I'm looking at creating a data query WCF service over a slow satellite connection and I really like WCF Data Services. The problem I see is that HTTP is a very verbose format and since everything I'm doing is internal and .NET, is it possible to use NetTcpBinding instead to reduce some of the overhead?
Is this even possible? Advisable?
While researching this on my own, i ran across the MSDN article on Self-Hosted WCF Data Services. This article notes that you can host the service with DataServiceHost which still requires HTTP (it's derived from WebServiceHost).
But you can also roll your own host using IDataServiceHost. Here's an excerpt from the MSDN article:
For cases where the WCF host
implementation is too restrictive, you
can also define a custom host for a
data service. Any class that
implements IDataServiceHost interface
can be used as the network host for a
data service. A custom host must
implement the IDataServiceHost
interface and be able to handle the
following basic responsibilities of
the data service host:
Provide the data service with the service root path.
Process request and response headers information to the appropriate
IDataServiceHost member implementation.
Handle exceptions raised by the data service.
Validate parameters in the query string.
The article seems to suggest that MS has properly segrated data-service responsibilities from network interface responsibilities. If that's so, then I should be able to write a NetTcpDataServiceHost. Has anyone ever written a IDataServerHost? Any suggestions?
No, WCF Data Services are built on top of REST, and REST itself is very intimately and completely based on the HTTP verbs like GET, PUT, POST etc. - you cannot run those over NetTcp, since those are intrinsically tied to the HTTP protocol stack.
Maybe there are other options for you to reduce the data being transmitted? Tweak your objects - trim the fat, if you can - both on the number of rows retrieved at once, and the number of attributes/data fields transmitted. That's probably you're most promising approach.
Related
We are trying to build a Nservicebus service that can communicated with form and wpf based clients using WCF. I have read that you can inherit from WcfService.
like:
public class ThirdPartyWebSvc : WcfService<ThirdPartyCmd, ThirdPartyCmdResponse>
And then you simple create a endpoint in the app.config and you done like described here. but the problem is that i have to create a endpoint for every command.
I would like to have a single endpoint that excepts any command and returns its response.
public class ThirdPartyWebSvc : WcfService<ICommand, IMessage>
Can someone point me in the right direction? Using Nservicebus for client communication can't be done for us and i don't want to build a proxy like server unless thats the only way to do it.
Thanks
So from what I can gather, you want to expose a WCF service operation which consumers can call to polymorphically pass one of a number of possible commands to, and then have the service route that command to the correct NServiceBus endpoint which then handles the command.
Firstly, in order to achieve this you should forget about using the NserviceBus.WcfService base class, because to use this you must closely follow the guidance in the article you linked in your post.
Instead, you could:
design your service operation contract to accept polymorphic requests by using the ServiceKnownType attribute on your operation definition, adding all possible command types,
host the service using a regular System.ServiceModel.ServiceHost(), and then configure an NserviceBus.IBus in the startup of your hosted WCF service, and
define your UnicastBusConfig config section in your service config file by adding all the command types along with the recipient queue addresses
However, you now have the following drawbacks:
Because of the requirement to be able to pass in implementations of ICommand into the service, you will need to recompile your operation contract each time you need to add a new command type.
You will need to manage a large quantity of routing information in the config file, and if any of the recipient endpoints change, you will need to change your service config.
If your service has availability problems then no more messages to any of your NSB endpoints.
You will need to write code to handle what to do if you do not receive a response message from the NSB endpoints in a timely manner, and this logic may depend on the type of command sent.
I hope you are beginning to see how centralizing this functionality is not a great idea.
All the above problems would go away if you could get your clients to send commands to the bus in the standard way, but without msmq how can you do that?
Well, for a start you could look at using one of the other supported transports.
If none of these work for you and you have to use WCF hosted services, then you must follow the guidance in the linked article. This guidance is there to steer you in the correct direction - multiple WCF services sounds like a pain, until you try to centralize them into a single service - then the pain gets bigger, not less.
