I have a WCF service that among other bindings also uses WebHttpBinding for JSON inputs/results.
I made a custom IErrorHandler implementation in order to be able to set the StatusCode to 400 when something goes wrong and also return a JSON understandable message. It´s the straight implementation that you can find everywhere (nice way described here).
My problem is: when I test it locally using Visual Studio Web Development Server (Cassini) it works perfectly. However, when I deploy it to my test server (Windows 2008 with standard config for IIS and everything else) it does not work.
When I call it and debug with Firebug I get a HttpStatusCode 200 as a return and no response text. With Fiddler I get a HttpStatusCode 504 and no return at all. However, the behavior I expected (and what happens locally) is a call to the error callback of the ajax call with the responseText set.
I debugged it remotely and everything looks just fine. The execution pipeline is OK and all the classes are called as they should be just like they are locally, except it does not work.
Any suggestions? I´m pretty much out of options here to figure this out.
Thanks a lot!
if firebug and fiddler are giving different results, what happens if you telnet to it directly and perform a request (Something like:)
GET /VirtualDirectoryAndGetData HTTP/1.1
HOST: example.com
[carriage return]
It wouldn't surprise me if you're somehow getting odd headers/formatting back (to explain why firebug/fiddler disagree)
Another thing to test would be publishing to your dev machine to see if it's a machine-specific issue or a server vs dev webserver issue.
If it's happening anywhere outside VS, you might also try commenting out the lines where you set
rmp.StatusCode = System.Net.HttpStatusCode.BadRequest;
rmp.StatusDescription = "Bad request";
This may indicate whether it's a response code issue or an error handler issue.
If you can edit your question to include the results (with sensitive info removed), we'll see if we can track it down further.
Edit: after looking at the question again, it may well be that the server is erroring before it can send ANY response. FF might assume 200 by default, whereas ie might assume 504 (Gateway Timeout). This is total speculation but is possible. Do you see anything in the event logs?
I had a similar issue which I was able to solve. Take a look at the IIS settings. Details on how I overcame the issue are in this post: IErrorHandler returning wrong message body when HTTP status code is 401 Unauthorized
Related
i am doing a load test on one of our website.
My jmeter Script is executing successfully even after the server is down. It is not throwing any errors and also giving the response code as 200.
I have tried all other solutions like Response assertions but that is not helping me.
Can you guys help me with this? I am not sure of what i am missing here.
Server status
jmeter response
JMeter automatically treats HTTP Status Codes below 400 as successful, it doesn't do any extra checks of content so if your server responds with an OOM error but having non-error HTTP Status code - JMeter will consider it as OK.
Ideally in case of error your server should respond with HTTP Status Code 5xx so I would recommend raising an issue to correct the behaviour.
In the meantime consider adding a Response Assertion to explicitly check whether the response contains what it is supposed to be containing (or alternatively that it does not contain error word)
What is the response you get when you hit API from POSTMAN tool?
If you are getting 200 then please consult your developer to handle error code properly.
If you are getting 400 or 500, then there is something missing from your Response Assertion.
I'm having a weird issue with Apache CXF and large (375MB) MTOM attachments are empty.
Running it locally in Eclipse produces the desired results, but deploying it to our server just gives an empty attachment.
The server is written in .NET and doesn't support chunking. With Chunking enabled the client works, but when i disable cunking it fails.
Sadly i'm unable to debug on the server, so i'm restricted to trace logging.
I've tried every trick i've been able to google.
Disable schema validation (CXF-4551) (CXF-7758)
Manually copying the file to java.io.tmpdir before sending, to ensure it can be read.
Custom DataSource
Disable WS-Security
Disable logging interceptor
Nothing seems to make a difference.
Every run i just get something like the following
</soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
--uuid:40ef745b-ac3c-4013-bbe7-a9cc28880423
Content-Type: application/xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: <7611ca0a-22f8-4637-b4f7-a5dfe7f20b81-3#www.somewhere.dk>
Content-Disposition: attachment;name="32_2018-03-28_output.xml"
--uuid:40ef745b-ac3c-4013-bbe7-a9cc28880423
Trying with a smaller (2KB) file on the server works just fine. A 75MB file gets attached correctly, but results in a HTTP 400 from the receiver (which i suspect is because the file is not fully transferred)
Does anyone have any ideas as to what might be causing this ?
After much trial & error, i finally managed to "solve" this. I enabled schema validation, and the data now appears. This is the exact issue that both bugs in my original question claims to fix.
Client client = ClientProxy.getClient(port);
BindingProvider bp = ((BindingProvider) port);
bp.getRequestContext().put("schema-validation-enabled", "true");
I can't add a comment so I'm posting this as an answer.
Jimmy could you perhaps comment on the latest CXF issue and provide some more details? Which version of CXF, what kind of client you are using, real code samples ideally, client logs?
I’m trying to get a mod_perl2 application ported to AWS. As part of the port I thought I’d move from Debian Squeeze to Wheezy with the latest stable mod_perl & Apache2 combination.
The application works right up to the point I try and write JSON responses to the client. At this point, each request is canceled on the client and on the server I get the error
Apache2::RequestIO::print: (103) Software caused connection abort
whenever I write to the client, i.e.:
$self->req->print($output);
I’ve tried tcpdumping the response to the client, and I can see it being written out, but no response is received on the client end and it just barfs chips. I can’t find any information on how to get around this.
