I have a UITablView with search box, when you type a text, content will show according starting character typed in serach box then when you select uitableview cell, it goes to another page, which has nearly 30 objects like, UILabel and UITextView. This is the way I constructed the page. When I select a company, I get a memory warning: "Did recieve memory warning level 1".
I verified every object, I had given release statement. Still I am getting the problem. How should I avoid the problem?
For starter, launch your application with Instruments using the memory leaks template. This probably can tells you what objects are stay in the memory.
in xcode 5 just go to product -> analyse ... then see the list of the memory leaks break point... just go throw the break point and try to release those are not required variable and class object ....
some bref
Or
This tool tells you what library is leaking, then you can debug your code as you deem suitable. If it is well organized, you will be able to see immediately what object is leaking and fix the problem with ease.
Related
I have a method on one of my ViewController's that is called by one of its view's and delivered some value. It then sends out a message to a manager object with some information about the VC's state.
- (void)elementXChangedWithValue:(float)value {
ParameterManager * pMan = [ParameterManager sharedInstance];
[pMan updateParameter:self.elementX.parameter value:value];
}
In debugging, it was important for me to inspect what the .SomeElement.parameter state was so I could know what was getting lost in translation by the time I get to my ParameterManager.
Unfortunately, although Self is definitely non-nil and accessible the debugger shows scant information about the class making quick and practical glancing of the value difficult. (i will sometimes invoke "po" command in the debugger command line, however).
Not sure if it helps but this project is running heavy with the Objective-C/Swift interoperability although the ViewController is a fully Objective-C class.
Here is an image of what I am getting in the debugger. The drop-down arrow shows nothing but empty.
The debugger isn't perfect and sometimes you just cant see what is in certain areas, such as self. What does always work is NSLog's placed in code though, so if all else fails, add one of those in at the right place to print out the object you wish to know about.
The debugger may show more info after you make it execute these commands:
expr #import UIKit;
expr #import Foundation;
This loads the whole UIKit and Foundation symbols in the debugger at runtime, you only need to execute it once per debug session.
You can automate this with a user-defined breakpoint that'll be triggered every time your application starts in the debugger.
Source : http://furbo.org/2015/05/11/an-import-ant-change-in-xcode/
Is it possible to access the properties of objects in xCode console?
If I try the following I get an error that he property doesn't exist.
po someObject.someprop
If I don't breakpoint the code and run the app it works fine so I know someObject.someprop exists. I don't think I have the grasp on xCode console yet? What I loved about Flex/Flash development is that I could set a break point and in the console window or variables view I could traverse every structure down to the ends of the earth.
I could see SomeDicionary[key].someArray[1].someObject.prop and it would show me the value. Is this not possible in xCode console or is there a trick to get to it?
You'll actually have to use the bracket syntax notation:
po [someObject someprop]
The debugger is sometimes very finnicky about syntax. This is filled with all sorts of helpful tips for debugging in XCode.
Just a side note, variables/properties declared in the implementation file (*.m) instead of the header file (*.h) can sometimes be invisible to the debugger variable list display depending on if the breakpoint is in that class's code, because of scope. Not necessarily required here, but useful to know seeing as how it is kind of relevant.
I'm trying to use a recent feature of the Scintilla component, which provides OSX-like text-highlighting effect (the yellow animated bouncing box), and I'm stuck with an error that pops up intermittently :
EXC_BAD_ACCESS
pointing to this particular line :
if (layerFindIndicator!=nil)
if ([layerFindIndicator animationForKey:#"animateFound"])
[layerFindIndicator removeAnimationForKey:#"animateFound"];
(the ifs are mine; just in case I caught the object layerFindIndicator being nil, or deallocated or whatever... Unfortunately, it doesn't help...)
layerFindIndicator is seemingly a subclass of CAGradientLayer. (You may see the full code for layerFindIndicator, here).
Since, I'm an absolute newbie to Quartz Core, could please give me any hint as to HOW this could be debugged?
Since, I'm an absolute newbie to Quartz Core, could please give me any hint as to HOW this could be debugged?
This doesn't have anything to do with QuartzCore specifically (at least, I hope not)—it's general this-object-has-been-killed-before-its-time-how-do-I-find-the-killer stuff.
In Xcode:
Edit your current scheme.
For the Profile action, set it to use the Debug build configuration.
Dismiss that and then hit the Profile command.
Xcode will build for that action and then launch Instruments.
