I have a form with some validations set in entity metadata class. and then binding entity instance to UI by VM. Something as below:
Xaml like:
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot">
<StackPanel VerticalAlignment="Top">
<input:ValidationSummary />
</StackPanel>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Name, Mode=TwoWay}" />
<ComboBox x:Name="xTest" ItemsSource="{Binding MyList}"
SelectedItem="{Binding MyItem,Mode=TwoWay,
DisplayMemberPath="MyName"
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
ValidatesOnNotifyDataErrors=True,
ValidatesOnExceptions=True,
NotifyOnValidationError=True,UpdateSourceTrigger=Explicit}" />
</Grid>
Code-behind like:
public MyForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.xTest.BindingValidationError +=new EventHandler<ValidationErrorEventArgs>((s,e)=>{
BindingExpression be = this.xTest.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.SelectedItemProperty);
be.UpdateSource();
if (e.Action == ValidationErrorEventAction.Added)
((ComboBox)s).Foreground = new SolidColorBrush(Colors.Red);
});
}
Metadata like:
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
[RequiredAttribute]
public int MyItemID { get; set; }
But when running the app, I got nothing display in valudationSummary.
For CombBox, even there is error, looks like BindingValidationError event is never fired.
How to resolve it?
Why are you using an Explicit UpdateSourceTrigger?
Silverlight validation happens inside the binding framework, when the binding is updating the source object. The way you have this, there won't be a binding validation error because you never tell the binding to update the source object. Well, actually you do, but it happens inside the validation error event handler. You've written chicken-and-egg code.
Remove your UpdateSourceTrigger on your binding or set it to Default.
Remove the explicit call to BindingExpression.UpdateSource.
Remove setting the ComboBox foreground to red - you are using NotifyOnValidationError=True, which eliminates any need to manually color the control.
Remove the DisplayMemberPath from the binding
So your XAML:
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot">
<StackPanel VerticalAlignment="Top">
<input:ValidationSummary />
<ComboBox x:Name="xTest" ItemsSource="{Binding MyList}"
SelectedItem="{Binding MyItem,
Mode=TwoWay,
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
ValidatesOnNotifyDataErrors=True,
ValidatesOnExceptions=True,
NotifyOnValidationError=True}" />
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
And your code:
public MyForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
// you don't need anything here to have the validations work
}
Related
In an AvaloniaUI window, I want to have a TabControl whose tabs are added and removed from an ObservableCollection<T>. The tab's "title" (the text appearing on the tab strip) should be set inside each item of the collection, which could belong to a different type.
For that I defined a type:
public abstract class TabViewModelBase : ViewModelBase
{
public abstract string TabHeader { get; }
}
and my collection is defined like this:
public ObservableCollection<TabViewModelBase> OpenTabs { get; } = new();
In the axaml file, this is the definition of the TabControl:
<TabControl Items="{Binding OpenTabs}">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding TabHeader}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
</TabControl>
So far, this works like a charm.
The problem begins when I also want to set up a container for the view inside each tab, which should not be a part of the contained view itself. I've tried by editing the xaml above and setting a ContentTemplate like this:
<TabControl Items="{Binding OpenTabs}">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding TabHeader}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<TabControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Child="{Binding}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ContentTemplate>
</TabControl>
However this results in the following error:
[Binding] Error in binding to 'Avalonia.Controls.Border'.'Child': 'Could not convert 'Project.ViewModels.TestingViewModel' to 'IControl'.'
This seems to be because ViewLocator, which automatically matches a view model to a view based on its name, is not being called. I assume this is because I've defined a DataTemplate inside TabControl.ContentTemplate.
Is it possible to instruct Avalonia to use ViewLocator inside TabControl.ContentTemplate, so that a view is selected based on its name?
<Border Child="{Binding}"/>
Border expects an actual control as a child, not a view model. You need to use ContentControl instead. It can also have it's own data template or view locator.
I found a way to work around the issue, by defining an IValueConverter that uses ViewLocator internally:
public class ViewModelValueConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object? Convert(
object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture
)
{
if (value == null)
return null;
if (
value is ViewModelBase viewModel
&& targetType.IsAssignableFrom(typeof(IControl))
)
{
ViewLocator viewLocator = new();
return viewLocator.Build(value);
}
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
public object ConvertBack(
object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture
)
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
and using it in XAML:
<Window.Resources>
<local:ViewModelValueConverter x:Key="variableView"/>
</Window.Resources>
<TabControl Items="{Binding OpenTabs}">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding TabHeader}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<TabControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Child="{Binding, Converter={StaticResource variableView}}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ContentTemplate>
</TabControl>
but it feels like there might be a simpler solution.
