Custom Web sites built on SharePoint are cropping up everywhere (just visit topsharepoint.com to see). With that said, my question pertains to creating a fully customized, branded site using SharePoint as the CMS as depicted by many of the topsharepoint.com sites.
I understand the concept of creating the custom master master page(s) (SharePoint 2010 even includes a minimal.master to start). The problems I have are:
What site template does one use? In 2007 the recommended front-facing Web site site collection template was the Publishing Portal. Is this still the case?
What navigation do you use? Do you leverage the OOB navigation? If so, how do you style it extensively?
How do you keep the on-page editing capabilities within the new site template?
Are there any online tutorials are walk-throughs that address all of these issues? I have been searching, but it's really sparse out there.
Related
Now I'm in the stage where I need to pick a test automation tool to use it on a project built on modern SharePoint.
And of course this will include testing out of the box webparts and SharePoint provided webparts.
So my question is ,does cypress.io can handle testing webparts as after a lot of researches I found articles said that it can't until now.
And I'm still struggling with making cypress to login to my SharePoint tenant.
Any info about these will be really helpful
I was just given administrator access to my company's SharePoint 2010 site, and I need to implement an Approval workflow. This is an out-of-the-box workflow, and it is not currently available to me. The only help I have been able to find after exhaustive web searches is to navigate to Site Settings -> Site Collection Administration -> Site Collection Features and activate the Workflows feature, which should be the last feature in the list.
The problem is, there is no Workflows feature in my top-level site's Site Collection Feature. There is only a "Three-state workflow" feature for workflows, and the Three-state workflow is the only one available. What would keep the "Workflows" feature from being displayed in the Site Collection Features list? I need to activate this feature to get access to the OOTB workflows and their functionality.
TIA!
Are you using SharePoint Foundation ?
The only workflow feature available for fondation is the Three State workflow. The Workflows Feature (out of the box) is only in Standard and Enterprise
I would like to develop a custom application (multiple screens, complex processes) on top of Sharepoint Foundation 2010. I decided to write visual web parts for simple logic and Silverlight web parts for complex application logic. First of all: Is this decision ok?
My application will use it's own data in a separate DB. The only connection between my DB and Sharepoint will be users. Users will authenticate against Sharepoint and access my application from there. They will belong to certain roles which will define their rights within my application (either admins - hierarhicaly managing data of subtree users - or they will be regular users - only able to see their own data).
Within my application (and DB) all these users will be hierarchically related. Users with subtree of users are admins of their subtree.
Problem?
If I do write web parts (of whatever kind), how do I ensure that these same web parts are not used in other Sharepoint sites as well? It would most probably break the application and it could of course make it possible to replicate the same application but using different users...
I thought I could as well write application pages (so my application would be in _layouts folder as I understand it), which would make it possible to not reuse my application, but users and rights are assigned on site level so I'm not able to define security in Sharepoint directly... So I can't win this way either...
These are all specualtions on my thin Sharepoint development experience, so correct me of I'm wrong in any of the above... But beside all that what would you suggest? How would suggest I should do this?
To get straight to the point WebPart are for reuse and personalization when you develop a web part.
To Answer your first question : Is WebPart development okay, Partially yes because, you have multiple option to prevent a web Part being accessed or used in other SharePoint Web Application or website.
First way is to deploy your webpart to the Applications Bin Directory so that your code is accessible only to your application not others.
Second way is that WebPart can be used in a SharePoint web application only if there is a Safe Control entry in the Web.Config.
Third Way is to prevent the users from Personalizing any page in SharePoint so that they cannot deploy any Web Parts even in their own Personalized Pages. (this can be achieved by removing personalization rights).
Farm Admin should be a Good guy that he will not add that safe control entry in other websites that doesn't want this webpart functionality.
Application Pages are not good idea because by the name you could guess they are shared across the farm & is accessible to all the SharePoint websites deployed in the server.
