I have a NSFetchedResultsController which displays data in a UITableView. I'm using the boiler plate code provided by Xcode when choosing to create a Core Data project. I added the following predicate to the NSFetchRequest the NSFetchedResultsController uses (before NSFetchedResultsController is initialized):
NSPredicate *predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"deleted == NO"];
[fetchRequest setPredicate:predicate];
Now in another location of my app, I set the deleted property like so (pseudo-code):
myManagedObject.deleted = YES
saveDataContext
When I return to the TableViewController, it still shows this "deleted" row.
When I try to reload the table view, nothing happens.
When I try to reload the fetchedResultsController using performFetch, it says:
'FATAL ERROR: The persistent cache of section information does not match the current configuration. You have illegally mutated the NSFetchedResultsController's fetch request, its predicate, or its sort descriptor without either disabling caching or using +deleteCacheWithName:'
If I remove the caching, in the init method, call performFetch, then call [myTable reloadData] it works.
Isn't there a simpler way to refresh the data? Preferably one that allows you to use the caching feature of NSFetchedResultsController?
As far as I know, the only place I am modifying the fetch request, predicate, or sort descriptor is in the same method that allocs and inits the NSFetchedResultsController, so it seems that the error message that it displays is incorrect.
Update: Now that I understand the NSFetchedResultsController a bit better, I understand that it won't remove rows for you automatically, and it's the controller:didChangeObject:atIndexPath:forChangeType:nowIndexPath: method that is primarily responsible for deleting rows. I had this method implemented, since I used Apple's template for my project.
However, in my case I'm not actually deleting an item, I'm just updating a property (deleted) to specify that the item should no longer exist in the list. This means that the controller:didChangeObject:atIndexPath:forChangeType:nowIndexPath: method's change type is NSFetchedResultsChangeUpdate and not NSFetchedResultsChangeDelete. I updated the code to something such as:
case NSFetchedResultsChangeUpdate: {
MyObj *obj = (MyObj *)anObject;
if (obj.deletedValue) { // NOTE: deletedValue returns the deleted property as BOOL
[tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
} else {
[self configureCell:[tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:indexPath] atIndexPath:indexPath];
break;
}
}
The problem with this is that I get the error message:
Invalid update: invalid number of rows in section 0. The number of rows contained in an existing section after the update (3) must be equal to the number of rows contained in that section before the update (3), plus or minus the number of rows inserted or deleted from that section (1 inserted, 2 deleted). with userInfo (null)
Basically it's complaining that the number of objects in the NSFetchedResultsController and the number of cells in the table aren't synced.
Hopefully this makes it clearer:
// DB Items (Name, Deleted):
[Foo, NO]
[Bar, NO]
[Baz, NO]
// mark one as deleted
Objects[1].deletedValue = YES;
// DB items now look like so:
[Foo, NO]
[Bar, YES]
[Baz, NO]
Even though NSFetchedResultsController's NSFetchRequest's NSPredicate is set to deleted == NO, the NSFetchedResultsController still sees 3 items instead of 2.
How can I solve this issue? Would I need to refresh the NSFetchedReultsController somehow? What else could be the problem?
The problem was that I didn't realize that deleted is a reserved word in this case. I had to rename the field and it worked fine.
You need to setup a delegate to the NSFetchedRequestController in order to keep track of changes. To handle batch updates you need to override three methods:
controllerWillChangeContent: - (Setup lists of index paths here)
controller:didChangeObject:atIndexPath:forChangeType:newIndexPath: - (Store for each call here)
controllerDidChangeContent: (Excute updates to UITableView here.)
For the much simpler case where you know that only rows will always be updated one at a time, then go for just something like this:
-(void)controller:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
didChangeObject:(id)anObject
atIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
forChangeType:(NSFetchedResultsChangeType)type
newIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)newIndexPath;
{
switch (type) {
case NSFetchedResultsChangeInsert:
[self.tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:newIndexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationTop];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeDelete:
[self.tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationTop];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeUpdate:
[self.tableView reloadRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
break;
}
}
It seems pretty clear to me, from the error message, that an NSFetchedResultsController does not expect you to change its fetch request once it is created.
