I wanted to see if others are using SQL Server 2008 Change Data Capture and if so how do you like it? We currently use APEXSQL Audit Triggers for our auditing purposes which seems to work pretty well, but means we have to add triggers to all of our "audited" tables.
Some of the articles I have read have pointed out things like having to create a new capture table when you change a schema then drop the old one, but as far as the general maintenance is concerned it seems to be fairly straight forward.
Any comments /input is greatly appreciated.
--S
How busy is the system and what is the end goal for the Auditing; tracking changes in a short period of time, or auditing changes for a long time? One of the biggest problems I have with CDC is that it utilizes the log reader and SQL Agent jobs to capture changes, so a busy system can get behind to the point that it will never catch up unless you turn off CDC, leading to at worst a full transaction log, or at best delayed truncation causing the log to grow in size. If your intent is to do real auditing CDC is not built for that, its more for synchronizing changes than it is for auditing for a long term, unless you setup jobs to pull the data over into audit tables like you would with a triggered solution.
You don't mention the new Server Audit Specifications here, which would be another option to look at, but keep in mind that Server Audit Specifications are used for auditing by inclusion. This is one of the reasons that I still use the old tried and true triggers and audit tables method in my SQL Server 2008 Ent databases, its still the easiest solution until the newer features get past being v1.0 features in the product.
If you have a working auditing solution, I wouldn't even try it.
Another problem I noted when looking into this was that you can't add things like the user who made the change to the tables (or at least I couldn't figure out how), so your audit tables may be more flexible than CDC allows.
Finally CDC tables expire in 3 days (although I think you can change the expiration but still have to set a specific time frame.) We keep our audit records for longer than that so you still need to copy them out of the CDc tables to an audit table.
Related
I am working on a sql transaction audit software
initial i am using fn_dblog on database to read sql transactions and write them in a file on regular time interval but then i find that it's risky to use fn_dblog on production database
so please suggest me any other alternative way to get data from production database
Note - I am already try to get sql transaction history from backup file(.bak) by reading transaction from it (using fn_dblog on my system not on database) but
that does not help me (because it not contains all transaction history)
fn_dblog() is an undocumented SQL Server function so you are wise to be careful using it.
Your question on how to audit transactions really depends on what you want to audit. Is it really every single transaction that occurs? Or, is it specific types of transactions like DDL and DML operations? There are a few options depending on the answer to this, yoru specific business case, etc.
Change Data Capture was introduced in 2008 and captures insert, update, and delete activity. For many cases, this is what folks want to edit. What user (usually from an application) edited data in the database.
DDL and DML Triggers can be created to fire when a specific event occurs. For DML this includes actions like INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, etc. You can create the trigger to log the action after it occurs as an auditing feature. These types of triggers can lead to performance issues, so be sure to read up on them. I'd start with Aaron Bertrand's blog on them. DDL triggers depend on certain DDL events like creating and dropping a database, creating encryption, altering indexes, creating users, etc.
SQL Server Audit is a built in mechanism that create server audits, which can contain server audit specifications for server level events, and database audit specifications for database level events. Audited events can be written to the event logs or to audit files. Note a big difference from Change Data Capture is that it isn't stored in clean relational format like CDC is.
Change your application. This would be an application and database design change, but this method is commonly implemented. Essentially each time a change is made to a data row, instead of editing it, a new row is inserted with a timestamp and the user that made the change. This record becomes the "current truth" record and all other records area history of that record. SQL Server has methods to make this integrated using ROWVERSION and TEMPORAL TABLES
Use a paid option like Redgate, Solarwinds, etc...
I'm looking for an auditing solution that does exactly what Change Data Capture (CDC) does, except I need it to also track the application user that made the change. I'm currently using SQL Server 2012 Enterprise and may be upgrading to 2014 later this year.
We already have an auditing solution in place that leverages Delete, Insert, and Update triggers, but some new requirements might force us to update every audit trigger and corresponding audit table. Given various problems we've run in to with that solution over the years, this seems like as good a time as any to reevaluate and potentially replace the solution.
