Suppose I have a table with columns (DayId, RunningTotal):
DayId RunningTotal
---------------------
1 25
3 50
6 100
9 200
10 250
How can I select the DayId and the amount the RunningTotal has increased from the previous day? i.e. how can I select:
DayId DayTotal
---------------------
1 25
3 25
6 50
9 100
10 50
The only current method I know is with a while loop I am trying to factor out. Also, the DayId has no regular rules, just that it is some increasing integer value, but it increases by an irregular amount as shown in the example table.
EDIT: using MS SQL Server 2005
with cte as (
select dayid, runningtotal, row_number() over (order by dayid asc) as row_index
from #the_table
)
select cur.dayid, cur.runningtotal - coalesce(prev.runningtotal, 0) as daytotal
from cte cur
left join cte prev on prev.row_index = cur.row_index - 1
(I really wish they'd implemented support for the lead and lag functions in SQL Server :|)
There is probably a more succinct way than this, but try:
select t3.DayId,
case when t4.DayId is null then t3.RunningTotal else t3.RunningTotal - t4.RunningTotal end as DayTotal
from (
select t1.DayId, max(t2.DayId) as PreviousDayId as
from MyTable t1
left outer join MyTable t2 on t2.DayId < t1.DayId
group by t1.DayId
) a
inner join MyTable t3 on a.DayId = t3.DayId
left outer join MyTable t4 on a.PreviousDayId = t4.DayId
Related
I need to find the closet value of each number in column Divide from the column Quantity and put the value found in the Value column for both Quantities.
Example:
In the column Divide the value of 5166 would be closest to Quantity column value 5000. To keep from using those two values more than once I need to place the value of 5000 in the value column for both numbers, like the example below. Also, is it possible to do this without a loop?
Quantity Divide Rank Value
15500 5166 5 5000
1250 416 5 0
5000 1666 5 5000
12500 4166 4 0
164250 54750 3 0
5250 1750 3 0
6250 2083 3 0
12250 4083 3 0
1750 583 2 0
17000 5666 2 0
2500 833 2 0
11500 3833 2 0
1250 416 1 0
There are a couple of answers here but they both use ctes/complex subqueries. There is a much simpler/faster way by just doing a couple of self joins and a group-by
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/rM268EYMWuK7yQT3gwSbGE/0
select
min(min.quantity) as minQuantityOverDivide
, t1.divide
, max(max.quantity) as maxQuantityUnderDivide
, case
when
(abs(t1.divide - coalesce(min(min.quantity),0))
<
abs(t1.divide - coalesce(max(max.quantity),0)))
then max(max.quantity)
else min(min.quantity) end as cloestQuantity
from t1
left join (select quantity from t1) min on min.quantity >= t1.divide
left join (select quantity from t1) max on max.quantity < t1.divide
group by
t1.divide
If I understood the requirements, 5166 is not closest to 5000 - it's closes to 5250 (delta of 166 vs 84)
The corresponding query, without loops, shall be (fiddle here: https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=sqlserver_2017&fiddle=be434e67ba73addba119894a98657f17).
(I added a Value_Rank as it's not sure if you want Rank to be kept or recomputed)
select
Quantity, Divide, Rank, Value,
dense_rank() over(order by Value) as Value_Rank
from
(
select
Quantity, Divide, Rank,
--
case
when abs(Quantity_let_delta) < abs(Quantity_get_delta) then Divide + Quantity_let_delta
else Divide + Quantity_get_delta
end as Value
from
(
select
so.Quantity, so.Divide, so.Rank,
-- There is no LessEqualThan, assume GreaterEqualThan
max(isnull(so_let.Quantity, so_get.Quantity)) - so.Divide as Quantity_let_delta,
-- There is no GreaterEqualThan, assume LessEqualThan
min(isnull(so_get.Quantity, so_let.Quantity)) - so.Divide as Quantity_get_delta
from
SO so
left outer join SO so_let
on so_let.Quantity <= so.Divide
--
left outer join SO so_get
on so_get.Quantity >= so.Divide
group by so.Quantity, so.Divide, so.Rank
) so
) result
Or, if by closest you mean the previous closest (fiddle here: https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=sqlserver_2017&fiddle=b41fb1a3fc11039c7f82926f8816e270).
