I'm trying to set up a cube calculation. My current remit is that I will receive exchange rates, and these will be sent at the start of the month. Sometimes they will change during the month, and I will receive a rate to use for that currency onwards.
The initial problem is that LastNonEmpty uses the granularity questioned, which means when I query by day most days do not have exchange rates, so the calculations fail. I replaced the exchange rate measure, initially with a recursive calculation, but later with the following:
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[EOD]
AS
Aggregate({NULL:[Date].[Calendar Y M D].CurrentMember}, [Measures].[End Of Day Rate])
So, when viewed on the date dimension, it will get the most recent exchange rate. This allows a daily calculation as follows:
MEMBER [Measures].[Converted]
AS
SUM
(
{[Currency].[Currency].[Currency] * [Date].[Calendar Y M D].CurrentMember},
(
(
[Measures].[Sales]
)
/ [Measures].[EOD]
)
)
Lastly I use this in a query:
SELECT
{
[Measures].[Converted]
}
ON COLUMNS,
NON EMPTY
{
[Date].[Calendar Y M D].[Calendar Day].&[2010-Q3-08-01] :
[Date].[Calendar Y M D].[Calendar Day].&[2010-Q3-08-31]
}
ON ROWS
FROM [Cube]
This all works fine, but ideally I'd prefer to query by year/month, as these are month-end reports. I can sum all this in the code tiers, but I'd rather have MDX that can do it itself.
The problem is that the calculations are done almost recursively at the day-level, then I'd like them rolled up to the month (Or even year) level.
I did try the currency conversion wizard, swapping the exchange rate for the time-aggregated one above, but attempting to browse the cube in SSMS locked the server as it tried to do the aggregation for the whole calendar :(
Any suggestions on what approach is best to take?
If you used views or named queries in the DSV instead of tables, then you could adjust the view or named query to limit the data to days where you have loaded exchange rate data. I'm not sure if this would meet your business need, but you could eliminate the empty data issues through this approach. After all, there's not much use to loading data that doesn't contain a value or, worse, preloading a guestimated exchange rate that would have to be overwritten once the actual numbers are available.
Related
I am currently attempting to use DAX queries to calculate the proportion of the balance attributed to each State in my analysis cube, from the following image:
I currently have a Sales table with a ReportDateKey that joins a ReportDate table that has a DateKey
If I use the following statement:
AllCurrentBalanceByDate:=CALCULATE([TotalCurrentBalance],ALLSELECTED())
It gives me the overall total, ignoring the date altogether, which is a useless figure.
If I enter the following query and display it in the excel spreadsheet:
AllCurrentBalanceByDate:=CALCULATE([TotalCurrentBalance],ALLSELECTED('Report Date'[Month]))
it is returning the same data as found in the Balance column. Again, useless. I need a total for each month, so that I can calculate the state balance / overall total for that month to get the proportion/percentage attributable to that State.
What am I doing wrong?
So if you want your measure to ignore whichever State is selected, you need to include the State columns in your ALL filter.
Also I suppose you want to use ALL instead of ALLSELECTED as your overall balance per month shouldn't be affected by external filters on state (but this depends on your use case)?
AllCurrentBalanceByDate:=CALCULATE(SUM([CurrentBalance]),ALL(Geography[StateName]))
This is a question regarding SSAS Cubes, MDX formulas and Power BI.
I have a measure with the active members per each month. So when I select for example 2018 it shouldn´t aggregate but return the last available month with active members, and if I break down by month it should give the active members for each month.
So I have this formula which works almost fine if querying in MS Management Studio:
with member [Measures].[Last existing SOCIOS] AS
Max(
EXISTING [DIM FECHA].[Jerarquía].[MES NOMBRE].members,
iif([Measures].[ACTIVOS] = 0,null,
[Measures].[ACTIVOS])
)
select {[Measures].[Last existing SOCIOS]} on columns,
[DIM FECHA].[MES NOMBRE].members on rows
from [cubo_Compromisos]
where [DIM FECHA].[AÑO].&[2018]
I would prefer to have the november value returned at the 'All' level. But this is not my main problem. The real issue is that when I use this measure in Power BI it behaves differently: when selecting multiple months it ignores the selected values and just returns the last value for the whole year.
In the screenshot below I have added the value returned by the KPI Card because that is the value that I want returned:
If I select items like this it does it right, but I need it to select all months, and not just one because I am using this measure along others:
Does anyone know the right MDX function to use or an alternative?
Edited: 23-11-2018
It does the same in a Pivot Table connected to a SSAS Cube.When I add the date dimension to the table it works fine. But when using the date dimension and filtering it without the dimension added as rows it returns the value for the whole year.
The function you are looking at is LastChild. Last Child on the upper level of the hierarchy will return the value you are looking at.
