)
// transfer vc values here
vc.value1 = aValue;
vc.value2 = anotherValue;
[self.navigationController pushViewController:vc animated:YES];
[vc release];
After your view controller is instantiated you have an opportunity to pass objects to it. Say MyViewController is a detail view then you'd give it the object it will be displaying the details for. Or, if it's a table view you can give it the NSArray it will need for display. Then in viewDidLoad or awakeFromNib or awakeFromCoder, or... you can fill out the view...so to speak.
#1 is fine, with or without #3 (these two are not mutually exclusive)
#4 is my preferred solution. For instance, if I had a UserViewController, I would probably also like to have a User object and create it this way:
User *user = [self.users objectAtIndex:someIndex];
UserViewController *uvc = [[[UserViewController alloc] initWithUser:user] autorelease];
#2 is not a good idea. Objects should not access the UI elements of other objects. Much trouble comes from this when you decide to change your UI around (and you will).