What you need to do is add the predicate to the fetch request before the NSFetchedRequestController is initialised. If you want to change the predicate of the fetch request while the app is running, you probably need to create a new NSFetchedRequestController and replace the old one completely.
Related
I am struggling with a UITableView that I previously had working and somehow I have broken it!
It is part of a unit in Paul Hegarty's course
The symptom is that the view loads but it is empty. I am clearly misunderstanding something fairly basic.
So far as I understand the two key methods are 1 the section rows count which in my case is returning zero, which I know is wrong!
- (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section
{
// #warning Incomplete method implementation.
// Return the number of rows in the section.
NSLog(#"TopPlaces %#",self.topPlaces);
//return 100;
return [self.topPlaces count];
}
Because of the above the following method is never called because there are no rows.
- (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
And the second is within ViewDidLoad where I can log my data to the console and everything appears fine. i.e. my data is generated within ViewDidLoad
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
dispatch_queue_t dowloadQueue = dispatch_queue_create("flick downloader", NULL);
dispatch_async(dowloadQueue, ^{
NSArray *topPlaces = [FlickrFetcher topPlaces];
//NSLog(#"Array is %#",topPlaces); // array is OK here
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
NSSortDescriptor *woeDescriptor = [[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:#"_content" ascending:YES];
NSArray *woeDescriptors = #[woeDescriptor];
NSArray *sortedReturns = [topPlaces sortedArrayUsingDescriptors:woeDescriptors];
self.topPlaces = sortedReturns;
//all the data is present here, count is 100 and array will log to console
NSLog(#"count here is %u",[self.topPlaces count]);
});
});
// Uncomment the following line to preserve selection between presentations.
self.clearsSelectionOnViewWillAppear = NO;
}
The problem is that you make an asynchronous call to fetch the data (which means that your array should be full of data at some point in the future), but you do not reload your tableview afterwards. Calling reloadData will do the trick:
...
self.topPlaces = sortedReturns;
//all the data is present here, count is 100 and array will log to console
NSLog(#"count here is %u",[self.topPlaces count]);
[self.tableView reloadData]; // Assuming that 'tableView' is your outlet
This will instruct your tableview to query once again its datasource and will eventually load all the data in your (now non-empty) topPlaces array.
Further Explanation:
I saw in the comment of #nerak99 that he is not completely sure why the problem fixed with reloadData.
Well, let's use an example:
Imagine that you've got a restaurant.
You open the place at 06:00 in the morning and you see that you've got nothing to cook. So you ask from one of your guys to go to the market for supplies (that's your asynchronous call).
At the same time you instruct a waitress to write today's menu, so she writes... well, nothing (that's your tableview asking for number of rows).
Now at 07:00 the guy who went to the market returns with 10 items. What is the next logical step in order to update your menu? To actually inform the waitress (that's your reloadData) about the items you've returned with.
I hope that this makes sense :)
What is self.topPlaces? Try to NSLog the array and see if there's any contents. If not, make sure that it's being set.
I'll be able to write a more specific answer if you provide more info.
I have a fetchedResultsController with a predicate, where "isOpen == YES"
When calling for closeCurrentClockSet, I set that property to NO. Therefore, it should no longer appear on my tableView.
For Some Reason, this is not happening.
Can someone help me figure this out please?
-(void)closeCurrentClockSet
{
NSPredicate * predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"isOpen == YES"];
NSArray *fetchedObjects =
[self fetchRequestForEntity:#"ClockSet"
withPredicate:predicate
inManagedObjectContext:[myAppDelegate managedObjectContext]];
ClockSet *currentClockSet = (ClockSet *)fetchedObjects.lastObject;
[currentClockSet setIsOpen:[NSNumber numberWithBool:NO]];
}
--
I have a couple of methods more, using the exact same approach,
by calling a custom fetchRequestForEntity:withPredicate:inManagedObjectContext method.
In those methods, when changing a property, tableView get correctly updated!
But this one above (closeCurrentClockSet), doesn't! I can't figure out why.
--
My implementation for my fetchedResultsController, is from Apple's documentation.
Also, another detail. If I send my App, to the background. Close it and re-open, tableView shows updated as it should!
I have tried my best to follow previous questions here on stackOverflow. No luck. I also NSLogged this to the bone.
The object is getting correctly fetched. It is the right one. isOpen Property is being correctly updated to NO. But for some reason, my fetchedResultsController doesn't update tableView.