select
Quantity, Divide, Rank, Value,
dense_rank() over(order by Value) as Value_Rank
from
(
select
so.Quantity, so.Divide, so.Rank,
-- There is no LessEqualThan, assume 0
max(isnull(so_let.Quantity, 0)) as Value
from
SO so
left outer join SO so_let
on so_let.Quantity <= so.Divide
group by so.Quantity, so.Divide, so.Rank
) result
You don't need a loop, basically you need to find which is lowest difference between the divide and all the quantities (first cte). Then use this distance to find the corresponding record (second cte) and then join with your initial table to get the converted values (final select)
;with cte as (
select t.Divide, min(abs(t2.Quantity-t.Divide)) as ClosestQuantity
from #t1 as t
cross apply #t1 as t2
group by t.Divide
)
,cte2 as (
select distinct
t.Divide, t2.Quantity
from #t1 as t
cross apply #t1 as t2
where abs(t2.Quantity-t.Divide) = (select ClosestQuantity from cte as c where c.Divide = t.Divide)
)
select t.Quantity, cte2.Quantity as Divide, t.Rank, t.Value
from #t1 as t
left outer join cte2 on t.Divide = cte2.Divide
Can anybody tell me how to calculate the difference between the rows of the same column?
ID DeviceID Reading Date Flag
1 2 10 12/02/2015 1
2 3 08 12/02/2015 1
3 2 12 12/02/2015 1
4 2 20 12/02/2015 0
5 4 10 12/02/2015 0
6 2 19 12/02/2015 0
In ABOVE table I want to calculate the difference between the Readings for DeviceID 2 for some date say 12/02/2015 for example,
(12-10=2)
(20-12=8)
(19-2 =-1) and want to sum up this difference
i.e. 2+8+(-1)=9
If you use MS Access, I was try this code for your question:
I was made 4 query in MS Access:
Query1 to get data deviceId=2 and date=12/2/2015:
select id, reading from table1 where deviceid=2 and date=#12/2/2015#;
Then I make Query2 to get row number from query1:
select
(select count(*) from query1 where a.id>=id) as rowno,
a.reading from query1 a;
Then I make Query3 to get difference value field reading from query2:
select
(tbl2.reading-tbl1.reading) as diff
from query2 tbl1
left join query2 tbl2 on tbl1.rowno=tbl2.rowno-1
And then final query to get sum from result difference in query3:
SELECT sum(diff) as Total_Diff
FROM Query3;
But, if you use SQL Server, you can use this query (look for example sqlfiddle):
;with tbl as(
select row_number()over(order by id) as rowno,
reading
from table1
where deviceid=2 and date='20150212'
)
select sum(diff) as sum_diff
from (
select
(b.reading-a.reading) as diff
from tbl a
left join tbl b on a.rowno=b.rowno-1
) tbl_diff
You can try this (replace Table1 with your table name):
SELECT Sum([Diffs].[Difference]) AS FinalReading
FROM (
SELECT IDs.DeviceID, [Table1].Reading AS NextReading, Table1_1.Reading AS PrevReading, [Table1].Reading-Table1_1.Reading AS Difference
FROM (
(
SELECT [Table1].DeviceID,
[Table1].ID,
CLng(Nz(DMax("ID","Table1","[DeviceID] = " & [DeviceID] & " And [ID] < " & [ID]),0)) AS PrevID
FROM Table1
WHERE DeviceID = 2
) AS IDs
INNER JOIN Table1
ON IDs.ID=[Table1].ID)
INNER JOIN Table1 AS Table1_1
ON IDs.PrevID=Table1_1.ID
) AS Diffs;
The IDs table expression calculates the prev ID for the DeviceID in question. (I put the WHERE clause in this table expression, but you can move it to the outer one if you want to calc the FinalReadings for ALL devices at once, the filter it at the end. Less efficient but more flexible.) We join back to the original tables on the ID and PrevIDs from the inner table expressions, get their Reading values, and perform the difference operation in the Diffs table expression. The final outer query just sums the Difference values from each row value.