I found quite a few people asking about this question on the net without many answers. The solution to my problem was very specific but I thought I’d post what I did anyway, it may help someone.
The client was canceling the request before the response was fully written, which was crapping out Apache::RequestIO (for reasons I still don’t know).
I couldn’t work out why I was seeing this behavior.
By using tcpdump I could see that data was being written out to the client – and it looked fine.
By inspecting the page in Chrome and looking at the network stack, I could see that my request for data was being canceled after no response was received (which was odd because the code worked fine on other servers and I could see the response was being written). Debugging was may harder because with Apache crashing out with an error in print IO I couldn’t check if the bytes written equaled the bytes of data. I wasn’t sure if something was getting stuck on the server side.
So, I changed the Content-Type of the response from application/json to text/html, so that I could query the page and just look at the actual response as text. Once I did that, I could see that the response was fine.
I started to look for other causes, and I found that in the migration to the new server, I’d missed altering some URLs in the DB to point to the new server, which meant my application was trying to get some data from the old DB.
This in turn was causing a load of timing issues, which was causing my problems. Once I fixed the config, the problems went away.
We are getting a 405 error and the following exception from IIS7 when attempting to apply a ResponseStreamFilter to HttpResponse.Filter:
HttpException:
The HTTP verb POST used to access path '/app/Thing.asmx/Command' is not allowed.
We are applying the filter by using an HttpModule with code like this:
var rfs = new ResponseFilterStream(HttpContext.Current.Response.Filter);
rfs.TransformStream +=
new Func<System.IO.MemoryStream, System.IO.MemoryStream>(ProcessStream);
HttpContext.Current.Response.Filter = rfs;
Log("Response stream filter applied correctly.");
All of the code in our HttpModule works just fine... it's all wrapped in a try-catch just to be safe and isn't throwing any exceptions, and diagnostic logging like the last line above is working correctly.
But it looks like our ProcessStream method in the above code is never being called. If we apply the filter to HttpResponse.Filter at all, IIS throws the 405 exception before our filter begins processing.
Our code has worked before on several similar systems, so we suspect IIS/machine configuration on this specific server is responsible. What could be causing this?
The most commonly reported cause for a 405 error in a situation like this seems to be using Url.Rewrite. (The HTTP verb POST used to access path '/test.html' is not allowed) However, we are never using a Url.Rewrite.
Another commonly reported cause is trailing slashes in the request URL. (HTTP 405 on Error on HTTP POST IIS ASP .NET) But as mentioned above, the URL being requested does not end with a slash.
The app pool is running .NET 4.0 in a Classic pipeline (jQuery AJAX post receives 405 error (HTTP verb POST not allowed)), but our code has run without issue on many other systems under a Classic app pool, so there would still have to be something unique to this server's configuration. Changing to Integrated pipeline breaks the application our code is filtering, so that's not a possible workaround anyway.
Turns out, it was a very obscure IIS bug:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980368
The ExtensionlessUrl handler (*.) was incorrectly getting involved with the request instead of just the WebServiceHandlerFactory (*.asmx) as expected. The workaround was:
Manually deleting the ExtensionlessUrl handler entries from the web application's handler mappings
Manually moving the ExtensionlessUrl handler entries under anything you actually expect to be hit
Adding a web.config entry under system.webServer/handlers to remove the ExtensionslessUrl handler as needed (we went with this option to make sure it got included with app demployment)
We had to burn a Microsoft support ticket on this one, since there's no way we would have figured this out in any reasonable timeframe. Hopefully this helps someone else.
I have some WCF services which are running great locally; client can consume them and the server is putting data in the DB as expected. The problem is that when I deploy these to a staging machine, all I can see are HTTP 500 errors.
How do I start debugging the problem?
Given that it's only on staging and not on my local dev machine, I assume it's an IIS configuration problem somewhere.
When I use Fiddler to see what's being sent and what the response is, I can see (as expected) correct request data, and only a 500 as the response -- no further details.
I'm pretty green to WCF and IIS, so it's probably something obvious; I've used aspnet_iisreg, deployed my .svc file and all the built DLLs/files from bin; maybe I missed something.
I looked in the IIS logs, but they're pretty skimpy; no error information there, either (or maybe I'm looking in the wrong place?)
(More important than solving the specific problem is figuring out how to see enough details about errors so I can work through problems myself.)
Edit: I of course checked the event logs first -- and surprisingly, didn't find any mention of the exceptions. So I assume that the service is at least being invoked, and that something is faulting in the middle.
The first place to look for errors is event log on the server. There should be basic information why request was not processed. If it is WCF related you can turn on WCF tracing and check for more details in generated logs.
Add:
<httpErrors errorMode="Detailed"/>
In Web.config under:
<system.webServer>
And see what's happening in more details.
'Http 500 Internal Server Error' might occur if your Service Account's password got expired. Please make sure that you don't have any issues with Service Account which is running the app pool on IIS.
It turns out that the server was returning a 500 because of a huge dataset returned; WCF puts some limitations on the size of data (and strings) you can return, to prevent DOS attacks. I solved the problem by increasing the limits, and decreasing the size of data returned (where applicable).