To give you an idea of what I'm currently working with (and may be able to leverage), we use a stored procedure (ConnectionInitialize) to store a user id with a SPID in a table (ApplicationUser) and then we delete the row using another stored procedure (ConnectionReset) once we're done making our deletes, inserts, and updates.
Were we to use CDC, I looked into adding a trigger to something like the cdc.lsn_time_mapping table, but I couldn't find a way to map the LSN back to the SPID (and therefore the user id) that was being used. This also presented some other issues in that CDC is always a little bit behind.
I looked into SQL Server Audit a little bit, but that presented some challenges of its own. We're using Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) to appease some of our security requirements, but SQL Server Audit looks like it'd need a separate encryption strategy; that and I'm more interested in the columns than in the actual SQL statements. Even so, these aren't deal-breakers for me, so I'm still looking into it.
Given what I'm trying to accomplish, does anyone have any feedback or recommendations?
By itself, CDC doesn't meet the requirements. The reason being is that CDC only grabs changes to your data, not any underlying context under which those changes were made. You can, however, get what you're looking for if you're willing to tag your data with some audit columns. The basic idea is that you append a column to your table (or to a different table if you aren't able to modify the actual table for whatever reason) and populate it with the user who last modified the record (pretty simple to do via an insert/update trigger). Once that is actual data, you can consume it however you need to (CDC being one possible mechanism).
Late answer but hopefully useful.
There is a third party tool, ApexSQL Audit, capable of meeting your requirements. My previous company is using it for years and they have been satisfied with it.
There is a helpful comparison article you can read to find more details about audited data, auditing mechanisms, integrity protection etc, for both CDC & Audit tool at one place.
I have a database with 50 tables and I want to log users requests, such as inserts, updates or deletes on all the tables in the database. I can also create a trigger for this for each request type.
What is the best way to do this from a performance perspective or is there a better way to track this?
You can also create audit tables which are populated by triggers (and which allow much more flexibility than change data capture). The critical component is to capture sets of data not try to work row-by-row. It does add some overhead yes, but if you write the triggers correctly, it isn't that much. Be sure to capture who (including which application if you have multiple applications hitting the database) and when as well as the old and new values. Set up one audit table per table you want audited (too much locking if you use only one audit table). And at the time you set up your system, write the code to get data back from a bad transaction or set of transactions. That makes it easier to recover when you do have something go wrong and you need to revert. We use two tables per table audited, one contains the info about the process that did the changes (name of the application, date, user, etc. and an auditid), the other contains the details about what was changed (old and new values, ID of the record being affected and column affected). Our structure enables us to use the same structure for each table being audited, and allows the tables to change without having to change the audit table and allows us to easily script the audit tables for a new tables. It is also easy for us to see what records were changed at the same time or in the same process or to find out which of the many applications which touch our database was responsible for the bad data as well as telling us who in particular was responsible for the bad data. This helps us track down application bugs and find out why the data was changed the way it was in some cases. It also makes it easier for us to track down all the data that was affected by a broken process rather than just the one we knew about.
If you have Enterprise Edition, look into Change Data Capture. If you don't have Enterprise and aren't interested in capturing the historical values of the columns that change, look into Change Tracking.
See Comparing Change Data Capture and Change Tracking to understand the differences between the two.
Assuming all requests to insert, update and/or delete data goes through some middle-tier data access layer, I would suggest you do your logging there. This is where we do all of ours. It is much simpler than trying to extract the actual insert / delete / update statements out of SQL Server.
If you want to do auditing of data, you can look into Change Data Capture (CDC). But this requires the Enterprise Edition.
I know SQL Server 2008 can do this, but essentially I need a way to log all the changes made to a database. I don't need to log selects, and I don't need to log the user, the only important data is what has been added or changed, both with regard to data and structural changes like columns, tables, and indices.
What are my options?