I'm looking to create an Application Object Server that is sitting between Window form client and SQL 2008R2 Database, it handling application business rule and support CRUD, I have achive this with WCF and WCF dataservice in the past, It would be better if we can combine those two kind of WCFs into one.
Do you know any way to achive this? or we should go back to the WinSock day.
Awaiting for your thoughts
WCF Data Services are based on the REST-style WCF services (webHttpBinding) - so those are quite fundamentally different from the traditional SOAP-style WCF bindings.
I don't see how you could easily combine WCF Data Services with a traditional SOAP WCF service (assuming that's what you're trying to do).
What you could do is:
create an entity data model as basis for both services
create the WCF Data Service on top of that EDM
separately create a set of WCF SOAP service methods, based on the same EDM
But SOAP and REST are quite different, at a very basic level:
REST tends to work with resources - you have a Customer (also in your URL), and you can fetch it, edit it, update it, delete it
SOAP on the other hand tends to work more with operations - you have your customer, but then you expose methods like GetCustomer, UpdateCustomer etc. - your basic building blocks are methods that take parameters
Is it possible to use oData with a WCF service application but not use WCF Data Services?
It will be great if someone could shed more light on oData. I have done some Googling on this topic, but whenever I search for "wcf odata", I get information about WCF Data Services.
Any help/links will be appreciated.
WCF Data Services is the Microsoft implementation of the general OData protocol. As such, only WCF Data Services are / support / implement OData - a "normal" WCF service does not (and can not).
You might need to elaborate exactly why you feel the need or urge to use OData but not use WCF Data Services. What's the issue / problem you have with that setup? WHY do you want to use only a "normal" WCF service??
Update: ok, so you want to have services that expose data in different fashions and with different methods. What you could do is create a regular WCF service that's exposing both SOAP endpoints as well as a webHttpBinding REST endpoint. This will work - but then it's a "regular" WCF service, with methods that take parameters and return some data structure. This is not WCF Data Service (OData).
OData is more of a "here's my data collection, you can browse around in it" kind of approach - it's more about exposing an entire data model to the outside world using REST. This doesn't mix and match with SOAP - which is a lot more procedure-oriented, e.g. LoadCustomer, SaveInvoice and so forth.
So while it's absolutely possible to have procedure-oriented WCF services exposing both SOAP and REST endpoints at the same time, I don't really see how you can mix and match the "expose-this-resource" kind of approach for WCF Data Services / OData with a SOAP binding - this just doesn't work, I believe.
So if you must expose your data model of WCF Data Services (OData), you will need to author a second, pretty different looking regular WCF services for the SOAP clients, that might be based on the same data in the end (access the same database, for instance), but it's "face" will look quite different.
There is a new(ish) project from Microsoft called WCF WebApi (NuGet Package), which is simplifying doing RESTful WCF. It really takes to heart the "Representation" part of REST, so that you can expose your data in many representations (JSON, XML, oData, PNG, etc) based on content negotiation (or optionally whatever convention you want) all from the same service contract operation. Currently baked into the framework is the ability to support oData GET queries, by simply returning a collection .AsQueryable().
While this isn't a pure WCF/oData solution, as your question is speaking to, I thought I would mention the project in case it fit your specific requirements. The current Go-Live licensing might prove prohibitive, as might the "preview" status of this code; but if not, this may be a solution for you.
* UPDATE * This project was rolled into ASP.NET (usually in conjunction with ASP.NET MVC) and is no longer under the WCF team. The new product is called ASP.NET WebAPI.
I have just started evaluating whether or not I should be using OData influenced wcf data services or a standard WCF service application as the primary data source for Silverlight applications. I would like your thoughts on which is a better way under what situation/circumstance. What is lighter over the wire, easier to maintain, etc.
What I have gathered so far is:
There are no Wcf data service templates in VS2010 that I know of, and I will need to create a asp.net web project first and then add a wcf data service, so its going to affect how I structure my projects.
