I am having trouble using CreateCriteria to add an outer join to a criteria query while using Fluent NHibernate with automapping.
Here are my entities -
public class Table1 : Entity
{
virtual public int tb1_id { get; set; }
virtual public DateTime tb1_date_filed { get; set; }
.
.
.
virtual public IList<Table2> table2 { get; set; }
}
public class Table2: Entity
{
public virtual int tb2_id { get; set; }
public virtual int tb2_seqno { get; set; }
.
.
.
public virtual Table2 table2 { get; set; }
}
I try to use the following to add an outer join to my criteria query -
CreateCriteria("Table2", NHibernate.SqlCommand.JoinType.LeftOuterJoin);
But I am getting an error -
{"EIX000: (-217) Column (tbl1_id) not found in any table in the query (or SLV is undefined)."}
So it seems that it is trying to automatically set the id of the second table, but doesn't know what to set it to. Is there a way that I can specifically set the id? Here is my Session -
var persistenceModel = AutoMap.AssemblyOf<Table1>()
.Override<Table1>(c => {
c.Table("case");
c.Id(x => x.id).Column("tbl1_id");
})
.Where(t => t.Namespace == "MyProject.Data.Entities")
.IgnoreBase<Entity>();
Hope that makes some sense. Thanks for any thoughts.
You seem to have answered your own question so I'm just going to spout some recommendations...
One of the nice things about fluent nhibernate is that it follows conventions to automatically create mappings. Your entities seem to be very coupled to the names of your database tables.
In order to map to a different database convention while keeping idealistic names for entities and columns you can use some custom conventions:
public class CrazyLongBeardedDBATableNamingConvention
: IClassConvention
{
public void Apply(IClassInstance instance)
{
instance.Table("tbl_" + instance.EntityType.Name.ToLower());
}
}
public class CrazyLongBeardedDBAPrimaryKeyNamingConvention
: IIdConvention
{
public void Apply(IIdentityInstance instance)
{
string tableShort = TableNameAbbreviator.Abbreviate(instance.EntityType.Name);
instance.Column(tableShort + "_id");
}
}
class CrazyLongBeardedDBAColumnNamingConvention : IPropertyConvention
{
public void Apply(IPropertyInstance instance)
{
string name = Regex.Replace(
instance.Name,
"([A-Z])",
"_$1").ToLower();
var tableShort = TableNameAbbreviator.Abbreviate(instance.EntityType.Name);
instance.Column(tableShort + name);
}
}
TableNameAbbreviator is a class that would know how to abbreviate your table names.
These would map from:
public class Table1 : Entity
{
virtual public int Id { get; set; }
virtual public DateTime DateFiled { get; set; }
}
To a table like:
CREATE TABLE tbl_table1 {
tbl1_id INT PRIMARY KEY
tbl1_date_filed datetime
}
I added a HasMany option to the override for my first table to define the relationship to my second table. I then added an override for my second table which defines the id column for that table.
Thank
Related
After trying numerous things, I am still unable to figure out the right way to query the following relationship using Fluent NHibernate.
This would otherwise have been an easier task if I had to write SQL queries. Hope to get some better advice to avoid N+1 issue and unoptimized auto-generated SQL queries.
I have the following relationship which goes something as below :
Tags can have media content (Images of various predefined sizes, videos, documents etc.) associated with it.
- 1 Tags can have multiple Media Items mapped to it (Lets's say images with dimension 32x32, 64x64, 600x100, 0 or more Videos)
- Every media item is mapped to a media description which helps in identifying the size and type of the media
- The same media item can be used by a different tag. Example, having a generic image for all tags which do not have any icons.
