I know this has been asked several times and I have read all the posts as well but they all are very old. And considering there have been advancements in versions and releases, I am hoping there might be fresh views.
We are building a new application on ASP.NET MVC and need to finalize on an ORM tool. We have never used ORM before and have pretty much boiled down to two - nHibernate & Entity Framework.
I really need some advice from someone who has used both these tools and can recommend based on experience. There are three points that I am focusing on to finalize -
Performance
Learning Curve
Overall Capability
Your advice will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
I would use Nhibernate. I would pickup Sharp Architecture as a great framework that wraps NHibernate, ASP.NET MVC and a bunch of other open-source tools into a coherent whole that will give you a solid architectural foundation.
Nhibernate is more mature than EF4. It is well supported by the community. As long as you are willing to get your hands dirty from time to time, you will like it. It's support for LINQ is currently a little weak but it is rapidly getting better. The learning curve is not bad, but things like session management can be a little confusing at first. One of the reasons I like Sharp Architecture is they have all the NHibernate stuff you will need in place and plenty of guidance on how to use it properly in an ASP.NET MVC project.
EF4 has the MS stamp of approval. It is pretty good now but still behind NHibernate. It is a perfectly good choice and you will find lots of docs from MS, MS support and eventually more developers that are familiar with the ins and outs. I should also mention that the Sharp Architecture folks are adding support for EF4 to their overall framework. They will still support NHibernate, but you will be able to use EF4 if you like.
I think it takes more time to learn NHibernate.
EF provides graphical designer, unfortunately NHibernate doesn't have a generic designer. BTW it's not a problem. If you design in domain-driven (DDD) manner, you will design your entities first and you don't care about database structure (as you used to), NHibernate will handle that for you.
EF 4 got closer to NHibernate. I wouldn't start working with EF 3.5, it lacks a lot of features.
If you think NHibernate is too complicated at first sight, you can start with frameworks built on top of NHibernate. ActiveRecords and Sharp Architect are good examples.
AFAIR EF 3.5 supported only SQL Server 2000. It couldn't handle the new data types from SQL Server 2005. I have no information on EF 4 but I suppose it support these improvements.
If you use NHibernate in real word applications, you have to build an infrastructure. E.g. I implemented the Unit of Work and Repository patterns to be able to write tests and create layers in my application. You have to expect the same using EF. Detaching and attaching entities in EF 3.5 was not an easy thing, I had to write tricky extension methods to mark fields dirty and so on. I hope they solved it in EF 4. There is no such problem with NHibernate.
You don't have to write HQL queries in NHibernate, you can use the LINQ provider. I think it's very important. :)
All in all NHibernate is a mature product with good community and commercial support. EF is young but strongly supported by Microsoft. Oh, and EF is a Microsoft-only thing while you can port your NHibernate knowledge to Java as well. It this counts for you.
I'm trying to look into this...
After building apps into both, NHibernate is definitely more powerful, but it's also quite clunky where EF is very clean. And after working with Rails/ActiveRecord, both are very feature rich in comparison, so either would definitely work!
I noticed that NHibernate keeps track of what it just ran, and if it just ran a statement, it doesn't exectute it again, so a properly designed app will run minimal database statements. I know that EF is not exactly slow either, but I'm not sure if it caches statements and results in the same way. For a large app, this could save some database resources!
So in short, NHibernate for functionality and configurability, and EF 4.0 for cleanliness and a quick easy learning curve. Also, one should expect EF in the next version or two should may catch up to or surpass NHibernate in functionality too, so it may make sense to have some familiarity with both.
just take a look at this
http://gregdoesit.com/2009/08/nhibernate-vs-entity-framework-a-performance-test/
Related
I am in process of evaluating ORM first time. Please suggest which one i should choose for my next project.
I wrote couple of sample code with EF 4.1 code first. Before start same exercise with Nhibernate, I want to know if somebody have already experience with both in production application.
My evaluating criteria
Speed of database access
Learning curve (because I am new to ORM)
Community support
Tutorial/Books availability
Anything else which I should consider (Because I am noob to ORM)
I wish if people who have experience with both the ORM in production level app answer my question.
Thanks in advance!!!
I am aware that this question may be a little bit dangerous to ask ;)
Having used EF 4.1 and Castle ActiveRecord (based off NHibernate), I would rate them as follows:
Speed of DB access - NHibernate for anything remotely complex, otherwise about the same. The problem with EF is that it creates such convoluted SQL that it's difficult to know how to optimise it or if it's even possible to do so.
