I tried storing a selector(SEL) in a NSMutableDictionary and it caused a crash, probably because the dictionary tries to dereference it as an object pointer. What is the standard recipe for storing non-objects in a dictionary?
You can convert selectors to NSString using NSStringFromSelector() and you can go back the other way with NSSelectorFromString().
SEL aSel = #selector(takeThis:andThat:);
[myDict setObject:NSStringFromSelector(aSel) forKey:someKey];
SEL original = NSSelectorFromString([myDict objectForKey:someKey]);
Try using a NSMapTable with NSObjectMapKeyCallBacks and NSNonOwnedPointerMapValueCallBacks. This works like a NSMutableDictionary but allows any pointers as values, not just objects.
You also could store the selector in a NSInvocation object and use that with a regular dictionary. If you need to store more than the Selector (target, parameters and so on) this is probably the better solution.
Wrap them into objects.
Related
Is it possible to directly access an object variable with an array of objects like so..
NSArray *myObjectsInArray = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:(id) myClass,myOtherClass, nil];
NSLog(#"%d",[myObjectsInArray[0] returnSize]); //works perfect
NSLog(#"%d",[myObjectsInArray[0].size]); // error
I'm not sure if it's a syntax problem or if it cannot be accessed without a method.
thanks for any help.
Accessing an array like so myArray[0] is equivelant to calling [myArray objectAtIndex:0]. The return value of objectAtIndex: is id. Any method call may be sent to an id reference. However, the compiler will not allow the use of the dot syntax shortcut to call methods on it.
If you really want to use the dot syntax, you need to cast it.
NSLog(#"%d",[((MyClass*)myObjectsInArray[0]).size]);
Since NSSstring is not defined in length like integer or double, do I run the risk of problems allocating an array of NSStrings for it using malloc?
thanks
ie:
NSString ***nssName;
nssName = (NSString***) malloc(iN * sizeof(NSString*));
the end result with for_loops for the rows is a 2D array, so it is a little easier to work then NSArray(less code).
No problems should arise, allocating an array of NSStrings is like making an array of the pointers to string objects. Pointers are a constant length. I would recommend just using NSArray but it is still fine to use a C array of NSStrings. Note that this may have changed with ARC.
Here is completely acceptable code demonstarting this:
NSString** array = malloc(sizeof(NSString*) * 10); // Array of 10 strings
array[0] = #"Hello World"; // Put on at index 0
NSLog(#"%#", array[0]); // Log string at index 0
Since NSString is an object (and to be more precise: an object cluster) you cannot know its final size in memory, only Objective-C does. So you need to use the Objective-C allocation methods (like [[NSString alloc] init]), you cannot use malloc.
The problem is further that NSString is an object cluster which means you do not get an instance of NSString but a subclass (that you might not even know and should not care about). For example, very often the real class is NSCFString but once you call some of the methods that treat the string like a path you get an instance of NSPathStore2 or whatever). Think of the NSString init methods as being factories (as in Factory Pattern).
After question edit:
What you really want is:
NSString **nssName;
nssName = (NSString**) malloc(iN * sizeof(NSString*));
And then something like:
nssName[0] = #"My string";
nssName[1] = [[NSString alloc] init];
...
This is perfectly fine since you have an array of pointers and the size of pointer is of course known.
But beware of memory management: first, you should make sure the array is filled with NULLs, e.g. with bzero or using calloc:
bzero(nssName, iN * sizeof(NSString*));
Then, before you free the array you need to release each string in the array (and make sure you do not store autoreleased strings; you will need to retain them first).
All in all, you have a lot more pitfalls here. You can go this route but using an NSArray will be easier to handle.
NSStrings can only be dealt with through pointers, so you'd just be making an array of pointers to NSString. Pointers have a defined length, so it's quite possible. However, an NSArray is usually the better option.
You should alloc/init... the NSString*s or use the class's factory methods. If you need an array of them, try NSArray*.
You should not use malloc to allocate data for Objective-C types. Doing this will allocate memory space but not much else. Most importantly the object will not be initialized, and almost as importantly the retain count for the object will not be set. This is just asking for problems. Is there any reason you do not want to use alloc and init?
I want to store a bunch of key value pairs, with the key being my own object (ObjectA) that inherits from NSObject, and the value being an int.
I am trying to use an NSMutableDictionary. I understand that you can only store object types in the dictionary, so I have the following:
id value = [NSNumber numberWithInt:my_number];
[[self dictionary] setObject:value forKey:myObjectA];
Now that gives me an error, saying
-[ObjectA copyWithZone:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance
which is fine, I understand that object keys need to implement the NSCopying protocol. However I then read that you can do this by wrapping your objects using NSValue.