Entities:
Media
public class Media:IEntity
{
private ICollection<TagMedia> _tagMedia;
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string FilePath { get; set; }
public virtual MediaType MediaType { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<TagMedia> TagMedia
{
get { return _tagMedia?? (_tagMedia= new List<TagMedia>()); }
protected set { _tagMedia= value; }
}
}
Tag
public class Tag:IEntity
{
private ICollection<TagMedia> _tagMedia;
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<TagMedia> TagMedia
{
get { return _tagMedia?? (_tagMedia= new List<TagMedia>()); }
set { _tagMedia= value; }
}
}
TagMedia
public class TagMedia :IEntity
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual Media Media { get; set; }
public virtual Tag Tag { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime AddedOn { get; set; }
}
MediaType
public class MediaType:IEntity
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Description { get; set; }
}
Mappings
MediaMapping
public class MediaMapping : IAutoMappingOverride<Media>
{
public void Override(AutoMapping<Media> mapping)
{
mapping.Map(c => c.FileName).CustomSqlType("varchar(60)").Not.Nullable();
}
}
TagMapping
public class TagMapping : IAutoMappingOverride<Tag>
{
public void Override(AutoMapping<Tag> mapping)
{
mapping.HasMany<TagMedia>(c => c.TagMedia)
.KeyColumn("TagId")
.Cascade.SaveUpdate()
.BatchSize(25);
mapping.BatchSize(25);
mapping.DynamicUpdate();
mapping.DynamicInsert();
}
}
TagMediaMapping
public class TagMediaMapping : IAutoMappingOverride<TagMedia>
{
public void Override(AutoMapping<TagMedia> mapping)
{
mapping.Map(c=>c.AddedOn);
}
}
Query:
The following query gets the cartesian product of all media mapped to the tag and does not eliminate records other than "Icon-16x16". I expect the ORM to return no more than one row.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
_session.Query<Tag>()
.FetchMany(x => x.TagMedia)
.ThenFetch(x => x.Media)
.ThenFetch(x=>x.MediaType)
.Where(c => c.Id == id
&& c.TaxonomyMedia.Any(x=>x.Media.MediaType.Description== "Icon-16x16"))
.SingleOrDefault();
Generated SQL:
exec sp_executesql N'select *
from [Tag] Tag0_ left outer join [TagMedia] Tagme1_ on Tag0_.TagId=Tagme1_.TagId
left outer join [Media] media2_ on Tagme1_.MediaId=media2_.MediaId
left outer join [MediaType] mediatype3_ on media2_.MediaTypeId=mediatype3_.MediaTypeId
where Tag0_.TagId=#p0
and (exists (select Tagme4_.TagMediaId
from [TagMedia] Tagme4_ inner join [Media] media5_ on Tagme4_.MediaId=media5_.MediaId inner join [MediaType] mediatype6_ on media5_.MediaTypeId=mediatype6_.MediaTypeId where Tag0_.TagId=Tagme4_.TagId and mediatype6_.MediaTypeDescription=#p1))',N'#p0 int,#p1 nvarchar(4000)',#p0=102,#p1=N'Icon-16x16'
go
the SingleOrDefault function is a LINQ function and not implemented by NHibernate. Use .Take(1)
I think the solution is:
_session.Query<Tag>()
.FetchMany(x => x.TagMedia)
.ThenFetch(x => x.Media)
.ThenFetch(x=>x.MediaType)
.Where(c => c.Id == id
&& c.TaxonomyMedia.Any(x=>x.Media.MediaType.Description== "Icon-16x16"))
.Take(1)
.SingleOrDefault();
I am trying to create my own foreign key convention that will name the FK in "FK_SourceTable_TargetTable" format.
However, when I run it I end up with two foreign keys instead of one.
My custom foreign key convention looks like this:
public class OurForeignKeyConvention : ForeignKeyConvention
{
protected override string GetKeyName(Member property, Type type)
{
if (property == null)
return string.Format("FK_{0}Id", type.Name); // many-to-many, one-to-many, join
if (property.Name == type.Name)
return string.Format("FK_{0}_{1}", property.DeclaringType.Name, type.Name);
return string.Format("FK_{0}_{1}_{2}", property.DeclaringType.Name, property.Name, type.Name);
}
}
My code to exercise it:
[TestMethod]
public void ShouldBeAbleToBuildSchemaWithOurConventions()
{
var configuration = new Configuration();
configuration.Configure();
Fluently
.Configure(configuration)
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings
.AddFromAssemblyOf<Widget>()
.Conventions.Add<OurForeignKeyConvention>()
)
.BuildSessionFactory();
new SchemaExport(configuration).Create(false, true);
}
My classes and mappings:
public class Widget
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Description { get; set; }
public virtual WidgetType Type { get; set; }
public virtual ISet<WidgetFeature> Features { get; set; }
}
public class WidgetFeature
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual Widget Widget { get; set; }
public virtual string FeatureDescription { get; set; }
}
public class WidgetMap : ClassMap<Widget>
{
public WidgetMap()
{
Id(w => w.Id);
Map(w => w.Description);
HasMany(w => w.Features).Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan().Inverse();
}
}
public class WidgetFeatureMap : ClassMap<WidgetFeature>
{
public WidgetFeatureMap()
{
Id(w => w.Id);
Map(w => w.FeatureDescription);
References(w => w.Widget);
}
}
The end result is two foreign keys, one called what I want - FK_WidgetFeature_Widget - and another one called FK_WidgetId.