Learning curve - I personally found EF easier to get started with, but others may feel differently, and both certainly have a learning curve.
Community support - Depends on what you mean by 'support'. You'll find lots of info on the web (and this site) for both. NHibernate is open source, while EF is controlled by MS.
Tutorials/Books - I believe there are more 'official' resources available for EF at this time, but searching on forums will likely get you what you can't find in books.
Anthing else - Realize that the purpose of ORM's is to simplify the data access layer for the developer. However, both of these ORM's (and pretty much every other heavyweight ORM) expect you to use certain coding patterns for this simplification to be realized. While coding pattern enforcement isn't a Bad Thing (some would argue that it's a must), it's something you certainly need to prepare for before choosing one.
If you are a noob to ORM and only need the basic features you may find the Entity Framework and Nhibernate are over kill and should be looking at a light weight one like Massive:
https://github.com/robconery/massive
That said there are two main issues you face with EF vs NH
EF is all that microsoft support and so all their tooling by default uses EF. Making beginner code easier with EF.
NHibernate is more mature and has a greater feature set (if you need it) also has a good development community and lots of blog info about it.
I would choose Massive if you want simple / fast but unsupported, EF if you want easy and MS support but limited in some ways, or NHibernate if you have the time to learn a proper ORM.
Hope this helps.
Well im my personal experience Nhibernate have been the right choice, in complex situation have given me better time results, and it was a lot easier to learn.
I learned it first and then tried the Entity Framework and I found it easier to learn nhibernate Even though in that moment i didn't knew anything about ORM.
Community support and Tutorials and books I can say they are both good and have a lot of material to learn from.
Now I can use them both but still likes Nhibernate a lot more.
This is probably a long shot.
In the .NET world, has anyone found an ORM (Commercial or Open) that has the flexibility of NHibernate to support domain driven design with good Linq support? Linq to sql is dead, Entity Framework doesnt yet support POCO's, lazy load or object first development very well, and none of the old stand bys such as LLBLGen seem to either.
Anyone find anything new and exciting in the ORM market?
Thanks!
See ORMBattle.NET - it won't exactly answer your question (btw, I hardly admit this is possible), but there is some info on quality of LINQ support.
Note (or disclaimer): I'm one of persons related to creation of ORMBattle.NET, as well as one of DataObjects.Net authors.
Which version of the .NET Framework are you talking about? 3.5? 4.0?
There are quite a few ORMs out there and some of the commercial ones may in fact meet your needs (or be working on new releases that meet your needs). Competing against both NHibernate and Entity Framework from a commercial perspective is pretty daunting. Microsoft made it much harder than necessary to write a Linq provider, which is why so few ORMs have one. Writing a domain driven design oriented ORM that supports multiple database vendors is also a pretty steep hill to climb.
NHibernate certainly has all the momentum right now, but that doesn't mean it's invincible. It's hard to compete with free & open source software that has a multi-year head start, even for a company with the financial resources of Microsoft.
I think you may just need to be patient. NHibernate's Linq provider is improving and the other ORM vendors are working hard on improving their offerings as well. Things could change significantly in the next two years or so.
No, I don't know of any. Because NHibernate is popular and very good at what it does, and EF is likely to pick up most of the remainder (particularly devs that don't want to stray from Microsoft-supplied frameworks), the barrier to entry for a new player is very high. Another ORM would need to add something significant over and above what NHibernate currently offers in order to get any reasonable level of interest.
If there was an open source project that wanted to deliver better Linq support in an ORM, in my opinion it would have greater success contributing to NHibernate Linq rather than attempting to build its own framework from scratch.
I wouldn't call it a "NHibernate killer", but SubSonic works well. It's simple to use, allows you to choose between using the Active Record pattern and the Repository pattern. It supports POCOs, lets you use object-first development and setting up lazy-loading is easy enough.
CQRS could be considered an NHibernate killer. The basic premise is that your domain objects are not used to support your read model and application queries. As such, you can start using something more like a document store to hold your aggregate or even use event sourcing. To update your read model, you have it listen to the events published by your aggregate so that it can update itself accordingly. Using this architectural style we have been able to eliminate the our reliance upon NHibernate. Now if we decide to use an RDBMS, it's because of the strengths of the database rather than as the default choice.
I would basically like to know things such as:
Advantages/disadvantages between the two?
Similarities/differences between the two frameworks?
How are they similar/different architecturally?
How much boilerplate code is needed to use each?