Instruments will prompt you to choose a template; you want the Zombies template. Once you've chosen it, Instruments will create a trace document and run your application. Switch to your application (if it isn't already frontmost), then do whatever causes the crash.
If the crash really is a dead-object crash, Zombies will reveal it. You'll get a flag in Instruments's timeline saying something like “message sent to zombie object 0xd3c2b1a0”, and your program will probably exit shortly thereafter.
In that flag is a tiny little button that looks like this: ➲ except it'll be gray. Click on it.
That takes you to the history of that object (actually of that address, including any previous objects or other allocations that have started at that address). Show your Extended Detail Pane (the one that appears on the right showing a stack trace), then scroll down to the end and then move backward (upward) step by step through time, looking at releases and autoreleases, looking for the one that isn't balancing out the object's allocation or a retain.
The solution will probably involve one or more of:
Changing a property to be strong or weak rather than assign/unsafe_unretained
Adding a property where you previously did not strongly own an object
Rearchitecting some things, if it's not clear which of the above you need to do or if either one of them seems like a filthy hack
Switching to ARC to get weak properties and __weak instance variables (both of which get set to nil automatically when the referenced object dies) and to get local variables being implicitly initialized to nil
But it'll depend on what you find in Instruments. And, of course, there's the chance that your problem—the bad access—isn't a dead object at all and all of the above will not help you.
Try this:
if (layerFindIndicator!=nil){
if ([layerFindIndicator animationForKey:#"animateFound"]){
[layerFindIndicator removeAnimationForKey:#"animateFound"];
}
}
Also check to see if it is released else were.
EDIT:
Another thing I found was you didn't have an white space in the if. Your code should now look like this:
if (layerFindIndicator != nil){
if ([layerFindIndicator animationForKey:#"animateFound"]){
[layerFindIndicator removeAnimationForKey:#"animateFound"];
}
}
Something got changed at the new SDK and my code suddenly isn't working.
I created a new empty project and created only a UITableView in it.
I used the same code as i've been used to, except the compiler said that i do not need to use autorelease anymore, so i removed it.
Oh, and I replaced retain with strong as i was recommended.
When I run the app it shows the TableView like it should look, but the minute i touch anywhere on screen, like scrolling for example, it crashes with EXC_BAD_ACCESS error.
What do I miss??
You should post some more informations on where your program crashed! But I don't think the mentioned compiler warnings are the reason. You should have tried to run your project with the compiler by turning of ARC (automatic reference count) and see what happens. If you can go back, do that first.
Also maybe there went something wrong with the changes you made because of ARC . If you have not done the changes with the Xcode refactoring tool I recommend you doing so.
Therefor select in the Xcode Menu:
Edit > Refactor > Convert to Objectiv-C ARC...
It will go through your code and apply the changes. Apple recommends though that your project should work without crashes and warnings before using it.
I have written this trivial action method associated to a textfield.
Every time I enter text into a textfield a search in a PDF is performed and PDFView automatically scroll to selection:
- (IBAction) search:(id)id
{
NSString *query = [self.searchView stringValue]; // get from textfield
selection = [document findString: query fromSelection:NULL withOptions:NSCaseInsensitiveSearch];
if (selection != nil)
{
[self.pdfView setCurrentSelection:selection];
[self.pdfView scrollSelectionToVisible:self.searchView];
}
}
Problem is that after 3 or 4 searches I get EXC_BAD_ACCESS on row (i).
If I debug I see that query contains an NSCFString and not an NSString.
I think it is a memory management problem..but where?
I replicated the same issue inside a trivial testcase:
#interface PDFRef_protoTests : SenTestCase {
#private
PDFDocument *document;
}
........
- (void)setUp
{
[super setUp];
document = [[PDFDocument alloc] initWithURL: #"a local url ..."];
}
- (void)test_exc_bad_access_in_pdfdocument
{
for (int i =0 ;i<100; i++)
{
NSString *temp;
if (i % 2 == 0) temp = #"home";
else if (i % 3 ==0) temp = #"cocoa";
else temp=#"apple";
PDFSelection *selection = [document findString: temp
fromSelection:nil
withOptions:NSCaseInsensitiveSearch];
NSLog(#"Find=%#, iteration=%d", selection, i);
}
}
Update:
1) It seems that it happens also if I use asynchronous search (method beginFindString: withOptions) every time I perform second search.
2) I found a similar problem to mine in MacRuby Issue Tracking: http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/1029
3) It seems that if I disable temporarily garbage collection it works but memory goes up.