I am struggling to get this working, using T-SQL Query (SQL SERVER 2008) for the following problem:
Ky ProductID Start # End # Diff
1 100 10 12 0
2 100 14 20 2 (14 - 12)
3 100 21 25 1 (21 - 20)
4 100 30 33 5 (30 - 25)
1 110 6 16 0
2 110 20 21 4 (20 - 16)
3 110 22 38 1 (22 - 21)
as you can see I need the difference between values in two different rows and two columns.
I tried
with t1
( select ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION by ProductID ORDER BY ProductID, Start# ) as KY
, productid
, start#
, end#
from mytable)
and
select DATEDIFF(ss, T2.complete_dm, T1.start_dm)
, <Keeping it simple not including all the columns which I selected..>
FROM T1 as T2
RIGHT OUTER JOIN T1 on T2.Ky + 1 = T1.KY
and T1.ProductID = T2.ProductID
The problem with the above query is when the productID changes from 100 to 110 still it calculates the difference.
Any help in modifying the query or any simpler solution much appreciated.
Thanks
You can try below code for the required result :
select ky,Start,[End],(select [end] from table1 tt where (tt.ky)=(t.ky-1) and tt.ProductID=t.ProductID) [End_Prev_Row],
case ky when 1 then 0
else (t.start -(select [end] from table1 tt where (tt.ky)=(t.ky-1) and tt.ProductID=t.ProductID))
end as Diff
from table1 t
SQL FIDDLE
Try something like that. It should give you the difference you want. I'm getting the first row for each product in the first part and then recursively build up by using the next Ky.
with t1
as
(
select ProductID, Ky, 0 as Difference, [End#]
from mytable where ky = 1
union all
select m.ProductID, m.Ky, m.[Start#] - t1.[End#] as Difference, m.[End#]
from mytable m
inner join t1 on m.ProductID = t1.ProductID and m.Ky = t1.Ky + 1
)
select Ky, ProductID, Difference from t1
order by ProductID, Ky
As Anup has mentioned, your query seems to be working fine, I just removed DateDiff to calculate the difference, as I assume columns are not of DATE datatype from your example, I guess that was the issue, please find below the modified query
with t1
as
( select ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION by ProductID ORDER BY ProductID ) as KY
, productid
, st
, ed
from YourTable)
select T1.ProductID, t1.ST,t1.ED, ISNULL(T1.st - T2.ed,0) as Diff
FROM T1 as T2
RIGHT OUTER JOIN T1 on T2.KY+1 = T1.KY
and T1.ProductID = T2.ProductID
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION by rc.ContractID ORDER BY rc.ID) AS ROWID,rc.ID,rc2.ID,rc.ContractID,rc2.ContractID,rc.ToDate,rc2.FromDate
FROM tbl_RenewContracts rc
LEFT OUTER JOIN tbl_RenewContracts rc2
ON rc2.ID = (SELECT MAX(ID) FROM tbl_RenewContracts rcs WHERE rcs.ID < rc.ID AND rcs.ContractID = rc.ContractID)
ORDER BY rc.ContractID
Replace your table name and columns and add calculated column to get the DATEDIFF.
Suppose:
MyTable
--
Amount
1
2
3
4
5
MyTable only has one column, Amount, with 5 rows. They are not necessarily in increasing order.
How can I create a function, which takes a #SUM INT, and returns the TOP N rows that sum to this amount?
