I'm having a weird issue with form painting in the Compact Framework. I have a login dialog that is basically a small form that is opened on top of another using ShowDialog. When a card is swiped, the login dialog is supposed to close, then some login tasks are performed and then the form behind it should be activated. The problem is that the form behind the login dialog is not being refreshed and so the login dialog will not be removed until after the form behind is refreshed by some user action. This is probably due to the heavy processing that goes on in the login tasks part, but I've not found a way to solve this.
Basically, I want a way to force the application to close the dialog and paint everything again, before performing the heavy login tasks. I've tried numerous refresh methods without any luck:
Form loginDialog = new Form();
DialogResult result = loginDialog.ShowDialog();
loginDialog.Dispose();
//I've tried everything at this point to get the form to refresh before performing
//login tasks
this.Refresh();
this.Invalidate();
Application.DoEvents();
PerformHeavyLoginTasks();
Does anyone know what could be going wrong? Thanks
Ok I figured this out. The problem was with a custom control on the background form that manually paints itself using rectangles and such. I think this is a compact framework bug since I called Refresh and Invalidate on that control as well and it should've repainted. I had to create a method that would call the control's OnPaint override directly since Invalidate and Refreshed were pretty much ignored.
The issue, I believe, is that you're not fully understanding what's going on system-wise here.
When your fore window (the Dialog) is dismissed, the background window (the Form) is given focu and tol to repaint the clipping region where the dialog was. This happens via a PostMessage call, which sends a Windows Message that has to be popped, translated and dispatched down in the bowels of the Application.Run call.
This is, by design, a fairly slow process as the UI should not be preempting things that are important.
If you are doing heavy processing immediately after that PostMessage happens, the processing of those windows messages can often be slowed, ending up with the UI appearing "locked" or drawing really slowly. This is exacerbated if the processing you're doing is on the same thread as the UI.
Why are your efforst not making things better?
Calling Refresh simply sends another message. That message now gets in line for processing, so it would actually make things worse.
Calling Invalidate does pretty much the same this as Refresh, just asynchronously. Again, it makes things worse.
DoEvents tells the message pump to pop, translate and dispatch a message. That dispatch still has to be processed on the UI thread, so noting is going to happen until the thread has time to do the work (i.e. after your processing)
So how do we "fix" this?
The first step is often to put the processing on a separate thread to allow the scheduler to round-robin tasks between the UI and processing threads, up to the default quantum. Thgis means that the processing can only starve the UI for a maximum of 100ms before some sort of drawing is allowed to occur (assuming equal thread priority).
new Thread(PerformHeavyLoginTasks)
{
IsBackground = true
}.Start();
You can go a step further and give the UI a "jump start" on the processing (of 10ms in this example):
new Thread(new ThreadStart(delegate
{
Thread.Sleep(10);
PerformHeavyLoginTasks();
}))
{
IsBackground = true
}.Start();
Of course this may mean you need to now handle the next "display" asynchrously if the UI you want to display is dependent on the processing result. There are plenty of online resources for async patterns, so I won't beat that dead horse here.
Related
I am currently working on a LabVIEW project and have found myself stuck on how to make a while loop exit when I press the abort (stop) button. For a simple while loop I understand how to do this - but the problem is that this while loop is nested inside of an event structure and I'm guessing that the button cannot be pressed while the loop is executing. Attached here is a picture of part of my code (that contains this specific event case which is causing me problems): To spend a little more time explaining what the problem is - I think the code is doing what I want it to do (namely output a set of commands in a repeated cycle with a wait timer) but I cannot stop the code mid cycle (pressing the abort button with my mouse does nothing - as in the button doesn't show it being pressed and the indicator shows no change, I also can't use any other functionality of my program during the cycle which I'm assuming is related). And I do not want to stop the LabVIEW program from running entirely - just the code inside the while loop pictured above. This is what the front panel is configured too for completeness:
Essentially what I want to happen is the while loop to execute when I press DWG and in the middle of the cycle be able to abort it. Sorry if my code seems a little messy. Additionally, I've tried the same code with a for loop originally (via a conditional terminal so it could stop early) and that didn't work either. Thanks for any help I appreciate it!
