Having some problems while trying to optimize my SQL.
I got 2 tables like this:
Names
id, analyseid, name
Analyses
id, date, analyseid.
I want to get the newest analyse from Analyses (ordered by date) for every name (they are unique) in Names. I can't really see how to do this without using 2 x nested selects.
My try (Dont get confused about the names. It's the same principle):
SELECT
B.id,
B.chosendatetime,
vStockNames.name
FROM
vStockNames
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT TOP 1
vAnalysesHistory.id,
vAnalysesHistory.chosendatetime,
vAnalysesHistory.companyid
FROM
vAnalysesHistory
ORDER BY
vAnalysesHistory.chosendatetime DESC
) AS B
ON
B.companyid = vStockNames.stockid
In my example the problem is that i only get 1 row returned (because of top 1). But if I exclude this, I can get multiple analyses of the same name.
Can you help me ? - THanks in advance.
SQL Server 2000+:
SELECT (SELECT TOP 1
a.id
FROM vAnalysesHistory AS a
WHERE a.companyid = n.stockid
ORDER BY a.chosendatetime DESC) AS id,
n.name,
(SELECT TOP 1
a.chosendatetime
FROM vAnalysesHistory AS a
WHERE a.companyid = n.stockid
ORDER BY a.chosendatetime DESC) AS chosendatetime
FROM vStockNames AS n
SQL Server 2005+, using CTE:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT a.id,
a.date,
a.analyseid,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY a.analyseid
ORDER BY a.date DESC) AS rk
FROM ANALYSES a)
SELECT n.id,
n.name,
c.date
FROM NAMES n
JOIN cte c ON c.analyseid = n.analyseid
AND c.rk = 1
...without CTE:
SELECT n.id,
n.name,
c.date
FROM NAMES n
JOIN (SELECT a.id,
a.date,
a.analyseid,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY a.analyseid
ORDER BY a.date DESC) AS rk
FROM ANALYSES a) c ON c.analyseid = n.analyseid
AND c.rk = 1
You're only asking for the TOP 1, so that's all you're getting. If you want one per companyId, you need to specify that in the SELECT on vAnalysesHistory. Of course, JOINs must be constant and do not allow this. Fortunately, CROSS APPLY comes to the rescue in cases like this.
SELECT
B.id,
B.chosendatetime,
vStockNames.name
FROM
vStockNames
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT TOP 1
vAnalysesHistory.id,
vAnalysesHistory.chosendatetime,
vAnalysesHistory.companyid
FROM
vAnalysesHistory
WHERE companyid = vStockNames.stockid
ORDER BY
vAnalysesHistory.chosendatetime DESC
) AS B
You could also use ROW_NUMBER() to do the same:
SELECT
B.id,
B.chosendatetime,
vStockNames.name
FROM
vStockNames
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT
vAnalysesHistory.id,
vAnalysesHistory.chosendatetime,
vAnalysesHistory.companyid,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY companyid ORDER BY chosendatetime DESC) AS row
FROM
vAnalysesHistory
) AS B
ON
B.companyid = vStockNames.stockid AND b.row = 1
Personally I'm a fan of the first approach. It will likely be faster and is easier to read IMO.
Will something like this work for you?
;with RankedAnalysesHistory as
(
SELECT
vah.id,
vah.chosendatetime,
vah.companyid
,rank() over (partition by vah.companyid order by vah.chosendatetime desc) rnk
FROM
vAnalysesHistory vah
)
SELECT
B.id,
B.chosendatetime,
vsn.name
FROM
vStockNames vsn
join RankedAnalysesHistory as rah on rah.companyid = vsn.stockid and vah.rnk = 1
It seems to me that you only need SQL-92 for this. Of course, explicit documentation of the joining columns between the tables would help.
Simple names
SELECT B.ID, C.ChosenDate, N.Name
FROM (SELECT A.AnalyseID, MAX(A.Date) AS ChosenDate
FROM Analyses AS A
GROUP BY A.AnalyseID) AS C
JOIN Analyses AS B ON C.AnalyseID = B.AnalyseID AND C.ChosenDate = B.Date
JOIN Names AS N ON N.AnalyseID = C.AnalyseID
The sub-select generates the latest analysis for each company; the join with Analyses picks up the Analyse.ID value corresponding to that latest analysis, and the join with Names picks up the company name. (The C.ChosenDate in the select-list could be replaced by B.Date AS ChosenDate, of course.)
Complicated names
SELECT B.ID, C.ChosenDateTime, N.Name
FROM (SELECT A.CompanyID, MAX(A.ChosenDateTime) AS ChosenDateTime
FROM vAnalysesHistory AS A
GROUP BY A.CompanyID) AS C
JOIN vAnalysesHistory AS B ON C.CompanyID = B.CompanyID
AND C.ChosenDateTime = B.ChosenDateTime
JOIN vStockNames AS N ON N.AnalyseID = C.AnalyseID
Same query with systematic renaming (and slightly different layout to avoid horizontal scrollbars).