I did try a couple a "hammer" solutions, like reloadData and calling performFetch. But that didn't work. Or would make sense to used them...
EDIT: scratch that, it DID work, calling reloadData imediatly after performFetch on my resultsController but using reloadData is hammering a solution. Plus, it takes out all animations. I want my controller to auto-update my tableView.
Can someone help me figure this out?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Nuno
EDIT:
The complete implementation.
fetchedResultsController is pretty standard and straightforward. Everything else is from Apple's documentation
- (NSFetchedResultsController *)fetchedResultsController
{
if (_fetchedResultsController) {
return _fetchedResultsController;
}
NSManagedObjectContext * managedObjectContext = [myAppDelegate managedObjectContext];
NSEntityDescription *entity =
[NSEntityDescription entityForName:#"ClockPair"
inManagedObjectContext:managedObjectContext];
NSFetchRequest *fetchRequest = [[NSFetchRequest alloc] init];
[fetchRequest setEntity:entity];
NSString *predicate = [NSString stringWithFormat: #"clockSet.isOpen == YES"];
[fetchRequest setPredicate: [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:predicate]];
NSSortDescriptor *sortDescriptor1 =
[[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:#"clockIn" ascending:NO];
NSArray *sortDescriptors = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:sortDescriptor1, nil];
[fetchRequest setSortDescriptors:sortDescriptors];
[fetchRequest setFetchBatchSize:20];
NSFetchedResultsController *theFetchedResultsController =
[[NSFetchedResultsController alloc] initWithFetchRequest:fetchRequest
managedObjectContext:managedObjectContext
sectionNameKeyPath:nil
cacheName:#"Root"];
_fetchedResultsController = theFetchedResultsController;
_fetchedResultsController.delegate = self;
return _fetchedResultsController;
}
--
Boilerplate code from Apple's documentation:
- (void)controllerWillChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
{
// The fetch controller is about to start sending change notifications, so prepare the table view for updates.
[self.tableView beginUpdates];
}
- (void)controller:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
didChangeObject:(id)anObject
atIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
forChangeType:(NSFetchedResultsChangeType)type
newIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)newIndexPath
{
UITableView *tableView = self.tableView;
switch(type) {
case NSFetchedResultsChangeInsert:
[tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:newIndexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationTop];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeDelete:
[tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeUpdate:
[tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
[tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:newIndexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeMove:
[tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationLeft];
[tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:newIndexPath]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationTop];
break;
}
}
- (void)controller:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
didChangeSection:(id )sectionInfo
atIndex:(NSUInteger)sectionIndex
forChangeType:(NSFetchedResultsChangeType)type
{
UITableView *tableView = self.tableView;
switch(type) {
case NSFetchedResultsChangeInsert:
[tableView insertSections:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:sectionIndex]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeDelete:
[tableView deleteSections:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:sectionIndex]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
break;
}
}
- (void)controllerDidChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
{
// The fetch controller has sent all current change notifications, so tell the table view to process all updates.
[self.tableView endUpdates];
}
1ST UPDATE:
Tracking [managedObjectContext hasChanges] does return YES, as it should. But fetchedResultsController doesn't update the tableView
2ND UPDATE
didChangeObject:atIndexPath: does not get called for this particular case!
I have 2 more methods, with the EXACT same code, they just happen to be a different entity. And they work perfectly. Thank you #Leonardo for pointing this out
3TH UPDATE this method, follows the same rules. But does actually work.
- (void)clockOut
{
NSPredicate * predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"isOpen == %#", [NSNumber numberWithBool:YES]];
NSArray * fetchedObjects =
[self fetchRequestForEntity:#"ClockPair"
withPredicate:predicate
inManagedObjectContext:[myAppDelegate managedObjectContext]];
ClockPair *aClockPair = (ClockPair *)fetchedObjects.lastObject;
aClockPair.clockOut = [NSDate date];
aClockPair.isOpen = [NSNumber numberWithBool:NO];
}
Anyone has any other ideas for what I might be missing?
Thank you,
Nuno
OK, I will explain your problem, then I will let you judge whether it is a bug in FRC or not. If you think it is a bug, then you really should file a bug report with apple.