Your problem is that inside the event structure, by default the UI is frozen so no UI actions (keyboard/mouse/etc) are processed until you exit that frame.
Option 1. You can right click the Event Structure and select "Edit events handled by this case" dialog and then uncheck the "Lock panel" checkbox -- that will allow the UI to be live while you are in that frame. I do not recommend this solution generally unless you have an extremely simple user interface because it leads to the user being able to change controls without the events behind those controls being processed (not a good UI experience for users). But if the UI is simple enough, that works.
Option 2. You can create a user event that is the code you want inside your While Loop. When the Deg Wait Go button is pressed, use the "Generate User Event" node to trigger that event. Do the same thing in the user event case so that the event re-triggers itself if and only if the Abort button has not been pressed.
Option 3. Create a separate loop OUTSIDE your UI loop that does your processing with some sort of command queue running between the UI loop and that other loop. The other loop moves into various states at the request of the UI loop... it's the one that does nothing until it receives a "go" message and then keeps looping until it receives a "stop" message. You can Google "queued message handler" for extensive details of this solution. This is the most common solution for complex UI requirements, especially useful for separating concerns of the UI code from the execution code.
I have a winforms program written in visual Studio, coded in visual basic.
The main part of the program is a while loop that sends out serial commands, writes data to sql, does basic arithmetic, and updates controls on my form. I have this while loop in a background workers do work sub so that the controls can be updated from the background worker sub, while it is still running. After awhile of running, my form will freeze up, while halfway through updating several text boxes. However, the background worker continues to run, the sql data still gets written, and most curiously clicking a button on the form does what it is supposed to, even though we can't see that the button was pressed.
I can't think of anything that would cause behavior like this, where visually the form is frozen, but all the controls still respond.
It freezes because the UI thread is busy with the loop. It seems that you didn't implement the background worker properly and it is still attached to the UI thread.
You can add DoEvents somewhere inside your loop, which gives the UI thread some time to handle UI events. But this is just a Band-Aid fix because I don't know your code. The ideal way is to fix your background worker and its relationship with the UI thread.
I am running a lengthly task in an Action and I would like to have a display of where I am at. For that I created a Text Field and I tried it with setStringValue:
[textField setStingValue: [NSSting stringWithFormat:#"%ld",currentValue]]
The code works but unfortunately it is not updating the NSTextField after every iteration but rather when the whole Action is done.
What am I doing wrong?
This is because applications with the Cocoa framework use an event loop to perform operations, and events occur in a completely serial fashion.
An event is basically any kind of action that the framework designer could not predict or found convenient to have run in a delayed manner. Since you can't predict when clicks will be performed, they need to be considered events; and for efficiency reasons (since you don't want to repaint a component multiple times if you don't need to), the repaint actions are events too.
Your action runs in response to a user event (for instance, a click on a button is an event) and therefore blocks all other events waiting in the queue until it's complete. However, components are repainted in response to a different, framework-triggered event, and as such the text field must wait until your action completes to repaint itself. This is why you cannot visually change the value of a text field from inside an action.
In order to notify your user of the progress of your task, you'll need to run it on a different thread. There's a lot to say about threads, so you should probably read some about them. I'm also sure that there are plenty of examples of how to run a long action in a background thread and update the UI accordingly for Cocoa all over the Internet.
When you click on a UI component, and it enters the Action block, the code is running on the main thread, the same thread that is painting the UI. If you run a long running operation in that block, it isn't going to paint until you are done because it is busy doing whatever you have it doing - you have hijacked the paint thread.
As said elsewhere, you need to spawn another thread, and then have the new thread perform the long running operation, and occasionally send messages to have the UI be updated by the main thread.
As a next step, go read the Apple documentation on NSThread, specifically:
+ (void)detachNewThreadSelector:(SEL)aSelector toTarget:(id)aTarget withObject:(id)anArgument
Be aware that threading is a non-trivial domain area, and be ready for some wierd behavior if you aren't careful.