Related
We have many old selects like this:
SELECT
tm."ID",tm."R_PERSONES",tm."R_DATASOURCE", ,tm."MATCHCODE",
d.NAME AS DATASOURCE,
p.PDID
FROM TABLE_MAPPINGS tm,
PERSONES p,
DATASOURCES d,
(select ID
from TABLE_MAPPINGS
where (R_PERSONES, MATCHCODE)
in (select
R_PERSONES, MATCHCODE
from TABLE_MAPPINGS
where
id in (select max(id)
from TABLE_MAPPINGS
group by MATCHCODE)
)
) tm2
WHERE tm.R_PERSONES = p.ID
AND tm.R_DATASOURCE=d.ID
and tm2.id = tm.id;
These are large tables, and queries take a long time.
How to rebuild them?
Thank you
You can query the table only once using something like (untested as you have not provided a minimal example of your create table statements or sample data):
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT m.*,
COUNT(CASE WHEN rnk = 1 THEN 1 END)
OVER (PARTITION BY r_persones, matchcode) AS has_max_id
FROM (
SELECT tm.ID,
tm.R_PERSONES,
tm.R_DATASOURCE,
tm.MATCHCODE,
d.NAME AS DATASOURCE,
p.PDID,
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY tm.matchcode ORDER BY tm.id DESC) As rnk
FROM TABLE_MAPPINGS tm
INNER JOIN PERSONES p ON tm.R_PERSONES = p.ID
INNER JOIN DATASOURCES d ON tm.R_DATASOURCE = d.ID
) m
)
WHERE has_max_id > 0;
First finding the maximum ID using the RANK analytic function and then finding all the relevant r_persones, matchcode pairs using conditional aggregation in a COUNT analytic function.
Note: you want to use the RANK or DENSE_RANK analytic functions to match the maximums as it can match multiple rows per partition; whereas ROW_NUMBER will only ever put a single row per partition first.
You're querying table_mappings 3 times; how about doing it only once?
WITH
tab_map
AS
(SELECT a.id,
a.r_persones,
a.matchcode,
a.datasource,
ROW_NUMBER ()
OVER (PARTITION BY a.matchcode ORDER BY a.id DESC) rn
FROM table_mappings a)
SELECT tm.id,
tm.r_persones,
tm.matchcode,
d.name AS datasource,
p.pdid
FROM tab_map tm
JOIN persones p ON p.id = tm.r_persones
JOIN datasources d ON d.id = tm.r_datasource
WHERE tm.rn = 1
I have a table that contains invoices for all phone numbers, and each number has several invoices, I want to display only the first invoice for precise number but i don't really know how get only first invoice , this is my query
SELECT
b.contrno
a.AR_INVDATE
FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD a
INNER JOIN P_EDW_TMP.invoice b
ON b.contrno=a.contrno
WHERE a.AR_INVDATE< (SELECT AR_INVDATE FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD WHERE contrno=b.contrno )
Teradata supports a QUALIFY clause to filter the result of an OLAP-function (similar to HAVING after GROUP BY), which greatly simplifies Tim Biegeleisens's answer:
SELECT *
FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD a
INNER JOIN P_EDW_TMP.invoice b
ON b.contrno = a.contrno
QUALIFY
ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (PARTITION BY b.contrno
ORDER BY a.AR_INVDATE) = 1
Additionally you can apply the ROW_NUMBER before the join (might be more efficient depending on additional conditions):
SELECT *
FROM
( SELECT *
FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD a
QUALIFY
ROW_NUMBER()
OVER (PARTITION BY b.contrno
ORDER BY a.AR_INVDATE) = 1
) AS a
INNER JOIN P_EDW_TMP.invoice b
ON b.contrno = a.contrno
Use ROW_NUMBER():
SELECT
t.contrno,
t.AR_INVDATE
FROM
(
SELECT
b.contrno,
a.AR_INVDATE,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY b.contrno ORDER BY a.AR_INVDATE) rn
FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD a
INNER JOIN P_EDW_TMP.invoice b
ON b.contrno = a.contrno
) t
WHERE t.rn = 1;
If you are worried about ties, and you want to display all ties, then you can replace ROW_NUMBER with either RANK or DENSE_RANK.
If I correctly understand, then one way is to use group by with min(a.AR_INVDATE):
SELECT
b.contrno,
min(a.AR_INVDATE)
FROM P_STG_TABS.IVM_INVOICE_RECORD a
INNER JOIN P_EDW_TMP.invoice b
ON b.contrno=a.contrno
group by b.contrno
I have to JOIN two tables: articles and sales, but not all the data of articles, just need the last load.
Is there a difference between this two ways? there is a most faster/efficient way? and more important, why?
