We have a situation where we have multiple databases with identical schema, but different data in each. We're creating a single session factory to handle this.
The problem is that we don't know which database we'll connect to until runtime, when we can provide that. But on startup to get the factory build, we need to connect to a database with that schema. We currently do this by creating the schema in an known location and using that, but we'd like to remove that requirement.
I haven't been able to find a way to create the session factory without specifying a connection. We don't expect to be able to use the OpenSession method with no parameters, and that's ok.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Andy
Either implement your own IConnectionProvider or pass your own connection to ISessionFactory.OpenSession(IDbConnection) (but read the method's comments about connection tracking)
The solution we came up with was to create a class which manages this for us. The class can use some information in the method call to do some routing logic to figure out where the database is, and then call OpenSession passing the connection string.
You could also use the great NuGet package from brady gaster for this. I made my own implementation from his NHQS package and it works very well.
You can find it here:
http://www.bradygaster.com/Tags/nhqs
good luck!
Came across this and thought Id add my solution for future readers which is basically what Mauricio Scheffer has suggested which encapsulates the 'switching' of CS and provides single point of management (I like this better than having to pass into each session call, less to 'miss' and go wrong).
I obtain the connecitonstring during authentication of the client and set on the context then, using the following IConnectinProvider implementation, set that value for the CS whenever a session is opened:
/// <summary>
/// Provides ability to switch connection strings of an NHibernate Session Factory (use same factory for multiple, dynamically specified, database connections)
/// </summary>
public class DynamicDriverConnectionProvider : DriverConnectionProvider, IConnectionProvider
{
protected override string ConnectionString
{
get
{
var cxnObj = IsWebContext ?
HttpContext.Current.Items["RequestConnectionString"]:
System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.CallContext.GetData("RequestConnectionString");
if (cxnObj != null)
return cxnObj.ToString();
//catch on app startup when there is not request connection string yet set
return base.ConnectionString;
}
}
private static bool IsWebContext
{
get { return (HttpContext.Current != null); }
}
}
Then wire it in during NHConfig:
var configuration = Fluently.Configure()
.Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2005
.Provider<DynamicDriverConnectionProvider>() //Like so
Related
I am very new to Activiti BPMN. I am creating a flow diagram in activiti. I m looking for how username (who has completed the task) can be pass into shell task arguments. so that I can fetch and save in db that user who has completed that task.
Any Help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance...
Here's something I prepared for Java developers based on I think a blog post I saw
edit: https://community.alfresco.com/thread/224336-result-variable-in-javadelegate
RESULT VARIABLE
Option (1) – use expression language (EL) in the XML
<serviceTask id="serviceTask"
activiti:expression="#{myService.toUpperCase(myVar)}"
activiti:resultVariable="myVar" />
Java
public class MyService {
public String toUpperCase(String val) {
return val.toUpperCase();
}
}
The returned String is assigned to activiti:resultVariable
HACKING THE DATA MODEL DIRECTLY
Option (2) – use the execution environment
Java
public class MyService implements JavaDelegate {
public void execute(DelegateExecution execution) throws Exception {
String myVar = (String) execution.getVariable("myVar");
execution.setVariable("myVar", myVar.toUpperCase());
}
}
By contrast here we are being passed an ‘execution’, and we are pulling values out of it and twiddling them and putting them back.
This is somewhat analogous to a Servlet taking values we are passed in the HTMLRequest and then based on them doing different things in the response. (A stronger analogy would be a servlet Filter)
So in your particular instance (depnding on how you are invoking the shell script) using the Expression Language (EL) might be simplest and easiest.
Of course the value you want to pass has to be one that the process knows about (otherwise how can it pass a value it doesn't have a variable for?)
Hope that helps. :D
Usually in BPM engines you have a way to hook out listener to these kind of events. In Activiti if you are embedding it inside your service you can add an extra EventListener and then record the taskCompleted events which will contain the current logged in user.
https://www.activiti.org/userguide/#eventDispatcher
Hope this helps.
I have used activiti:taskListener from activiti app you need to configure below properties
1. I changed properties in task listener.
2. I used java script variable for holding task.assignee value.
Code Snip:-
I want to retrieve a Map from a using JAX-RS (text/xml)
#GET
public Map<String,String> getMap(){
}
but I am getting the error below:
0000001e FlushResultHa E org.apache.wink.server.internal.handlers.FlushResultHandler handleResponse The system could not find a javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter or a DataSourceProvider class for the java.util.HashMap type and application/x-ms-application mediaType. Ensure that a javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter exists in the JAX-RS application for the type and media type specified.
[10:43:52:885 IST 07/02/12] 0000001e RequestProces I org.apache.wink.server.internal.RequestProcessor logException The following error occurred during the invocation of the handlers chain: WebApplicationException (500 - Internal Server Error) with message 'null' while processing GET request sent to http://localhost:9080/jaxrs_module/echo/upload/getSiteNames
The solution I choose is to wrap a Map and use it for the return param.
#XmlRootElement
public class JaxrsMapWrapper {
private Map<String,String> map;
public JaxrsMapWrapper(){
}
public void setMap(Map<String,String> map) {
this.map = map;
}
public Map<String,String> getMap() {
return map;
}
}
and the method signature will go like this
#GET
public JaxrsMapWrapper getMap()
Your problem is that the default serialization strategy (use JAXB) means that you can't serialize that map directly. There are two main ways to deal with this.
