I'm currently creating a class that extends UIComponent in Flex 3, but when the flash builder try to compile show me some errors
1044: Interface method createAutomationIDPartWithRequiredProperties in namespace mx.automation:IAutomationObject not implemented by class components:ArtWorkImage
1044: Interface method get automationEnabled in namespace mx.automation:IAutomationObject not implemented by class com.senocular.display:TransformTool
I see that UIComponent implements this interface, but I had never had this error before, I'm assuming UIComponent should made this implementation by default, so it should be something else, I already try to recreate the project or clean it, with no result, can someone please point me how maybe this can be fix, thanks for your help
oh btw I had this project before in flex builder, exported as a FXP and imported in Flash Builder, thanks!
All UI objects use an Automation delegate to handle implementation of the automation interface. Each UIComponent has a specific automation delegate registered with the Automation Framework. These automation delegate implementations are injected into the object by the Automation framework when the object is created according to the class name of the object.
For example:
UIComponent <- UIComponentAutomationImpl
ToolTip <- ToolTipAutomationImpl
DateChooser <- DateChooserAutomationImpl
Normally if you subclass a component you should inherit the Automation Implementation. However depending upon how the instances of the object are being created the automation framework may not be able to resolve the class name to the appropriate super class. In this case you may need to take additional steps to get the automation implementation into your class.
If you want your class to automatically be injected with a particulary automation implementation you should call the static registerDelegateClass method on the mx.automation.Automation class.
import mx.automation.*
Automation.registerDelegateClass(com.foo.bar.ArtWorkImage, mx.automation.delelegates.core.UIComponentAutomationImpl);
Alternatively you could directly implement the IAutomationObject methods in your UIComponent or create your own delegate class and instantiate and "inject" it into your class in its' constructor thereby by passing the Automation framework.
Here are few links that might help you understand the automation framework:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/automation/Automation.html
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/automation/delegates/core/UIComponentAutomationImpl.html
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/automation/package-detail.html
Related
Is there a quick easy way to have IntelliJ identify the superclass or interface defining the method being called in a class?
For example, in the following example, the fireEvent method is being called on the implicit this but this method is not defined within this Java class being edited in IntelliJ 2018.3. Is there some way to ask IntelliJ which of the several interfaces being implemented as well as any parent in the superclass hierarchy defines this particular method?
…
private void doIt() {
…
fireEvent( event ) ;
}
What I am asking is for the opposite of this Question, Does IntelliJ have the equivalent of the Eclipse “method view”?. That Question asks “for a given class, what are its methods offered?”. I am asking “for a given method being invoked, from what inherited superclass or interface is that method defined?”.
I generally just context-click (Ctrl-click on PC, Command-click on macOS) to navigate to the source for a method. The .java file of the superclass or interface opens in the editor.
In order to avoid navigating away, you can also context-hover. Another option is showing the javadoc via context-q when the cursor is somewhere in the method name.
We have Alert interface in selenium 2.0 API. Do we have any classes that implement Alert interface?
When we call driver.switchTo.alert().accept() or driver.switchTo.alert().dismiss(), how are these methods invoked? I do not any classes that implement Alert interface.
Please help me to understand this concept.
The piece of code driver.switchTo().alert() returns an object of class RemoteAlert which implements the Alert interface. The RemoteAlert is a private class inside the RemoteWebDriver class.
Check out the RemoteWebDriver code.
At the moment I´m trying tests on the interoperability of VB6 and .NET using COM.
I have followed this simple example to call a .NET component from COM.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973802.aspx
The DLL is registered and the assembly was "succesfully added to the cache". However when I take a look into the object browser of VB6 I can only see methods of the interface and not of the actual class. COM is set on visible and the correct path for the KeyFile, are both in the AssemblyInfo.vb file. The .NET Class+Interface looks like this:
Public Interface iTemperature
'some properties and functions
End Interface
Public Class NET_Temperature
Implements iTemperature
'some implemented public properties and functions
End Class
When I try to run the following Code:
Set moTempClass = New PhysServer2.NET_Temperature
Set moTemp = moTempClass
I´m getting the well known 429-runtime error, saying that creating an object through an Active-X-component does not work. There is a lot of information on the internet regarding this error with unregistered DLL/TLB, but I´m more concerned about the fact that only the methods and properties of the interface are shown in the object browser and not the implemented methods/properties of the interface - the class. How can I fix this Error and make the methods in my class sort of visible to COM and the object browser?
I'm familiar with the VisualWorks and Dolphin versions of Smalltalk, but have not previously used Squeak. I'm just familiarising myself with Pharo, which is a 'cleaned up' fork of Squeak.
I'm used to having the facility in the Class Browser to show either only the methods implemented by a class or both the methods inherited and the methods implemented.
Is this useful facility missing in Squeak, or have I just been unable to find it?
You can double-click on any class to open a Hierarchy Browser on that particular class. The hierarchy button in the toolbar and the menu entry browse hierarchy (Ctrl+H) open the same view.
There is the Inheritance Browser that shows you the hierarchal implementations of the currently selected method. Click on the inheritance button in the toolbar.
Furthermore there is the Protocol Browser that displays all methods and super methods of a class together. To open this browser select browse protocol (Ctrl+Shift+P) in the context menu of the class.
If you want to build a browser with that behaviour, you should take a look at the Glamour browser construction DSL.
I personally do not feel the need to see all 34 pages of method names defined in ProtoObject and Object, or the 5 pages of method categories. Object methods size prints 421.
AFAIK in the GemStoneTool there is such a thing, thre is a 1 or so and a # which seems to change the view to see all the methods available in a class (be it inherited or in the class itself) I'm as amazed as you that nothing like that exists in "standard images". Maybe the users know the libraries for ages, and maybe they remember enough to not bother. ....
Why can't I create a class in VB.NET that inherits System.IO.Directory? According to Lutz Roeder, it is not declared as NotInheritable!
I want to create a utility class that adds functionality to the Directory class. For instance, I want to add a Directory.Move function.
Please advise and I will send you a six pack. OK nevermind I'm not sending you anything but if you come to the bar tonight I will hook you up and then beat you in pool.
From the Meta Data of .NET
namespace System.IO
{
// Summary:
// Exposes static methods for creating, moving, and enumerating through directories
// and subdirectories. This class cannot be inherited.
[ComVisible(true)]
public static class Directory
You cannot inherit from a Static Class.
Are you using C# 3.0 VB.NET 2008 -- then you could add an Extension Method
If you use the DirectoryInfo class, you will have access to a MoveTo function.
EDIT: I'll correct myself... The static Directory class already has a Move method.
I'd guess that Reflector isn't picking up the sealed attribute correctly for VB (or perhaps just not displaying it properly). If you look at the IL, it is sealed:
class public abstract auto ansi sealed beforefieldinit Directory