I think that function can be used in the Cube design in SSAS - then this will be the standard behavior. If you want to do it with a query you need to do something like:
SELECT [Date].[Fiscal].[Fiscal Quarter].[Q1 FY 2002].LastChild ON 0
FROM [Adventure Works]
To get the last month of the 1st quater (I used example from microsoft and another post on the subject )
I'm trying to add a calculated member to my cube, which will return the first fiscal year where there is any data at all in a particular measure.
The purpose is to suppress (i.e. NULLify) various year-on-year calculated measures when the year is this first year: in that year, comparison with the previous year is meaningless.
I've got this so far:
WITH MEMBER Measures.DataStartYear_Sales
AS
HEAD(
NONEMPTY([Calendar].[Fiscal Periods].[Fiscal Year].Members,[Measures].[QuantityOrdered])
,1).Item(0).Properties("NAME")
At the moment:
a. It's a query-scoped measure, as that's easier to experiment with.
b. It returns the first year's Name, as that's easier to see. Eventually I'll just return the member itself, and do an IS comparison against the year hierarchy .CurrentMember in the other calculated member calculations.
The problem I expected, which has happened, is that I only want this measure to be calculated once, over the whole cube. But when I used it in a query, it obviously reacts to the context. For example, if I stick the Products dimension on ROWS, the value of this measure will be different for each row, because each product's earliest order date is different.
That is of course useful, but it's not what I want. Is there some way to force this measure to ignore the query context, and always return the same value?
I looked into SCOPE_ISOLATION and SOLVE_ORDER, but they don't do what I'm trying to do here.
I suppose I could specify a tuple of Dimension1.All, Dimension2.All.... DimensionN.All, covering all dimensions in the cube, but that seems messy and fragile.
I think you might be able to accomplish this with static sets. Here is an example using Adventure Works that produces the same first year regardless of context:
WITH STATIC SET FirstYear AS
HEAD
(
NONEMPTY([Date].[Calendar Year].[Calendar Year].MEMBERS, [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])
, 1
)
MEMBER FirstYearName AS
FirstYear.ITEM(0).NAME
SELECT
[Measures].[FirstYearName] ON COLUMNS
, [Date].[Calendar Year].[Calendar Year].MEMBERS
//Add as many dimensions as you like here...for example
* [Product].[Product].[Product].MEMBERS
ON ROWS
FROM
[Adventure Works]
;
Example output:
That should hopefully put you on the right track.
For now sometimes I have problems with creating difficult calculated members in SSAS. Is it possible to make case which will SUM certain measure on certain level when user choose another certain level of dimension? For example we have standard time dimension with 4 levels:
Year
Month
Week
Day
Also we have some measure orders which have default function SUM in properties.
Which case do we need to calculate this: sum all orders in week which including current day which we have chosen already.
Also could you recommend me some nook or source for level up my mdx knowledge?
Thanks a lot.
Yes, it's possible, when you use MDX functions, which are connected with levels.
Here is an example with Year > Quarter > Month > Day hierarchy:
Use MDX calculated member to have a SUM of upper level member children (including selected one):
The same if you want to create calculation inside the cube:
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[SameLevelMembers]
as SUM({[Report Date].[Report Date].CurrentMember.Parent.Children},[Measures].[Count]),
VISIBLE = 1 ;
And a result in cube browser:
Hundreds of articles you can find there: http://ssas-wiki.com/w/Articles#MDX
I also like this one: http://mdxpert.com because of well-structured info.
I have yearly sales goals in a measure called "Target" and a date dimension called DimCalendar.
Looking at the underlying data, I'm thinking I should get a value different than what the below query returns. It's my understanding that this query will get the value for the "Target" measure where the associated year is 2016 (one year in the future or -1) and for a specific account.
SELECT
{[Measures].[Target]} on columns,
{ParallelPeriod(
[DimCalendar].[Year].[Year]
,-1
,[DimCalendar].[Year].&[2015])} on rows
FROM [MySalesCube]
WHERE { [Account].[Account].&[2025] }
This query returns
1944768
However, the underlying data seems to add up to only 162064
Nope, looks like there is an issue with the data after all after using the cube browser. Got to go revisit my ETL process.
This is what you have specified:
ParallelPeriod(
[DimCalendar].[Year].[Year]
,-1
,[DimCalendar].[Year].&[2015])
It means the following:
Take the year 2015
Then jump the specified number of periods, in your case -1, using the level specified, in your case [Year]
The following should (I think) be a simplified but equivalent version - if the first argument is missed out then it just uses the level of the third argument:
ParallelPeriod(
-1
,[DimCalendar].[Year].&[2015])
Although I think you can just use lag to make everything more readable:
[DimCalendar].[Year].&[2015].LAG(-1)
Then again there is no point using 1 or -1 inside lag, as we have the functions NEXTMEMBER and prevMEMBER this could just be simplified to the following:
[DimCalendar].[Year].&[2015].NEXTMEMBER