Write an XmlAdaptor
There are a number of questions on this on SO but the nicest explanation I've seen so far is on the CXF users mailing list from a few years ago. The one tricky bit (since you don't want an extra wrapper element) is that once you've got yourself a type adaptor, you've got to install it using a package-level annotation (on the right package, which might take some effort to figure out). Those are relatively exotic.
Write a custom MessageBodyWriter
It might well be easier to write your own code to do the serialization. To do this, you implement javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter and tag it with #Provider (assuming that you are using an engine that uses that to manage registration; not all do for complex reasons that don't matter too much here). This will let you produce exactly the document you want from any arbitrary type at a cost of more complexity when writing (but at least you won't be having complex JAXB problems). There are many ways to actually generate XML, with which ones to choose between depending on the data to be serialized
Note that if you were streaming the data out rather than assembling everything in memory, you'd have to implement this interface.
Using CXF 2.4.2, it supports returning Map from the api. I use jackson-jaxrs 1.9.6 for serialization.
#Path("participation")
#Consumes({"application/json"})
#Produces({"application/json"})
public interface SurveyParticipationApi {
#GET
#Path("appParameters")
Map<String,String> getAppParameters();
....
}
With CXF 2.7.x use
WebClient.postCollection(Object collection, Class<T> memberClass, Class<T> responseClass)
,like this in your rest client code.
(Map<String, Region>) client.postCollection(regionCodes, String.class,Map.class);
for other collections use WebClient.postAndGetCollection().
I know how to configure NHibernate and log4net to log the resulting SQL of my queries. Is it possible, however, to log only specific queries (for example activating the logging activity before a LINQ query and deactivating it right after the query)?
You can programmatically add and remove appenders to an instance of log4net. So what you could do is when you hit a query that you want to log, programmatically add a new appender, run the query, and then programmatically remove the appender. I have not tested this but I think this should be possible.
Here is a reference for how to programmatically add appenders.
You may log the SQL by yourself with an interceptor, which you would enable when needed.
public class SqlLogInterceptor : EmptyInterceptor
{
private static readonly ILog _log =
LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(SqlLogInterceptor ));
public bool Enabled { get; set; }
public override SqlString OnPrepareStatement(SqlString sql)
{
// Adjust your log level as you see fit.
if (Enabled)
_log.Info(sql);
return sql;
}
}
When opening the session, provide an instance of the interceptor to OpenSession and keep a reference on it.
Set its Enabled property when you need your logging. Provided you have used the interceptor instance with only one session, it will then log only that session SQL.
Parameter values will not be logged with this solution.
I'm relatively new to NHibernate and I've got a question about it.
I use this code snippet in my MVC project in Controller's method:
MyClass entity = new MyClass
{
Foo = "bar"
};
_myRepository.Save(entity);
....
entity.Foo = "bar2";
_myRepository.Save(entity);
The first time entity saved in database succesfully. But the second time not a single request doesnt go to database. My method save in repository just does:
public void Save(T entity)
{
_session.SaveOrUpdate(entity);
}
What should I do to be able to save and then update this entity during one request? If I add _session.Flush(); after saving entity to database it works, but I'm not sure, if it's the right thing to do.
Thanks
This is the expected behavior.
Changes are only saved on Flush
Flush may be called explicitly or implicitly (see 9.6. Flush)
When using an identity generator (not recommended), inserts are sent immediately, because that's the only way to return the ID.
you should be using transactions.
a couple of good sources: here and here.
also, summer of nHibernate is how I first started with nHibernate. it's a very good resource for learning the basics.
In SQL Server 2005, is there a way to specify more than one connection string from within a .NET Application, with one being a primary preferred connection, but if not available it defaults to trying the other connection (which may be going to a diff DB / server etc)?
If nothing along those exact lines, is there anything we can use, without resorting to writing some kind of round-robin code to check connections?
Thanks.
We would typically use composition on our SqlConnection objects to check for this. All data access is done via backend classes, and we specify multiple servers within the web/app.config. (Forgive any errors, I am actually writing this out by hand)
It would look something like this:
class MyComponent
{
private SqlConnection connection;
....
public void CheckServers()
{
// Cycle through servers in configuration files, finding one that is usable
// When one is found assign the connection string to the SqlConnection
// a simple but resource intensive way of checking for connectivity, is by attempting to run
// a small query and checking the return value
}
public void Open()
{
connection.Open();
}
public ConnectionState State
{
get {return connection.State;}
set {connection.State = value;}
}
// Use this method to return the selected connection string
public string SelectedConnectionString
{
get { return connection.ConnectionString; }
}
//and so on
}
This example includes no error checking or error logging, make sure you add that, so the object can optionally report which connections failed and why.
Assuming that you'd want to access the same set of data, then you'd use clustering or mirroring to provide high availability.
SQLNCLI provider supports SQL Server database mirroring
Provider=SQLNCLI;Data Source=myServer;Failover Partner=myMirrorServer
Clustering just uses the virtual SQL instance name.
Otherwise, I can't quite grasp why you'd want to do this...
Unfortunately there are no FCL methods that do this - you will need to implement this yourself.