Can someone please explain how I would wrap my objects, and how I can then find the value by the key? Am I still able to use dictionary objectForKey:myObjectA or do I have to wrap myObjectA with an NSValue object while I'm searching as well? Or should I be implementing NSCopying on my custom class, or using a string key instead?
I am looking for this simplest and easiest way to use a dictionary, if I have to I'll implement a string key and use setValue:forKey: instead but I'd rather use the object key if I can.
Dictionary keys are always copied. So you simply need to implement the NSCopying protocol for your class, which is just the copyWithZone: method.
Additionally you should implement the isEqual: method for your class.
Edit: How to implement your copyWithZone: depends on a number of factors (main factor: deep vs. shallow copy). See Apple's Implementing Object Copy guide and this SO answer.
You could turn an id into an NSValue with:
NSValue* value = [NSValue valueWithNonretainedObject:object];
...
id object_ = [value nonretainedObjectValue];
but you need to manage the ownership outside of the dictionary. This is going to be a mess. It's better to adopt NSCopying.
There is also a 4th option: use a CFDictionary, which allows the object only can be CFRetain/CFReleased, not copied.
CFMutableDictionaryRef dict = CFDictionaryCreateMutable(
kCFAllocatorDefault, 0,
&kCFTypeDictionaryKeyCallBacks,
&kCFTypeDictionaryValueCallBacks
);
...
CFDictionarySetValue(dict, myObjectA, value);
...
CFRelease(dict);
And if you're programming for Mac or iOS 6 and above, try NSMapTable.
NSMapTable* dict = [[NSMapTable mapTableWithStrongToStrongObjects] retain];
...
[dict setObject:#"?" forKey:foo];
...
[dict release];
In iOS 6 you can use NSMapTable (https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Cocoa/Reference/NSMapTable_class/Reference/NSMapTable.html), which allows you to chose weak/strong attributes for the keys and objects.
You don't need to wrap your object using NSValue. What you have will work except you're missing a piece. For myObjectA's class you need to adopt the NSCopying protocol (see the docs for what to add). Once that's added the code you posted above should work correctly.
You might want to consider using strings though over your own object for the key. The key is required to be a string if key-value coding is going to be used to access it at all. So using a string will make life easier if you can take advantage of key-value coding anywhere you're using the dictionary.
I want to use the object's reference value as a key into a dictionary, as opposed to a copy of value of the object. So, I essentially want to store an object associated with a particular instance of another object in a dictionary and retrieve that value later.
Is this possible? Is it completely against the idea of NSDictionary? I can tell that I am probably approaching this the wrong way because the dictionary wants me to implement NSCopying on the object itself, which doesn't really make sense in terms of what I'm doing. I can see that what I should really be doing is wrapping the pointer value, but that seems a little mad.
Advice would be appreciated.
I think you can use [NSValue valueWithPointer:object].
NSMutableDictionary has been designed to only deal with Objective-C object instances. For example, when you call setObject:forKey: method calls copyWithZone: on the key and retain on the value.
If you want to have a dictionary structure and to be able to deal with arbitrary key and value, then you can go with CFMutableDictionary. You can describe precisely what is done with key and values; it is flexible enough to deal with arbitrary pointer or event char * strings.
This did the trick for me
aDictionary[#((intptr_t)object)] = ...;
You can use the address in memory of myObejct as a key in myDictionary
NSString *myObject_addressInMemory = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%p", myObject];
myDictionary[myObject_addressInMemory] = someValue;
I want to have a mutable array with primitives in obj-c (selectors). What's the recommended way to do this? NSArray and those can only hold objects.
You should use an NSValue to wrap the selector or any other primitive type you need. In Cocoa SEL is some kind of pointer, so you can use [NSValue valueWithPointer:whatever] to construct it and [value pointerValue] to get it out. Or, in general you can use [NSValue valueWithBytes:&whatever objCType:#encode(SEL)]; this works for any type.
If you want to store an array of SEL objects, the easiest thing would be to convert the SELs to NSStrings using the NSStringFromSelector() function, store them in an NSMutableArray, and then convert them back to SELs when you pull them out using NSSelectorFromString() function.
Other than managing a C-style array yourself (which is definitely not the best option, IMO), your only option is to use NSArray/NSMutableArray, and store the numbers using NSNumber. It's slightly more annoying to get the value out than with the actual numeric type, but it does free you from managing the array's memory yourself.
Since the primitive types are generally just numbers (be they integer or floating-point) or pointers, what's the problem with using the classes used to wrap those up for your purposes? An NSMutableArray of NSNumbers, for example?