So for input 6, I want
Amount
1
2
3
Since 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. 2 + 4 / 1 + 5 won't work since I want TOP N ROWS
For 7/8/9/10, I want
Amount
1
2
3
4
I'm using MS SQL Server 2008 R2, if this matters.
Saying "top N rows" is indeed ambiguous when it comes to relational databases.
I assume that you want to order by "amount" ascending.
I would add a second column (to a table or view) like "sum_up_to_here", and create something like that:
create view mytable_view as
select
mt1.amount,
sum(mt2.amount) as sum_up_to_here
from
mytable mt1
left join mytable mt2 on (mt2.amount < mt1.amount)
group by mt1.amount
or:
create view mytable_view as
select
mt1.amount,
(select sum(amount) from mytable where amount < mt1.amount)
from mytable mt1
and then I would select the final rows:
select amount from mytable_view where sum_up_to_here < (some value)
If you don't bother about performance you may of course run it in one query:
select amount from
(
select
mt1.amount,
sum(mt2.amount) as sum_up_to_here
from
mytable mt1
left join mytable mt2 on (mt2.amount < mt1.amount)
group by mt1.amount
) t where sum_up_to_here < 20
One approach:
select t1.amount
from MyTable t1
left join MyTable t2 on t1.amount > t2.amount
group by t1.amount
having coalesce(sum(t2.amount),0) < 7
SQLFiddle here.
In Sql Server you can use CDEs to make it pretty simple to read.
Here is a CDE I did to sum up totals used in sequence. The CDE is similar to the joins above, and holds the total up to any given index. Outside of the CDE I join it back to the original table so I can select it along with other fields.
;with summrp as (
select m1.idx, sum(m2.QtyReq) as sumUsed
from #mrpe m1
join #mrpe m2 on m2.idx <= m1.idx
group by m1.idx
)
select RefNum, RefLineSuf, QtyReq, ProjectedDate, sumUsed from #mrpe m
join summrp on summrp.idx=m.idx
In SQL Server 2012 you can use this shortcut to get a result like Grzegorz's.
SELECT amount
FROM (
SELECT * ,
SUM(amount) OVER (ORDER BY amount ASC) AS total
from demo
) T
WHERE total <= 6
A fiddle in the hand... http://sqlfiddle.com/#!6/b8506/6
I recently inherited a database on which one of the tables has the primary key composed of encoded values (Part1*1000 + Part2).
I normalized that column, but I cannot change the old values.
So now I have
select ID from table order by ID
ID
100001
100002
101001
...
I want to find the "holes" in the table (more precisely, the first "hole" after 100000) for new rows.
I'm using the following select, but is there a better way to do that?
select /* top 1 */ ID+1 as newID from table
where ID > 100000 and
ID + 1 not in (select ID from table)
order by ID
newID
100003
101029
...
The database is Microsoft SQL Server 2000. I'm ok with using SQL extensions.
select ID +1 From Table t1
where not exists (select * from Table t2 where t1.id +1 = t2.id);
not sure if this version would be faster than the one you mentioned originally.
SELECT (ID+1) FROM table AS t1
LEFT JOIN table as t2
ON t1.ID+1 = t2.ID
WHERE t2.ID IS NULL
This solution should give you the first and last ID values of the "holes" you are seeking. I use this in Firebird 1.5 on a table of 500K records, and although it does take a little while, it gives me what I want.