If I change OurForeignKeyConvention to always return the same name regardless of whether the "property" parameter is null then I correctly get a single FK - but I then cannot get the "SourceTable" part of my FK name.
Can anyone explain what I am doing wrong here? Why is GetKeyName called twice? And why does one of the calls not provide a value for the "property" parameter?
Doh. ForeignKeyConvention provides the name for the FK column. What I should have been using is the IHasManyConvention, which can be used to name the FK constraint itself.
public class OurForeignKeyConstraintNamingConvention : IHasManyConvention
{
public void Apply(IOneToManyCollectionInstance instance)
{
instance.Key.ForeignKey(string.Format("FK_{0}_{1}", instance.Relationship.Class.Name, instance.EntityType.Name));
}
}
I am using flunet nhibernate and in a many to many relation I need to have key column for the table between these two entities
HasManyToMany(p => p.Signers)
//.Cascade.AllDeleteOrphan()
.Table("PersonnelDocumentSigner")
.Schema("personnel");
public partial class PersonnelDocument
{
private IList<Position> _signers;
virtual public IList<Position> Signers
{
get
{
if (_signers == null)
_signers = new List<Position>();
return _signers;
}
set
{
_signers = value;
}
}
}
the created table just consist of these two columns:PersonnelDocumentId,PositionId
but I need a column Id for this connector table "PersonnelDocumentSigner"
how exactly I can assign it?
link-tables like your PersonnelDocumentSigner normally dont need an Id column because PersonnelDocumentId and PositionId together are the Id/Primary key. If you still want to have additional Data in the linking Table you should Create a new Entity.
class PersonnelDocumentSigner
{
public virtual PersonnelDocument Document { get; set; }
public virtual Position Signer { get; set; }
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
// additional Properties
}
class PersonnelDocumentSignerMap : ClassMap<PersonnelDocumentSigner>
{
Table("PersonnelDocumentSigner");
CompositeId()
.KeyReference(pds => pds.Document)
.KeyReference(pds => pds.Signer);
Map(pds => pds.Id);
// additional Mapps
}
This is based on a legacy system.
I have the following tables:
CREATE TABLE a
id int
CREATE TABLE b
a_id int,
c_id int
relationshipid int -- must be IN (1, 2, 3)
CREATE TABLE c
id int
I want the following domain models
public class A
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public C entityc { get ; set; }
}
public class C
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
Table b is set up so that for a particular defined relationshipid there is (well, should only be) one pair of ids. For other relationships, that one to one mapping through B doesn't hold true. Relationshipid can be one of a small number of values.
How do I get entity C into class A from the relationship where the relationshipid is 1 using fluent NHIbernate?
As a side question, is there a name for what I am trying to do here? The original approach was trying use a HasOne with a Join table and Filter the results, but obviously that failed miserably.
EDIT: Clarified RelationshipID and purpose.
I think the easiest way to map this would be to make your table b an entity and have references to both A and C within that entity and RelationshipId as the id. So your mappings would look something like this:
public class A
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public IList<B> bEntities { get; set; }
}
public class ClassAMap : ClassMap<A>
{
public AMap()
{
Table("A");
Id(x => x.Id);
HasMany(x => x.bEntities)
.KeyColumns.Add("a_id");
}
}
public class B
{
public virtual int RelationshipId { get; set; }
public virtual A InstanceA { get; set; }
public virtual C InstanceC { get; set; }
}
public class ClassBMap : ClassMap<B>
{
public BMap()
{
Table("B");
Id(x => x.RelationshipId , "relationshipid");
References(x => x.InstanceA);
References(x => x.InstanceC);
}
}
Edit:
If your wanting to filter these results for the collection of B entities in your A entity to only ones matching RelationshipId = 1 then you should take a look at this post:
Fluent NHibernate and filtering one-to-many relationship on query requiring multiple joins?
You could also do something like this in your class A:
public class A
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public IList<B> bEntities { get; set; }
public C InstanceC
{
get { return bEntities.First<B>(x => x.RelationshipId == 1).InstanceC; }
}
}
I'm wanting to have a 1 to many relationship in NHibernate where the Child table only has access to it's parentsId. Or the foreign key in the DB.
