I'm trying to get the maximum value of an integer field in a table. Specifically, I'm trying to automatically increment the "InvoiceNumber" field when adding a new invoice. I don't want this to be an autoincrement field in the database, however, since it's controlled by the user -- I'm just trying to take care of the default case. Right now, I'm using
session.CreateCriteria<Invoice>()
.SetProjection(Projections.Max("InvoiceNumber"))
.FutureValue<int>();
to get the biggest invoice number already in the database. This works great, except when there are no invoices already in the database. Then I get a System.ArgumentException: The value "" is not of type "System.Int32" and cannot be used in this generic collection. Changing to FutureValue<int?>() didn't solve the problem. Is there a way to tell NHibernate to map the empty string to null? Or is there a better way to accomplish my goal altogether?
The stack trace of the exception (at least the relevant part) is
NHibernate.HibernateException: Error executing multi criteria : [SELECT max(this_.[InvoiceNumber]) as y0_ FROM dbo.[tblInvoice] this_;
SELECT this_.ID as ID647_0_, this_.[NHVersion] as column2_647_0_, this_.[Description] as column3_647_0_, this_.[DiscountPercent] as column4_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateDays] as column5_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateDays] as column6_647_0_, this_.[Notes] as column7_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonths] as column8_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonths] as column9_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDatePeriod] as column10_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyDay] as column11_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyDayDay] as column12_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyDayMonth] as column13_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyThe] as column14_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyTheDOW] as column15_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyTheMonth] as column16_647_0_, this_.[DiscountDateMonthlyTheWeek] as column17_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDatePeriod] as column18_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyDay] as column19_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyDayDay] as column20_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyDayMonth] as column21_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyThe] as column22_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyTheDOW] as column23_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyTheMonth] as column24_647_0_, this_.[PaymentDueDateMonthlyTheWeek] as column25_647_0_ FROM dbo.[tblTermsCode] this_;
] ---> System.ArgumentException: The value "" is not of type "System.Int32" and cannot be used in this generic collection.
Parameter name: value
at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowWrongValueTypeArgumentException(Object value, Type targetType)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1.VerifyValueType(Object value)
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1.System.Collections.IList.Add(Object item)
at NHibernate.Impl.MultiCriteriaImpl.GetResultsFromDatabase(IList results)
use....UniqueValue<int?>();
NH uses a non-generic IList in their MultiCriteria implementation. Which is used for FutureValue batching. see here for why List<int?> fails to add null through it's IList implementation. I'm surprised I've never run into this before. Avoid using nullable value types with Future or MultiCriteria.
With the QueryOver API:
Session.QueryOver<T>()
.Select(Projections.Max<Statistic>(s => s.PeriodStart))
.SingleOrDefault<object>();
if nothing is returned its null, otherwise cast the result as numeric
Related
I have an old installation of Sitefinity (version 6.3)
On the profile, I have a custom field that is numeric. I now have the needs to change this to hold a string instead.
What I found was that there is no easy way to change datatype (https://www.progress.com/documentation/sitefinity-cms/edit-an-existing-custom-field), but is It possible by code/config?
I'm guessing that one option is to delete the field, and then recreate it is a possibility, but since I have much data it would be a lot of work to restore data in the field. Is this the only way?
Edit: I've deleted the column and recreated it as a string/varchar.
I'm now facing a problem with some type of converter
type converter initialization failed. The converter with name 'DecimalConverter' does not convert from CLR type 'System. String' to SQL type 'DECIMAL'.
Parameter name: converterName
Actual value was OpenAccessRuntime.Data.DecimalConverter, Telerik.OpenAccess.Runtime, Version=2013.3.1211.3, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7ce17eeaf1d59342.
This line in stack trace is of importance
[MetadataException: The metadata for field 'CustomerNo_sv' of class 'Telerik.Sitefinity.Security.Model.SitefinityProfile' cannot be initialized: Type converter initialization failed. The converter with name 'DecimalConverter' does not convert from CLR type 'System. String' to SQL type 'DECIMAL'.
Parameter name: converterName
Actual value was OpenAccessRuntime.Data.DecimalConverter, Telerik.OpenAccess.Runtime, Version=2013.3.1211.3, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7ce17eeaf1d59342.]
Somehow the language specified values isn't converted as I can see. Now the whole site is down and I can't reach backend. So I guess I have to solve this out in DB?
What I do in similar cases is this:
I create the new field and then populate the new column in the database with the values from the old column (field).
In your case, you'd be looking at the sf_sitefinity_profile table.
This way the data will be migrated to the new field.
After that you can delete the old field and start using the new one.
My current table in BigQuery has a column that uses complex types. The "family" column is actually a list ("repeated" feature) of records (with 2 fields: id & name).
When I try to get the 1st "id" value of 1 row with the following syntax:
FieldValueList c = qr.getValues().iterator().next();
c.get("family").getRepeatedValue().get(0).getRecordValue().get("id");
I get the exception:
Method threw 'java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException' exception.
Retrieving field value by name is not supported when there is no fields schema provided
This is a bit annoying because my table has a clearly defined schema. And when I do the "read" query with the same Java call, I can also see that this schema is correctly found:
qr.getSchema().getFields().get("family").getSubFields().toString();
-->
[Field{name=id, type=INTEGER, mode=NULLABLE, description=null}, Field{name=name, type=STRING, mode=NULLABLE, description=null}]
Due to this exception, the workaround that I have found is to pass the "index" of the record field instead of giving it its name
c.get("family").getRepeatedValue().get(0).getRecordValue().get(0).getLongValue();
However, this seeks awkward to pass an index instead of a name.