Can the Entity Framework be used efficiently outside of Visual Studio compared to NHibernate? Is the Entity Framework more efficient than NHibernate when used with Visual Studio?
Note: This question refers to the Entity Framework 2 (currently still in development).
Disclaimer: This post is based on my current knowledge of what the next version of Entity Framework will be like. That might be inaccurate or it might change until the next version is actually relased.
General Approach:
The main approach of Entity Framework (EF) is using their graphical designer tool to create an Entity Data Model and to generate domain classes as well as mapping from that model. There is support for other approaches as well, but that way of working will probably always be the main one.
NHibernate (NH) is a text based tool which requires the user to write all the domain classes and mapping manually, if you don't turn to third party software for code generation, such as MyGeneration of CodeSmith, or additional convention over configuration support, such as Fluent NHibernate.
Code Generation:
Code generation is a major part of standard EF usage, either by using their graphical designer tool or by using their command line tools. The availability of both GUI and command line tools is a plus since makes EF easy to get started with as well as allowing for more advanced usage that can be automated, for example in a build process.
Code generation is not supported by NHibernate, except for the schema generation stuff if you want to count that as code gen. You can get code generation if you turn to third party software though.
Database Schema Generation:
EF will add support for model first development, by allowing the user to generate a schema from an Entity Data Model. NHibernate has had schema generation support for a long time. The difference here is how you create your "model", as mentioned earlier.
LINQ:
EF will have improved their whacky LINQ implementation from v1 and NH have now reached version 1.0 of LINQ to NH, so there should not be any major differences between the two in that regard.
POCO:
EF will add better support for the Domain Driven Design approach and the use of domain classes that are separated from the data access layer. However, since POCO is not the main use case of EF I can't really see how their POCO support could ever reach the level of NHibernate. The POCO support in EF is still young, and to me it feels more like that it is a bonus if you are a POCO/DDD supporter and you find yourself working on EF for some reason.
The entire NHibernate framework is build for POCO development, by DDD people, and they have reached version 2.1 as well as taking advantage of all the work put into Hibernate on the Java side. NHibernate will probably remain the no 1 choice for the DDD/POCO/ALT.NET crowd for quite some time.
Lazy Loading:
The next version of EF will include support for automatic lazy loading. Automatic lazy loading has been an important part of NHibernate for a long time.
Learning Curve:
Both frameworks are complex and powerful, and hence take a long time to master. But EF is quite beginner friendly since it is integrated into Visual Studio, with its graphical designer tool, and since it can generate a lot of stuff for you without you having to know just about anything about the framework. However, if you want to dig deeper into EF and really learn the framework, you should be prepared to spend quite a lot of time using it.
NHibernate has a notorious learning curve, but some recent improvements have reduced it a bit. Now that LINQ to NH is at v1.0 the query syntax will be easier to understand for developers new to NH, and the Fluent NHibernate project is improving the mapping experience, and even working on automatic mapping, which is getting better and better all the time.
I am trying to work out with ORM tool to move over to and have narrowed it down to two candidates.
nHibernate or LLBLGen Pro
Please can you guys give me pros and cons in using both these tools especially if you have experience in both. I am not really interested in any other tools but am wanting some heads up so I can decide which tool to spend time learning....
I already know that one is free and one isn't, I also know that nHibernate might take some learning....
Many thanks, Richard
I have used both. At first I was sold on nHibernate and refused to try anything else even though I knew about other options.
With LLBLGen Pro, I was skeptical, but soon saw the advantages as well. I have not totaly abandoned nHibernate. I will continue to keep int in my "box of tools". I have found LLBLGen useful in some cases especially when interacting with a database that already exists and you have no choice of re-designing it. It takes less than an hour (depending on size of database of course) to generate my LLBLGen Entity Objects from the database, as opposed to having to code all of it manually with nHibernate, AND do the mappings. nHibernate is missing a nice graphical interface to create the mappings. This fact becomes even more important when the database is massive with thousands of tables that you need to potentially access in your application.
Although LLBLGen is more of a Data Access Layer generator (And I am not normally a fan of DAL generators), it has a lot of features a "true ORM" tool would have. In my opinion it has the best of both worlds. Once you start working with it you start to realize that it is very flexible and extendable. One part I like a lot is that it is possible for me to create partial classes for the generated entity objects, where I can code in my business logic, as well as validation.
The code generation is templated so you have full control over the code it generates. With nHibernate I find myself writing some of the same kind of code over and over again. With LLBLGen I can generate it and get to focus on business logic and issues quicker.
