I´m writing on an service to watch for the existence different files in diffent folders...
I´m using filesystemwatchers to get the events.
As a part of the deployment one of the watched folders is deleted and new created from time to time.
As a result the service throws an error and is stopped...
Is it possible to catch that kind of error and recreate the filewatcher on the new folder by the service?
Catch the deleted event, and then reschedule with timed poll to watch a new one?
I don't have a compiler to hand right now but I knocked up this pseudo code:
using System;
using System.IO;
public class Watcher : IDisposable{
void Dispose(){ watcher.OnDeleted -= onDelete; }
string file;
FileSystemWatcher watcher;
FileSystemEventHandler onDelete;
public class Watch(string file, FileSystemEventHandler onDelete) {
this.file = file;
watcher = new FileSystemWatcher{ Path = file }
this.OnDelete = onDelete;
watcher.Deleted += onDelete;
watcher.NotifyFilter = ...; // looking for delete event;
// Begin watching.
watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
}
}
public static class watch {
Watcher watcher;
public static void Main() {
watcher = new Watcher("somedir", ondeleted);
SetUpChangeWatchers();
while(true){
// stuff!
}
CleanUpChangeWatchers();
}
private static void ondeleted(object source, RenamedEventArgs e){
CleanUpChangeWatchers();
watcher.Dispose();
while(!directoryRecreated(file)){
Thread.Sleep(...some delay..);
}
SetUpChangeWatchers();
watcher = new Watcher("somedir", ondeleted);
}
}
You can handle this with the .deleted event. However, if you delete the directory assigned to the filesystemwatcher.Path, it may cause an error. One way around this is to assign the parent of the watched directory to filesystemwatcher.Path. Then it should catch the deletion in the .deleted event.
It is also possible to have an error inside the handler if you try to access the directory just deleted. When this happens, you may not get the normal breakpoint and it seems like it's caused by the deletion itself.
Related
With this program I am attempting to have the user select a text file that is a representation of a 4x4 sudoku problem. My agent will then take this file and attempt to solve the sudoku puzzle.
The problem I'm running into is that I can't seem to figure out how to get the proper file selected, and then passed into the method call for processing.
This is the file selector class I've created. So far it successfully brings up a button, and when clicked brings up the computer's file structure so the user can select a file.
import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import java.io.File;
/**
* Created by neil on 7/12/17.
*/
public class file_selector {
public JPanel panel1;
public File file;
JButton button1;
public file_selector() {
final JFileChooser fc = new JFileChooser();
button1.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {
#Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
int returnVal = fc.showOpenDialog(null);
if (returnVal == JFileChooser.APPROVE_OPTION) {
file = fc.getSelectedFile();
System.out.println("You chose to open " + file.getName());
}
}
});
}
public File getFile() {
return file;
}
}
This is my main method in which I attempt to use the file that the user selected. When I put the function calls in a while loop (like it is currently) it never proceeds because the file is never set. If I don't put the function calls in a while loop, I get a nullPointerException error when I try to process the file because the file has a null value.
public class sudoku {
//create 2d array that represents the 16x16 world
public cell[][] world_array = new cell[15][15];
static File myFile;
ArrayList<String> world_constraints;
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
JFrame frame = new JFrame("file_selector");
file_selector fs = new file_selector();
frame.setContentPane(fs.panel1);
frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
frame.pack();
frame.setVisible(true);
myFile = fs.getFile();
while(myFile != null) {
sudoku my_puzzle = new sudoku();
my_puzzle.solve_puzzle();
}
}
I've done a ton of searching and can't seem to find what's wrong with my file_selector class such that it isn't setting the user selected value for the file.
You call getFile immediately after showing the frame and before the user has opportunity to click anything. Since the condition for while is false, the loop ends immediately and the method doesn't do anything afterwards, in particular it never calls getFile again.
Two options:
Make the button solve the puzzle, not just set file (easier, just change actionPerformed method).
Make file_selector emit an event when a file is selected and add a listener to it (this can be a challenge for you).
I have an older implementation using NAudio 1.6 to play a ring tone signalling an incoming call in an application. As soon as the user acceptes the call, I stop the playback.