I've tried the following setup:
public class ParentTable
{
public ParentTable()
{
_childRecords = new List<ChildTable>();
}
public virtual int ParentId { get; set; }
private IList<ChildTable> _childRecords;
public virtual IEnumerable<ChildTable> ChildRecords
{
get { return _childRecords; }
}
public void AddChildTable(string value)
{
_childRecords.Add(new ChildTable{ StringField = value });
}
}
public class ChildTable
{
public virtual int ChildTableId { get; set; }
public virtual string StringField { get; set; }
public virtual int ParentId { get; set; }
}
Mappings:
public class ParentTableMap : ClassMap<ParentTable>
{
public ParentTableMap()
{
Not.LazyLoad();
Id(x => x.ParentId);
HasMany(x => x.ChildRecords)
.Not.LazyLoad()
.KeyColumn("ParentId").Cascade.All()
.Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughCamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
}
}
public class ChildTableMap : ClassMap<ChildTable>
{
public ChildTableMap()
{
Not.LazyLoad();
Id(x => x.ChildTableId);
Map(x => x.StringField);
Map(x => x.ParentId).Not.Nullable();
}
}
The following test fails as it's trying to insert 0 into the ParentId column?
[TestFixture]
public class Tests
{
[Test]
public void SaveOrUpdate_ParentWithChildren_WillCreateParentWithChildRecordsHavingMatchingParentId()
{
int id;
using (var sessionForInsert = SessionProvider.SessionFactory.OpenSession())
{
using (var trx = sessionForInsert.BeginTransaction())
{
//Assign
var parent = new ParentTable();
parent.AddChildTable("Testing");
parent.AddChildTable("Testing2");
sessionForInsert.SaveOrUpdate(parent); // Fails here with DB constraint error
id = parent.ParentId;
}
}
using (var sessionForSelect = SessionProvider.SessionFactory.OpenSession())
{
//Action
var result = sessionForSelect.Get<ParentTable>(id);
Assert.AreEqual(id, result.ParentId);
Assert.AreEqual(id, result.ChildRecords.First().ParentId);
Assert.AreEqual(id, result.ChildRecords.Last().ParentId);
}
}
}
This is what it's trying to do:
exec sp_executesql N'INSERT INTO ChildTable (StringField, ParentId) VALUES (#p0, #p1); select SCOPE_IDENTITY()',N'#p0 nvarchar,#p1 int',#p0='Testing;,#p1=0
I realise I could set-up a reference to the Parent Class in the Child Class. However I'd like to avoid this if at all possible, due to circular references and the problems that will cause when serializing and de-serializing these classes.
Has anyone successfully set-up and 1 to many relationship like the above?
Thanks
Dave
I think you either need to:
Make the ParentId on ChildTable nullable, or
Change your id generators to something NHibernate can generate.
The second option is nice. Switch to Guid.Comb for your id's. There's a restriction on what object relational mappers can do. Specifically, it is recommended to let NHibernate generate the id's instead of the database. I think this (long) blog post explains it in detail: http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2009/02/nh210-generators-behavior-explained.html.
Good luck!
The problem is that you are attempting to insert a parent and its children in one operation. To do this, NHibernate wants to insert the child records with a null ParentId then update ParentId after the parent record is inserted. This foreign key constraint causes this to fail.
The best solution is to map the relationship from child to parent. You don't have to publicly expose the parent, you could just expose its ParentId as int? if desired.
If that's unacceptable, you should be able to accomplish this by changing the order of operations. First, I would require the ParentId in ChildTable's constructor. Then change the operation order in the test to get it to pass.
public class ChildTable
{
public ChildTable(int parentId) { ParentId = parentId; }
public virtual int ChildTableId { get; set; }
public virtual string StringField { get; set; }
public virtual int ParentId { get; private set; }
}
using (var trx = sessionForInsert.BeginTransaction())
{
//Assign
var parent = new ParentTable();
sessionForInsert.Save(parent);
sessionForInsert.Flush(); // may not be needed
parent.AddChildTable("Testing");
parent.AddChildTable("Testing2");
trx.Commit();
id = parent.ParentId;
}
EDIT:
public class ChildTable
{
private ParentTable _parent;
public ChildTable(Parent parent) { _parent = parent; }
public virtual int ChildTableId { get; set; }
public virtual string StringField { get; set; }
public virtual int? ParentId
{
get { return _parent == null : null ? _parent.ParentId; }
}
}
public class ChildTableMap : ClassMap<ChildTable>
{
public ChildTableMap()
{
Not.LazyLoad();
Id(x => x.ChildTableId);
Map(x => x.StringField);
// From memory, I probably have this syntax wrong...
References(Reveal.Property<ParentTable>("Parent"), "ParentTableId")
.Access.CamelCaseField(Prefix.Underscore);
}
}