Scala: Using HashMap with a default value - oop

Question

I have a mutable HashMap and would like to use it like a default-dictionary. The obvious method appears to be to use getOrElse and provide the default value each time as a second value. However this seems a little inelegant in my use case since the default value doesn't change.
var x = HashMap(1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c")
println(x.getOrElse(4, "_")
println(x.getOrElse(5, "_"))
// And so on...
println(x.getOrElse(10, "_"))
Is there any way to create a HashMap (or similar class) such that attempting to access undefined keys returns a default value set on the creation of the HashMap? I notice that HashMap.default is just set to throw an exception but I wonder if this can be changed...

Answer 1

Wow, I happened to visit this thread exactly one year after I posted my last answer here. :-)
Scala 2.9.1. mutable.Map comes with a withDefaultValue method. REPL session:
scala> import collection.mutable
import collection.mutable
scala> mutable.Map[Int, String]().withDefaultValue("")
res18: scala.collection.mutable.Map[Int,String] = Map()
scala> res18(3)
res19: String = ""

Answer 2

Try this:
import collection.mutable.HashMap
val x = new HashMap[Int,String]() { override def default(key:Int) = "-" }
x += (1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c")
Then:
scala> x(1)
res7: String = b
scala> x(2)
res8: String = a
scala> x(3)
res9: String = c
scala> x(4)
res10: String = -

Answer 3

scala> val x = HashMap(1 -> "b", 2 -> "a", 3 -> "c").withDefaultValue("-")
x: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,java.lang.String] = Map((1,b), (2,a), (3,c))
scala> x(3)
res0: java.lang.String = c
scala> x(5)
res1: java.lang.String = -
EDIT:
For mutable.HashMap, you could do the following:
scala> import collection.mutable
import collection.mutable
scala> val x = new mutable.HashMap[Int, String] {
| override def apply(key: Int) = super.get(key) getOrElse "-"
| }
x: scala.collection.mutable.HashMap[Int,String] = Map()
scala> x += (1 -> "a", 2 -> "b", 3 -> "c")
res9: x.type = Map((2,b), (1,a), (3,c))
scala> x(2)
res10: String = b
scala> x(4)
res11: String = -
There might be a better way to do this. Wait for others to respond.

Answer 4

I'm more a java guy... but if getOrElse is not final, why don't you just extend HasMap and provide something like this:
override def getOrElse(k: Int, default: String) = {
return super.getOrElse(k,"_")
}
Note: syntax is probably screwed up but hopefully you'll get the point