I'm messing around with the PushSource sample filter shipped with the DirectShow SDK and I'm having the following problem:
When I call IMediaControl::Run(), it returns S_FALSE which means "the graph is preparing to run, but some filters have not completed the transition to a running state". MSDN suggests to then call IMediaControl::GetState() and wait for the transition to finish.
And so, I call IMediaControl::GetState(INFINITE, ...) which is supposed to solve the problem.
However, to the contrary, it returns VFW_S_STATE_INTERMEDIATE even though I've specified an infinite waiting time.
I've tried all three variations (Bitmap, Bitmap Set and Desktop) and they all behave the same way, which initially lead me to believe there is a bug in there somewhere.
However, then, I tried using IFilterGraph::AddSourceFilter to do the same and it did the same thing, which must mean it's my rendering code that is the problem:
CoInitialize(0);
IGraphBuilder *graph = 0;
assert(S_OK == CoCreateInstance(CLSID_FilterGraph, 0, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER, IID_IGraphBuilder, (void**)&graph));
IBaseFilter *pushSource = 0;
graph->AddSourceFilter(L"sample.bmp", L"Source", &pushSource);
IPin *srcOut = 0;
assert(S_OK == GetPin(pushSource, PINDIR_OUTPUT, &srcOut));
graph->Render(srcOut);
IMediaControl *c = 0;
IMediaEvent *pEvent;
assert(S_OK == graph->QueryInterface(IID_IMediaControl, (void**)&c));
assert(S_OK == graph->QueryInterface(IID_IMediaEvent, (void**)&pEvent));
HRESULT hr = c->Run();
if(hr != S_OK)
{
if(hr == S_FALSE)
{
OAFilterState state;
hr = c->GetState(INFINITE, &state);
assert(hr == S_OK );
}
}
long code;
assert(S_OK == pEvent->WaitForCompletion(INFINITE, &code));
Anyone knows how to fix this?
IBaseFilter *pushSource = 0;
graph->AddSourceFilter(L"sample.bmp", L"Source", &pushSource);
AddSourceFilter adds a default source filter, I don't think it will add your pushsource samplefilter.
I would recommend to add the graph to the ROT, so you can inspect it with graphedit.
And what happens if you don't call GetState()?
hr = pMediaControl->Run();
if(FAILED(hr)) {
/// handle error
}
long evCode=0;
while (evCode == 0)
{
pEvent->WaitForCompletion(1000, &evCode);
/// other code
}
Open GraphEditPlus, add your filter, render its pin and press Run. Then you'll see states of each filter separately, so you'll see what filter didn't run and why.
Related
I get a Null Pointer Exception, and the trace tells me it is inside a function that I have. This function runs every frame and does some calculations and stuff. Anyway, the problem is that when I go to debug, stepping through each line, the function runs fine, and the error only comes up at the end of the draw loop.
This error only recently came up, and the changes I made don't have much to do with the function in question so...
The function mentioned in the trace detects if the object touches something, and acts on it.
Also, the trace gives a line number that does not exist, I'm guessing that's because of the Processing compiling.
I am using Processing 4 if that matters.
Here's the trace:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at ants$Ant.sense(ants.java:190)
at ants$Ant.go(ants.java:220)
at ants.draw(ants.java:44)
at processing.core.PApplet.handleDraw(PApplet.java:2201)
at processing.awt.PSurfaceAWT$10.callDraw(PSurfaceAWT.java:1422)
at processing.core.PSurfaceNone$AnimationThread.run(PSurfaceNone.java:354)
Thanks!
Edit:
More info: This is an ant simulator, and it crashes at food pickup. This used to work and broke while adding (seemingly) unrelated stuff. It crashes at food pickup, which is managed by the sense() function. The Food class only has a position and a render function.
Here is some code:
void sense() { // The problematic function
if (!detectFood && !carryFood) {
float closest = viewRadius;
Food selected = null;
for (Food fd : foods){
float foodDist = position.dist(fd.position);
if(foodDist <= viewRadius) {
if(foodDist < closest) {
selected = fd;
closest = foodDist;
}
}
}
if (selected != null){
detectFood = true;
foodFocused = selected;
}
} else {
if(position.dist(foodFocused.position) < 2*r) {
takeFood();
detectFood = false;
}
}
}
void draw() { // draw loop
background(51);
for (Food food : foods) {
food.render();
}
for (Ant ant : ants) {
ant.go();
}
for (int i=0; i < trails.size(); i++) {
Trail trail = trails.get(i);
if (trail.strenght <= 0)
trails.remove(trail);
else
trail.go();
}
}
The problem is not the trail, as it still crashes without it,
I'm trying to use join_facet() iteratively to grow a single facet starting from a given facet_handle. However, I'm running into trouble when using the Halfedge_around_facet_circulator in combination with join_facet(). My while-loop does not become false anymore which works fine if I don't use join_facet() and the circulator seems to point to something else.
I assume that the join operation is somehow changing that Halfedge_around_facet_circulator. But why and how to solve this?