Your fetch result controller predicate is like this:
NSString *predicate = [NSString stringWithFormat: #"clockSet.isOpen == YES"];
which is a valid predicate for a boolean value. It is going to follow the relationship of the clockSet entity and grab its isOpen attribute. If it is YES then those objects will be accepted into the array of objects.
I think we are good up to here.
Now, if you change one of clockSet.isOpen attributes to NO, then you expect to see that object disappear from your table view (i.e., it should no longer match the predicate so it should be removed from the array of fetched objects).
So, if you have this...
[currentClockSet setIsOpen:[NSNumber numberWithBool:NO]];
then, whichever top-level object has a relationship to the currentClockSet should "disappear" from your FRC array of fetched results.
However, you do not see it disappear. The reason is that the object monitored by the FRC did not change. Yes, the predicate key path changed, but the FRC holds entities of ClockPair and a ClockSet entity actually changed.
You can watch the notifications fly around to see what's going on behind the scenes.
Anyway, the FRC will use a key path when you do a fetch, but it will not monitor changes to objects that are not in its actual set of fetched objects.
The easiest work-around is to "set" an attribute for the object that holds this key path object.
For example, I noticed that the ClockPair also has an isOpen attribute. If you have an inverse relationship, then you could do this...
currentClockSet.isOpen = NO;
currentClockSet.clockPair.isOpen = currentClockSet.clockPair.isOpen;
Notice that you did not actually change the value at all. However, the setter was called, which triggered KVO, and thus the private DidChange notification, which then told the FRC that the object changed. Thus, it re-evaluates the check to see if the object should be included, finds the keypath value changed, and does what you expect.
So, if you use a key path in your FRC predicate, if you change that value, you need to worm your way back to all the objects in the FRC array and "dirty them up" so that those objects are in the notification that is passed around about object changes. It's ugly, but probably better than saving or changing your fetch request and refetching.
I know you don't believe me, so go ahead and try it. Note, for it to work, you have to know which item(s) in the FRC array of objects would be affected by the change, and "poke" them to get the FRC to notice the change.
The other option, as I mentioned earlier, is to save the context, and refetch the values. If you don't want to save the context, you can make the fetch include updates in the current context, without refreshing from the store.
I have found that faking a change to an object that the FRC is watching is the best way to accomplish a re-evalution of predicates that are key paths to other entities.
OK, so, whether this is a bug or not is up for some debate. Personally, I think if the FRC is going to monitor a keypath, it should do it all the way, and not partially like we see here.
I hope that make sense, and I encourage you to file a bug report.
You ran into a similar problem.
I know this question is pretty old but I hope this helps someone else:
The easiest way was to introduce a new property named lastUpdated: NSDate in the parent object.
I had a Conversation which contains several Messages. Whenever the isRead flag of the message was updated, I needed an update in the ConversationOverviewViewController that only displays Conversations. Furthermore, the NSFetchedResultsController in the ConversationOverviewVC only fetches Conversations and doesn't know anything about a Message.
Whenever a message was updated, I called message.parentConversation.lastUpdated = NSDate(). It's an easy and useful way to trigger the update manually.
Hope this helps.
After [currentClockSet setIsOpen:[NSNumber numberWithBool:NO]]; can you save the managed object context:
NSError *saveError = nil;
if( ![[myAppDelegate managedObjectContext] save:&saveError] ) {
// handle error saving context
}
I suspect your UITableView will update properly after saving the context. This is likely why sending your app to the background works. I suspect that your Core Data stack is set up in the application's delegate in such a way that it performs a save on the main NSManagedObjectContext when it goes into the background.
I have a parent-child Core Data relationship set up in my iPhone app. I have a Manufacturer object and a Car object. It is a to-many relationship with the Manufacturer being the owner. The main view is a Table View containing the Manufacturers. The detail view is another Table View with the different types of cars. I have been using Tim Roadley's Core Data Tutorial as the base. This tutorial uses Stanford's Core Data Table View Library for the table views.