Basically the follwing is done:
1. As soon as the I get an event that a call must be signalled, a timer is started
2. Inside this timer Play() on the player
3. When the timer starts again, a check is performed if the file is played by checking the CurrentTime property against the TotalTime propery of the WaveStream
4. When the user accepts the call, Stop() is called on the player and also stop the timer
The point is, that we run sometimes in cases where the playback is still repeated although the timer is stopped and the Stop() was called on the player.
In the following link I read that the classes BufferedWaveProvider and WaveChannel32 which are used in the code are always padding the buffer with zero.
http://mark-dot-net.blogspot.com/2011/05/naudio-and-playbackstopped-problem.html
Is it possible that the non-stopping playback is due to usage of the classes BufferedWaveProvider and WaveChannel32?
In NAudio 1.7 the AudioFileReader class is there. Is this class also padding with zeros? I did not find a property like PadWithZeroes in this class. Does it make to use AudioFileReader in this case of looped playback?
Below the code of the current implementation of the TimerElapsed
void TimerElapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
try
{
WaveStream stream = _audioStream as WaveStream;
if (stream != null && stream.CurrentTime >= stream.TotalTime )
{
StartPlayback();
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//do some actions here
}
}
The following code creates the input stream:
private WaveStream CreateWavInputStream(string path)
{
WaveStream readerStream = new WaveFileReader(path);
if (readerStream.WaveFormat.Encoding != WaveFormatEncoding.Pcm)
{
readerStream = WaveFormatConversionStream.CreatePcmStream(readerStream);
readerStream = new BlockAlignReductionStream(readerStream);
}
if (readerStream.WaveFormat.BitsPerSample != 16)
{
var format = new WaveFormat(readerStream.WaveFormat.SampleRate, 16, readerStream.WaveFormat.Channels);
readerStream = new WaveFormatConversionStream(format, readerStream);
}
WaveChannel32 inputStream = new WaveChannel32(readerStream);
return inputStream;
}
I want to make an application in javaFX 2 which opens as a smaller login window, then, when you put in correct data, it takes you to bigger main window. Both are designed in fxml and events are handled within java code.
Yes, I know, it is almost the same as the application in samples and I've tried to do what I want and it worked there.
Now, when I did the same in my project, I hit a problem when I want to change the value of stage.
As you can see in the code below, I have global variable and I set the value of primaryStage in start method to it. Just as a test, I print it out at end of start method and the value is set.
Then, when I try to use it when button is clicked(method buttonClick), the value of stage variable is null, therefore I cannot use it to resize window or anything else.
My question is why is stage variable value reseted despite that I don't use change anything between the two prints?
This code is sample of what I've tried, I've just cut out all code which is not crucial to understand how my application works.
public class App extends Application {
private Stage stage;
#FXML
private AnchorPane pane;
#Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
try {
stage = primaryStage; // Set the value of primaryStage to stage
primaryStage.setScene(new Scene(openScene("Login"))); // Load Login window
primaryStage.show(); // Show the scene
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(App.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
System.out.println(stage);// <-- Here it has the value of primaryStage obviously
}
#FXML
void buttonClick(ActionEvent event) throws IOException {
// Note that even if I try to print here, the value of stage is still
// null, so the code doesn't affect it
// Also, this loads what I want, I just can't change the size.
try{
pane.getChildren().clear(); // Clear currently displayed content
pane.getChildren().add(openScene("MainScene")); // Display new content
System.out.println(stage); // <-- Here, output is null, but I don't know why
stage.setWidth(500); // This line throws error because stage = null
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(App.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
public Parent openScene(String name) throws IOException {
//Code from FXML login example
Parent parent = (Parent) FXMLLoader.load(PrijavnoOkno.class.getResource(name
+ ".fxml"), null, new JavaFXBuilderFactory());
return parent;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
launch(args);
}
}
Although it is not clear by whom and where the buttonClick action method is called, I pressume it is a login button's action in Login.fxml. Also I assume you have defined the App (a.k.a PrijavnoOkno) as a controller of this Login.fxml.
According to these assumptions, there are 2 instances of App.class:
one created when the app starts up and where the stage variable is assigned with primary stage in start() method,
and another instance created by FXMLLoader (while loading Login.fxml) and where the stage variable is not assigned and thus NPE.
One of the right ways can be, create a new Controller class for Login.fxml, call your login action in it. Access the global stage (by making it static in App) from there.