I'm working on a view (called 'Familify') which shows users a list of assets, and allows them to delete an asset from the list. The assets are stored in an ObservableCollection in the ViewModel, so the command to delete simply takes the asset object and removes it from collection. I'm having issues getting the 'delete' functionality working. Here is the XAML and codebehind:
Familify.xaml
<ListView
ItemsSource="{Binding Assets}">
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="80px" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="150px" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="60px" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<TextBlock
Grid.Column="0"
Text="{Binding number}" FontFamily="Consolas"/>
<TextBlock
Grid.Column="1"
Text="{Binding type}"/>
<TextBlock
Grid.Column="2"
Text="add binding here"/>
<TextBlock
Grid.Column="3"
Text="add binding here"/>
<Button
Command="{x:Bind ViewModel.RemoveAssetCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}"
Content=""
FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets"
Grid.Column="4">
</Button>
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
Familify.xaml.cs
namespace asset_manager.Views
{
public sealed partial class Familify : UserControl
{
FamilifyViewModel ViewModel { get; set; }
public Familify()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
DataContextChanged += (s, e) =>
{
ViewModel = DataContext as FamilifyViewModel;
};
}
}
}
The idea is that clicking the button removes the asset from the list. (Just to note, the normal binding showing number, type, etc. is working correctly.) My thinking so far:
Try to use binding to access the RemoveAssetCommand stored in the View Model for the page. However, I couldn't get ancestral binding to work (i.e. trying to find the data context of an element higher up in the XAML hierarchy didn't work because findAncestor isn't a thing in UWP.)
x:Bind looked like a good solution, because it uses an explicit path to the property. So, if I declared ViewModel in my code behind, I could use x:Bind ViewModel.property. All well and good. I did just that, and intellisense allowed me to access the ViewModel.RemoveAssetCommand when typing it out.
However, this did not work, because I get the error no DataType defined for DataTemplate. This makes sense, so I tried two things.
x:DataType="Models:Asset" (put in the DataTemplate tag above) is the model being shown in the data template, so I tried that first. Of course, the command is not declared in the model, it's declared in the View Model, so that didn't work.
I instead tried x:DataType="ViewModels:FamilifyViewModel", thinking I could just use x:Bind with that. However, I then got an error that it couldn't cast an object of type Asset to FamilifyViewModel. This makes sense, because the object getting passed to this data template is of the type Asset.
This is a pain, because the whole reason I thought x:Bind would work is that I could just access the property directly from the ViewModel in the codebehind.
Explicitly stated, 1) is it possible to use x:Bind within a data template to access a base level property (in this case, a Prism command) on the ViewModel? and 2) is there a better way to go about implementing this functionality?
Is it possible to use x:Bind within a data template to access a base level property (in this case, a Prism command) on the ViewModel?
Yes, if you want to access a base level, you can reassign DataContext of button like following:
<Button DataContext="{Binding ElementName=Familily, Path=DataContext}"/>
The Family is the name of UserControl.
is there a better way to go about implementing this functionality?
When you put commad in the ViewModel and bind the button as above. The the bind item of button will become Family DataContext. So you could not invoke delete action directly in the ViewModel.
The best practice to implement this functionality is that put the RemoveAssetCommand in the Asset class. And use the ItemsSource of ListView as Button CommandParameter.
<Button
Command="{Binding RemoveAssetCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding ElementName=MyListView, Path=ItemsSource}"
Content=""
FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets"
Grid.Column="4">
</Button>
Asset.cs
public class Asset
{
public string number { get; set; }
public string type { get; set; }
public ICommand RemoveAssetCommand
{
get
{
return new CommandHandler<ObservableCollection<Asset>>((item) => this.RemoveAction(item));
}
}
private void RemoveAction(ObservableCollection<Asset> items)
{
items.Remove(this);
}
}
ViewModel.cs
public class FamilifyViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Asset> Assets = new ObservableCollection<Asset>();
public FamilifyViewModel()
{
Assets.Add(new Asset { number = "100001", type = "hello" });
Assets.Add(new Asset { number = "100001", type = "hello" });
Assets.Add(new Asset { number = "100001", type = "hello" });
Assets.Add(new Asset { number = "100001", type = "hello" });
}
}
I work an a Windows 8 application which shows a GridView on one page. When ever the user selects an item of this grid and clicks on a button, the next page is loaded with detail information of the selected item.
I am using MVVM for this and have a DelegateCommand from Prims:
public DelegateCommand<Route> ShowRouteDetailsCommand { get; private set; }
This command is initialized inside the constructor:
this.ShowRouteDetailsCommand = new DelegateCommand<Route>(this.ShowRouteDetails);
The navigation is done by Prisms navigation service:
private void ShowRouteDetails(Route route)
{
this.NavigationService.Navigate(PageNames.RouteDetails, route.Id);
}
The routes are shown inside a GridView:
<GridView x:Name="RouteGrid"
ItemsSource="{Binding Routes}"
SelectionMode="Single">
<GridView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate> ...