For someone who is just starting to use ORM type tools, I really recommend to start with LLBLGen, because nHibernate can be overwhelming. And in the end you will have achieved the same result (More or less).
Edit #1: LLBLGen now also has 100% support for LINQ. (So if you like LINQ to SQL for that reason) further LLBLGen can support many databases, where LINQ to SQL is only for Microsoft SQL Database.
Edit #2:
According to Graviton you can use CodeSmith to do some of the code generating for you for nHibernate. That is really cool, but for a newcomer to ORM I would still recommend LLBLGen. To me that is adding more dependencies where LLBLGen has it all in one package. Also like I said before the learning curve is so much less steep and you will get the same benefits, which will also help you ease in to nHibernate if you ever decide to go there.
The major difference is that LLBLGen is a code generator, while NHibernate is a "true" ORM library.
LLBLGen advantages:
Easy to use model designer. Can import your existing database schema
Fully typed object model and query language
LLBLGen disadvantages:
You need the designer application to change your model
Not free
Can bloat your code because a lot of code is generated
NHibernate advantages:
No designer application needed. Only code
Widely used (based on the most popular Java ORM, Hibernate)
Very powerful for mapping any data model you can imagine
Open source
NHibernate disadvantages:
Hard to learn
Not as strongly typed as one would like (especially queries)
Of course, this is just my personal point of view...
I typed up a fairly long answer before realizing this was a somewhat old question. Oh well. It's still very relevant.
You have narrowed your list to the two best candidates for an ORM in the .NET world. I have limited experience with either, but I've read extensively about the pros and cons of both. They really serve somewhat different needs in different ways.
In the upcoming LLBLGen Pro 3.0, Frans Bouma has talked about adding features to generate NHibernate mappings. So, it's not even necessarily an either/or decision.
If you want to do "class first" design (as opposed to "database first" design), NHibernate is pretty much your best and only option right now (neither LLBLGen Pro nor Entity Framework support this mode, although it sounds like Entity Framework is improving it's support in the next version).
NHibernate and LLBLGen Pro both work hard to work well with legacy databases which you can not change and have to live with. That is their common strength. They both also work with Linq. They both also support some amount of graphical modeling, although LLBLGen Pro is far superior in this regard (ActiveWriter for NHibernate feels like the LinqToSql designer in Visual Studio, but it's not really as feature rich).
LLBLGen Pro has much stronger code generation abilities, but too much code generation can lead to compromised testability and maintainability (one small tweak can cause massive amounts of code to need retesting).
While NHibernate wants to help you work through fairly complex object/relational mapping scenarios like class inheritance, LLBLGen Pro is really just exposing your database as a data layer and business objects in a very quick way.
If you can purchase LLBLGen Pro and have some time, I would try both and see which one better meets your needs. Learning both ORMs is good for your resume in any case.
So, in the end, I would say it's situational. The cost of NHibernate and its lack of serious flaws make a pretty compelling case in the majority of situations.
The new version of LLBLGen Pro (3.0) allows you to generate code for NHibernate, so don't have to choose :). It also allows you to split up your entities into different domains.
I still prefer the LLBLGen pro runtime though, the LINQ interpreter is more complete and it has better change tracking of fields.
Unfortunately there's not many new features in the new LLBLGen Pro 3.0 runtime, as the creator first wanted to focus more on tooling than improving the existing framework.
I've used nHibernate, LLBLGen Pro, a custom data layer from my consulting company, the Enterprise Library, and LINQ. LLBLGen is by far my favorite and it allows writing one business layer that can talk to different types of databases using the same code providing database independence! Another incredible feature is it allows multiple connections to different databases. This is very useful when at a large company and one system is written in Sql Server and the other you have to interface with is in Oracle.
LLBLGen Pro is an amazing product backed up by Frans who is very active and works hard to fix issues. LLBLGen is like PhotoShop, it is an incredible tool and that can do amazing effects in the hands of someone who knows how to use. And like any tool that saves lots of time, it takes a week or two to learn how to use it, but will save months later on your project.
Not only did it speed up the DAL generation side of my app, it is also easy to create queries in the Business layer and send to the presentation layer. It made it easy to create an enterprise class application.
If one really wants to use nHibernate, start with LLBLGen Pro and generate the nHibernate code. If later on your department decides to switch from nHibernate to LINQ, you are covered. Want to switch from Sql Server to Oracle? This is possible and relatively easy with LLBLGen whereas with manually coded nHibernate code, you have to rewrite everything which is almost impossible to cost justify.