1)
SELECT *
FROM sales S
INNER JOIN articles A
ON S.article_id = A.article_id AND A.load_date = (SELECT MAX(load_date) FROM articles)
2)
SELECT *
FROM sales s
INNER JOIN (
SELECT *
FROM articles
WHERE load_date = (SELECT MAX(load_date) FROM articles)
) A
ON s.article_id = a.article_id
Most DBMSes also support Windowed Aggregate Functions and a RANK might be more efficient (and easier to write if you're used to it):
SELECT *
FROM
(
SELECT *,
RANK() -- max date gets rank #1
OVER (PARTITION BY a.article_id
ORDER BY a.load_date DESC) rn
FROM sales s
INNER JOIN articles a
ON s.article_id = a.article_id
) dt
WHER rn = 1
I am trying to write a query to implement pagination, my basic requirements is that I need a query where I can give min and max range of rows to return for e.g. for page 1 I need record from 1 – 10 for page to 11-20 and so on and so forth.
Through some help form internet and here at SO I have written down the following query but it’s not really working out that way it should and returning me a big sum of rows whatever the range is (probably I am missing some join in the query)
SELECT b.id,b.title,b.name
FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (select NULL as noorder)) AS RowNum, *
FROM [student] b
) as alias,[student] b,[class] c
WHERE b.[status]=1
AND c.id=b.class
AND c.name='Science'
AND RowNum BETWEEN 1 AND 5
ORDER BY b.dtetme DESC
I am lost while fixing in it, can someone please point out the mistake.
Thank you!
Your whole query logic + ROW_NUMBER should go in the sub-query. You use outer WHERE just for paging.
ROW_NUMBER must have ORDER BY on which paging is to be implemented.
SELECT a.id ,
a.title ,
a.name
FROM
(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY b.dtetme DESC) AS RowNum, b.*
FROM [student] b
INNER JOIN [class] c ON c.id = b.class
WHERE b.[status] = 1
AND c.name = 'Science'
) a
WHERE RowNum BETWEEN 1 AND 10 -- change numbers here for pages
ORDER BY t.RowNum
I think the problem is with th addition of [student] b in the FROM, try moving the join into the subquery.
SELECT a.id, a.title, a.name
FROM (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY (select NULL as noorder)) AS RowNum, *
FROM [student] b
JOIN [class] c ON c.id = b.class
WHERE b.[status]=1
AND c.name='Science'
) as a
WHERE a.RowNum BETWEEN 1 AND 5
ORDER BY a.dtetme DESC
Also you may want to consider wrapping this in a procedure or function so you can change the range.
It seems you want something like this:
SELECT t.id,t.title,t.name FROM (
SELECT s.id,s.title,s.name, RowNum = ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY s.dtetme DESC)
FROM student s
INNER JOIN class c ON c.id = s.class
WHERE s.[status]=1 AND c.name='Science' ) AS t
WHERE t.RowNum BETWEEN 1 AND 5
ORDER BY t.RowNum
I've got a problem where my count(*) will return the number of rows before distinct rows are filtered.
This is a simplified version of my query. Note that I'll extract a lot of other data from the tables, so group by won't return the same result, as I'd have to group by maybe 10 columns. The way it works is that m is a map mapping q, c and kl, so there can be several references to q.id. I only want one.
SELECT distinct on (q.id) count(*) over() as full_count
from q, c, kl, m
where c.id = m.chapter_id
and q.id = m.question_id
and q.active = 1
and c.class_id = m.class_id
and kl.id = m.class_id
order by q.id asc
If I run this i get full_count = 11210 while it only returns 9137 rows. If I run it without the distinct on (q.id), distinct on (q.id) is indeed the number of rows.
So it seems that the count function doesn't have access to the filtered rows. How can I solve this? Do I need to rethink my approach?
I'm not entirely sure what exactly you are trying to count, but this might get you started:
select id,
full_count,
id_count
from (
SELECT q.id,
count(*) over() as full_count,
count(*) over (partition by q.id) as id_count,
row_number() over (partition by q.id order by q.id) as rn
from q
join m on q.id = m.question_id
join c on c.id = m.chapter_id and c.class_id = m.class_id
join kl on kl.id = m.class_id
where q.active = 1
) t
where rn = 1
order by q.id asc
If you need the count per id, then the column id_count would be what you need. If you need the overall count, but just on row per id, then the full_count is probably what you want.
(note that I re-wrote your implicit join syntax to use explicit JOINs)
Can you use a subquery:
select qid, count(*) over () as full_count
from (SELECT distinct q.id
from q, c, kl, m
where c.id = m.chapter_id
and q.id = m.question_id
and q.active = 1
and c.class_id = m.class_id
and kl.id = m.class_id
) t
order by q.id asc
But the group by is the right approach. The key word distinct in selectis really just syntactic sugar for doing a group by on all non-aggregate-functioned columns.