Would anyone know of a way to extract Google Synonyms, either through their API or other (TOS-approved) methods?
Specifically, Google have a function that allows you to type a tilde sign "~" in front of a word to conduct a search with synonyms.
As opposed to the search results, I'd like to extract the actual synonym data - so for ~cat, I would like a script that returns feline, kitten, etc.
http://www.synonymlab.com/ do something similar, I guess - but do they do this through the API?
Sorry but there's limited information out there. Any ideas if it's possible?
I looked around for a Google synonym API and found no evidence of such as service.
On the other hand, I found evidence that other people also looked and found nothing. :)
As alternatives, you might consider using WordNet, Freebase (see a discussion on synonyms), or Wikipedia (see Extracting Named Entities and Synonyms from Wikipedia).
The Google Doesn't provide an API for Synonyms. However, A great API Service for Synonyms is http://datamarket.azure.com/dataset/bing/synonyms . It will allows you to request 5000/pm.
I found this. This provides unlimited JSON response for the word you want to search.
https://dictionaryapi.dev/
Related
I am struggling with the AtTask API. Specifically, I'm finding the documentation to be confusing and the examples to be very limited. For instance, the API supports "Named Queries" but there seems to be no listing or documentation of them. One point says that they are listed under "Actions" in the API Explorer, but I find very little there, and the named query that is used in the example "myWork" is not listed.
Can anyone point me to better documentation or examples? I can muddle through by trial and error, writing all my own queries, but it would be nice to know if there is already a Named Query that does what I need to do. For Instance, I need to get a list of assigned tasks. myWork returns a list of tasks that have already started, but I also need the work requests.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
There is no question that the AtTask documentation is very weak and that undocumented features exist. Very frustrating. One thing that does help sometimes is to call the meta data for an object.
To view a tasks meta data go to cl02.attask-ondemand.com/attask/api/v4.0/task/metadata
Then just copy and paste the result on this page http://json.parser.online.fr/
It's not the best, but I found a few undocumented features that way.
Regarding getting a list of assigned tasks, I would consider just querying the tasks object with a user ID set as the search critera. Something like
cl02.attask-ondemand.com/attask/api/v4.0/task/search?method=get&assignedToID=5419c3e90001c026e1b72b7014e8e694
I’m trying to retrieve Wikipedia pages based on the "official website" specified on them, but preferably without going and building a complete index of Wikipedia. If I query DBpedia using:
SELECT ?s WHERE {
?s foaf:homepage <http://www.nytimes.com>
}
I get the desired result, but there are several issues when trying to make this work in general:
foaf:homepage is mostly not set.
I couldn’t find a query-able propery that maps to "official website". In some cases, a query based on dbpedia-owl:wikiPageExternalLink works, but of course in others you get a list of pages that happen to have this page as a link.
URLs take various forms - www.example.com, www.example.com/, www.example.com/index.html, etc. and I couldn't figure out an efficient way to query based on a regular expression or even on STRSTARTS - seems like it always involves producing a huge query result and then filtering.
You are hitting on the fact that a lot of data in DBPedia is somewhat incomplete or poorly formatted. This is more or less unavoidable since its source material is the same way. For example, foaf:homepage is sometimes missing, but that is likely because in the source Wikipedia page that same info is missing. That being said, sometimes the crawling tools the DBPedia folks use misses a trick - if you think it's doing something wrong in converting Wikipedia data to RDF let them know directly and they can adjust their crawler.
Other than that, your question is a bit too broad to answer, really. foaf:homepage is the property used for the official website for a given topic. Where it's not set you simply don't know what the official site is. dbpedia-owl:wikiPageExternalLink is a general link for any external resource that is referenced by the wiki article - so it's not just the official website.
As for the formatting - I have yet to see this, most links I encountered while browsing are fully formed URLs. If you want us to answer that you'll have to edit your question to include some concrete examples.
Is it possible to use the Apple Search API to search by genre ? I'm thinking specifically games in the app store. Using Obj-c.
As has been pointed out in the comments of this question...
Search Apple App store by genre with iOS/Obj-c
There seems to be a problem with trying to search by genre, so I'm looking for answers which of examples of that actually working, not just links to the docs.
It's not actually documented on the Search API documentation, but you can add a genreId parameter to the search URL and it restricts the search to a particular genre.
If you look at the JSON returned from a search for "Yelp", there are 4 interesting things:
"genreIds":["6005", "6001"]
"genres":["Social Networking", "Weather"]
"primaryGenreName":"Social Networking"
"primaryGenreId":6005
Adding &genreId=6001 to a URL will find apps in the US in the "Weather" category. I'm using the search term "Check" in the URL.
https://itunes.apple.com/search?term=Check&country=us&entity=software&genreId=6001
Because it's not documented, you can't rely on it working forever. You may also be able to use the primaryGenreName as a parameter, I didn't try that. You'll have to figure out what numbers correspond to what categories too.
The Search API is documented here: http://www.apple.com/itunes/affiliates/resources/documentation/itunes-store-web-service-search-api.html
You can use this link to generate an RSS Feed of your liking. Without knowing too much about how you intend to use it, I would suggest looking at these two solutions and using the best one that suits your needs.
Is there a way to search the web which does NOT remove punctuation? For example, I want to search for window.window->window (Yes, I actually do, this is a structure in mozilla plugins). I figure that this HAS to be a fairly rare string.