SELECT l.id + 1 start_id, MIN(fr.id) - 1 stop_id
FROM (table l
LEFT JOIN table r
ON l.id = r.id - 1)
LEFT JOIN table fr
ON l.id < fr.id
WHERE r.id IS NULL AND fr.id IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY l.id, r.id
For example, if your data looks like this:
ID
1001
1002
1005
1006
1007
1009
1011
You would receive this:
start_id stop_id
1003 1004
1008 1008
1010 1010
I wish I could take full credit for this solution, but I found it at Xaprb.
from How do I find a "gap" in running counter with SQL?
select
MIN(ID)
from (
select
100001 ID
union all
select
[YourIdColumn]+1
from
[YourTable]
where
--Filter the rest of your key--
) foo
left join
[YourTable]
on [YourIdColumn]=ID
and --Filter the rest of your key--
where
[YourIdColumn] is null
The best way is building a temp table with all IDs
Than make a left join.
declare #maxId int
select #maxId = max(YOUR_COLUMN_ID) from YOUR_TABLE_HERE
declare #t table (id int)
declare #i int
set #i = 1
while #i <= #maxId
begin
insert into #t values (#i)
set #i = #i +1
end
select t.id
from #t t
left join YOUR_TABLE_HERE x on x.YOUR_COLUMN_ID = t.id
where x.YOUR_COLUMN_ID is null
Have thought about this question recently, and looks like this is the most elegant way to do that:
SELECT TOP(#MaxNumber) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY t1.number)
FROM master..spt_values t1 CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2
EXCEPT
SELECT Id FROM <your_table>
This solution doesn't give all holes in table, only next free ones + first available max number on table - works if you want to fill in gaps in id-es, + get free id number if you don't have a gap..
select numb + 1 from temp
minus
select numb from temp;
This will give you the complete picture, where 'Bottom' stands for gap start and 'Top' stands for gap end:
select *
from
(
(select <COL>+1 as id, 'Bottom' AS 'Pos' from <TABLENAME> /*where <CONDITION*/>
except
select <COL>, 'Bottom' AS 'Pos' from <TABLENAME> /*where <CONDITION>*/)
union
(select <COL>-1 as id, 'Top' AS 'Pos' from <TABLENAME> /*where <CONDITION>*/
except
select <COL>, 'Top' AS 'Pos' from <TABLENAME> /*where <CONDITION>*/)
) t
order by t.id, t.Pos
Note: First and Last results are WRONG and should not be regarded, but taking them out would make this query a lot more complicated, so this will do for now.
Many of the previous answer are quite good. However they all miss to return the first value of the sequence and/or miss to consider the lower limit 100000. They all returns intermediate holes but not the very first one (100001 if missing).
A full solution to the question is the following one:
select id + 1 as newid from
(select 100000 as id union select id from tbl) t
where (id + 1 not in (select id from tbl)) and
(id >= 100000)
order by id
limit 1;
The number 100000 is to be used if the first number of the sequence is 100001 (as in the original question); otherwise it is to be modified accordingly
"limit 1" is used in order to have just the first available number instead of the full sequence
For people using Oracle, the following can be used:
select a, b from (
select ID + 1 a, max(ID) over (order by ID rows between current row and 1 following) - 1 b from MY_TABLE
) where a <= b order by a desc;
The following SQL code works well with SqLite, but should be used without issues also on MySQL, MS SQL and so on.
On SqLite this takes only 2 seconds on a table with 1 million rows (and about 100 spared missing rows)
WITH holes AS (
SELECT
IIF(c2.id IS NULL,c1.id+1,null) as start,
IIF(c3.id IS NULL,c1.id-1,null) AS stop,
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (
ORDER BY c1.id ASC
) AS rowNum
FROM |mytable| AS c1
LEFT JOIN |mytable| AS c2 ON c1.id+1 = c2.id
LEFT JOIN |mytable| AS c3 ON c1.id-1 = c3.id
WHERE c2.id IS NULL OR c3.id IS NULL
)
SELECT h1.start AS start, h2.stop AS stop FROM holes AS h1
LEFT JOIN holes AS h2 ON h1.rowNum+1 = h2.rowNum
WHERE h1.start IS NOT NULL AND h2.stop IS NOT NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT 1 AS start, h1.stop AS stop FROM holes AS h1
WHERE h1.rowNum = 1 AND h1.stop > 0
ORDER BY h1.start ASC