In cases if you are not okay with the above to Web Part approach , I would suggest to create sub sites as per the permission requirement you want and provision pages that will go in to each of the sub sites. Each of these pages will have a ASP.NET User control that hold the Business Logic you have written.
I want to make use of some of the ASP.NET 3.5 capability within SharePoint 2007. In particular, I want to do the following:
Provide REST and maybe JSON through HTTP so that another product can consume SharePoint content.
Provide AJAX web parts within SharePoint. These will probably have little to no server side controls. Most content will be loaded using Javascript and hitting an external system (primarily not SharePoint) over HTTP that provides REST or JSON.
Provide this capability as a product. This is not a one-off solution for a single implementation.
My main concern is push-back from IT groups not wanting to change their SharePoint environment to allow for the product to work. So, I'd prefer to be able to say that what I'm doing is "supported by Microsoft", but I'm not sure that will be the case.
I realize that I could create a separate (non-SharePoint) web site on the SharePoint server(s) for WCF endpoints that provide SharePoint data to an external application. I would rather not do this because that won't help my web parts (if they need help) and that makes deployment harder. Proper SharePoint deployment will automatically have SharePoint update all necessary files (e.g., web.config) on any new web front end added to the farm and this wouldn't follow that pattern. In addition, I'd lose the ability to use SPContext.Current.
I have read much of Daniel Larson's book on Developing Service-Oriented AJAX Applications on the Microsoft Platform (good read, BTW), esp. Chapter 11 on extending SharePoint. He outlines WCF, ASMX, and HTTP Handler options and for the most part recommends the HTTP Handler option. It appears that the HTTP Handler option has minimal changes to web.config.
I have also seen a blogs on SharePoint as a WCF Host, SharePoint 2007 and the Thin .NET 3.5 Development Model, How to: Get up and running with .NET 3.5 in your SharePoint environment, and Enabling .NET 3.5 in SharePoint 2007 Sites, the Lazy Way. As well as the "Silverlight (.NET 3.5) Config Feature" (and maybe even the "Ajax.Config Feature") in the SharePoint 2007 Features CodePlex Project. It seems that all of these options do some fairly drastic changes to the web.config and may not be acceptable to potential customers.
What are the opinions out there on this? What about if I want to use the AJAX Control Toolkit (I've used this before in SharePoint, but it has been a while)?
Note that we probably could require SharePoint SP2 if that helps, but I don't think it does.
Note also that Silverlight is not a requirement for the SharePoint web parts, but allowing for it might be nice.
Your first point could be solved by a custom wrapper to the SharePoint web services, presenting the API that you want to present, rather than the generic web service.
Your second point, AJAX enabled pages and web parts, is already possible - how to enable AJAX in SharePoint.
.NET 3.5 Is supported in SharePoint (as of SP1 I believe), However you will not be able to get away from making web.config changes and installing .NET 3.5 on the servers - it will likely only be there if there are already AJAX web parts in use.
Aside from that what you are looking at is largely independent of SharePoint - If you can build something as an aspx page or asmx web service you should be able to deploy it to a SharePoint site.
If you want to avoid 3.5 installation issues altogether you should be able to build something totally separate - jQuery for the web parts (no server side components needed) and for getting data out of sharepoint build something that translates calls to the standard web services into a friendlier interface.
How do I create a new webpage in the Documentum front end Webtop?
The short answer is that it can not be done.
WebTop is Documentum's generic application for browsing their back-end content repository. Think of it as a web-based Windows Explorer on steroids. It's a tool for storing, versioning, and sharing electronic documents (Word, Excel, etc.) - it's not a tool for creating web pages.
Documentum's Web Content Management product is called Web Publisher. It is the tool that companies use to allow non-technical business users to create and edit web pages.
Why WebTop? You should use Web Publisher which is built on WebTop with the specific purpose of managing web content. Is this an OOTB installation? Web Publisher / WebTop requires significant amount of customization in order to start being useful. Do you have templates defined? If so, then just go to File New and select your template.
http://www.dmdeveloper.com/ Is a good site with some very good how-to's.