Adding Cars and Manufacturers gives me no problem, but when I go in and delete with multiple cars in the table view I get this error:
*** Assertion failure in -[UITableView _endCellAnimationsWithContext:], /SourceCache/UIKit_Sim/UIKit-1914.84/UITableView.m:1037
2012-07-29 23:39:33.561 App [16368:c07] * Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException', reason: 'Invalid update: invalid number of rows in section 0. The number of rows contained in an existing section after the update (0) must be equal to the number of rows contained in that section before the update (2), plus or minus the number of rows inserted or deleted from that section (0 inserted, 1 deleted) and plus or minus the number of rows moved into or out of that section (0 moved in, 0 moved out).'
If I delete the only car, it works fine until I try to add a new car, when I get this error:
*** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: 'Illegal attempt to establish a relationship 'manufacturer' between objects in different contexts (source = <Car: 0x6d96da0> (entity: Car; id: 0x6d8a3c0 <x-coredata:///Car/tC78E17EB-1D68-4998-8C4D-6D1199CE253F4> ; data: {
dateAdded = nil;
manufacturer = nil;
carName = new;
}) , destination = <Manufacturer: 0x6bb1f40> (entity: Manufacturer; id: 0x6d87340 <x-coredata://2E8DDF34-B01A-4203-A53E-73DBE6A2F976/Garden/p6> ; data: <fault>))'
Here is my editing method:
- (void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView commitEditingStyle:(UITableViewCellEditingStyle)editingStyle forRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
{
if (editingStyle == UITableViewCellEditingStyleDelete) {
[self.tableView beginUpdates];
Plant *plantToDelete = [self.fetchedResultsController objectAtIndexPath:indexPath];
NSLog(#"Deleting plant '%#'", plantToDelete.plantName);
[self.managedObjectContext deleteObject:plantToDelete];
[self.managedObjectContext save:nil];
//delete empty tableview row
[self.tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationRight];
NSLog(#"Before performFetch...");
[self performFetch];
NSLog(#"After performFetch...");
[self.tableView endUpdates];
}
}
The performFetch method is contained in the previously mentioned CoreDataTableViewController files. For your convenience, here it is:
(void)performFetch
{
_debug = YES;
if (self.fetchedResultsController) {
if (self.fetchedResultsController.fetchRequest.predicate) {
if (self.debug) NSLog(#"[%# %#] fetching %# with predicate: %#", NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd), self.fetchedResultsController.fetchRequest.entityName, self.fetchedResultsController.fetchRequest.predicate);
} else {
if (self.debug) NSLog(#"[%# %#] fetching all %# (i.e., no predicate)", NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd), self.fetchedResultsController.fetchRequest.entityName);
}
NSError *error;
[self.fetchedResultsController performFetch:&error];
if (error) NSLog(#"[%# %#] %# (%#)", NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd), [error localizedDescription], [error localizedFailureReason]);
} else {
if (self.debug) NSLog(#"[%# %#] no NSFetchedResultsController (yet?)", NSStringFromClass([self class]), NSStringFromSelector(_cmd));
}
[self.tableView reloadData];
}
According to other questions, I am doing this correctly by using beginUpdates and endUpdates. This is a puzzling error. Thanks for your help.
I am not sure why you are performing the fetch again, if an object is removed from the context, the fetched results controller is aware of that change already. I think the main problem you have is calling perform fetch in the middle of processing updates to the table. If you comment that line out, does it still have the error?
Additionally, the following may or may not be another part of the the problem as this is where you are differing from my own code:
I have not seen the begin/end edits calls in tableView:CommitEditingStyle: before. My own process in that method generally deletes the object without any concern for the table row. The table rows are reconciled in the fetchedResultController delegate methods like so:
-(void)controllerWillChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller {
//the fetch controller is about to start sending change notifications so prepare the tableview
[self.tableView beginUpdates];
}
-(void)controller:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller
didChangeObject:(id)anObject
atIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath
forChangeType:(NSFetchedResultsChangeType)type
newIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)newIndexPath {
// reconcile your rows here
switch(type) {
case NSFetchedResultsChangeInsert:
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeDelete:
// this one is you
[self.tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationRight];
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeUpdate:
break;
case NSFetchedResultsChangeMove:
break;
}
-(void)controllerDidChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller {
// The fetch controller has sent all current change notifications, so tell the table view to process all updates.
[self.tableView endUpdates];
}
As long as the number of rows matches the number of fetched objects after all that, you should not have that error.