Unfortunately, Google, Bing, AltaVista, Yahoo, and Excite all strip the punctuation and just show anything with the word "window" in it. And according to Google, on their site, at least, there is NO WAY AROUND IT.
In general, searching for chunks of code must be hard for this reason... anyone have any hints?
google codesearch ("window.window->window" but it doesn't seem to get any relevant result out of this request)
There is similar tools all over the internet like codase or koders but I'm not sure they let you search exactly this string. Anyway they might be useful to you so I think they're worth mentioning.
edit: It is very unlikely you'll find a general purpose search engine which will allow you to search for something like "window.window->window" because most search engines will do some processing on the document before storing it. For instance they might represent it internally as vectors of words (a vector space model) and use that to do the search, not the actual original string. And creating such a vector involves first cutting the document according to punctuation and other critters. This is a very complex and interesting subject which I can't tell you much more about. My bad memory did a pretty good job since I studied it at school!
BTW they might do the same kind of processing on your query too. You might want to read about tf-idf which is probably light years from what google and his friends are doing but can give you a hint about what happens to your query.
There is no way to do that, by itself in the main Google engine, as you discovered -- however, if you are looking for information about Mozilla then the best bet would be to structure your query something more like this:
"window.window->window" +Mozilla
OR +XUL
+ Another search string related to what you are
trying to do.
SymbolHound is a web search that does not remove punctuation from the queries. There is an option to search source code repositories (like the now-discontinued Google Code Search), but it also has the option to search the Internet for special characters. (primarily programming-related sites such as StackOverflow).
try it here: http://www.symbolhound.com
-Tom (co-founder)
I was searching the net for something like a wiki database, just like wikipedia but instead stores structured content, editable by users. What I was looking for was an online database accessible by everyone where people can design the schema and data with proper versioning of both schema and data. I couldn't find any such site. I am not sure if it is my search skills or if there really is no wiki database as of now. Does anyone out there know anything like this?
I think there is a great potential for something like this. A possible example will be a website with a GUI for querying a MySQL DB where any website visitor can create DB objects and populate data.
UPDATE: I had registered the domain wikidatabase.org to get started on a tool but I didn't find enough time yet. If anyone is interested in spending some time and coding on this, please let me know at wikidatabase.org
It's not quite what you're looking for, but Semantic Mediawiki adds database-like features to MediaWiki:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki
It's still fundamentally a Wiki, but you can add semantic tags to pages ([[foo::bar]] [[baz::1000]]) and then do database-type queries across them: SELECT baz FROM pages WHERE foo=bar would be {{#ask: [[foo::bar]] | ?baz}}. There is even an embryonic SPARQL implementation for pseudo-SQL queries.
OK this question is old, but Google led me here, so for anyone else out there looking for a wiki for structured data: Take a look at Foswiki.
This might be like what you're looking for: dbpedia.org. They're working on extracting data from Wikipedia, and encoding it in a structured format using RDF, so that it can be queried using SPARQL.
Linkeddata.org has a big list of RDF data sets.
Do you mean something like http://www.freebase.com?
You should check out https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page which is a bit different but still may be of interest.
Something that might come close to your requirements is Google Docs.
What's offered is document editing roughly similar to MS Word, and spreadsheets roughly similar to Excel. I'm thinking of the latter, of course.
In Google Docs, You can create spreadsheets for free; being spreadsheets, they naturally have a row-and-column structure similar to a database, and which you can define flexibly. You can also share these sheets with other people. This seems to be a by-invite-only process rather than open-to-all, but there may be other possibilities I'm not aware of, or that level of sharing might be enough for you in any case.
mindtouch should be able to do it. It's rather easy to get data in / out. (for example: it's trivial to aggregate all the IP's for servers into one table).
I pretty much use it as a DB in the wiki itself (pages have tables, key/value..inheritance, templates, etc...) but you can also interface with the API, write dekiscript, grab the XML...
I like this idea. I have heard of some sites that are trying to pull together large datasets for various things for open consumption, but none that would allow a wiki feel.
You could start with something as simple as an installation of phpMyAdmin with a known password that would allow people to log in, create a database, edit data and query from any other site on the web.
It might suffer from more accuracy problems than wikipedia though.
OpenRecord, development of which seems to have halted in 2008, seems to approach this. It is a structured wiki in which pages are views on the data. Unlike RDBMSes it is loosely typed - the system tries to make a best guess about what data you entered, but defaults to text when it cannot guess. Schemas appear to have been implied.
http://openrecord.org
An example of the typing that is given is that of a date. If you enter '2008' in a record, the system interprets this as a date. If you enter 'unknown' however, the system allows that as well.
Perhaps you might be interested in Couch DB:
Apache CouchDB is a document-oriented
database that can be queried and
indexed in a MapReduce fashion using
JavaScript. CouchDB also offers
incremental replication with
bi-directional conflict detection and
resolution.
I'm working on an Open Source PHP / Symfony / PostgreSQL app that does this.
It allows multiple projects, each project can have multiple directories, each directory has a defined field structure. Admins set all this up.
Then members of the public can suggest new records, edit or report existing ones. All this is moderated and versioned.
It's early days yet but it basically works and is already in real world use in several projects.
Future plans already in progress include tools to help keep the data up to date, better searching/querying and field types that allow translations of content between languages.
There is more at http://www.directoki.org/
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned Wikibase yet, which is the software that powers Wikidata.