I have an application that searches in a database for some information.
Since the database is quite big, it sometimes takes a lot of time before the application returns the results to the interface.
I want to add some sort of spinning wheel to inform the user that the application is still searching the database and did not freeze. Once the results are returned, the wheel should disappear.
Any idea how to do this or is there a good tutorial explaining how to do this?
Have you considered changing the mouse pointer to the hourglass as this would be extremely simple to implement:
Me.Cursor = Cursors.WaitCursor
...Do your DB calls here...
Me.Cursor = Cursors.Default
However, I would agree that display a 'spinning wheel' is probably a little more user friendly and definately a lot more obvious. So, first get hold of an animated gif that suits your needs. Then create a form that has a picture box containing the image.
Once you have that you can show the form to the user and in the background do the DB work, once this has completed close the form.
Another alternative would be to use a rolling progress bar instead, so when it reaches 100% it cycles around again and keeps going until you close it.
EDIT:
One thing that I forgot to mention is that you will have to handle exception conditions. Lets say you set the cursor to wait, then an error occurs. The exception may bypass the code that resets everything. This leaves the user with a changed cursor and no means of changing it.
When I have done this kind of thing I have typically created a disposable WaitCursor class and then used something like this:
Using myWaitCursor As WaitCursor = New WaitCursor
...do something...
End Using
In the Dispose of the WaitCursor class you set the cursor back to default. The same would apply if you went down the route of using a form with an image or progress bar.
Find an animated gif of such a spinner, like this one. Put it in a PictureBox, set its Visible property to True when you start the job. Beware that you'll have to run the query in a worker thread to keep the animation alive and the user interface responsive. The BackgroundWorker class is good for that.
You could use the Environments Default wait cursor, which for Vista/7 is a circle with the outside spinning, or the XP tumbling hourglass.
You could launch your DB access on a BackgroundWorker and show an animated control such as a Marquee progress bar, or you could show a custom animation to show Busy status.
My mdi VB.Net application performs a long operation on some data. Ideally I should use a separate thread to prevent the dreaded “Not Responding” message.
My problem is if I use a separate thread users then have the ability to click on other controls in the application which can directly affect the operation my background thread is working on, creating an error.
Is there any way to prevent all the mdi windows, toolbars and other controls from receiving mouse clicks and keyboard input during my background thread’s operation?
Or is there a way to clear the message que before performing a Application.DoEvents?
Thanks
I would say that the best choice when you don't want a user to click on a control is to set Enabled to False for that control.
CLARIFICATION: Setting Enabled to False for a parent control will also disable any children. So, setting Enabled to False on the main window and and MDI windows, will do the trick.
There are a couple of ways of disabling the controls but I'm not sure it's what you want.
If you have a main window which is completely disabled while a background thread is processing then why go through the overhead of processing on the background? The advantage of processing on the background is to allow the user to still work with the application while you process data.
I think a better approach would be to take Dustin's route and selectively disable certain controls that can affect the background operation. Or make your background operation independent of the UI while it's processing.
If you tell us a little bit more about how your Main Window and Background thread interact we may be able to give you a better solution.
Hide all forms and only show the one main form. Then disable the Toolbar/Menu if you have either. Then have a status bar with a progress bar and when it gets done, unhide the form the user was working on.
When you are using a statusbar or a progress bar while your background thread is processing some longduring task, disabling your form will also disable your progress/status bar from updating. So what you should do in this case is disable every other control exept from the one that needs te be kept active (e.g. like a progressbar).
List<Control> lstControls = GetAllControls(this.Controls);
foreach (Control ctrl in lstControls)
{
if (ctrl.GetType().Name.ToLower().Contains("progressbar") {
ctrl.Enabled = true;
}
else
{
ctrl.Enabled = false;
}
}
Use a thread and display a modal dialog that shows the user the progress of your task and gives the user the option to cancel it.
The modal dialog will automatically prevent input (the parent may have to be the mdi window itself.)
(Please do not use hacks like hiding or disabling controls or windows. And please, please, please! do not use DoEvents.)