Try removing the lines
//delete empty tableview row
[self.tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationRight];
NSLog(#"Before performFetch...");
[self performFetch];
NSLog(#"After performFetch...");
I believe that CoreDataTableViewController will automatically handle removing the row from the table. You are essentially removing the row twice which is causing the error.
I was having the same error occur when I would open a tableViewController that was a subclass of Tim Roadley's CoreDataTableViewController. My specific app does not require the user to be able to add or delete rows, but it allows them to reorder the fetched results by name and by distance as well as search the data. I used Dean David's answer (the accepted answer above), but after every case statement I only added a break statement. So far that has worked for this app!
Hopefully this will be a quick fix. I have been trying to figure out the error that i keep getting. The error is listed below and the appdelagate is below that.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
2012-04-12 21:11:52.669 Chanda[75100:f803] --- Assertion failure in -[UITableView _endCellAnimationsWithContext:], /SourceCache/UIKit_Sim/UIKit-1914.84/UITableView.m:1037
2012-04-12 21:11:52.671 Chanda[75100:f803] --- Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException', reason: 'Invalid update: invalid number of rows in section 0. The number of rows contained in an existing section after the update (2) must be equal to the number of rows contained in that section before the update (2), plus or minus the number of rows inserted or deleted from that section (1 inserted, 0 deleted) and plus or minus the number of rows moved into or out of that section (0 moved in, 0 moved out).'
#import "AppDelegate.h"
#implementation AppDelegate
#synthesize window = _window;
#synthesize databaseName,databasePath;
- (BOOL)application: (UIApplication *)application didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: (NSDictionary *)launchOptions {
self.databaseName = #"Customers.db";
NSArray *documentPaths = NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(NSDocumentDirectory, NSUserDomainMask, YES);
NSString *documentDir = [documentPaths objectAtIndex:0];
self.databasePath = [documentDir stringByAppendingPathComponent:self.databaseName];
[self createAndCheckDatabase];
return YES;
}
- (void)createAndCheckDatabase {
BOOL success;
NSFileManager *fileManager = [NSFileManager defaultManager];
success = [fileManager fileExistsAtPath:databasePath];
if (success) return;
NSString *databasePathFromApp = [[[NSBundle mainBundle] resourcePath] stringByAppendingPathComponent:self.databaseName];
[fileManager copyItemAtPath:databasePathFromApp toPath:databasePath error:nil];
}
#end
I don't see the reason for you to show us this part of code. Your error must be connected to this part in your code I assume
- (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath;
- (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section
Probably you are making a mistake in one of these data source methods. Currently it's impossible to say what exactly is wrong but I assume it could be something like: You are telling the table view in the numberOfRowsInSection you would like to have n rows reserved and setup and in the cellForRowAtIndexPath you then only handle n - 1 rows for example.
Sorry that this answer can't be as precise as it should be. If you show us your implementation of your data source it would be much easier to tell what's going on.
Like Sun Tzu said: it's best to win without fighting. In my case whenever I see this kind of error message (ie discrepancy between rows added deleted etc).. I don't even debug anything.. I simply avoid making that extra call where I reload the rows etc.. that's 99% of the cases where this error happens.
This is a common scenario where this bug happens: I have a UINavigationController and it has a UITableView, when I click on a row it pushes a new UITableView and so on. This error always happens to me when I pop the last UITableview and go back to the UITableView before it, at this point I make an unnecessary call to the loadIt function which basically inserts the rows and relaods the UITableView.
The reason this happens is because I erroneously place my loadIt function in viewDidAppear:animated rather than viewDidLoad. viewDidAppear:animated is called every time the UITableView is displayed, viewDidLoad is only called once.
When removing rows, remember that it also checks sections when updating, in:
- (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView *)theTableView
If you want to remove a row that is the last item in a section you need to remove the whole section instead (otherwise it might get section count wrong and throw this exception).
Don't forget to update your array which determines numberOfRowsInSection. It needs to be updated before you animate and remove
We check if number of rows in section is 1 because we will have to delete the entire section.
Do correct me if anyone can make this answer clearer.