I've used AutoAudit quite a bit, you simply apply it to whatever tables you wish to audit.
Main drawback is that it requires a single column PK. But most of my tables have surrogate identity PKs, so it's fine for that design philosophy.
Event Notifications can be deployed to monitor all schema changes at the database and even entire isntance level.
Global gata changes is not possible to monitor. You can select specific tables to monitor and deploy a trigger based monitoring. There are also low-impact log bassed solutions, but not out-of-the-box, they all need third party tools.
I would like to log changes made to all fields in a table to another table. This will be used to keep a history of all the changes made to that table (Your basic change log table).
What is the best way to do it in SQL Server 2005?
I am going to assume the logic will be placed in some Triggers.
What is a good way to loop through all the fields checking for a change without hard coding all the fields?
As you can see from my questions, example code would be veeery much appreciated.
I noticed SQL Server 2008 has a new feature called Change Data Capture (CDC). (Here is a nice Channel9 video on CDC). This is similar to what we are looking for except we are using SQL Server 2005, already have a Log Table layout in-place and are also logging the user that made the changes. I also find it hard to justify writing out the before and after image of the whole record when one field might change.
Our current log file structure in place has a column for the Field Name, Old Data, New Data.
Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
Updated 12/22/08: I did some more research and found these two answers on Live Search QnA
You can create a trigger to do this. See
How do I audit changes to sql server data.
You can use triggers to log the data changes into the log tables. You can also purchase Log Explorer from www.lumigent.com and use that to read the transaction log to see what user made the change. The database needs to be in full recovery for this option however.
Updated 12/23/08: I also wanted a clean way to compare what changed and this looked like the reverse of a PIVOT, which I found out in SQL is called UNPIVOT. I am now leaning towards a Trigger using UNPIVOT on the INSERTED and DELETED tables. I was curious if this was already done so I am going through a search on "unpivot deleted inserted".
Posting Using update function from an after trigger had some different ideas but I still believe UNPIVOT is going to be the route to go.
Quite late but hopefully it will be useful for other readers…
Below is a modification of my answer I posted last week on a similar topic.
Short answer is that there is no “right” solution that would fit all. It depends on the requirements and the system being audited.
Triggers
Advantages: relatively easy to implement, a lot of flexibility on what is audited and how is audit data stored because you have full control
Disadvantages: It gets messy when you have a lot of tables and even more triggers. Maintenance can get heavy unless there is some third party tool to help. Also, depending on the database it can cause a performance impact.
Creating audit triggers in SQL Server
Log changes to database table with trigger
CDC
Advantages: Very easy to implement, natively supported
Disadvantages: Only available in enterprise edition, not very robust – if you change the schema your data will be lost. I wouldn’t recommend this for keeping a long term audit trail
Reading transaction log
Advantages: all you need to do is to put the database in full recovery mode and all info will be stored in transaction log
Disadvantages: You need a third party log reader in order to read this effectively
Read the log file (*.LDF) in sql server 2008
SQL Server Transaction Log Explorer/Analyzer
Third party tools
I’ve worked with several auditing tools from ApexSQL but there are also good tools from Idera (compliance manager) and Krell software (omni audit)
ApexSQL Audit – Trigger based auditing tool. Generated and manages auditing triggers
ApexSQL Log – Allows auditing by reading transaction log
Under SQL '05 you actually don't need to use triggers. Just take a look at the OUTPUT clause. OUTPUT works with inserts, updates, and deletes.
For example:
INSERT INTO mytable(description, phone)
OUTPUT INSERTED.description, INSERTED.phone INTO #TempTable
VALUES('blah', '1231231234')
Then you can do whatever you want with the #TempTable, such as inserting those records into a logging table.
As a side note, this is an extremely easy way of capturing the value of an identity field.
You can use Log Rescue. It quite the same as Log Explorer, but it is free.
It can view history of each row in any tables with logging info of user, action and time.
And you can undo to any versions of row without set database to recovery mode.