Frans was also available and answered some of my questions.
Don't forget one of the greatest plus point of Hibernate: HQL. With HQL, your SQL skill is not wasted. And Hibernate provides very nice, seamless support for native query as well.
If you have some weird, out-of-standard database, it's almost certain that you need your SQL skill at some point, and good luck with LLBL!
For me it boils down to database centric (LLBLGen Pro) vs. domain model centric (NHibernate).
Since I'm a DDD/OO guy, the choice has always been very easy for me, but I do see why LLBLGen Pro is popular.
We use LLBLGen at work, and it's reviled -- namely because we have multiple similar schemas, but you need to have a different DLL/Class library for each schema, meaning that it becomes annoying to write code that can target any schema.
Of course, that's an unusual environment, so it may not apply to you.
I need to collect some information about existing ORM solutions.
Please feel free to write about any programming language.
Can you tell about the best ORM framework you ever use and why is it better then others?
I used NHibernate and Entity Framework.
Current stable version of entity framework is very immature. It is too difficult, or impossible to perform common tasks. Testing your code is also difficult since you cannot really separate your entities from your data access classes. But it perfectly integrates with visual studio ide. Setting up is easy and updating all the models from database takes just a few seconds. Upcoming version of EF (4.0) will solve some of this problems.
NHibernate is quite powerful. It supports plain old clr objects, so you can work with simple entities. Configurations provide great control in great detail. Framework capabilities are satisfying and it has a large and active community and good documentation. Setting up and updating entities is a little difficult since you must use generators that looks up your database and generates entities and xml files. It may be tricky to find a generator or a template that exactly fits your needs. But once you set all things up, you will love it.
I found LINQ to SQL to be a pretty straight forward solution. The first time I used it, I'd say I had a basic ORM working within a few hours, and was creating LINQ queries with it.
Microsoft has an additional ORM (Entity Framework), which I've heard is more complex but may be useful for highly complex distributed applications with multiple data sources etc.
Overall I found LINQ to be an easy and fast to use ORM.
I have been looking at Telerik Open Access for last few months, in genernal this ORM has been a pain to work with, it was advertised as having extensive linq support but in reality many of the linq features you would normally expect dont work server side and are performed on the client. I also had problems using multiple conditions in a where clause, see my last question. Here are a few things that i found
No support for views
Unable to map more than one entity to the same table
Inheritance and Interface support requires you to make changes to you database schema
No visual designer like LINQ to SQL and Entity Framework
If you want to perform an insert any related entities must be fetched first
Rohan
LINQ2SQL was nice, EF makes sense, but is very complex and SQL Server oriented. NHibernate is special and Telerik OpenAccess (fully .NET / Visual Studio) got a broad set of functionality and professional support.
Since I know the product I can comment on Rohan's concerns:
Existing Views can be used and full Views support is coming up
Mapping more than one entity to the same table "works" for class hierarchies, limitation with reverse mapping exists
Inheritance and Interfacer support "do not require" changes to the the database schema, again limitation with reverse mapping exists though
Visual Designer will come, Forward and Reverse Mapping Wizards allow you already to do anything in an easy way
There is a workaround for the insert issue mentioned and it will be fixed generally
Check out the Telerik site to find happy customers and feel free to use the telerik forums and support resources for any question.
-Peter
Im new to OpenAccess ORM and we are using two products. Reporting and OpenAccess.
I think there are some features that people missed.
OpenAccess uses graphical designers while nHibernate still uses handwritten xml files
OpenAccess is not limited to SQl Server as EF4 and similiar frameworks
using it is easier and the forums are pretty helpful.
With ORM there are multiple possibilities, all depends what you want.
As a real ORM mapper I strongly recomment NHibernate and Fluent NH mappings. You need a lot of research to put together a nice architecture, but then nothing stands in your way. With minimal compromises you get real flexibility.
EF6x (core is not prod.-ready IMHO) is called an ORM, but what it generates is more closer to a DAL. There are some thing's you can't do effectively with EF6. Still, this is my favorite tool for a read-model, while I do combine it with NHibernate (where NH I use for a DDD/write model).
Now to performance - its always pro and cons. If you deep deeper into ORM architecture (see my article: avoid ORM bad habits) then you will find intuitively the ways to make it faster. Here's my another article on how to make EF6x 5x faster (at least for read situations): EF6.x 5x faster