The command is currently added inside the app bar (just for testing):
<AppBarButton Command="{Binding ShowRouteDetailsCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding SelectedValue,
ElementName=RouteGrid, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
Icon="Forward" />
My problem is, that the parameter of ShowRouteDetails is allways empty. It doesn't even matter if I try GridViews SelectedValue or SelectedItem property.
I know that I could easily add a SelectedRoute property, bind the SelectedItem to it and use it in ShowRouteDetails but this seems dirty to me.
Why don't you just create a var in your viewModel and bind it to the SelectedItem of the gridView? In this way, when you run the command, you have only to read the value of that var.
<GridView x:Name="RouteGrid" ItemsSource="{Binding Routes}"
SelectionMode="Single" SelectedItem="{Binding myVar}">
<GridView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
I have the following piece of XAML:
<GroupStyle.HeaderTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid Background="#286C9A" Width="336" Height="22">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Checked}" Foreground="Black" HorizontalAlignment="Left"/>
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding Checked}" HorizontalAlignment="Right" />
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</GroupStyle.HeaderTemplate>
It's a template in a ListView. Checked is a bool property, and the problem is that the initial value of the property is transferred correctly to the view (both TextBlock and CheckBox). But following changes to the property is only reflected on the TextBlock, the Checkbox does not react.
Can someone tell me what happens?
EDIT:
The relevant part (I believe) of the ViewModel is this :
public class MenuGroup : ObservableCollection<MenuItem>
{
bool #checked;
public bool Checked
{
get { return #checked; }
set
{
if (#checked == value) return;
#checked = value;
OnPropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("Checked"));
}
}
}
EDIT: It is apparent that the binding stops working the first time I have clicked on the checkbox and thus manually changed it's state. And it works all the way if it's TwoWay binding. But why that is, I don't know.
I have a issue when trigger comes in ViewModel the SelectedItem(parameter) comes the previously selected Item. I need the newly selected item as parameter on selectionChanged.
I am new in WP8. Below is the code
<toolkit:ListPicker Header="Background"
ExpansionMode="FullscreenOnly"
Template="{StaticResource ListPickerControlTemplate}"
VerticalAlignment="Top"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Buildings.ObjectList}"
Margin="0"
x:Name="buldings"
Padding="0">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding Path=BuildingSelectionCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding Path=SelectedItem, ElementName=buldings}" />
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
Thanks
Vinod
Normally should you get the currently SelectionItem passed as parameter to your Command. Since the event is written in past tense, so that you should get the currently SelectedItem and not the previously one.
What you can try is to add a binding for the SelectedItem to your ListPicker and omit passing the SelectedItem to your Command as parameter.
<toolkit:ListPicker SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedBuilding, Mode=TwoWay}" >
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding Path=BuildingSelectionCommand}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</toolkit:ListPicker>
Your command then needs to access the property SelectedBuilding to execute
public class BuildingSelectionCommand{
// a reference to your ViewModel that contains the SelectedBuilding-Property
public BuildingsViewModel ViewModel {
get;
set;
}
public bool CanExecute(object parameter) {
return ViewModel.SelectedBuilding != null;
}
public void Execute(object parameter){
var selectedItem = ViewModel.SelectedBuilding;
// execute command logic with selectedItem
}
}
The code can be diffrent on your side, cause it depends on how you have implemented your ViewModel and Command, but i think you should get it.
Another way without using an EventTrigger, is to execute the command directly in your SelectedBuilding-Property.
public Building SelectBuilding{
get {
return _selectedBuilding
}
set{
_selectedBuilding = value;
RaisePropertyChanged("SelectedBuilding");
if (BuildingSelectionCommand.CanExecute(_selectedBuilding)) {
BuildingSelectionCommand.Execute(_selectedBuilding);
}
}
XAML:
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<command:EventToCommand Command="{Binding BuildingSelectionCommand}" PassEventArgsToCommand="True"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
Command:
RelayCommand<SelectionChangedEventArgs> BuildingSelectionCommand { get; set; }
BuildingSelectionCommand = new RelayCommand<SelectionChangedEventArgs>(async (args) => { });
You just missed the "PassEventArgsToCommand". Make sure your command has a SelectionChangedEventArgs.
The simple way to solve it is to use
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedBuilding, Mode=TwoWay}"
as Jehof suggested and get rid of all the "<i:" trigger settings but simply handle the change in the SelectedBuilding property setter and call a method instead of using commands to wrap a method call. You are not gaining anything with a command since you are not even using CanExecute here, but simply adding more code.