Polyhedron P_out; // is a valid pure triangle Polyhedron
bool merge_next = true;
while (merge_next == true) {
Polyhedron::Halfedge_around_facet_circulator hit = facet_handle->facet_begin(); // facet_handle pointing to facet of P_out
merge_next = false;
do {
if(!(hit->is_border_edge())) {
if (coplanar(hit->facet(), hit->opposite()->facet())) {
if (CGAL::circulator_size(hit->opposite()->vertex_begin()) >= 3 && CGAL::circulator_size(hit->vertex_begin()) >= 3
&& hit->facet()->id() != hit->opposite()->facet()->id()) {
Polyhedron::Halfedge_handle hit2 = hit;
P_out->join_facet(hit2);
merge_next = true;
}
}
}
} while (++hit != facet_handle->facet_begin());
}
What this code should do:
Given the facet_handle, iterate over the corresponding halfedges of facet and merge if possible. Then taking facet_handle of created new facet again and doing the same until no neighboring facets are left to merge.
Edit:
There are areas on which the code runs fine and others where it crashes at hit->is_border_edge() after the first join_facet().
I am having some trouble with programming hit detection in Processing.JS. I have tried to make a function that checks if something is touching an object and returns true and otherwise returns false. This is that here.
Snake.prototype.checkTouching = function(v){
if(v.position.x > this.position.x - this.width/2 && v.position < this.position.x + this.width/2 && v.position.y > this.positon.y - this.height/2 && v.position.y < this.position.y + this.height/2){
return true;
}else{
return false;
}
};
I am implementing it by creating a new variable "b" in my draw function that holds the value the function returned then using an if statement to check if the value "b" is holding is true. Like so
var b = snakey.checkTouching(mos);
var restarts = 0;
if(b === true){
restarts += 1;
Program.restart();
}
unfortunately even when the object the function is running on is touching the object that is running it nothing happens. I have already checked to see if the logic works and it is valid so I know it has to be my implementation I just can not seem to find out what is wrong with my implementation. Can anyone tell what I am doing wrong? Full program here.Full Program
I have an application that loads in a bundle and in doing so I call CFURLCreateFromFileSystemRepresentation before CFBundleCreate: -
bundlePackageURL = CFURLCreateFromFileSystemRepresentation(
kCFAllocatorDefault,
(const UInt8*)bundlePackageFileSystemRepresentation,
strlen(bundlePackageFileSystemRepresentation),
true );
Most of the time, running the same application and loading the same bundle that resides in the application bundle's Resource directory, the function works and returns a valid CFURL. However, with exactly the same parameters passed in to the function, the call sometimes fails.
I now have code to handle the failure: -
CFURLRef bundlePackageURL = NULL;
int attempt = 0;
while((bundlePackageURL == NULL) && (attempt++ < 12000))
{
bundlePackageURL = CFURLCreateFromFileSystemRepresentation(
kCFAllocatorDefault,
(const UInt8*)bundlePackageFileSystemRepresentation,
strlen(bundlePackageFileSystemRepresentation),
true );
// failed to load, so try again
if(bundlePackageURL == NULL)
fprintf(stdout, "Retrying to obtain CFURL: %d...\n", attempt);
}
As you can see, this makes up to 12000 attempts to call the function and when it fails, I've seen it take anything between a few hundred to over 10000 repeated calls before it succeeds.
Can anyone please explain why the function may be failing at times and if this is normal?
I have been developing a very simple text game using Objective C and Xcode. It is almost done but I am having a problem, the scanf method stops the loop and asks for user input while I need the computer to be running the rest of the loop, the solution I came up with was running two while loops at the same time, one being the logic loop and another being a loop for user input.
I have been doing my research and it looks like using threads are the way to go, I just have not found a tutorial that will break it down for a n00b in Objective C (I am decent in java, I just have never worked with threads). If anybody could explain them or link me to a very broken down tutorial that would be great. Or if anybody has another idea I am open to anything else.
Necessary Code (The scanf I am having a problem with has asterisks on the line):
while(running != 0)
{
if(gameState == 1)
{
if(timeToGenerateNum == true)
{
while(randNumber < 10000000)
{
randNumber = arc4random() % 100000000;
}
NSLog(#"%i", randNumber);
timeToGenerateNum = false;
}
else
{
while(time <= 2500)
{
NSLog(#"Testing");
time++;
******************scanf("%i", &userNum);************************
if(userNum == randNumber)
{
score += time;
time = 0;
timeToGenerateNum = true;
}
}
NSLog(#"Game Over! Your score was %i!", score);
running = 0;
}
}
else if(gameState == 2)
{
NSLog(#"To play, simply type in the number that appears on the screen.");
NSLog(#"But be careful, you only have a short amount of time before GAME OVER!");
NSLog(#"The quicker you type in the number the more score you get!");
NSLog(#"Are you ready to start, if so type '1' and press enter!");
scanf("%i", &gameState);
}
}
You're going to have to learn a bit about BSD (Unix, Linux) input/output to pull this off: replace your call to scanf with a non-blocking function you write to acquire input from the user's keyboard.
This function should immediately return whatever the user typed, or immediately return with a zero character count if she didn't type anything.
Read up on the select(2) system call, and keep in mind that keyboard input (standard input) is the first file descriptor, file descriptor zero.