WCF Data services expose actual table names over the service. I don't know yet of a way I can alias them and I'm not sure its a good idea to let the world know my table structure
In a standard wcf service I will need to write linq queries against the EF or Domain service classes on the service side, while in a data service I can move that processing logic to the client.
At first glance examining the classes exposed by the wcf data services seem easier to read and understand than those exposed by the EF
Do add your thoughts on this..
Thanks for your time.
There are no Wcf data service
templates in VS2010 that I know of,
Not project template - just an item template (for use inside an ASP.NET web site or web app). WCF DataServices are very tightly coupled to HTTP, so they only make sense in a web site/app.
WCF Data services expose actual table
names over the service.
NO ! At least not necessarily. The whole point of EF is that you can decouple the actual physical structure of your database from the (conceptual) model that gets exposed. You can totally rename entities, you can map several entities onto a single table, split up an entity over several tables, you can leave out attributes - anything you like!
At first glance examining the classes
exposed by the wcf data services seem
easier to read and understand than
those exposed by the EF
I doubt it - because by default, WCF Data Services will use a Linq-to-SQL or EF model as their basis, really. You can make that as simple or as complicated as you like.
Using a "regular" WCF service allows you to use the netTcpBinding for much faster performance (thanks to binary message encoding vs. textual messages for other bindings), when using your Silverlight 4 app in a company-internal network (doesn't work for internet scenarios) - not something you can do with WCF DataServices.
The main difference in my opinion is the SOAP vs. REST difference:
SOAP (traditional WCF) is oriented towards methods - you think and design your system in terms of methods - things you can do (GetCustomer, SaveOrder etc.)
REST (the WCF DataServices approach) is all about resources, e.g. you have your resources and collections of resources (e.g. Customers) and you expose those out to the world, with standard HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) instead of separate specific methods that you define
So both approaches have their pros and cons. I guess the most important question is: what kind of app are you creating, and what kind of user audience are you targetting?
Update:
for intranet / internal apps, I would think the advantage of a netTcpBinding (binary encoding) would justify using a classic WCF service - also for data-intensive apps, I personally find a method-based approach (GetCustomer, SaveCustomer) to be easier to use and understand
for a public-facing app, using HTTP and being as interoperable as possible is probably your major concern, so in that scenario, I'd probably favor the WCF Data Service - easy to use, easy to understand URLs for the user
I am migrating a web service to WCF so I can use binary encoding. I am now realizing that the session calls and application state calls are not recognized. WCF is supposed to be better then a web service so I am assuming that there is a better way to do things.
1) How do I maintain session and call a web service that uses session?
2) How do I replace the application object?
For those of you who are migrating a large project and cannot afford to be so ideological, I found a real answer here:
http://megakemp.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/migrating-aspnet-web-services-to-wcf/
In WCF, the best practice is not to have any state whenever possible, since your clients should be calling you with a "per-call" approach - each call from a client gets a new instance of your WCF service class, which is totally independent of anything else, ideally.
If you need to have persistent state, store it in a persistent store - typically a database.
WCF is also by default totally independent of ASP.NET and IIS, and thus cannot leverage the HttpContext, HttpSessionState and so forth objects - since it might be self-hosted in a console app which has no knowledge of IIS, HTTP context etc.
The question is: what exactly do you really use from those HttpSessionState and HttpApplicationState objects? Somehow, you need to abstract that away or solve it some other way, e.g. have the client send you that information (as a parameter on your web service method call, or as a header in the message), or have the client send you a "token" of sorts which allows you to retrieve the relevant info from e.g. a database table.
Chapter 4 in Juval Lowy's excellent Programming WCF Services (link) is all about Instance Management. There are sections on Per-Session services and Durable services, each of which might be what you're looking for.
However, Marc's point is very valid. There are a lot of cons to using session with WCF services, but it is possible. Lowy discusses a lot of this in some detail.