Parts of our UI uses IObservableElementEnumerable.EnumerableChanged in order to update if the user e.g. deletes a domain object from a folder.
When the UI is disposed, we unsubscribe from the event... or so we thought. It turns out that the unsubscribe doesn't have any effect, and our event handler is still called. This caused a number of odd bugs, but also leads to memory leaks.
The only time unsubscription works, is if we store the IObservableElementEnumerable reference instead of calling IObservableElementEnumerableFactory.GetEnumerable(obj) again. But this, in turn, is likely to keep a live reference to the folder object, which will break if the folder itself is deleted by the user.
This is particularly puzzling as the GetEnumerable() documentation clearly states: "It is expected that subsequent calls with the same domain object will yield the same instance of IObservableElementEnumerable." Is this not to be interpreted as a guarantee?
Should there be any reason for unsubscription not working?
The following code replicates the issue on Petrel 2011 (add to a simple plugin with a menu extension, or get the full solution here (DropBox)):
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using Slb.Ocean.Core;
using Slb.Ocean.Petrel;
using Slb.Ocean.Petrel.Basics;
using Slb.Ocean.Petrel.UI;
namespace ObservableElementEnumerable
{
public class OEEForm : Form
{
private Droid _droid;
private bool _disposed;
public OEEForm()
{
IInput input = PetrelProject.Inputs;
IIdentifiable selected = input.GetSelected<object>().FirstOrDefault() as IIdentifiable;
if (selected == null)
{
PetrelLogger.InfoOutputWindow("Select a folder first");
return;
}
_droid = selected.Droid;
GetEnumerable().EnumerableChanged += enumerable_EnumerableChanged;
PetrelLogger.InfoOutputWindow("Enumerable subscribed");
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
base.Dispose(disposing);
if (disposing && !_disposed)
{
GetEnumerable().EnumerableChanged -= enumerable_EnumerableChanged;
PetrelLogger.InfoOutputWindow("Enumerable unsubscribed (?)");
_droid = null;
_disposed = true;
}
}
IObservableElementEnumerable GetEnumerable()
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("OEEForm");
object obj = DataManager.Resolve(_droid);
IObservableElementEnumerableFactory factory = CoreSystem.GetService<IObservableElementEnumerableFactory>(obj);
IObservableElementEnumerable enumerable = factory.GetEnumerable(obj);
return enumerable;
}
void enumerable_EnumerableChanged(object sender, ElementEnumerableChangeEventArgs e)
{
PetrelLogger.InfoOutputWindow("Enumerable changed");
if (_disposed)
PetrelLogger.InfoOutputWindow("... but I am disposed and unsubscribed!");
}
}
public static class Menu1
{
public static void OEEBegin1_ToolClick(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
OEEForm f = new OEEForm();
f.Show();
}
}
}
To replicate:
Run Petrel with the plugin
Load a project with a folder with objects
Select the folder
Activate the plugin menu item
With the popup open, delete an object in the folder
Close the Form popping up
Delete an object in the folder
The message log should clearly show that the event handler is still called after the form is disposed.
You already keep a reference to the underlying enumerable by connecting the event. Events are references as well. Just keep a reference to the enumerable and unsubscribe from the same instance as the one you subscribe to.
To deal with the issue of objects that are deleted by the user you need to listen to the delete event.
I am writing a small app in VB and I would like to know how I would set it up so that when a user pressed a button, a sechduled task is ran. Keep in mind that this task is already created, I just need it to run.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Use the System.Diagnostics.Process class. You can create a process and run it with Process.Start() method.
EDIT:
Following code sample starts the helloworld.exe. This is just to give an idea about the Process class. You can find this example in Process.Start Method
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.ComponentModel;
namespace MyProcessSample
{
class MyProcess
{
public static void Main()
{
Process myProcess = new Process();
try
{
myProcess.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
// You can start any process, HelloWorld is a do-nothing example.
myProcess.StartInfo.FileName = "C:\\HelloWorld.exe";
myProcess.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true;
myProcess.Start();
// This code assumes the process you are starting will terminate itself.
// Given that is is started without a window so you cannot terminate it
// on the desktop, it must terminate itself or you can do it programmatically
// from this application using the Kill method.
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
}
}
}
}
How about using the recently added System.Threading.Tasks library?
Link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.tasks.aspx