Is there a better way to get the value of a field in a record inside an array (if my column is only a record, without array, then I don't get the exception) ?
Is this exception normal?
You can wrap the unnamed FieldValueList with a named one using the "of" static method:
FieldList subSchema = qr.getSchema().getFields().get("family").getSubFields();
FieldValueList c = qr.getValues().iterator().next();
FieldValueList.of(
c.get("family").getRepeatedValue().get(0).getRecordValue(),
subSchema).get("id");
The "of" method takes a FieldValueList (returned by getRecordValue() in this case) and a FieldList (subSchema here), and returns the same FieldValueList but with named access.
I am getting this error:
String was not recognized as a valid Boolean.Couldn't store <No> in meetsstd Column. Expected type is Boolean
When I am running this query:
SELECT * FROM work_nylustis_2013_q3.nylustis_details WHERE siteid = 'NYLUSTIS-155718' LIMIT 50
From this code:
Adapter.SelectCommand = New NpgsqlCommand(SQL, MLConnect)
Adapter.Fill(subDT) ' This line throws error
The meetsstd field is a varchar(3) and it does store either a 'Yes' or a 'No' value. How is this getting this confused with a boolean - a varchar should not care whether is holds 'Yes', or 'Si', or 'Oui'? And it only happens on 27 records out of the 28,000 in the table.
I usually blame npgsql for this kind of strangeness, but the last entry in the stack trace is: System.Data.DataColumn.set_Item(Int32 record, Object value)
Any clues?
Thanks!
Brad
To check if it is problem with database or with driver you can reduce problem to one row and column using your current environment:
SELECT meetsstd FROM work_nylustis_2013_q3.nylustis_details WHERE sitenum=1
(of course you must change sitenum into primary key)
Then try such query using psql, pgAdmin or some JDBC/ODBC based general editor.
If psql shows such record which raises error with your Npgsql based application then problem is with Npgsql driver or problem is with displaying query results.
If other tools shows such strange errors then problem is with your data.
Have you changed type of meetsstd field? Mayby you try to show it on some grid and this grid used Boolean field which was converted to Yes/No for displaying?
There were three similar questions in StackOverFlow but none gave an answer..
If have found why this error in occurring but don't know the fix.
I am using Strongly Typed Dataset for my project which is created as a dll for DAL.
I have added the Sql Server Table into this dataset using the designer and has created a DataAdapter
It works fine when i insert using DataTableAdapter
daLabTest.Insert(txtLabTestId.Text, cmbLabTestType.Text, cmbTestName.Text, txtLabFees.Text, dtpLabEffDate.Value)
but when i want to show the data from the table in a combobox or gridview i get this error.
i told that i found out what the problem is, I just previewed the data using DataSet designer and found out that the Function returns data like this...
The query i wrote to view this in dataset is
Select distinct(TestType) from LabTestTypes
so this should return only one column but the dataset is returning 5 columns but others as null, and the TestName column is a primary which should not be null when returned, so the problem exists..
To resolve this i tried to change the NullValue & AllowDBNull property to [Empty] and true respectively but that didn't worked for me.
Please help me in this...
That overly general constraint exception is nasty, where's the InnerException after so many complaints?!
This template may help identify the problem row and column but a "Fill" version of the query function is needed. E.g. GetDistinct*() --> Fill*(). Then a table can be created and interrogated for the row's error text.
SomeTable tTable = new SomeTable()
try {
// sorry, if you have a GetData, change to the fill version
someTable.FillByActiveLogin(tTable, loginName);
} catch (System.Data.ConstraintException constrExc) {
System.Data.DataRow[] rowsErr = tTable.GetErrors();
for (int i = 0; i < rowsErr.Count(); i++)
if (rowsErr[i].HasErrors)
Dbg.WriteLine(rowsErr[i].RowError);
}
(Thanks Michael S for this hint whoever/wherever you are!)
I got this error in a function from a DLL that uses a stored procedure. The procedure did not return all the fields in the table. One of the fields excluded was one that cannot be null. That apparently caused the constraint exception. When I changed the procedure and the DLL to include that field, the exception went away.
After spending ages on this problem myself, I have resolved it modifying the query in the dataset to return a dummy value (that can be ignored) for each key field that is not required in the output.
So your query would become...
Select distinct TestType, 1 as ID, "Dummy" as TestName, "Dummy" as TestFees, "Dummy" as TestDate
from LabTestTypes
I have been struggling with this, i have two models and showing data in Cgridview with one model, this model contains some id's whose values are in different table
So, i have added
'value'=> 'TblAreaoflaw::model()->FindByPk($data->typeoflaw)->areaoflaw'
which is giving this error
"Trying to get property of non-object"
Might be due to this reason that the some records doesn't exist in the TblAreaoflaw. Can't we check in this line through isset?
When i put static value, it work well, like
'value'=> 'TblAreaoflaw::model()->FindByPk(5)->areaoflaw',
Could anyone please help
thanks a lot
The error you get is because this expression TblAreaoflaw::model()->FindByPk($data->typeoflaw) is returning null. This means that you are effectively trying to get null->areaoflaw which won't work (this is what the error message "Trying to get property of non-object" clarifies).
My best guess is that $data->typeoflaw returns a non-existing primary key for the TblAreaoflaw model.
Make sure :
TblAreaoflaw is actually a model, I doubt its Areaoflaw
You have database specified primary key which is the id (5) you are passing
Try:
'value'=> '(TblAreaoflaw::model()->FindByPk($data->typeoflaw)->areaoflaw) ?
: "default or null value"'
Obviously substitute the null string to whatever you want. You may need to adjust the condition to use !empty() or similar, but see how it goes. (And if you do that or aren't using PHP 5.3, use the full ternary expression.)