[self.tableView beginUpdates];
if ([tableView numberOfRowsInSection:indexPath.section] == 1) {
[tableView deleteSections:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:indexPath.section] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
} else {
[tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:#[indexPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationNone];
}
[self.tableView endUpdates];
I put each section elements in separated arrays. Then put them into another array( arrayWithArray). My solution here for this problem:
[quarantineMessages removeObject : message];
[_tableView beginUpdates];
if([[arrayWithArray objectAtIndex: indPath.section] count] > 1)
{
[_tableView deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:[NSArray arrayWithObject:indPath] withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationBottom];
}
else
{
[_tableView deleteSections:[NSIndexSet indexSetWithIndex:indPath.section]
withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationFade];
}
[_tableView endUpdates];
I had the same error.
I was using the following lines
UINib *myCustomCellNib = [UINib nibWithNibName:#"CustomNib" bundle:nil];
[tableView registerNib:myCustomCellNib forCellReuseIdentifier:#"CustomNib"];
to register the nib in the viewDidLoad method, since I had a different nib that was also associated with the same class. Hence, the line
UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:#"GBFBLoadingCell"];
was returning nil unless I registered the nib in the viewDidLoad.
My problem was that I forgot to set the identifier in the attributes inspector for my file "CustomNib.xib" and "CustomNib~iphone.xib". (Or more precisely, that I forgot to press enter after typing the identifier in the attribute inspector in XCode, so that the new name failed to save.)
Hope this helps.
If you're using an NSFetchedResultsController like me and updating data in a background thread, don't forget to begin and end updates in the delegate:
- (void)controllerWillChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller {
[self.tableView beginUpdates];
}
- (void)controllerDidChangeContent:(NSFetchedResultsController *)controller {
[self.tableView endUpdates];
}
I Had the same error , which when trying with [tableView reloadData] was working fine .
The error was actually in the line
[TabView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:indexPathsArray withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationRight];
When i tried to check the indexPath values , they weren't correct as required .
I fixed it by changing values in indexPathsArray .
Hope this helps .
Its could be one of UITableViewDataSource protocol methods
For
- tableView:numberOfRowsInSection:
it should return an integer equal to the sum or result of
-insertRowsAtIndexPaths:withRowAnimation: and/or -deleteRowsAtIndexPaths:withRowAnimation:
For
- numberOfSectionsInTableView:
it should return an integer equal to the sum or result of
-insertRowsAtIndexPaths:withRowAnimation: and/or
-deleteSections:withRowAnimation:
I had the same problem with a Core Data base. If your using many FRC, you just need to reload the tableview inside each condition in numberOfSectionsInTableView.
I just had this happen to me while using Swift and a FRC backed data store to manage information. Adding a simple check to the delete operation to evaluate the current indexPath.section allowed me to avoid an extraneous call. I think I understand why this problem occurs... Basically I load a message into the top row whenever my dataset is empty. This creates an off by one issue as there is a faux row.
My Solution
... delete my entity, save the datastore and call reloadData on tableView
//next I add this simple check to avoid calling deleteRows when the system (wrongly) determines that there is no section.
if indexPath.section > 0 {
tableView.deleteRowsAtIndexPaths([indexPath], withRowAnimation: .None)
}
Simply check that you call [yourTableView reloadData]; after modify array of values.
I'm developing an iOS app with a view containing a TableView.
Some method receives data from the web, opens a new thread to calculate information and inserts a row into the table at run time with the method: insertRowsAtIndexPaths.
Now if a lot of data is coming at once, the table may update itself after a few insertions and not after each one, and thats provokes an exception saying that the number of rows in section isn't right (that's because it thinks it should have an increment of one row but the threads already inserted the array of data some more cells).
Even if I make a lock on the insertion to the datasource array and the insertRowsAtIndexPaths method, it's still do the same.
NSLock *mylock = [[NSLock alloc] init];
[mylock lock];
[array addObject:object];
[tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:indexPath withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationLeft];
[mylock unlock];
help please,
Thank you!
you have to run this method on the main thread. All User Interface interaction has to be done on the main thread.
Let's say your method looks like this:
- (void)addSomeObject:(id)object {
[array addObject:object];
[tableView insertRowsAtIndexPaths:indexPath withRowAnimation:UITableViewRowAnimationLeft];
}
and you are calling it like this:
[self addSomeObject:anObject];
then you would change this call to something like this:
[self performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(addSomeObject:) withObject:anObject waitUntilDone:NO];