I wrote something like:
[[NSGarbageCollector defaultCollector] disable];
[[NSGarbageCollector defaultCollector] enable];
surrounding search code
Another Update
Very weird thing is that sometimes all works. Than I clean and Rebuild and problem arises again. From a certain point of view is is not 100% reproducible. I suspect a bug in PDFKit or some compiler setting I have to do
Update Again
Dears it seems very crazy. I'd concentrate on testcase which is very trivial and which replicates easily the problem. What's wrong with it? This testcase works only if I disable (by code or by project setting) GC
Another Update
Boys it seems a bug but I downloaded an example called PDFLinker from Apple website (http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#samplecode/PDFKitLinker2/Introduction/Intro.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS10003594). This example implements a PDFViewer. Code of my app and this example are quite similars. For the same search action on same PDF, my memory rises at 300/400 MB while PDFLinker rises at 190MB. Clearly there is something wrong in my code. But I am comparing it bit by bit and I don't think I am inserting memory leaks (and Instrument doesn't give me any evidence). Maybe is there some project-wide setting ?
Update Yet
Changing from 64 bit to 32 bit memory consumption lowered. Surely there is a problem with 64bit and PDFKit. BTW still EXC_BAD_ACCESS on second search
SOLUTION
Crucial point is that PDFKit with Garbage collection is bugged.
If I disable GC all works correctly.
I had another issue that had complicated my analysis: I disabled GC on Project Setting but GC remained enabled on Target Settings. So Apple's example PDFLinked2 worked while mine not.
I agree you have found a bug in PDFKit.
I got various forms of errors (segmentation fault, selector not understood, etc) running your test case. Wrapping the code in #try/#catch doesn't prevent all errors associated with this method.
I also got errors printing the log message.
To work around the bug(s), I suggest you disable GC during your invocation of -findString:fromSelection:, as you've already discovered.
Also, be sure to make copies of the values of interest from selection before re-enabling GC. Don't just copy selection either.
If you conduct searches from multiple places in your code I also suggest you extract a separate method to perform the search. Then you can invoke that one to conduct the searches for you without duplicating the GC disable/enable nesting.
This sort of thing is usually evidence that you're hanging onto a pointer to an object that has been destroyed. Turn on zombie objects (with NSZombieEnabled) to see exactly where and when you're accessing a bad object.
Judging from your screen shot it doesn't seem like you have NSZombie turned on. Probably the reason why it doesn't help you. Here's how you turn it on:
How to enable NSZombie in Xcode?
The screenshot you provided was otherwise very useful, but you really need NSZombie to figure out this kind of errors. Well, unless it's obvious, which it isn't from the code you posted.
EDIT: I read the comment that you're using garbage collection. I'm an iOS developer, so I have very limited experience with garbage collection in Objective-C, but as far as I understand NSZombie doesn't work in a garbage collected environment.
I'm not sure it should be possible to get EXC_BAD_ACCESS in a garbage collected environment, unless you create your own pointer and try to call methods on it without having created an object and I don't see why you would do that.
I've heard that some frameworks doesn't work well with garbage collection, but I wouldn't think PDFKit was among them. Anyway, the solution might be to not use garbage collection. Perhaps you should file a bug report with Apple.
keep PDFSelection *selection as a member variable and pass it in fromSelection: instead of nil.
It is possible that PDFDocument keeps the returned PDFSelection instance to improve the performance.
Did you try retaining the searchview stringvalue object before using it?
As you say it happens when you type fast and it happens for async calls, it is possible that the object stringValue is pointing to is being released between the time your query object is pointing to it, and the time you use it int the search.
You could try something like this to see if the problem persists:
- (IBAction) search:(id)id
{
NSString *query = [[self.searchView stringValue] retain]; // get from textfield
selection = [document findString: query fromSelection:NULL withOptions:NSCaseInsensitiveSearch];
if (selection != nil)
{
[self.pdfView setCurrentSelection:selection];
[self.pdfView scrollSelectionToVisible:self.searchView];
}
[query release];
}
Of course there is also the possibility that document is relased. How do you declare it? is it a property with retain? Can it be released by the time you are searching?
EDIT:
I see that you posted the code with the second parameter as NULL, but in your screenshot, this value is nil.
The documentation says you should use NULL when you want to start the search from the beginning.
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/GraphicsImaging/Reference/QuartzFramework/Classes/PDFDocument_Class/Reference/Reference.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40003873-RH2-DontLinkElementID_1
And as the compiler interprets nil and NULL differently, this could be leading to some weird behavior internally.